RSN Fundraising Banner
Ex-Doorman Releases 'Catch and Kill' Contract About Alleged Trump Affair With a Housekeeper, Which He Claims Resulted in a Child
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=37309"><span class="small">Chas Danner, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Saturday, 25 August 2018 13:00

Danner writes: "The former Trump World Tower doorman who has alleged that Donald Trump had an affair and child out of wedlock with his former housekeeper has released the 'catch and kill' contract he signed in late 2015 with National Enquirer publisher American Media, Inc."

Dino Sajudin was given the $30,000 by American Media Inc. in 2015 in exchange for signing over the rights, 'in perpetuity,' regarding a rumor he heard that Trump had fathered an illegitimate child with an employee at New York City's Trump World Tower in the 1980s, according to multiple reports. (photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg)
Dino Sajudin was given the $30,000 by American Media Inc. in 2015 in exchange for signing over the rights, 'in perpetuity,' regarding a rumor he heard that Trump had fathered an illegitimate child with an employee at New York City's Trump World Tower in the 1980s, according to multiple reports. (photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg)


Ex-Doorman Releases 'Catch and Kill' Contract About Alleged Trump Affair With a Housekeeper, Which He Claims Resulted in a Child

By Chas Danner, New York Magazine

25 August 18

 

he former Trump World Tower doorman who has alleged that Donald Trump had an affair and child out of wedlock with his former housekeeper has released the “catch and kill” contract he signed in late 2015 with National Enquirer publisher American Media, Inc. CNN reports that the doorman, Dino Sajudin, is now free to discuss the contract and payoff — which were likely part of an effort by AMI CEO and Trump ally David Pecker to suppress damaging stories about Trump during his presidential campaign.

Other than the above scan of the contract itself, there isn’t much else in the new CNN report that wasn’t covered by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow (who also had but did not publish the contract) and the Associated Press in April. The cover up has taken on more relevance, however, following the news this week that Pecker had received immunity from federal prosecutors in exchange for information about hush money payments to two at least two women on behalf of Trump by Michael Cohen. Pecker had potentially violated campaign finance laws by paying to conceal stories in an effort to protect Trump; Cohen pleaded guilty to that very crime, in addition to charges of tax and bank fraud, on Tuesday. Both men have said that Trump directed the payments.

There are many good reasons to doubt Sajudin’s credibility regarding Trump’s alleged affair, and no evidence has yet been uncovered to substantiate his claims, but those concerns didn’t prevent Pecker and AMI from paying him $30,000 to kill it, then cancelling the Enquirer’s investigation on the subject and working to legally prevent other news organizations from reporting on the story and cover up. In fact, according to Farrow, an AMI source said it was “unheard of” to pay anything like what Sajudin got for an unverified rumor he heard secondhand — indicating that the only purpose of the move was to help Trump. Farrow also outlined a theory as to what Pecker may have wanted from Trump in exchange, other than his appreciative friendship:

Two A.M.I. sources said they believed that the catch-and-kill operations had cemented a partnership between Pecker and Trump, and that people close to the President had subsequently introduced Pecker to potential sources of funding for A.M.I. One A.M.I. source told me, “Pecker’s not going to take thirty thousand dollars from company funds to shut down a potentially damaging story about his buddy without making sure it got back to him so he could get credit.” In 2017, the company began acquiring new publications, including Us Weekly and Men’s Journal. According to the Times, last July Pecker visited the Oval Office and dined at the White House with a French businessman known for brokering deals with Saudi Arabia. Two months later, the businessman and Pecker met with the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.

Jerry George, a former senior editor at AMI, told the Huffington Post on Friday that “it was obvious” from within the organization that Pecker, once he took over the company, had ordered an end to negative coverage of Trump. Sources were rarely paid for stories that didn’t run, according to George, though the publication had caught and killed stories to protect politicians before, like then-AMI board member Arnold Schwarzenegger during his California gubernatorial race. Anything AMI published about Trump was first run by Cohen or another representative of the Trump Organization, explained George, and about 10 Trump-related stories were killed under Pecker by the time he left the company in 2013. He also said that hundreds of story leads that came in about Trump were never looked into. Several months after Trump began his presidential campaign, AMI paid $30,000 to buy and quash Sajudin’s.

Sajudin is now free to tell his Trump affair story, but he has yet to arrange any media appearances to do so. When he was contacted by Farrow about the allegation for the article in April, he replied, “My time is valuable. What’s your offer??” — then stopped communicating with Farrow when he found out he wouldn’t be paid. Sajudin’s lawyer told CNN that he was only recently released from his contract, and that the former doorman “hopes the truth will come out in the very near future.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+2 # MikeAF48 2018-08-25 14:22
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmm.
 
 
+4 # Glen 2018-08-26 06:52
Fortunately, or not, these reports will continue to pop up. The repulsiveness of Trump's behavior should be put up for inspection and indictment. The shame of it will last until the U.S. fails and falls.
 
 
+6 # Wise woman 2018-08-26 14:20
One of these days, trump is going to find out that his money can't buy everything. What comes of that should be hugely interesting.
 
 
+5 # treerapper 2018-08-27 08:54
The dt bottomless cesspool. Not surprising but the extent of it takes your breath away.