RSN Fundraising Banner
University Officials Tried to Stop This Cheerleader From Taking a Knee. Now She's Suing Them.
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=39316"><span class="small">Lindsay Gibbs, ThinkProgress</span></a>   
Sunday, 09 September 2018 08:28

Gibbs writes: "Tommia Dean, a former cheerleader at Kennesaw State University, is suing KSU and Georgia State officials for their response to her protest of police brutality and racial injustices during the national anthem."

Kennesaw State University cheerleaders, from left to right, Shlondra Young, Tommia Dean and Kennedy Town stand outside the student center on the school's campus in Kennesaw, Ga. (photo: Jeff Martin)
Kennesaw State University cheerleaders, from left to right, Shlondra Young, Tommia Dean and Kennedy Town stand outside the student center on the school's campus in Kennesaw, Ga. (photo: Jeff Martin)


University Officials Tried to Stop This Cheerleader From Taking a Knee. Now She's Suing Them.

By Lindsay Gibbs, ThinkProgress

09 September 18


"We just wanted to take the knee in the name of equality."

ommia Dean, a former cheerleader at Kennesaw State University, is suing KSU and Georgia State officials for their response to her protest of police brutality and racial injustices during the national anthem.

Last September, Dean and four other KSU cheerleaders took a knee during the national anthem, an extension of the movement started by former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

But the lawsuit alleges that after they knelt, the sheriff and a powerful government official in Georgia and the Sherriff conspired to pressure the then-president of KSU, Samuel Olens, to change the pre-game schedule to ensure that cheerleaders remained in the locker room during the anthem, just like football players traditionally did in Georgia.

The lawsuit says that this “constituted a conspiracy … to deprive Plaintiff Dean of her constitutional rights” and showcased “recklessness or callous indifference to the federally protected rights of others.” Additionally, the lawsuit is accusing Earl Ehrhart, a Georgia state representative, and Neil Warren, the Sheriff of Cobb County, of “participating in a private conspiracy actionable under the Ku Klux Klan Act,” since Ehrhart and Warren were targeting the protesting cheerleaders because they are African Americans protesting racism.

In an interview last year, the five cheerleaders said they did not make the decision to take a knee on a whim; it took weeks of prayer and discussion with each other, their parents, and other cheerleaders. But ultimately, they felt they needed to make a statement against racism.

“I feel as though it was nothing to disrespect America, which is why when we took the knee, we still made it a point to have our hands on our heart, but we just wanted to take the knee in the name of equality. That in a way is a love for this country, because we are using our freedom,” one of the cheerleaders told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

In another interview, one of the cheerleaders called taking a knee “the scariest thing I’ve ever done.”

Olens was not at the football game when the protest began, but was notified of it soon thereafter due to the backlash — and support — in the community. The lawsuit says that Olens was very aware of KSU policy, which specifically protects freedom of expression, even if that expression contradicts “personal views of university employees and students.” In the week after the protest, Olens was also informed by the University System of Georgia that students should not be prohibited from kneeling during the national anthem.

However, when Ehrhart and Warren started pressuring Olens and other members of the athletic department at KSU to make the protests stop, he quickly caved.

The lawsuit says that Ehrhart is the chairman of the House Committee that determines the budget for the University of Georgia System, which includes KSU, and that he describes himself as the “funding source” for the University System. So, he definitely carried a lot of influence.

On October 4, Whitlock informed KSU officials that cheerleaders would not be allowed on the field during the national anthem anymore.

“The only purpose of making the change was to appease defendants Ehrhart and Warren,” the suit contends. “At no prior home football game in KSU’s history had cheerleaders not been on the field during the playing of the national anthem.”

Warren and Ehrhart both took full credit for stopping this protest.

“Not letting the cheerleaders come out on the field until after national anthem was one of the recommendations that Earl [Ehrhart] and I gave him [Olens]!” Warren wrote in a text message, according to the suit.

In a text to Warren, Ehrhart replied: “He [Olens] had to be dragged there, but with you and I pushing he had no choice. Thanks for your patriotism my friend.”

On November 8, 2017, Olens reversed his decision due to pressure from students, faculty, and the Board of Regents. From then on, the cheerleaders were back on the field during the national anthem.

“While I believe there are more effective ways to initiate an exchange of ideas on issues of national concern, the right to exercise one’s freedom of speech under the First Amendment must be protected,” Olens wrote.

All five of the cheerleaders who took a knee last year tried out for the cheerleading squad at KSU this year; only one made the team.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Sunday, 09 September 2018 09:22
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # chemtex2611 2018-09-09 12:56
The big white men know what is best for everyone !
Phooey....

Boycott Georgia.
Leave it to those who live in the past.
 
 
+12 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-09-09 14:00
Universities are never supposed to become monuments of racist bigotry.
 
 
+2 # Texas Aggie 2018-09-09 15:54
People keep talking about how this isn't an effective way to protest and that the protesters should find some other way. I'm sure the protesters are open to suggestions, but by the very nature of protest, it will get someone annoyed. That is it's whole function. To change the behavior of someone being protested against.

If you don't attract their attention, they aren't going to change, so protests must be annoying. Otherwise the jerks like Warren and Ehrhart will go on their merry way being jerks and other people will suffer because of their jerkdom.