RSN Fundraising Banner
House Republicans Block Resolution to End US Support of War in Yemen
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=34216"><span class="small">Middle East Eye</span></a>   
Friday, 16 November 2018 09:21

Excerpt: "The Republican majority in Congress managed on Wednesday to block a Democrat-sponsored resolution to end Washington's support for Saudi-led coalition's war in Yemen by advancing a bill to remove gray wolves from the protected species list."

Yemeni children stand on ruins of a building destroyed in a Saudi air strike. (photo: AFP)
Yemeni children stand on ruins of a building destroyed in a Saudi air strike. (photo: AFP)


House Republicans Block Resolution to End US Support of War in Yemen

By Middle East Eye

16 November 18


'There's not a single American who wouldn't want the violence to end,' says Democratic congressman

embers of the US House of Representatives were voting on a bill called "Manage Our Wolves Act". But all Democrats talked about on the House floor was Yemen.

The Republican majority in Congress managed on Wednesday to block a Democrat-sponsored resolution to end Washington's support for Saudi-led coalition's war in Yemen by advancing a bill to remove gray wolves from the protected species list.

The measure on endangered animals included a separate provision that prevents swift voting on the Democrats' Yemen resolution.

Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna had invoked the 1973 War Powers Act in introducing the resolution, which gave the measure a "privileged" status, allowing it to bypass the various committees that bills normally go through in Congress.

Khanna's resolution was stripped of the status, however, when House Republicans voted to strip gray wolves of federal protection.

Democrats were furious.

"There's not a single American who wouldn't want the violence to end," Khanna said on Wednesday.

"I plead with my Republican colleagues, please vote no on this resolution. Let's have a debate. Let's have a debate about the starvation and the killing going on there and do the right thing for our Constitution and our world."

Jim McGovern, another Democrat, called removing the "privileged" status from a resolution to debate US involvement in a war overseas unprecedented.

"We should be voting on this," McGovern said. "People are dying every minute in Yemen. Our silence and our inaction mean that we are complicit."

He added human rights should be a bipartisan concern, "but it's clear that this administration doesn't give a damn about human rights."

He urged Congress not to follow the White House's lead on the matter.

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat from Hawaii, called the Saudi war in Yemen "genocidal" and accused Republicans of undermining American democracy by blocking the resolution.

"Don't be fooled; if Congress and this administration were truly concerned about the plight of the Yemeni people and peace, all US support for Saudi Arabia's atrocities would end now," she said on the House floor.

Humanitarian crisis

Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, a Democrat whose district in Michigan is home to thousands of Yemeni Americans, also denounced the Republican move.

"The war in Yemen has cost thousands of lives and created a devastating humanitarian crisis, and US participation in this conflict was never authorised by Congress," Dingell said in a statement.

"By preventing debate on the Yemen War Powers resolution, the current Republican leadership is abdicating Congress’ Constitutional responsibilities in favor of short-term political considerations."

Washington provides logistic support, including intelligence sharing, to the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen.

Saudi Arabia and its allies launched a bombing campaign against the impoverished country's Houthi rebels in 2015 to push them out of the capital, Sanaa, and restore the government of President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi.

The war has killed thousands of people, caused a cholera outbreak and brought Yemen to the verge of famine, but Riyadh and its allies have been unable to capture the capital, Sanaa.

Although Democrats have highlighted the urgency of ending the conflict, Republicans say Democrats can reintroduce the resolution when they become a majority in the House in January.

"In a few short weeks, the Democrats will assume the majority. They’ll be able to hold all the hearings and markups and votes that they want on this matter," Republican Congressman Dan Newhouse said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # ChrisCurrie 2018-11-16 12:35
The Republican politicians in our present US Congress have repeatedly voted (some as many as 70 times) to literally KILL MILLIONS of Americans denying them healthcare (in order to please their greedy corporate/billi onaire sponsors). They clearly have no god but money and don't really give a damn how many people they kill in order to get more of it!
 
 
0 # tedrey 2018-11-16 13:15
The poison clause in Rule HR_6784 reads:

"Sec. 4. The provisions of section 7 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1546) shall not apply to House Concurrent Resolution 138."

By the way, other provisions include:

"3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.
4. Provides that the bill shall be considered as read.
5. Waives all points of order against provisions in the bill."

Does this language mean that no Congressman may raise any points of order against the bill or its contents, but that it will not be necessary for them to read it? Those who can interpret Congresseese correct me if I'm wrong.