RSN Fundraising Banner
'It's Definitely Intimidation': Police Accused Over Raids on BLM Activist's Family
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36093"><span class="small">Jamiles Lartey, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Sunday, 26 August 2018 12:57

Lartey writes: "The peace and quiet of a south Memphis neighborhood gave way to chaos on Monday, as more than two dozen police cars, most unmarked, blocked off the street before officers raided two homes."

Memphis Activist Antonio Cathey demonstrating at the annual vigil for Elvis Presley at Graceland. (Brandon Dill/Guardian UK)
Memphis Activist Antonio Cathey demonstrating at the annual vigil for Elvis Presley at Graceland. (Brandon Dill/Guardian UK)


'It's Definitely Intimidation': Police Accused Over Raids on BLM Activist's Family

By Jamiles Lartey, Guardian UK

26 August 18


Was it coincidence that a mass raid on two Memphis homes occurred on the first day of a trial in which police face claims of illegal surveillance of Black Lives Matter campaigners?

he peace and quiet of a southMemphis neighborhood gave way to chaos on Monday, as more than two dozen police cars, most unmarked, blocked off the street before officers raided two homes.

Witnesses described more than 50 heavily armed officers: local police, sheriff’s deputies, some from other agencies. Many shielded their identity with black ski masks.

The score from this elaborate, multi-agency gang taskforce effort? A single “roach” from an ashtray, containing a quantity of marijuana too small to trigger an arrest. The homeowner was given a written citation.

Minutes away, at a downtown courthouse, the police department was entering its first day on trial. The case, brought by activists and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), alleges the Memphis police department (MPD) engaged in illegal surveillance of activists involved with Black Lives Matter and Fight for 15, including “catfishing” them with fake social media accounts.

In a statement to the Guardian, the MPD said the timing of the raid was “not related to the ACLU lawsuit in any way”.

Activists feel differently – the homes raided belonged to the uncle and grandmother of Antonio Cathey, one of the city’s more well-known activists and one of the targets of the alleged police spying.

Following the raids, activists reported police searching a community garden, tailing activists in unmarked cars, and in one case pulling over a vehicle in which one passenger was an ACLU lawyer representing the activists. The lawyer was briefly detained, in handcuffs.

“It’s most definitely intimidation and it’s to show us that even the courts can’t stop them doing what they want to do,” said Keedran Franklin, a prolific activist who has described being watched and targeted by Memphis police over the last two years.

According to Cathey, in the raid on his uncle’s home police tossed drawers, left clothing strewn about the house and broke family pictures. When officers entered the second house, he said, they pointed weapons at his 71-year-old grandmother.

“It was a retaliation to what was going on in court and it was an intimidation tactic but it didn’t scare me,” he said.

Cathey, Franklin and the ACLU lawyer Scott Kramer were at the courthouse for the first day of the trial when Cathey got word of the raid. When Kramer arrived at the scene, he said, he saw a number of officers using masks and bandannas.

“One guy used what looked like a white sheet on his head and then sunglasses over top of it,” Kramer said.

He also noted that several of the vehicles used appeared to display civilian license plates.

In its statement to the Guardian, the MPD did not address questions about masks or vehicles. It said the gang unit was dispatched on a warrant on suspicion of cocaine trafficking, then moved to Cathey’s grandmother’s house and arrested his cousin on an unrelated outstanding assault charge.

When authorities left the scene, Kramer was in a car with several activists who decided to follow one of the unmarked cars. They did so briefly before the county sheriff sent four vehicles to pull them over, for “following too closely”.

In a video posted to Facebook Live by the driver, Spencer Kaaz, another local activist, Kramer can be heard asking “why are you putting me in handcuffs” as an officer pats him down. The other passengers decline to get out. After some time, officers uncuff Kramer. He returned to court for the rest of the day’s proceedings.

Kramer said: “The bullet point is: on the same day that the ACLU is bringing a suit against the Memphis police, [they are saying] ‘We can pull you over and put you in handcuffs whenever we want to.’”

Cathey reported being followed by one of the undercover cars later in the week. On Thursday, Franklin discovered that MPD officers had paid a late-night visit to a community garden maintained by activists in Memphis’s Concerned Citizen Coalition, the group police are principally accused of spying on.

MPD would only tell the Guardian there was no call for service made at the garden. It declined to provide a reason why officers might have been there.

The surveillance project was operated by the MPD’s office of homeland security, which officials said was “originally designed to deal with threats to the MPD or Memphis in general”.

In a deposition for the ACLU lawsuit, officials said the office had been “retooled” around 2016, due to an increase in policing-related protests and to focus on “local individuals or groups that were staging protests”.

This included the publication of daily joint information briefings on potential protests and known protesters. According to the suit, the briefings regularly included information about meetings on private property, panel discussions, town halls and even innocuous events like “Black Owned Food Truck Sunday”.

A good deal of that information appears to have been obtained by a fake MPD Facebook profile for “Bob Smith”, which the ACLU said was used “to view private posts, join private groups, and otherwise pose as a member of the activist community”.

In one case, the Bob Smith pseudonym chatted with a protester on Facebook, describing himself as “just a fellow protester” and later saying “block me if you want, but i’m not a cop”.

A federal judge is currently considering his verdict on the ACLU lawsuit. He has already ruled that the city violated a federal consent decree barring the city from engaging in political surveillance. The judge will issue rulings later on several issues, including if the ACLU has standing in the case, if the consent agreement should be modified and if police violated the activists' first amendment rights by gathering political intelligence.

Late on Friday night, Franklin and Cathey were riding in a car when they were pulled over once again, allegedly for a busted turn signal light. Franklin streamed the incident to Facebook Live.

“I guess this is shit we’re going to go through, until they get it together,” he said.

Cathey told the Guardian: “The cops intimidate and follow us and do those things because they think they can just get away with it.

“But I’m going to be that voice for the people and let them know that this is not right. You guys are not going to continue to do this shit and get away with it, point blank. Period.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+12 # wilhelmscream 2018-08-26 15:23
Retaliation. That is what it is!
 
 
+5 # lorenbliss 2018-08-27 00:06
Coming soon to every rebellious household in the United States.
 
 
+2 # ddd-rrr 2018-08-27 06:40
The smell of the police-state-to -be, under this “administration ”, is getting ever stronger.
 
 
+2 # bubbiesue 2018-08-27 07:36
It is not right, it's unwarranted harassment. Time for it to stop. Slavery and Jim Crow are dead.
 
 
+2 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-08-27 08:54
US Police as usual: Lynching Lite. & the message is clear: Don’t be Uppity
 
 
+3 # Wally2007 2018-08-27 10:30
My hats off to the ACLU. This surveillance matter is FAR out of Bounds.
These cops or whomever they are should be challenged IMMEDIATELY
I strongly encourage all those affected to persevere and challenge the racist authorities. These matters seem quite prevalent since the DRUMP administration and Beauregard and all his cronies.
 
 
+3 # chrisconno 2018-08-27 11:53
If Trump and his rethuglicans are allowed to stand these are scenes from a not too distant future. Hell with worrying about ISIS sleeper cells, we've got NRA white supremacist sleeper cells all over the country who relish the thought of harassing anybody that defies any treatment they decide they are entitled to. Including but not exclusively, child endangerment and molestation, mass murder as a stand your ground defense, land grabs, and all things associated with chaotic rule. Republicans have given Trump a license to plunder at all costs.