RSN Fundraising Banner
Federal Workers Are Suing the US Government Over the Shutdown
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49863"><span class="small">Anne Flaherty, ABC News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 01 January 2019 14:56

Flaherty writes: "Federal workers on Wednesday sued the U.S. government over the shutdown, protesting the requirement that employees who are considered 'essential' must report to work without pay, a major federal workers' union announced Monday."

REI Co-op customers walk past an unstaffed ranger station kiosk, closed as part of the federal government shutdown, inside the flagship store in Seattle, December 26, 2018. (photo: AP)
REI Co-op customers walk past an unstaffed ranger station kiosk, closed as part of the federal government shutdown, inside the flagship store in Seattle, December 26, 2018. (photo: AP)


Federal Workers Are Suing the US Government Over the Shutdown

By Anne Flaherty, ABC News

01 January 19


A major union says its unfair to be told to work without pay

ederal workers on Wednesday sued the U.S. government over the shutdown, protesting the requirement that employees who are considered "essential" must report to work without pay, a major federal workers' union announced Monday.

An estimated 420,000 employees fall into the category of being essential, many of them working for the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department, focused on public safety. In previous government shutdowns, Congress approved back pay for federal employees, something that's likely to happen again once the standoff between President Donald Trump and congressional Democrats ends.

But the American Federation of Government Employees, one of the largest federal workforce unions, said it filed the lawsuit because it isn't fair to force people to work without pay and disrupt paychecks, especially for workers who protect public safety. Some of the people most affected by the policy are border patrol agents, airline security workers and immigration enforcement personnel.

"Our members put their lives on the line to keep our country safe," said AFGE President J. David Cox Sr. "Requiring them to work without pay is nothing short of inhumane."

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The defendant in the lawsuit is listed as "The United States Government." Trump is not mentioned directly.

The lawsuit came on day 10 of the third government shutdown this year.

While some agencies, including Veterans Affairs and the Defense Department already had enough money to carry them through next fall, nine departments and dozens of agencies have been shuttered. That triggered an automatic furlough of some 380,000 employees, according to estimates released by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

But under federal rules, a government shutdown cancels all annual leave, including planned vacations or sick leave for essential personnel. Around 420,000 employees are estimated to have been told they were considered crucial enough to cancel that leave and return to work.

The union sued the government after the 2013 shutdown, arguing that Fair Labor Standards Act requires that all employees are paid on time for their services. Last year, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims concluded that employees were entitled to twice their back pay because of the violation.

Jacqueline Simon, policy director for AFGE, said many federal offices are probably using some form of managerial discretion. For example, if someone is in the hospital or overseas and unable physically to return to work, it's likely their managers would overlook that. But, she added, technically someone could be charged as absent without leave and fired.

Simon said that overall, the shutdown is unfair to workers, who will start to see their paychecks disappear around Jan. 11. Paychecks issued in mid-January would cover time since the shutdown began, and depending upon the agency, most paychecks would be dramatically reduced.

Simon said she wouldn't be surprised if at some point federal workers file for unemployment or look for other work.

"People can only afford to keep a job without pay for so long," she said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # Citizen Mike 2019-01-01 22:47
A strike would be nice! That would make this a genuine shutdown and Trump and his Republican enablers would have to wear it.
 
 
+1 # DongiC 2019-01-02 04:41
The situation is insane as the pied piper of mental breakdown vainly tries to restore balance to a government more and more demented. Greatness hell, we need Trump to lead us back to normalcy. For him that seems to be an impossible task.
 
 
+3 # NAVYVET 2019-01-02 07:43
So Drumpf can be impeached for human slavery, along with all his other sins and crimes.
 
 
+2 # wilhelmscream 2019-01-02 12:33
He’ll just illegally fire them and every Right Winger (and Faux News) will applaud