RSN Fundraising Banner
Maryland Sues to Save Obamacare as Texas Judge Weighs Killing It
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49748"><span class="small">Andrew M. Harris, Bloomberg</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 December 2018 09:29

Harris writes: "Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh launched a counterattack Thursday to save Obamacare as a Texas federal judge contemplates killing it."

A patient looks over paperwork with a doctor. (photo: Craig F. Walker/Denver Post)
A patient looks over paperwork with a doctor. (photo: Craig F. Walker/Denver Post)


Maryland Sues to Save Obamacare as Texas Judge Weighs Killing It

By Andrew M. Harris, Bloomberg

15 December 18


This article was published 2 months ago and well prior to the ruling in Texas. It is however an active legal case and remains a viable challenge to yesterday's ruling. While the ruling in Texas federal court was a big disappointment for Obamacare advocates, it is far from being a settled legal matter. - MA/RSN


aryland Attorney General Brian Frosh launched a counterattack Thursday to save Obamacare as a Texas federal judge contemplates killing it.

Frosh sued the federal government in a Greenbelt, Maryland, court seeking a declaratory judgment that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional and a court order barring the U.S. from taking any action inconsistent with that conclusion.

The Maryland suit lands one week after the Trump administration told Fort Worth federal judge Reed O’Connor it has no qualms about his striking down the act, only that doing so too quickly could unleash "chaos." Twenty Republican-led states sued in Texas arguing the health care law became unconstitutional when Congress repealed the the tax penalty incurred for failing to comply with a requirement to obtain minimum qualifying coverage.

Obamacare is constitutional even without the tax penalty, Frosh argued in his lawsuit. Overturning the law "would throw millions off health insurance rolls by reversing Medicaid expansion, ending tax credits that help people," and empower insurers to once again deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, Frosh said in a statement announcing the filing.

Frosh sued U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the federal departments of Justice and Health and Human Services.

Texas and the other states claim that when Congress repealed the tax penalty last year, it eliminated the U.S. Supreme Court’s rationale for finding the ACA constitutional in 2012.

While California, 14 other states and the District of Columbia won permission to intervene in defense of the ACA in Fort Worth, the Trump administration sided with the states seeking to dismantle it, a factor acknowledged by Frosh in his statement.

The case is State of Maryland v. United States, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland (Greenbelt).

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+2 # MidwestDick 2018-12-15 11:18
Apparently Judge Roy Bean is alive and well and still living in Texas.
So, the ACA is unconstitooshin al 'cuz freedom and also because you are penalizing people for not buying in. That penalty represents an infringement on their rights because it is a government mandate to purchase a private service. A worthwhile argument. An argument that should be made by advocates of Medicare for all. But, SCOTUS shot it down because despite the "libertarian" rhetorical BS that taxation is penalization, taxation is legally mandated by the constitution.
So this Judge, not necessarily a pedophile but otherwise equal to Roy Moore in political ambition says that now that the constitutional issue no longer exists, the law must be unconstitutiona l. What???
 
 
+3 # laborequalswealth 2018-12-15 13:02
Oh please. Can't we just kill the scammy, profit-gouging HERITAGE FOUNDATION PLAN and get real health care coverage? MEDICARE FOR ALL -- NOW.
 
 
+3 # wrknight 2018-12-15 14:20
So O'Connor calls Trump and asks if he's OK with striking down Obamacare and Trump says "Yeah, I have no qualms with that". Apparently Constitutionali ty depends entirely on whether or not Trump has any qualms about it.