RSN Fundraising Banner
Former Fossil Fuels Lobbyist to Head Interior Department as Zinke Exits
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49182"><span class="small">Emily Holden, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Sunday, 16 December 2018 14:49

Holden writes: "Ryan Zinke's exit as interior secretary elevates a former lobbyist to the job, meaning the top two US environmental agencies will now be run by people previously paid by industry."

Deputy secretary, David Bernhardt, will take over at least temporarily when Ryan Zinke steps down. (photo: David Zalubowski/AP)
Deputy secretary, David Bernhardt, will take over at least temporarily when Ryan Zinke steps down. (photo: David Zalubowski/AP)


Former Fossil Fuels Lobbyist to Head Interior Department as Zinke Exits

By Emily Holden, Guardian UK

16 December 18


David Bernhardt’s new job means top two US environmental agencies will be helmed by people once paid by industry

yan Zinke’s exit as interior secretary elevates a former lobbyist to the job, meaning the top two US environmental agencies will now be run by people previously paid by industry.

The deputy secretary, David Bernhardt, will take over at least temporarily when Zinke steps down at the end of the year. He also could be in the running to head the department permanently. And at the Environmental Protection Agency, the acting administrator, Andrew Wheeler, who was a coal lobbyist, will be nominated to keep the post.

Bernhardt was a fossil fuels and water industry lobbyist at the law firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck before he joined the Trump administration. He was previously the chief lawyer at the interior department under the George W Bush administration .

In an ethics pledge, Bernhardt said he would wait until August 2019 to have certain interactions with his former firm and some major oil and gas companies he represented. But many of the industry-friendly changes he has ushered in as the No 2 official were on the wishlists of the companies who employed him.

“It’s not so much who has he helped. It’s who hasn’t he helped in industry so far,” said Bobby McEnaney, who works on western US energy issues for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“The notion that he could extricate himself from benefiting his former clients is impossible.”

Donald Trump, who campaigned on a promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington, has installed lobbyists across the federal government.

Many of Bernhardt’s former clients are lobbying his department now. The California-based Cadiz Inc spent at least $330,000 this year with his old firm, including to lobby the department, according to required disclosures. The interior department’s Bureau of Land Management in October 2017 approved the company’s pipeline to pump groundwater out of the Mojave desert, in a move that prompted lawsuits from environmentalists.

Westlands Water District, which includes large agricultural businesses in California, paid Bernhardt’s firm a total of $1.43m while he was one of its lobbyists, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Westlands has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars this year lobbying Congress and the department, including on changes related to the Endangered Species Act, according to government records.

Bernhardt has led efforts to weaken endangered species protections, writing an op-ed in the Washington Post claiming that the way the law is implemented makes for an “unnecessary regulatory burden”.

Bernhardt also represented Taylor Energy, the oil company that has been leaking hundreds of barrels per oil per day into the Gulf of Mexico for 14 years, nearly overtaking the BP Deepwater Horizon spill. Taylor is still lobbying the department through Bernhardt’s former firm, reporting it has spent $70,000 this year on “decommissioning activities in the outer continental shelf”, which covers the Gulf.

Bernhardt listed other major oil and gas and energy companies in his ethics pledge, including Halliburton Energy Services, Targa Energy, Noble Energy, NRG Energy, Eni Petroleum, Sempra Energy, the U.S. Oil and Gas Association and the Independent Petroleum Association of America

In a press release about Zinke’s departure, the American Energy Alliance praised department efforts in which Bernhardt has been involved, including easing permitting requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, rescinding regulations on methane emissions and shrinking the Bears Ears national monument in Utah.

Scientists say Bernhardt’s ties are problematic because he ignores research in favor of business.

In one example, scientists at the department’s Fish and Wildlife Service have warned that seismic testing ahead of drilling in the Arctic national wildlife refuge could hurt polar bears, according to a memo obtained by Mother Jones.

The Bureau of Land Management is dismantling a 2015 compromise between states, oil companies and environmentalists to protect the at-risk sage grouse.

A recent study from the interior’s US Geological Survey found that a quarter of the US greenhouse gases that cause climate change come from oil and gas production on public land, but the department is encouraging more drilling.

Department officials have also disregarded a government report warning about the risks from climate change.

Joel Clement, a climate scientist who left the interior department, said Bernhardt has long been “pulling the strings” on those major decisions and that he has been hostile to science.

“They’re not going to let science hold them back. That’s the thing that is so hard for us to get our head around is that, really, they are completely disregarding science,” Clement said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # Texas Aggie 2018-12-17 08:12
Talking about "science" and the right wing disregard for it is not the best way to frame the argument. A much better word to use instead of "science" is "reality." These white collar thugs are ignoring reality, and they've managed to do to the word "science" what their predecessors did to the word "liberal."

Formerly people respected the idea of science, but now the right wing sheeple have been taught that science is just an equivalent for opinion and that the egg heads who tout science are some sort of loonies. Just as "progressive" has taken on a positive connotation, so "reality" still has a positive connotation and can be substituted.