RSN Fundraising Banner
North Carolina Republican Mark Harris Directed the Hiring of Campaign Aide at Center of an Election-Fraud Investigation
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49736"><span class="small">Amy Gardner and Beth Reinhard, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Friday, 14 December 2018 09:13

Excerpt: "North Carolina congressional candidate, Republican Mark Harris, directed the hiring of a campaign aide now at the center of an election-fraud investigation, according to three individuals familiar with the campaign, despite warnings that the operative may have used questionable tactics to deliver votes."

The legislation is an admission that many state Republicans are eager to cut ties with Mark Harris. (photo: AP)
The legislation is an admission that many state Republicans are eager to cut ties with Mark Harris. (photo: AP)

North Carolina Republican Mark Harris Directed the Hiring of Campaign Aide at Center of an Election-Fraud Investigation

By Amy Gardner and Beth Reinhard, The Washington Post

14 December 18


orth Carolina congressional candidate, Republican Mark Harris, directed the hiring of a campaign aide now at the center of an election-fraud investigation, according to three individuals familiar with the campaign, despite warnings that the operative may have used questionable tactics to deliver votes.

Harris sought out the operative, Leslie McCrae Dowless, after losing a 2016 election in which Dowless had helped one of Harris’ opponents win an overwhelming share of the mail-in vote in a key county.

State and local investigators say that whether Harris knew that his campaign may have engaged in improper tactics has become a focus of the expanding probes into whether election irregularities affected the 9th District election, in which Harris leads Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes.

That question is also roiling the state Republican Party, whose leaders had rallied around Harris, a 52-year-old evangelical pastor from the suburbs of Charlotte. Party leaders are now backing away from Harris and trying to limit the fallout of a scandal that has delayed certification of the last undecided federal contest of the 2018 election cycle.

The North Carolina elections board has issued subpoenas to the Harris campaign and its general consultant, Red Dome Group. In addition, the Wake County district attorney’s office in Raleigh, the State Bureau of Investigation, the FBI and federal prosecutors are examining voting irregularities in the 9th District.

Dowless, 62, has declined multiple requests for interviews. Neither Todd Johnson, the primary candidate who had previously used Dowless’ services, nor his political consultant, Zach Almond, could be reached for comment.

Harris and Andy Yates of Red Dome, Harris’ campaign consultant, confirmed in statements last week that Dowless was paid for a field effort but said they were not aware of any illegal activity.

“I was absolutely unaware of any wrongdoing,” Harris said in a video released Dec. 7. Harris attorney John Branch declined to comment for this article.

Harris was warned about possible fraud on primary day in June 2016, during his first bid for the 9th District congressional seat, according to people familiar with the conversation.

The incumbent congressman and winner of the primary had received just one mail-in vote in rural Bladen County. Harris, who came in second place, had won four. Johnson, the last-place contender, meanwhile, had received nearly all of them - 221.

The only explanation, advisers told Harris that night in Charlotte, was that something shady had occurred on that third-place campaign, according to the people.

A year later, they said, when Harris resolved to run for Congress again, the candidate personally directed the hiring of Dowless, an adept field operative and Bladen County native who had helped deliver that unusual result in 2016.

Harris’ wife, Beth Harris, said in a text message Thursday: “We actually don’t recall any ‘aide’ saying anything on election night” of 2016. She added: “It was a crazy night where we were up and then went down.”

One person said Harris’ decision to hire Dowless stemmed partly from his realization that he would have defeated Rep. Robert Pittenger if he’d won the mail-in vote by as large a margin as third-place contender Johnson had.

Witnesses in interviews and affidavits say Dowless’ allegedly fraudulent operation on Harris’ behalf this year involved collecting incomplete and unsealed ballots, an illegal practice. Investigators are also examining whether Dowless or those working for him illegally discarded ballots.

Because Dowless was paid by Red Dome, which in turn billed the Harris campaign, the consulting firm is also under scrutiny.

Harris decided to hire Dowless before he brought on Red Dome in June 2017, according three people familiar with early campaign deliberations. And he decided to hire him despite warnings about Dowless’ criminal record and Dowless’ own public testimony describing questionable election tactics.

Around the same time in the spring of 2017, he also introduced Dowless to Pete Givens, a parishioner of Harris’ and a candidate for Charlotte City Council that year.

Givens was running a long shot bid as a Republican in a heavily Democratic district with historically low turnout. “How do we get 75,000 people who never show up off their rears?” Givens wondered at the time, he said in an interview. Harris drove Givens to meet Dowless, and Givens ended up hiring him, paying him $800 in May 2017.

Givens said that he didn’t know of any wrongdoing and that he believes “there’s no way that Mark Harris would have known that either.”

Walter McDuffie, the chairman of the Bladen County Republican Party, told The Washington Post that he warned the Harris campaign about Dowless’ criminal record, which includes felony convictions for fraud and perjury and a misdemeanor charge for passing a worthless check in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Harris also interacted regularly with Dowless during the 2018 primary campaign, according to Jeff Smith, a former associate of Dowless’ who gave him office space during the spring primary and saw him nearly daily. Smith told The Post that Dowless spoke often of talking to Harris by telephone about the mail-in absentee-ballot program. Much like Johnson in 2016, Harris defeated Pittenger in the primary with an overwhelming performance among mail-in voters in Bladen, which he won 437-17.

Details of Dowless’ absentee ballot operation came to light publicly in December 2016, when he told the state elections board that his get-out-the-vote operation included collecting absentee ballots.

Dowless had been asked to testify about allegations he had leveled against an African-American group that mostly supports Democratic candidates.

But over a five-hour hearing, the board interrogated him about his own operation. He described paid staffers collecting mail-in ballots, though he said he told the staffers to return the ballots to the voters. Under North Carolina law, it is illegal to tamper with or collect someone else’s ballot.

Two members of the board at the time said in interviews this week that the hearing raised red flags about absentee ballot activities in Bladen County. “It all stunk to high heaven,” said one member at the time, James Baker, a Republican and former Superior Court judge.

Another elections board member at the 2016 hearing, Democrat Maja Kricker, said she concluded from Dowless’ testimony that he was operating outside the law, adding that she thinks the Harris campaign should have known about his practices.

“Apparently either the Harris campaign or Mark Harris never vetted him,” she said.

The GOP-controlled board unanimously referred the testimony to state and federal investigators, but no indictments or public reports were issued. Lorrin Freeman, the Wake County district attorney, said an investigation sparked then now includes the 2018 election.

Freeman said her office is also examining whether anyone inside the Bladen County Board of Elections committed fraud.

Dowless’ testimony two years ago raised questions about his relationship with former Bladen County Elections Director Cynthia Shaw, who left her job in November ahead of her Jan. 1 scheduled retirement date.

Dowless told the elections board that Shaw knew that his get-out-the-vote crew put their initials on the corner of the absentee ballot request forms when they turned them in “so if there is a problem you know who to contact,” Dowless said.

Election officials are supposed to reach out directly to voters who need to correct any omissions or discrepancies regarding their absentee ballot request forms. Multiple attempts to reach Shaw were unsuccessful.

Investigators are also examining evidence published by the state elections board last week that the county board improperly printed the results of early in-person voting three days before Election Day. They are looking into whether the information was improperly shared with a campaign.

The investigations into the 2018 vote in the 9th Congressional District are putting the GOP on the defensive at a time when Republican lawmakers in North Carolina and around the country have passed voter ID laws and other restrictions they said would crack down on voting fraud.

On Wednesday, the state legislature passed a bill requiring a new primary if the state elections board orders a new election in the 9th District - allowing Republicans to replace Harris on the ballot. It was the latest sign of state Republicans backing away from their earlier demands that the state board immediately certify Harris as the winner.

The state board declined to do that last month, launching an investigation instead and planning to hold a hearing by Dec. 21. The board issued a statement this week saying investigators may need more time before a hearing can be called.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # economagic 2018-12-14 14:21
Yes, and this is claimed to be the fifth such investigation in Bladen County since 2010.

"Wull, nobuddy ever complained about it BEFORE."

And the Republican legislators have already made efforts to gain control over the state board of elections.
+2 # Elroys 2018-12-14 14:25
Since this is highly likely to be a clear case of criminal voter fraud, I'm sure that the Secretary of State in N. Carolina and all "good" Republicans will be in agreement that Mark Harris and his campaign buddy should be indicted, tried in a legitimate court of law and put in jail if found guilty - right? It is certainly what they demand - they are so concerned about voter fraud (never proven to be a problem before they got their filthy hands on the voters' ballots). Let's see how double / triple faced they can be.
0 # economagic 2018-12-15 15:51
Technical point, but important: The term "voter fraud" generally refers to individual persons casting ballots without authorization, such as voting multiple times or under a false name or without being lawfully registered. The activity described in this article--tamper ing with ballots lawfully cast or obtained by other persons, generally involving multiple ballots and for the purpose of unlawfully changing the outcome of an election--is usually called "election fraud."