RSN Fundraising Banner
Attorney Petitions Supreme Court to Declare Rod Rosenstein Acting Attorney General
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=46265"><span class="small">Jessica Schneider, CNN</span></a>   
Sunday, 18 November 2018 09:34

Schneider writes: "In a highly unusual move, lawyer Tom Goldstein asked the US Supreme Court on Friday evening to declare Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as the acting attorney general, instead of Matthew Whitaker who currently holds the job."

Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker. (photo: Getty)
Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker. (photo: Getty)

Attorney Petitions Supreme Court to Declare Rod Rosenstein Acting Attorney General

By Jessica Schneider, CNN

18 November 18


n a highly unusual move, lawyer Tom Goldstein asked the US Supreme Court on Friday evening to declare Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as the acting attorney general, instead of Matthew Whitaker who currently holds the job.

Goldstein also represented Maryland's Attorney General in a similar court filing at the district court level earlier this week.

Goldstein's motion was filed in connection with a gun rights case that is before the Supreme Court as a petition for a writ of certiorari, meaning the nine Justices will meet in conference at a date still to be determined to decide whether to hear it. The case is Barry Michaels v. Whitaker, which was automatically renamed from Michaels v. Sessions following Whitaker's appointment.

Since the attorney general is charged with enforcing all federal law, including the statutes in this gun rights case, the motion argues that the identity of the attorney general is imperative, and the rightful acting attorney general is Rod Rosenstein.

The motion urged the Supreme Court to immediately declare the proper acting attorney general since there "is a significant national interest in avoiding the prospect that every district and immigration judge in the nation could, in relatively short order, be presented with the controversy over which person to substitute as Acting Attorney General." And petitioners even left room for the Supreme Court to affirm Whitaker's appointment saying, "Even if this Court now determines that the President in fact validly appointed Mr. Whitaker as Acting Attorney General, that ruling would equally benefit the administration of justice by removing the cloud of uncertainty over the appointment and by resolving the burgeoning number of challenges to it."

"We do want Rosenstein named Acting Attorney General," Goldstein said. "But we say to the court, even if we're wrong, it sure would be better for everybody to know the answer to that because this has turned into a mess."

Similar motions challenging Whitaker's appointment have been filed in other cases, including by the state of Maryland in its Affordable Care Act lawsuit, and by a private attorney in Missouri representing a client charged with wire fraud. Last week, the judge overseeing Roger Stone associate Andrew Miller's motion to quash, indicated attorneys would likely be asked to file new briefs adjusting their arguments to reflect Whitaker's new position.

It is unclear if the Justices will even consider this separate motion, since they have not agreed to hear the underlying case. Michaels' attorney petitioned the Supreme Court on October 18 and the court recently extended the government's time to respond to mid-December, meaning the Court won't decide whether to hear arguments on the case until after that time. Four justices must vote to hear the case in order for oral arguments to be scheduled.

But Goldstein was optimistic the Justices could weigh in on this motion even before deciding whether to hear arguments on the underlying case. "The motion doesn't have anything to do with the cert process," Goldstein said. "The Justices are used to dealing with motions at different stages of the case. We don't expect that the will hold the motion up pending the decision on the cert petition."

The motion contends that Whitaker's appointment violates federal law and the Constitution. It argues that the Constitution's Appointments Clause mandates that all principal officers, including the attorney general, must be Senate confirmed, and that the Trump administration should have followed the Attorney General Succession Act when naming Sessions' replacement. The AG Succession Act provides that in the case of the vacancy of the office of Attorney General, the deputy attorney general would exercise all duties of the office. The Trump administration has maintained that Whitaker's appointment is valid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

On Wednesday, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel issued a defense of President Donald Trump's controversial appointment of Whitaker, offering several reasons why the appointment is constituent with the Constitution. The 20-page memo asserted that (1) the appointment is consistent with the plain terms of the Vacancies Reform Act, "because he had been serving in the Department of Justice at a sufficiently senior pay level for over a year" as the statute requires; (2) because Whitaker is only serving on a temporary basis, he wasn't required to be confirmed by the senate ahead of his selection last week; and (3) even though is a separate statute exists that provides a succession plan at DOJ, the President can choose someone else consistent with the Vacancies Act.

On Thursday, the top Democrats on the House and Senate Judiciary committees and the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee released a statement criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's reasoning.

"There should be bipartisan concern that this will embolden the future use of temporary appointments for illegitimate purposes. That's not what the framers or Congress intended," the statement said. "The attorney general must be Senate confirmed, plain and simple. This can't be allowed to stand."

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-11-18 11:03
How silly. Rosenstein has a bill of impeachment pending in the congress. He has been cited for contempt of congress. And he is facing felony charges for knowingly submitting fraudulent information to the FISA court. There is a long list of other charges pending against Rosenstein. Now that Democrats control congress, Rosenstein may get a "pass" on some of them. But before too long, Rosenstein will be in the docket. His chances of being elevated to Acting Attorney General are Zero.

Whitaker will only be in office for a month or two. Probably Trump is waiting until after January and after the new Senate is sworn in. Then his new appointment can have the senate hearing and a confirmation vote.

All of this is more Trump Derangement Syndrome. And it is a lot of protecting the criminal cabal who invented the Russiagate conspiracy in the first place. A good Attorney General would actually open a criminal investigation against people like Rosenstein, Comey, Ohr, Strzok, and the rest of them.
0 # lfeuille 2018-11-18 16:07
Wouldn't that be ironic. I wish it had a chance of succeeding.