RSN Fundraising Banner
Arbitration Tribunal Rules Against Ecuador, Favors Chevron
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33791"><span class="small">teleSUR</span></a>   
Friday, 07 September 2018 12:32

Excerpt: "Ecuador will be forced to pay economic reparations to the oil giant. The over 30,000 affected people in the Amazon haven't received any compensation."

Crude oil in an open toxic oil waste pit abandoned by Chevron in the Ecuadorean Amazon Rainforest near Lago Agrio. (photo: Caroline Bennett/Rainforest Action Network)
Crude oil in an open toxic oil waste pit abandoned by Chevron in the Ecuadorean Amazon Rainforest near Lago Agrio. (photo: Caroline Bennett/Rainforest Action Network)


Arbitration Tribunal Rules Against Ecuador, Favors Chevron

By teleSUR

07 September 18


Ecuador will be forced to pay economic reparations to the oil giant. The over 30,000 affected people in the Amazon haven't received any compensation.

he Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague has ruled in favor of oil giant Chevron and declared Ecuador guilty of violating a bilateral investment treaty signed with the United States in 1997, of withholding justice from the company, and for not providing Chevron with “just and equitable” treatment.

The announcement was made Friday morning by Ecuador’s Attorney General Iñigo Salvador, who gave a statement on the main points of the ruling in a press conference.

The court also ruled that Ecuador will have to pay economic compensation to the corporation that dumped 16 billion gallons of toxic wastewater into waterways and open pits in the Ecuadorean Amazon between 1964 and 1992, affecting over 30,000 Indigenous people and Campesinos in the area.

The amount has not been established yet, but Chevron requested that Ecuador assume the US$9.5 billion that the provincial court of Sucumbios in Ecuador sentenced Chevron to pay to the affected communities. This July, Ecuador’s Constitutional Court ratified the ruling against Chevron, but compensation to the affected communities seems unlikely.

The amount Ecuador will need to pay Chevron will be settled within the next 90 days, during which Chevron and Ecuador will have to present their cases and evidence to determine the amount.

The lawsuit against Chevron began in 1993 when the communities affected by Chevron-Texaco’s pollution sued the company for environmental damages in a New York court. According to the oil company, the state of Ecuador violated a 1995 agreement stipulating that Petroecuador, the state’s oil company, would assume all responsibilities for environmental damages by allowing Indigenous communities to sue Chevron-Texaco.

The arbitration court ruled that Ecuador violated the 1997 bilateral investment treaty despite Ecuador’s arguments that the treaty came into effect after the communities’ lawsuit. The case was moved from New York to Ecuador in 2002 upon Chevron's request.

The government of President Lenin Moreno announced Thursday that the state will sue former President Rafael Correa and his government officials if Ecuador lost the international arbitration process.

The current government is accusing Correa of failing to defend the country’s interests correctly and spending money on the international campaign “The Dirty Hand of Chevron,” which according to the government sought to “manipulate national and international public opinion.”

The Union of the Affected by Texaco’s Oil Operations announced they will hold a press conference Monday to discuss how the ruling affects their lawsuit against the corporation.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # Lgfoot 2018-09-08 10:43
I will crawl through broken glass before I ever buy gas from Chevron.