RSN Fundraising Banner
FOCUS: Senator Sasse Drops Kavanaugh Bombshell
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44597"><span class="small">Matthew Rozsa, Salon</span></a>   
Thursday, 04 October 2018 10:28

Rozsa writes: "Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) could have further complicated Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation prospects when he publicly suggested he would have preferred a woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court in his stead."

Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., questions President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, as he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee. (photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., questions President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, as he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee. (photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP)


Senator Sasse Drops Kavanaugh Bombshell

By Matthew Rozsa, Salon

04 October 18


Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) publicly suggested he would have preferred a woman to be nominated to the court instead

en. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) could have further complicated Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation prospects when he publicly suggested he would have preferred a woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court in his stead.

"Although I've said many complimentary things about Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his distinguished record . . . I will say that I urged the president back in June and early July to make a different choice before he announced this nomination," Sasse told the Senate Wednesday night as the upper chamber of Congress prepared for the long-anticipated FBI report on Kavanaugh's past conduct.

Kavanaugh faces multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including attempted rape. Sasse said that he had "urged the president to nominate a woman," claiming he had foreseen potential complications such as the one with Kavanaugh. "Part of my argument then was that the very important 'Me Too' movement was also very new, and that this Senate is not at all well prepared to handle potential allegations of sexual harassment and assault," Sasse said in his speech.

The Nebraskan senator felt that Trump picking a woman – he was most likely referring to Amy Coney Barret or Joan Larsen, both of whom are circuit court judges that appeared on Trump's Supreme Court shortlist – would have been the politically smart move. "In the interest of cautious prudence I urged a different path than the one that was chosen," Sasse remarked.

While Sasse framed his arguments as a reflection on what Trump should have done in the past rather than what Sasse would do in the future, his remarks nevertheless marked a startling breach from partisan unity at a time when the Republican Party cannot spare votes in order for Kavanaugh to be confirmed. With Republicans clinging to a 51-49 lead in the Senate — a position somewhat buttressed by having the ability for Vice President Mike Pence to cast a tie-breaking vote if necessary — they can only spare two senators.

Moreover, Sasse chastised Trump for mocking Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who accused his Supreme Court nominee of attempted rape in the 1980s. "We all know that the president cannot lead us through this time," he said. "We know that he's dispositionally unable to restrain his impulse to divide us."

The three Republican senators who have widely been considered to be possible defectors are Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jeff Flake of Arizona and Susan Collins of Maine. All three joined Sasse in condemning the president's mockery of Ford. On the Democratic side, the two senators seen as most likely to support Kavanaugh are Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

The motives for the different senators in terms of potentially defecting vary wildly. Collins and Murkowski are generally regarded as moderates who are sensitive to women's issues, while Flake and Sasse have been willing to part ways with Trump on a number of issues. Meanwhile, Heitkamp and Manchin are running for reelection in states that voted heavily for Trump in 2016.

Regardless of these complications, Senate Republicans have been determined to push through Kavanaugh's confirmation before midterm elections in five weeks, as they risk losing control of that legislative chamber. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell filed a motion for a cloture vote on Kavanaugh's nomination Wednesday, which means the first vote could occur as early as Friday and a full Senate vote could occur as early as Saturday, according to CBS News. A strong indicator that Senate Republican leadership was determined to confirm Kavanaugh regardless of what that report discovers about his background is the fact that the FBI report had not been read by the senators when McConnell filed for a cloture vote.

Democrats have expressed outrage at what they perceive as Republican attempts to misrepresent the contents of the FBI's background report, which has since then been provided to senators. The Republican senators' Twitter account announced that "nowhere in any of these six FBI reports ... was there ever a whiff of ANY issue ― at all ― related in any way to inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse."

In response, eight of the ten Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley claiming that, "while we are limited in what we can say about this background investigation in a public setting, we are compelled to state for the record that there is information in the second post that is not accurate. It is troubling that the Committee Majority has characterized the information from Judge Kavanaugh’s confidential background investigation on Twitter, as that information is confidential and not subject to public release."

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+85 # librarian1984 2018-10-04 12:24
Sasse: another self-professed moderate, like Collins, who disdains Trump but consistently votes with him.

Spare me.
 
 
-2 # candida 2018-10-04 17:40
Quoting librarian1984:
Sasse: another self-professed moderate, like Collins, who disdains Trump but consistently votes with him.

Spare me.


Like self-professed liberals/progre ssives who disdain social injustice but didn't vote for Hillary. Now look at the SH*T we have in the White House and soon to be in SCOTUS.

Spare ME!
 
 
+7 # librarian1984 2018-10-05 07:35
Like self-professed faux 'liberals' who continue to support war-mongering corporatists and divide the party, unwilling to cede the power they've abused and despite decades of electoral failure, who still believe in mythical moderate Republicans and the fairy tale of LOTE, who are determined to live in the past, guaranteeing an equally disastrous future?

Don't let go of your precious misinformation, c. Because what would you have left?

Keep giving cover to old corrupt hacks like Hoyer and Pelosi, make sure not one thing improves and we continue to lose to Trump. Check and check. Never question your position despite the fact true progressives have been right about almost everything for years.

Brilliant. Just brilliant.
 
 
+6 # hectormaria 2018-10-05 07:33
Why in the world are Dems and Progressive Organizations putting their hopes on Republicrytes like Sen. Collins? They will all vote in lock step as always and take all of them for fools once again: a Peanuts-Lucy replay. Notice how all those 'Women-for-Trum p' cheered wildly when Trump mocked Ms. Ford: Republicryte$ are 'fake Christians'- they only care about POWER, MAMMON and preserving their white privilege...... Hector
 
 
+14 # Porfiry 2018-10-04 13:38
truth and honesty vs. party lockstep loyalty. A sword that cuts both ways.
 
 
+24 # ddd-rrr 2018-10-04 14:30
Re Kavanaugh: To those Senators who think they must choose between doing
what is right for the country and what will get them reelected, PLEASE
do what is right for the country in this time of its need!
THAT is the ethically-requi red choice!
 
 
+3 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-10-04 20:44
& som of them would probably then be reelected anyway.
 
 
+10 # bardphile 2018-10-04 14:37
Meanwhile the shriveled-up little presidential ding dong is showing through the fig leaf.
 
 
+11 # lfeuille 2018-10-04 15:25
Does this mean he'll vote no? If not, who cares.
 
 
+7 # economagic 2018-10-04 16:05
Party uber patriotism--par don my bastard Germlish.
 
 
+22 # sashapyle 2018-10-04 16:13
The R’s agreed to this “investigation” so as to appear reasonable and to buy themselves time. They have every intention of undermining the investigation, disregarding its findings, and confirming this terrible candidate out of sheer partisan calculation and self-preservati on, to get a 9th Justice on board who thinks a sitting President is an infallible god (at least when it’s a Republican) and who will protect them all from REAL justice. Crooks like to have other crooks sit in “judgment” upon them. Buckle up folks, years and years of overt fascism, resource destruction, dehumanization and thievery are on the way now.
 
 
+27 # futhark 2018-10-04 17:30
"We know that he's {Trump's) dispositionally unable to restrain his impulse to divide us."

Let's give Senator Sasse credit for making a logical observation here. The next question is why he does he continue to align himself with the political party that has given itself over completely to the promotion of policies that will inevitably lead to such unbelievable division and chaos, the likes of which we have never seen before (or at least since the Civil War)?
 
 
+4 # economagic 2018-10-04 20:16
Good question. There is probably a clue in his stated reason for preferring someone other than K, and preferably a woman.
 
 
+3 # gapatton 2018-10-06 17:52
A not inspiring guy, who didn't have the political courage to vote "no" on the Kavanaugh nomination, even after seeming to indicate (as the headline on this news article said) that he wanted a different type of candidate.