RSN Fundraising Banner
Senate Intelligence Committee Refers More Cases of Suspected Lying to Mueller
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44441"><span class="small">Morgan Chalfant, The Hill</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 December 2018 14:33

Chalfant writes: "Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said Thursday that the Senate Intelligence Committee has made 'quite a few referrals' to special counsel Robert Mueller of cases where witnesses questioned in the panel's Russia probe were suspected of lying, adding he expects there will be more."

Robert Mueller. (photo: James Berglie/TNS)
Robert Mueller. (photo: James Berglie/TNS)


Senate Intelligence Committee Refers More Cases of Suspected Lying to Mueller

By Morgan Chalfant, The Hill

15 December 18

 

en. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said Thursday that the Senate Intelligence Committee has made "quite a few referrals" to special counsel Robert Mueller of cases where witnesses questioned in the panel’s Russia probe were suspected of lying, adding he expects there will be more.

“We’ve made quite a few referrals,” Burr, who chairs the Senate panel, told The Hill on Thursday afternoon. “I won’t get into the numbers, but where we have found criminality, we have made those referrals, and I’m sure that they’re not the last."

The Senate GOP chairman first revealed in November that the committee had referred cases of suspected lying to Mueller as the panel investigates Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Moscow.

His latest comments come after President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty last month to lying to the House and Senate Intelligence committees about plans to build a Trump property in Moscow.

Cohen, who also agreed to cooperate in Mueller’s sprawling investigation, has admitted to lying to Congress in order to minimize Trump’s connection to the proposed project and to limit the ongoing Russia probes.

The former Trump lawyer was sentenced to three years in federal prison on Wednesday for other crimes and will serve a two month sentence concurrently for lying to Congress.

A committee aide told The Hill that the panel did not refer Cohen’s case to Mueller. Instead, Mueller was able to review the transcript from Cohen’s interview with the committee in October 2017 after obtaining consent from Cohen’s attorney, the aide said.

The Senate panel has interviewed a slew of witnesses behind closed doors in its Russia investigation over the course of nearly two years, but lawmakers have signaled that they are not finished with the probe.

The panel has requested to interview Cohen again, among others. Burr said Thursday he is “fairly confident” the probe will wrap up in the spring.

“It’s just a question of how long it takes us to wrap up the remaining folks that we need to interview and those that we need to call back,” Burr said.

It is unclear who the committee believes may have lied during their testimony, or how many referrals the panel has made to the special counsel.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the likely incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said after Cohen's plea that he believes others lied in their testimony before the House panel in its now-defunct Russia probe.

Since Cohen pleaded guilty, some attention has been paid to the transcript of September 2017 testimony from Donald Trump Jr., President Trump’s eldest son, before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Trump Jr. told lawmakers then that the discussions about a possible Trump Tower Moscow within the Trump Organization “faded away I believe at the end of ’14” and “certainly” did not take place in 2016.

Those details conflict with Cohen’s account to Mueller. According to court filings in the case of Trump’s former lawyer, the discussions continued as late at June 2016, at which point Trump was the presumptive Republican nominee for president. Cohen also briefed Trump and members of his family about the project, prosecutors said.

An attorney for Trump Jr. did not immediately return a request for comment.

Trump Jr. testified before the House and Senate Intelligence committees in December 2017. Neither committee has publicly released a transcript his testimony, though the House panel voted to release transcripts of dozens of interviews from its investigation in September. The transcripts, including one from Trump Jr.’s interview, have been passed to the Director of National Intelligence for a classification review.

Others have pleaded guilty to false statements charges in connection with Mueller's probe, such as former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos, both of whom admitted to lying to FBI agents about their Russia contacts. Flynn is scheduled for sentencing next week.

Meanwhile, Trump has increasingly lashed out at Mueller's investigation, describing it as a partisan-led "witch hunt" and denying there was collusion between the campaign and Moscow.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-29 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-12-15 17:49
Why would he make these referrals to Mueller. He's not the attorney general. They should go to the attorney general. I do think a lot of people lied to congress in this investigation, none more than Comey and McCabe. It is not likely Mueller would open a case against his two best friends, Comey and McCabe.
 
 
0 # economagic 2018-12-16 08:35
Gosh, Dick, as your constituent I welcome your apparent candor. I missed that announcement last month. I've always thought you were just about as useless as your junior, Tommy T. I will withhold my final judgement until I see the political affiliations of the persons referred.

It looks like you and your cronies had it right the first time with regard to the Orange One. It pays to be careful what you wish for.
 
 
-16 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-12-16 09:36
I can't help adding here that to very many people in the US Mueller's operation has been a rogue operation from the start. It is not following good investigative practices and it has always been tainted by extreme bias. There is very little reporting on Mueller's excesses but once in a while things do slip through. The judge in the Flynn case seems to have lost his patience with Mueller's people. Last week he demanded ALL of Mueller's records on Flynn's case. They show substantial lying on the part of Mueller but not on Flynn's part. I would not be surprised to see the judge toss the whole case.

Also last week, it was revealed that it was Mueller who destroyed the Strzok-Page text messages. He was clearly trying to cover up malfeasance on the part of his lead investigator and the person who wrote the original document launching the investigation. But this is destruction of evidence and a rather serious crime. The DOJ's inspector general has been able to recover many of the texts from different sources but he is very pissed that Mueller tried to cover up the Strzok-Page text -- which do show the fraud at the outset of the Russiagate investigation.

Mueller's days seem to be numbered. Enough people know he's violated laws in his investigation and at some point he will be removed.
 
 
+3 # JCM 2018-12-16 14:12
Interesting but worthless without references.
 
 
+1 # Texas Aggie 2018-12-17 09:01
When dealing with RR, note if the article reflects poorly on Individual 1's relationship with Russia, and you don't need to read the drivel that he writes. Anything to protect the Russian interference with the election including lessons learned from Pravda and Izvestia.
 
 
+1 # economagic 2018-12-16 17:25
Documentation please. And yes, we know that many people believe there was no collusion, anywhere, and no hacking from Russia for the benefit of the Orange One. There are also a lot of people who believe there was. And there are a very few of us who know that we don't know the truth in this case so do not claim that we do.
 
 
0 # Texas Aggie 2018-12-17 08:57
"It is unclear who the committee believes may have lied during their testimony, or how many referrals the panel has made to the special counsel."

I would doubt that it is unclear to the people involved. They knew whether or not they were telling the truth and this bit of information isn't going to help them sleep at night.