RSN Fundraising Banner
Daniel Ellsberg and Jill Lepore Seek Records of Probe Into Pentagon Papers Leak
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49808"><span class="small">Alanna Durkin Richer, Associated Press</span></a>   
Tuesday, 25 December 2018 14:30

Richer writes: "A Harvard University professor and writer for The New Yorker is asking a court to order the release of documents related to two grand juries that sat in Boston nearly 50 years ago to investigate the leak of the Pentagon Papers."

The leaker of the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg. (photo: Reuters)
The leaker of the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg. (photo: Reuters)


Daniel Ellsberg and Jill Lepore Seek Records of Probe Into Pentagon Papers Leak

By Alanna Durkin Richer, Associated Press

25 December 18

 

Harvard University professor and writer for The New Yorker is asking a court to order the release of documents related to two grand juries that sat in Boston nearly 50 years ago to investigate the leak of the Pentagon Papers.

Jill Lepore said in documents filed in federal court on Monday that the long-secret records will shed light on the probe into the publication of the top-secret study that revealed the U.S. government misled the public about the Vietnam War. While much is known about the Pentagon Papers, a great deal about the Boston grand juries that convened in 1971 remains a mystery, she says.

“Why and when was the investigation opened? Why was it closed? To what lengths did the government go in conducting the investigation? Did those lengths include illegal wiretapping, as critics alleged at the time?” Lepore asks in the filings. “Unsealing the records is the only way to know the answers to these questions,” she said.

Lepore is seeking witness testimony, FBI reports and other documents related to the 1971 grand jury investigation, which she describes as a “landmark in the history of the federal government’s willingness to investigate and prosecute dissidents, scholars, journalists, and anyone else suspected of involvement with the release and publication of classified government material.”

Some details about the grand juries were revealed in newspaper accounts at the time, including the names of people who were subpoenaed to testify. They included linguist and activist Noam Chomsky, who received a copy of the Pentagon Papers from leaker Daniel Ellsberg, a friend of his. The goal of the second grand jury appears to have been to investigate Neil Sheehan, The New York Times reporter who first wrote about the documents, Lepore says.

Among those supporting the effort to unseal the documents is Ellsberg, the RAND Corporation analyst who gave the papers to The New York Times, Washington Post and other newspapers. Ellsberg says in a declaration filed in court that it is important “now more than ever” to release the grand jury investigation records because it represented one of the government’s earliest attempts “to use the Espionage Act to indict journalists for doing journalism.”

“The theory that journalists can be charged under the Espionage Act for publishing information to the American public is one that has never been tested in the courts. The Boston grand jury records could shed light on the government’s strategy for investigation of journalists, and its theory of the constitutionality of such an approach,” Ellsberg said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Monday, 24 December 2018 16:05
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-12-26 08:12
This would be interesting. The use of the Espionage Act against journalists and against leakers is a growing problem. I would hope this research brings the abuse of people's right to know out in the open. The Espionage Act used to hide government malfeasance and criminal activity is deeply wrong. Democracy depends upon a people's right to know what powerful institutions and individuals are doing. This is especially true for the military, intelligence agencies, and all of their private contractors (like RAND). We need to know what they are doing. Leakers are our only access.

I also hope this will benefit Assange, who may already be indicted under the Espionage Act -- even though he isn't even a US citizen and has no obligation of loyalty to the US government.