RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

Keep the Kashmir Issue in Limelight

Print
Written by Sajjad Shaukat   
Friday, 03 October 2014 23:35
One the one side, Indian new government led by the fundamentalist party BJP’s leader and Prime Minister Narindra Modi is trying to divert attention of international community from the Kashmir dispute by various sinister steps, on the other, Kashmiri leaders and Pakistan have been keeping this issue in limelight.

In this regard, terming the support and advocacy of the right to self determination of the people of Jammu and Kashmi (J&K), as historic commitment and duty for Pakistan, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, while addressing 69th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), stressed for settlement of the Kashmir issue, and offered Pakistan’s readiness to endeavour for the same through negotiations. He also reminded the international community of its pledge and responsibility for holding “plebiscite” in the Indian-held Kashmir, and resolves the issue in accordance with UN Charter. The speech generated appreciations from the political circles of Pakistan and Kashmir as well. It is also acknowledged that the speech is true reflection of sentiments of the people of Pakistan, who believe that peace and prosperity in south Asia is inter- linked with solution of core dispute of Kashmir between Pakistan and India.

Pakistan’s attempt to sensitize the international community on the unresolved state of Kashmir issue at the annual session of the UNGA seems to have irked Indian political circles in general and diplomatic and journalist communities in particular. Under the growing frustration, a notoriously controversial journalist affiliated with the Indian NDTV namely Barkha Dutt engaged Pakistan’s prime minister’s special advisor on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz, and managed to create a controversy through aggressive posture to make him concede that Pakistani High Commissioner Abdul Basit’s meeting with the Kashmiri leadership in New Delhi was ill-timed and affected Secretary level engagements. Majority of Pakistani media also covered the remarks of Sartaj Aziz in the similar fashion projected by the NDTV. And, Barkha Dutt, while trying to create misunderstanding to discredit Pakistan, has also hinted that Kashmir issue is “Achilles heels” of the Indian diplomacy. No doubt, Barkha-Aziz episode has been projected by the Indian media as admittance on the part of Pakistani official that due to the meeting with Kashmir leader by High Commissioner in Delhi, India was justified to cancel Secretary level talks with Pakistan. An impression is also given that Islamabad was not serious about engagements with New Delhi.

In this context, by using the pretext of meeting between Pakistan’s High Commissioner and the Hurriyat leaders of Kashmir, Indian Prime Minister Narindra Modi called off peace talks, scheduled to be held in Islamabad on August 25, 2014 between foreign secretaries of India and Pakistan.

However, the created controversy on the part of Indian media is a deliberate attempt to discredit Pakistani leadership’s sincere efforts to remind the international community of their responsibilities on resolution of Kashmir issue. Moreover, Indian media created an impression that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif by highlighting Kashmir issue made an effort to improve relations with Military establishment in the backdrop of the protesters of the sit-ins led by PTI and PAT. Indian Media also generated attached controversies of gray relations between political and military echelons of Pakistan. It may be recalled that on the pretext of boiling political situation, a segment of Pakistani media had suggested the prime minister to skip attending the UN General Assembly’s session.

It is notable that the extremist party BJP led by the Indian Prime Minister Modi is implementing anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan agenda. In this context, BJP leader Dr. Subramaniam Swamy, a staunch promoter of Hindutva (Hindu nationalism) stated on July 12, this year that India needed only two years to defeat Pakistan militarily, and the only solution of Kashmir was war, as “there is no peaceful, democratic solution.

Hence, the decision to terminate the secretary level parleys came as a political maneuvering by Narindra Modi’s regime, showing signs of Indian arrogance and intransigence, driven by emotional reaction, on which BJP top leadership capitalized to win the elections 2014. Besides, India recently intensified unprovoked firing at the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir including Working Boundary in Sialkot and other sectors to terrorize Pakistan, without caring the fact that the latter is also a nuclear power.

Nevertheless, India has never been sincere in engaging in meaningful peace process with Pakistan. Every Indian government due to international pressure found it easy to make false pledges that it was willing to engage in peace process to resolve all issues including Kashmir dispute with Islamabad. But, New Delhi earnestly endeavored to find excuses and pretexts to cancel peace talks, while shifting the blame to Pakistan. For example, in 2002, under the pretension of terrorist attack on the Indian parliament, India postponed the dialogue process. Again, in 2008, India cancelled the ‘composite dialogue’ on the pretext of Mumbai terror attacks.

It is mentionable that on May 27, 2014 Prime Minister Modi’s meeting with Prime Minister Sharif who went to New Delhi to participate in the oath-taking ceremony proved faultless, because Modi raised baseless issues of terrorism as pre-conditions to advance the Pak-Indian dialogue to resolve various issues including the core dispute of Kashmir. He said that slow pace of trial against the terrorists regarding the Mumbai 26/11 terror case, being held in Pakistan—Islamabad should take action against the culprits, and should stop cross-border terrorism in India.

While showing unrealistic approach, and talking in the terms of Hindu religious extremism, Indian new prime minister ignored the fact that on July 19, 2013 the Indian former home ministry and ex-investigating officer Satish Verma disclosed that terror-attacks in Mumbai in November 26, 2008 and assault on Indian Parliament in January 12, 2001 were carried out by the Indian government to strengthen anti-terrorism laws.

Similarly, Modi also neglected the statement of Indian ex-Army Chief Gen. VK Singh openly confessed in September 2013 that special intelligence unit like Technical Services Division were raised by him to operate inside Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan and Azad Kashmir to conduct terrorism and to bribe the politicians in the Indian-Occupied Kashmir.

In fact, it is a set practice of India to engage with Kashmiri leadership prior to any high level meeting with Pakistan. Kashmiri leaders are the central representatives about whom New Delhi and Islamabad will proceed to decide their fate through peace parleys. Therefore, they cannot be ignored as vital stakeholders. In this regard, Indian interpretations of stakeholders in the light of Simla Agreement (By ignoring the Kashmiri leaders) are absolutely mischievous.

It is of particular attention that soon after assuming power, Modi government, hurriedly decided to forcibly annex and integrate disputed territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, uncovering its intentions to wrap up the article 370 of the Indian constitution which ensures a special status to J&K. The aim behind is to fortify measures and continue its illegal occupation in the J&K. Therefore, United Nations Military Observer Group India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) in New Delhi was asked to vacate official accommodation, claiming that its role had become irrelevant, and indicating its intention to violate UN Security Council’s resolutions on Kashmir dispute, and to further commit human rights violations in the India-controlled Kashmir.

So, Indian extremist rulers’ efforts to abrogate article 370 in the Indian occupied Kashmir indicates that BJP led Modi government is proceeding with a plan to promote Hindutva philosophy and annex Kashmir as part of Indian union.

Nonetheless, it is Pakistan’s high officials and media must point out that New Delhi is willfully blaming Pakistan for cancellation of Secretary level talks. Indian hypocrisy is quite evident that on the pretext of meeting with Kashmiri leaders, they cancelled the engagements with Pakistan.

Maximum projection is required to be extended especially through print, electronic and social media to highlight that India played a mischievous role (Various forms of state terrorism) in the Indian-controlled Kashmir from purported accession of Kashmiri Maharaja to neutralization of Sheikh Abdullah by Nehru, followed by increasing Army deployment there, and atrocities committed against men, women and children of an independence loving Kashmiri nation.

Indian mischievous activities in the Indian-held Kashmir are also narrated and confirmed by an ex-RAW official R K Yadu in his book “Mission RAW.”

No doubt, Pakistan un-dauntingly supports self-determination struggle of Kashmiri people, and its political, military and public is in complete harmony in this respect, yet its top officials and media including the Kashmiri leaders must keep the Kashmir issue in limelight by showing to the internal community that being the usurper and occupying state, India is not sincere to engage in peaceful dialogue to resolve this issue with Pakistan.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN