ACLU, Black Lives Matter Say Plans to Reform the Chicago Police Don't Go Far Enough |
Wednesday, 15 August 2018 08:32 |
Hinkel writes: "Chicago police officers would be encouraged to avoid arresting people over minor offenses and would need permission from supervisors to make arrests related to certain infractions under a proposal by activist groups involved in the litigation over potential reforms to the troubled Police Department."
ACLU, Black Lives Matter Say Plans to Reform the Chicago Police Don't Go Far Enough15 August 18
On Tuesday morning, the groups — which include the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois and Black Lives Matter Chicago — released their first organized responses to the proposed court agreement Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan introduced last month. The criticisms are an attempt to influence the draft of the consent decree before it is submitted to a federal judge, which is expected to happen by early September. The activist organizations, the Emanuel administration and Madigan’s office are still wrangling over details of a potential court order that would eventually serve as a judicially enforceable mandate governing how officers use force and how they will be held accountable, among other issues. The public comment period for the draft consent decree ends Friday. On Tuesday, dozens of activists and lawyers gathered outside Emanuel’s office at City Hall and complained that the draft failed to address many of their concerns. “The proposed consent decree released by the city and the office of the attorney general falls far short of what’s required in order to end the reign of lawlessness and brutality that we’ve endured under this Police Department,” said Jonathan Projansky of Black Lives Matter Chicago. The groups proposed that the department be required to create a policy that encourages officers to use the “least intrusive response appropriate under the circumstances as reasonably understood by the officer at the time” in dealing with minor offenses. The suggested policy would encourage police to give warnings or divert people to “mediation or public health program(s)” rather than citing or locking them up. For a number of offenses, a supervisor would need to approve the arrest “unless not practicable under the circumstances.” Those crimes range from gambling and prostitution offenses to obstructing, resisting or assaulting a police officer The activist groups also want the department to be forced to enact a policy on foot pursuits, which have often led to shootings and other uses of force. The consent decree proposed by Emanuel and Madigan leaves room for the creation of a policy but does not mandate it. And the groups want officers to report every incident in which they point a Taser or a gun at a person, or even draw their firearms. The question of whether the department will have to report instances in which cops aim guns at people has been a sticking point between Madigan’s office and the Emanuel administration. Madigan’s office wants the incidents reported, and city officials apparently do not. The potential consent decree would be one of the most substantive consequences of the scandal sparked in late 2015 by the release of video of Officer Jason Van Dyke, who is white, shooting black teenager Laquan McDonald 16 times. Van Dyke is scheduled to stand trial on murder charges next month. The video touched off heated protests and led to an investigation of the police force by the U.S. Department of Justice. That inquiry led to a January 2017 report that described a broken Police Department in which badly trained police officers have engaged in brutality and misconduct with little fear of consequences. Emanuel voiced support for a consent decree in the final days of the Obama presidency, but the Trump administration has shown no interest in intervening in local police agencies, and the mayor last summer pulled back on his support for reforms overseen by the courts. Emanuel argued he could reform the department through an out-of-court agreement with the Trump administration, but activists and former Justice Department lawyers criticized that idea, voicing doubt that lasting change would come without a judge to impose it. In August 2017, Madigan sued the city to force a consent decree, and Emanuel said he would negotiate. Groups including Black Lives Matter Chicago and the ACLU of Illinois, meanwhile, brought lawsuits seeking to compel changes. The Emanuel administration and Madigan’s office reached a deal in court giving those activist groups a role in creating and enforcing a consent decree. The Chicago Fraternal Order of Police has cast the consent decree as part of a “war on the police” and argued Madigan’s lawsuit is not legal. The union has sought to intervene in the case, but a judge has yet to rule on that. The union’s leaders recently voted to stop cooperating with the Tribune, and President Kevin Graham declined to comment Tuesday. In an emailed statement, Emanuel spokesman Matt McGrath said: “We know Black Lives Matter and the ACLU have an opinion, we know the FOP has an opinion and we encourage every resident of Chicago to provide their feedback as a part of the public comment opportunity.” Madigan spokeswoman Maura Possley said the attorney general’s office is reviewing the feedback and will raise the issues in discussions with the city. The proposed consent decree includes changes to the way officers deal with people suffering from mental health problems, but the activist groups argued Tuesday that the proposal doesn’t go far enough. The groups want certified crisis intervention officers to respond to all calls involving people experiencing mental health issues. The groups also want the city to create a “behavioral health unit” that will allow civilians to intervene in crises and route people with mental health issues away from the justice system. Roxanne Smith of Communities United said police once threw her developmentally disabled son to the ground and handcuffed him while he was suffering a panic attack. Smith fears for his safety, she said. “I’m afraid that a police officer will meet him and think he is resisting or not following orders and the situation will escalate,” she said. |