RSN Fundraising Banner
Defying Veto Threat, House Approves Bills to Reopen Agencies and Deny Wall Funding
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49885"><span class="small">Erica Werner, Damian Paletta and Seung Min Kim, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Friday, 04 January 2019 09:29

Excerpt: "The newly Democratic-controlled House passed a package of bills late Thursday that would reopen the federal government without paying for President Trump's border wall, drawing a swift veto threat from the White House and leaving the partial shutdown no closer to getting resolved."

Nancy Pelosi holds the speaker's gavel after being elected speaker as the U.S. House of Representatives meets for the start of the 116th Congress inside the House Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 3, 2019. (photo: Reuters)
Nancy Pelosi holds the speaker's gavel after being elected speaker as the U.S. House of Representatives meets for the start of the 116th Congress inside the House Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 3, 2019. (photo: Reuters)

Defying Veto Threat, House Approves Bills to Reopen Agencies and Deny Wall Funding

By Erica Werner, Damian Paletta and Seung Min Kim, The Washington Post

04 January 19


he newly Democratic-controlled House passed a package of bills late Thursday that would reopen the federal government without paying for President Trump’s border wall, drawing a swift veto threat from the White House and leaving the partial shutdown no closer to getting resolved.

But two Senate Republicans who are up for reelection in 2020 broke with Trump and party leaders on their shutdown strategy, saying it was time to end the impasse even if Democrats won’t give Trump the more than $5 billion in border funding he is demanding.

The comments from Sens. Cory Gardner (Colo.) and Susan Collins (Maine) — the only Senate Republicans running for reelection in states Trump lost — pointed to cracks within the GOP that could grow as the shutdown nears the two-week mark. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) reiterated Thursday that the Senate will only take up government spending legislation that Trump supports.

McConnell’s stance prompted angry attacks Thursday from new House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other Democrats, who insisted they were trying to give Republicans a way out of the standoff by passing two pieces of legislation: one a package of six spending bills that were negotiated on a bipartisan basis in the Senate and would reopen nearly all the federal agencies that have been shuttered since Dec. 22, and the second a stopgap spending bill through Feb. 8 covering only the Department of Homeland Security.

The six-bill package passed the House 241-190 Thursday night, and the short-term Homeland Security spending bill passed 239-192. A handful of Republicans broke ranks on each measure to vote “yes” with the Democrats.

The House strategy could allow Senate Republicans to pass legislation that would reopen most of the government while setting aside the debate over the border wall. But thus far, because of Trump’s opposition, party leaders have refused.

“What we’re asking the Republicans in the Senate to do is to take ‘yes’ for an answer. We are sending them back exactly, word for word, what they have passed,” Pelosi said. “Why would they not do that? Is it because the president won’t sign it? Did they not hear about the coequal branch of government, and that we the Congress send the president legislation and he can choose to sign or not?”

McConnell on Thursday restated the stance he has adopted since the Senate unanimously passed a short-term spending bill last month without additional wall funding — only to watch as Trump turned against it the very next morning amid a conservative backlash.

“I’ve made it clear on several occasions, and let me say it again: The Senate will not take up any proposal that does not have a real chance of passing this chamber and getting a presidential signature. Let’s not waste the time,” McConnell said. “Let’s not get off on the wrong foot, with House Democrats using their new platform to produce political statements rather than serious solutions.”

As the impasse dragged on, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.) said for the first time that the stalemate could continue for “months and months.” A funding lapse of that length would have compounding consequences for the government’s ability to provide promised services, and for the approximately 800,000 federal workers who are either furloughed at home or working without any guarantee of getting paid.

Comments from the most politically vulnerable members of McConnell’s caucus suggested discomfort with the majority leader’s approach, and a desire for a quick resolution to the shutdown.

“I think we should pass a continuing resolution to get the government back open. The Senate has done it last Congress, we should do it again today,” Gardner said, as the 116th Congress got underway with pomp and ceremony on both sides of the Capitol.

Even if the legislation doesn’t have the border money Trump wants, Gardner said, “We can pass legislation that has the appropriations number in it while we continue to get more but we should continue to do our jobs and get the government open and let Democrats explain why they no longer support border security.”

Collins, a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, also indicated support for an element of the Democrats’ approach.

“I’m not saying their whole plan is a valid plan, but I see no reason why the bills that are ready to go and on which we’ve achieved an agreement should be held hostage to this debate over border security,” said Collins.

Nevertheless, Trump showed no sign Thursday that he was going to budge.

A veto threat issued by the White House against the House bills read: “The Administration is committed to working with the Congress to reopen lapsed agencies, but cannot accept legislation that provides unnecessary funding for wasteful programs while ignoring the Nation’s urgent border security needs.”

Trump himself made an appearance in the White House briefing room, where, flanked by members of the union for Border Patrol agents, he said he has “never had so much support as I have in the last week over my stance on border security . . . and for, frankly, the wall, or the barrier.”

“Without a wall you cannot have border security,” Trump continued. “It won’t work.”

Top congressional leaders plan to meet with Trump at the White House Friday, in a repeat of a meeting they had on Wednesday. But so far there are no signs of a breakthrough or any movement.

“We’re not doing a wall. Does anyone have any doubt that we’re not doing a wall?” Pelosi said Thursday.

Vice President Pence, in an interview Thursday on Fox News, reinforced the administration’s position. “I think the president has made it very clear: no wall, no deal,” Pence said.

The shutdown has lasted 13 days without any signs of compromise or earnest negotiations, with Democrats largely unifying and a number of Republicans flummoxed over Trump’s strategy.

Many of the federal workers impacted will miss their first paycheck beginning next week. Multiple national parks and museums have closed, and the impact is expected to become even more severe in the coming weeks. The food stamp program that millions of Americans rely on may grind to a halt beginning in February, and the Internal Revenue Service will not be able to process refunds.

Complicating matters for the White House, McConnell has distanced himself from the discussions since Trump turned on the spending bill passed by the Senate last month, which enraged some Republicans who had voted for the measure believing that they had Trump’s backing.

Shelby’s comments marked the first time a top political figure estimated the shutdown could drag into the spring, drawing alarm from federal workers and others.

“Hearing this from the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee is, quite candidly, a punch in the jaw of federal employees,” said Tony Reardon, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents about 150,000 federal employees. “Their mental anguish and anxiety is bad enough. To hear this coming straight from congressional leaders does not instill a lot of hope.”

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised to erect a wall along the Mexico border and have Mexico pay for it. He said terrorists, drugs and criminals were coming to the United States through Mexico and needed to be stopped. This pledge proved very popular with many of his supporters.

Since taking over in 2017, Trump has continued to assert that a wall is needed but has backed away from insisting that Mexico pay for it. He has instead said the money should come from U.S. taxpayers, an idea that has divided Republicans. But many Republicans, some reluctantly, have agreed to follow his lead during the current shutdown.

Though some Senate Republicans broke with Trump and leadership Thursday, others cautioned about what would happen if he caved on his signature promise.

“If he gives in now, that’s the end of 2019 in terms of him being an effective president,” said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday during an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News. “That’s probably the end of his presidency. Donald Trump has made a promise to the American people: He’s going to secure our border.”

The shutdown is affecting about a quarter of the portion of the federal government funded by Congress, since the Pentagon and major agencies including the Department of Health and Human Services have already been funded through Sept. 30 by spending bills passed by Congress earlier in the year. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security also are not affected.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+1 # economagic 2019-01-04 12:58
Can anyone explain to me how this is not a replay of the same charade the duopoly has been playing for the past fifty years and more? Is anyone willing to bet one thin dime that Pelosi will not blink first? Or that she will actively support universal health care by any name? Or a "Green New Deal" that is not hamstrung before it starts by her insistence on Republican-styl e austerity? Or that this year's "Select Committee" on climate change will produce any more concrete results than did the one ten years ago?

What is really galling is that the Democratic misleaders will likely cite the plight of the 800,000 federal employees as their reason to cave, then throw them under the bus the minute the deal is cut because there is no money available to pay their back wages, much less compensate them for all they will have lost in the meantime.

Does anyone wonder why Pelosi insisted on passing "Pay-Go" FIRST, before any other legislation? Is everyone aware that "Pay as you go" means no new spending without a commensurate reduction in some other "discretionary" program? Does anyone realize that has been a Republican demand for decades? Does anyone realize that it is a slightly different version of the austerity the World Bank and its lending agency the IMF have imposed on most of the developing world for nearly 70 years, and have now imposed on at least two European nations?

As Tom Lehrer sang c. 1960, "Who's next?" (a reference to possession of nuclear weapons.)

(WE are.)
+3 # tedrey 2019-01-04 17:52
Well, the Democrats won't be getting any legislation past the Republican Senate and Trump for some time anyway. But if they want to cut discretionary spending they might decide the Pentagon doesn't get any more advances until they've come up with the 21 trillion dollars they've haven't managed to account for.
+1 # Trumpistheswamp 2019-01-04 19:54
Paygo-Pelosi must go.
+4 # DongiC 2019-01-04 21:30
The current government shutdown is not quite the same as the previous ones. For one thing there are some real gung ho Progressives in the House of Representatives now who really represent a newly emerging zeitgeist. Something must be done about global warming, medical care for all classes, improvements to the infrastructure, limiting the power of the super rich. They will surely battle the President on the necessity of this stupid wall. Here's hoping they succeed.
+2 # economagic 2019-01-04 22:00
We'll have to hope, and we'll have to do more than hope, because the Democratic misleaders fear the ones embracing the new zeitgeist. The Old Guard is so ossified they are like zombies, muttering the same incoherent nonsense over and over.

"Come gather 'round people
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown
And accept it that soon
You'll be drenched to the bone
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin'
Or you'll sink like a stone
For the times they are a-changin'.

"Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."

(You kids under 40, that's Bob Dylan, 1964, minus the second verse.)