RSN Fundraising Banner
Steps To Write a Good Composition
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48193"><span class="small">AnnaEverson</span></a>   
Thursday, 10 May 2018 06:32


What should you
know to write a good composition? Actually, quite many things: spelling, grammar and punctuation rules, the ways how to build the structure, express your thoughts, find the right words. In general, you have to be a writer to succeed. Nevertheless, there are lots of excellent compositions written by ordinary students. So, probably they know some secret which helps them to be efficient. In fact, there is no secret, as you just shouldn�t think that composition is a huge problem but kind of a fun or magic. Yes, it is real magic when you make small steps and after that, putting all parts together, you get astonished by the result. Are you ready to start this way? So, here is the first step:

Preparation
Being aware of the assignment is half a way. Usually people are too busy to read the assignment properly. But do you remember the saying: �If I was asked to cut the tree in twelve hours, I would spend six hours sharpening my axe�. As a rule, every teacher has his on recommendations and demands and you should be confident that you have got acquainted with all of them. If you don�t understand or remember something, it is betterto ask additional questions. So, make sure that you know about the topic, length, purpose, style, tone and the necessity of research.


Free writing
Now forget about all rues and recommendations, take a pen and spend ten minutes or more writing on the topic. The punctuation andrequirements are not important. Your task is to make exploration of your opinions and thoughts to write my college application essay and to help them turn into the form of words. Don�t worry if you were warned by the teacher from involving personal opinion, it is not the final result, it is just the way to find the right direction.


Making a diagram
If you have got lots of ideas while the free writing, you have to organize them. You can choose the most attractive for you form. It can be a bubble or a web, anyway, take a big piece of paper or chalkboard and write the topic in the middle. After that write ideas around and phrases that can prove or develop them. Then connect separate parts by the straights lines and you will get a structure, moreover you have a clear vision, which points need to be refined.


Creating an Outline
After getting some significant ideas, arguments and concepts, start forming them. They should be transformed into the sentences, which buildyour paper.


Writing a Debatable Statement First
Your composition should be started with the statement, which will provoke the following arguments and thoughts, but not just prove evident things. Think about the specific and really interesting beginning and you will see the right direction.


Making Changes and Cuts
Don�t worry if your paper is still far from perfection after so many attempts. Now you should start �cleaning it�. After reading it several times, you can make a conclusion, that the work is too long and it includes too much useless information. Be ready to change some words to make the text sound natural and exquisit in some way.
Proofreading
The last step of this absorbing process is proofreading. It would be great, if you revise some rules of punctuation and spelling before, as it will help you to have more competent check. It can be also helpful if someone read your composition aloud. In such a way you will answer the mainquestion, if you have managed to gain your main aim and coped with the task.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Thursday, 10 May 2018 06:33
 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+49 # camus11 2011-08-03 10:04
Spot on--except that i fear the right wing neo-fascist gop'ers (let's face it, this describes the entire party and it is naive to pretend otherwise)have murdered their hostage(s). It is simply too late. Wait until you see who the democrats put on the "super congress" comittee--does anyone seriously doubt the gop'ers on the committee will have no problem maintaining a unified extremist position and oppose any taxes, but that at least one democrat will give in on entitlement "reform" (meaning destruction)and revenues?
 
 
+32 # rmorris 2011-08-03 11:11
I agree with camus11 above. It is going to get a lot worse before it gets better. If you want to see the future of the USA, look at the past of the Soviet Union. The light at the end of the tunnel is that we have tasted the good life and know where we want to go. The only thing standing in our way is a small group of plutocrats. I am told these taste wonderful if stewed long enough and spiced correctly.
 
 
+23 # historywriter 2011-08-03 13:09
That is exactly what I think will happen. I see that committee tying the administration' s hands even more. Why would they come to any "compromise" if they didn't have to before?
 
 
+12 # economicminor 2011-08-03 14:14
During the late 1920's Germany had very high unemployment and high inflation. Hitler ran under the guise of a Christian Democrat. A right wing conservative.

We are a little different in as much as we also have high personal debt to add to the high public debt obligations. Times are not good and not going to get better for a long while. And yes, Obama is a wuss at his best.

The problem with all the anger is that it really does no good. Most people are really responsible for their own contribution to this mess. Few complained while your 401k was increasing in value due to off shoring jobs or decreasing regulations. And most people spent way beyond their means and now want the government to fix in short order what took decades to accomplish.

The inverted debt pyramid is going to collapse. It is inevitable. When it does, it will take most of those with leveraged assets with it. A new order will arise. I just hope and pray that it isn't a Hitler or a Mussolini or a Stalin or Mao or Pol Pot or one of the other outrageous configurations of hate.

Pray for us all as we are going to need all the help we can get.
 
 
+7 # Cliff 2011-08-03 17:03
You are correct. The only solution is to vote the bums out. They are busy gloating now that they have set this deal up where even if we (Democrats) win next year, we will still have to have a split committee and all they have to do is refuse to budge. Sure the military is tied, but now when we save the money from war, we are almost guaranteed to cut spending at home.
 
 
+48 # fredboy 2011-08-03 10:22
Obama's limp prose about new jobs and restoring the economy seem like a distant echo--we've heard it for four years (remember the campaign?).

Time for new Democratic or Independent leadership. And not nut case tea party types. We need a real leader.
 
 
+8 # Merschrod 2011-08-03 16:48
A new candidate would be great - no nut case, just a decent progressive who understands the issues and who will out the "establishment" that Obama brought in.

My guess is that Obama will lose against a middle of the road Republican like Romney b/c 1) the base has lost faith in the system and 2) the independent swing vote will go for a candidate like Romney.

The only chance that Obama has with the present course of action that he holds is if the Rep. party puts up an extreme right-winger, e.g., Ryan or Bachman.
 
 
+23 # Karlus 2011-08-03 10:43
...Great...the Private Contracting States of America!....
 
 
+5 # Saberoff 2011-08-03 12:26
The United Soviet States of America...
 
 
+7 # magnumpo 2011-08-03 13:13
coming to a military near you...
 
 
+43 # DesignCreature 2011-08-03 10:43
Obama has no idea what fighting for something means. I don't think anyone anywhere anymore will believe anything he has to say. He has shown the country and the world he's no leader and hasn't a clue as to how to be one.
 
 
+11 # Mike K 2011-08-03 14:27
Which is exactly why a real Democrat needs to challange and hopefully defeate Obama in 2012. At the very least we need to put real Democrats like ALan Greyson in Congress.
 
 
+1 # AML 2011-08-04 14:06
I still maintain that it would be unwise to gamble UNLESS the Tbaggers break off and run their own candidate. That would even the playing field.
It would also be smart to pay attention to the polls right before the election. If Alan ran,or another progressive, but only got 22% of Dem votes, it would mean bailing on him and backing Obama (hold your nose).
 
 
+3 # Cliff 2011-08-03 17:18
All you have to do is look at the numbers. We let him get out-voted. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If someone better comes along that can get the votes, great, but I am not throwing my vote on someone who can't win. Obama can win. We don't want another Bush. Vote smart.
 
 
+10 # Carolyn 2011-08-03 11:02
Obama has what he wanted. He has dinished what Bush started. He is now the "decider", with no constiion in his way. Our elected representatives and senators -- especially the democratic ones, will go down in history as will our democratic president but not as FDR who saved our country in the same situation, with the Glass-Steagall Act. I can still be passed. It must be passed
 
 
+8 # in deo veritas 2011-08-03 12:09
Great post! Without the Glass-Steagall we are kaput. Unfortunately Obama will never support it or seemingly anything else that would endanger his position with Wall Street.
 
 
+53 # Barry Feldman 2011-08-03 11:05
I'd add that the radical right didn't really capture the American mind (polls indicated that 80% of the public preferred the Democrats' position) as much as it captured the Republican Party, which votes in lockstep with the tea party. It's the entire Republican Party that must be blamed for the ransom of the entire nation.
 
 
+21 # mjc 2011-08-03 11:07
Our economic policy has depended on consumer spending through many presidents and in the 1990s that seemed to be the way to go. But this depression is way too big to expect consumers, who have just as many reasons not to spend as the corporate interests, to pick up the slack. There is not way now to tap the wealthy 1% to 2% of our nation and as Reich points out there is no way to even approach FDR's plans to put the federal money to work on public programs. We are truly screwed. The super Congress will be dominated by the most conservative, whether Republican or Democrat. Guys like Ryan, Kyl, Mitch McConnell, god-forbid Bachmann don't do well "discussing" alternatives. They have an agenda that is as close to the "holy grail" as any ever to come before our Congress.
 
 
+13 # in deo veritas 2011-08-03 12:16
Actually their agenda is a carbon copy of Mussolini's corporate fascism with the worst aspects of Nazism added to spice it up. Anyone who is a true American regardless of religious affiliatiojn, if any, must realize that they are the nation's mortal enemy. Their only god ius money and therefore the enemy of real Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc. Their attempt to wrap themselves in the guise of Christianity is simply to disguise their real atheism. They use their pro-life and anti-gay rhetoric simply to distract us from the REAL issues. As far as "pro-life" why should they be trusted to care about the unborn-they have to concern for those already born or those who will be sacrificed to their greed either through starvation or lack of medical care. The rest are fit only for slave labor jobs that haven't been outsourced to the third world already.
 
 
+3 # maveet 2011-08-03 18:43
Quoting in deo veritas:
...they have to concern for those already born....

Friendly, appreciative correction: they have ZERO concern....
 
 
+27 # Barry Feldman 2011-08-03 11:15
I'd also note that it is the media that has subtly begun referring to believers in the immensely popular Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security programs as "The (radical) Left."
 
 
+15 # in deo veritas 2011-08-03 12:19
Surprise surprise! Look who controls the media!They have gotten away with lying for decades,whether about Vietnam, the JFK assassination,e tc.etc. And we have been stupid enough to fall for it. The rags we have now are no better than Der Sturmer, the Volkischer Beobachter, and others published by Goebbels, et al.
 
 
+25 # Realist 2011-08-03 11:33
He could declare a victory and bring our troops home from Afghanistan. Release them, and let them go look for jobs that don't exist. Or keep them in the military, building roads and bridges.
 
 
+11 # BradFromSalem 2011-08-03 12:05
Better yet.

Declare victory in Afganistan. Bring the troops home. Take the entire cost of the war and split it down the middle. 1/2 to pay towards the imaginary deficit, 1/2 to pay for infrastructure projects in the US. Job priorities are first veterans of the Afghan fiasco and second the long term unemployed.

Can the tea baggers complain about a 1:1 new spending to deficit reduction and jobs for the soldiers and those that need it most?
 
 
+7 # Cliff 2011-08-03 17:25
Great idea, but the tea-baggers already got a lock on spending cuts as the military comes home. That is the deal. I feel very bad for those soldiers. They are coming home to a world of shit.
 
 
+1 # BradFromSalem 2011-08-04 07:22
Cliff,

You are right, I forgot about that detail.

Do you also feel like you have just been invited into the TARDIS, only to discover its just a box?
 
 
+8 # in deo veritas 2011-08-03 12:20
Look how many projects in this country were completed by the Army Corps of Engineers! Great idea!
 
 
+9 # joan 2011-08-03 14:18
Realist,

President Obama could follow the plan of former President Eisenhower who engaged the returning veterans in building a superb highway system plus rebuilding the infratructure throughout the country.
 
 
+15 # jstick 2011-08-03 11:37
"no new help for distressed homeowners"

Yes, there will be, can be, if the banks are forced by the 50 state attorney's general to cut mortgage balances down to current market levels. The big banks got us into this underwater mortgage mess -- they can damn well pay to get us out of it! No taxpayer bailout needed.
 
 
+8 # in deo veritas 2011-08-03 12:22
Indeed you are right on! It makes me sick to see how many vultures on the web are peddling foreclosure information so they can profit from the misfortune of others. Anyone taking advantage of this information is no better than they are.
 
 
+12 # BradFromSalem 2011-08-03 12:30
We should have known right away that Obama was not going to be a President that channels the anger and dissatisfaction of the citizenry into actual solutions that are just.

He never took on the banks for more than a day, and even then it was tame.

The bailout was needed. We still have not addressed the real issue. And guess what? Its not making sure that banks are allowed to create ways to lend money in complicated schemes that give them better odds than Las Vegas could ever hope for. The real issue is that they are allowed to operate as unregulated monopolies.

p.s. Obama, the Congress is on recess! Name a head of the Consumer Protection Board, NOW!
 
 
-23 # Martintfre 2011-08-03 14:29
Liberal .. do not call yourself a Libertarian if you think that the government should create a consumer protection board -- call yourself a socialist or some other collectivist who believes in big brother government.
 
 
+3 # BradFromSalem 2011-08-05 06:12
Martinfre,

I am a Libertarian. I am not Right Wing, I am not Conservative.

Libertarian thought has been hijacked by persons that believe Liberty is equivalent to Laissez Faire economics. I reject that notion.

I do subscribe to the basic Libertarian thinking. Which is; we create governments to protect our physical well being, promote the our economic security, and enhance the lives of all that choose to live under such a government.

A Consumer Protection agency or any other government agency that serves to protect me from the excesses of Laissez Faire economics is consistent with Libertarianism. That board protects my economic interests just as an army protects me from invasion.
 
 
+4 # Martintfre 2011-08-03 12:04
The tax payers present and future are being held hostage to pandering politicians plundering our pockets for their personal promotion.
 
 
+8 # davidhp 2011-08-03 12:05
There was a time before the corporate oligarchy exported most of our manufacturing and heavy industrial jobs, that our economic recovery was not solely tied to consumer spending in the U.S. As a child of the Rust Belt during the days it was booming in economic might through the beginning of its decline, America was sold out long ago by these neo fascist corporate robber barons when they exported our industry to the third world where workers could be more easily controlled and the environment was not protected.

This was the beginning of the end of the decline of the American working class into serf status at the hands of ruling coporate elite.

The two party system has failed the working class, yet many still put their hope into the hands of the democrats who are also guility of collaboration with the neo fascists in moving America to a have and have not economic status.

What is going to take the majority of Americans to wake up to the political reality that currently there is no political party on our side, we must fight to take back what the robber barons have stolen.
 
 
+6 # JaneAnneJ 2011-08-03 12:07
It's time to pass H.R. 402 - The National Infrastructure Development Bank Act. Since March 23, it has been in the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, chaired by Dr. Ron Paul. Let's ask Dr. Paul to co-sponsor the bill to make it bipartisan. So far it has only been co-sponsored by 55 Democrats. Ask your Rep to co-sponsor it. Call Dr. Paul and ask him to co-sponsor it. 202-225-2831 Let's get our American Democracy Show on the road!
 
 
+1 # joyc 2011-08-03 12:07
Just more purty words..
 
 
+9 # giraffee2012 2011-08-03 12:25
The Rep from KY (the Turtle) and Boehner + Eric Cantor have too much clout bc they are funded by the Koch brothers + other pig corporations who want to break democracy (See Walker in WI) ---

Look at the FAA situation! This new super-committee will fail (says the Turtle and Boner) -- and then the trigger kicks in which is down with the big 3 +++ education, head start, etc. and no tax reform.

Supreme Court must repeal the 2010 UNCONSTITUTIONA L decision of personhood to corporations to run negative ads and FUND their cronies in Congress. Supremes: "WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?"

Register and get mail-in ballots NOW and help anyone who is not in the know - to do the same. Vote these crooks OUT in 2012.
 
 
+8 # jerryball 2011-08-03 15:18
The Supremes on the right are the guilty ones for this soul-selling of personhood. They are the Devil personified. They are the Faust that could.
 
 
+6 # Susan W 2011-08-03 12:43
So now he trots out his tired rhetoric about creating jobs, winning the future etc. Am I the only one sick to death of this oratorical bull### which means nothing and sounds the same time after time.

I thought he just told us the most important thing to do was to control spending and now he is talking about increasing spending. Perhaps he ought to review his speeches before he makes a bigger ass of himself.
 
 
+11 # VSweet 2011-08-03 12:56
I hate to say it but I shall, what is all these elected officials drinking in their coffee?

Do they think the poor, working class and senior citizens cannot reason, cannot hear, cannot see what everyone in Washington DC is doing to the American people?

What JOBS?? The Democrats kissed the Republicans and T Party butts just to signed off on the nation's debt and in the Midnight hour..just for a temporary deal with these parties and cuts down the road.

Frankly, I am disgusted with all the parties, mostly the ones I supported.
There are a few dedicated key legislative people, so I have not lost all my confidence just yet.
 
 
+6 # diane olson 2011-08-03 13:45
Is he naive and he really believes this stuff he says or is he totally cynical and he thinks enough of us will drink the Kool Ade to get him re-elected? I'm cynical myself and I'm beginning to believe that he is possibly working for someone other than the American people.
 
 
+5 # Tee 2011-08-03 14:49
What is so hard to understand that the ones who stimulate the economy are the middle and working Americans who buy consumer items, pay mortgages, rent, utilities, and taxes.

The rich invest, shelter their money, avoid taxes, accumulate wealth and hoard wealth.

This stupid exercise of the debt ceiling just witnessed is to take more money out of the hand of those who spend (middle and working class), and put the money into the hands of those who will essentially hoard it.

I worked to get Obama elected and I voted for Obama. The reason I voted for him was because Clinton and McCain I thought would be disasters and the corporate media wasn't going to let anyone else win.

This president doesn't work for the American people. He answers to Goldman Sach, big pharma, Hollywood, AIPAC, Big oil, and all the other interest groups he lied and said would have not influence on his administration. Obama should either be impeached or hung for treason.
 
 
+1 # bobby t. 2011-08-03 15:01
the buddha said that life was full of suffering and he was right. his answer: to let go. time to let go of all these small defeats and stop the negative rhetoric. there is also yin yang. good things happen from bad events. the only defeat would be the normal splintering of the democratic party and moderate republicans. the undecided vote. no president is the saviour, and obama certainly has disappointed me among many of you. but, he did put two great judges in the supreme court, and he needs to be there in the next six years so that he can put some more in to battle the scalia and thomas sellouts. it is critical that he finish the job. the ticket will be: obama/ clinton. i believe that was the deal he made back when he was running against her. remember her quick turnaround?
 
 
+7 # fhunter 2011-08-03 15:15
If Obama announced on January 21, 2009 that he is going to increase taxes on the rich, and put every cent in the "Infrastructure Bank" and spent every cent on a WPA type of rebuilding, he would have total support from the people. Unfortunately and tragically he did not do it, did not know what, how, when.
 
 
0 # Cliff 2011-08-03 17:33
Obama cannot do it alone.
 
 
0 # jerryball 2011-08-03 15:15
He sold out more than the American economy, he sold the soul of America to the Devils. The Faust Tale all over again. I'm so sorry I didn't push for Hillary. I nominate HILLARY IN 2012.
 
 
+5 # jerryball 2011-08-03 15:20
STRIKE! Take to the streets. Scream foul, anything, but Strike!
 
 
+6 # MainStreetMentor 2011-08-03 17:28
 
 
+3 # Isar 2011-08-03 18:10
There was a wonderful Musical written by Kander and Ebb back in the '60's about the rise of Nazi power in Germany, entitled "Cabaret." The MC sings "Money Makes the World Go Around".....and as the story unfolds, we are aware that the population of Berlin was naive and didn't realize how dangerous and destructive these silly Brown Shirts were...."This too shall pass...It is only politics," say Herr Schultz, a Jew who proclaims, "I am GERMAN first and foremost." The Nazi regime started small--way back in the 1920's....and it was driven by simplistic ideology and attracted people who were uneducated and easily persuaded to think that "the problem" could be easily solved with an easy final solution. Are these Bush-Obama years the equivalent of the 1920's....or have we already moved into the fear of the 1930's in Germany? Perhaps this too is extreme thinking, but why am I so frightened of the strangle hold that some people have on our President and government?
 
 
+2 # David Driesen 2011-08-03 19:27
I agree with all of this except for tax cuts for the middle class. I don't think that's responsible. We need an increase in taxes, certainly for the rich, and possibly for the middle class as well.
Obama should have demanded a clean bill raising the debt ceiling and campaigned in the states of any Republican who resisted for letters demanding this. The net result would have been an increased debt ceiling without an austerity program, probably before his deadline and certainly a few days after.
 
 
+4 # Rucy 2011-08-04 06:57
This waste-of-time, called the "Super Committee" - is really an "Economic Planning Committee" Soviet-style.

Where does it say in the Constitution that our 2 Houses of Representatives can decide to make a 3rd entity, of unelected people who cannot be lobbied?

What about drafting Al Gore?

So sad about Obama.... He had everything when he started,.... He could have been another Abe Lincoln, a JFK, a Thomas Jefferson type - and instead, he looks like Herbert Hoover before the big D.
 
 
+1 # MiddleGroundFallacy 2011-08-08 12:45
Does anyone here remember back when Americans were supposed to be smart?