RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

The Meaning of American Citizenship

Print
Written by John Turner   
Wednesday, 12 January 2011 03:45


A note I read this morning about whether the Chinese military is under civilian control set off a train of thought which may be worth sharing.

I know little about internal conditions in China, so I have scant basis for an opinion about the status of the military in that society. Presumably, as a citizen of the United States, I should feel more sure about the status of the military here. The truth is, though, I don’t know whether the president and his advisors can really control the military. We tend to presume that in this country civilian control of the military is complete. But is it?

I think it’s fairly clear that civilian leaders are often intimidated by high-ranking military officers. It’s also clear the latter do what they can to promote that intimidation. I’m not sure if the kind of fearfulness the military inspire constitutes independence. But it doubtless does promote a kind of influence that’s unknown to the constitution, and rarely discussed in our political discourse.

That’s my introduction. From it you would be justified in thinking this essay is to be mainly about the danger of military dominance. But actually I have something else in mind, a something else which touches on the sovereignty of the military but which stretches out far beyond it.

My question here is whether my function as a citizen has anything to do -- however minor -- with how the military, or any other part of the American power structure, behaves. I once thought that citizenship involved participation. I no longer have that feeling. The tiny portion of participating I might have exercised by voting is overwhelmed by propaganda and bought votes. Almost no officials with any sort of power, whether generals, or members of the House, or senators, or people in the White House give a damn what persons like me think. Why not? Because they know I’m in such a tiny minority -- that is the minority of people who try keep up with what’s going on in government -- that I’m completely insignificant. And I guess they’re right.

I have been transformed -- in my own mind -- from a participant in American performance to an observer of it. I’m not going to claim that sends me into despair. Watching the clownish behavior of politicians is fun. Writing to my friends about it is slightly satisfying. Knowing more than most people and being able to predict what’s going to happen gratifies the ego. Being out of action and on the sidelines is relaxing to some degree. But none of this is citizenship in the traditional notion of that term. Citizenship, as far as I can tell, has gone away in America. Maybe that was inevitable.

The government of the United States regularly does things that nauseate me. I’m not talking about things that just cause me to disagree. I expect to disagree with much of what any government does and I’ve accepted that as the way of the world. No, I am talking about things that strike me as insanely filthy.

The government of the United States recently induced a foreign country to seize an American citizen and torture him. And why? Because he had traveled to places that aroused the suspicion of some official or other.

The government of the United States throws people into cages, keeps them there for years, giving them no opportunity to plead their case in any way.

The government of the United States spies on citizens without obtaining warrants and claims the right to arrest and hold them without bringing any charges against them.

The government of the United States regularly bows down to a lobby of gun freaks.

The government of the United States spends billions of dollars every year to conduct wars that can’t be shown to accomplish anything other than destroying property, killing people, and making many more people miserable.

The government of the United States favors persons of vast wealth more than it does anyone else and regularly provides them with subsidies, seized from people of modest means, which make the rich even richer and more powerful.

This is just a beginning list. I could make a whole book of them. There are already whole books of them, which are read by very few.

I am not arguing that in doing these things the U.S. government is worse than all other governments. Truth is, probably, that it’s worse than some and not as bad as others. My point here is that my relationship with the vile behavior of the United States is exactly the same as it with nasty behavior of any other government. I have no more influence over the abusive acts of the United States government than I do over the transgressions of China, or Iran, or North Korea, or Russia. That condition is not consistent with any functional definition of citizenship.

I would be pleased if some American official were to step forward and prove me wrong. But I don’t think that’s going to happen. So, here I am, on the sidelines, which is doubtless where I’ll stay, watching something to which I feel less and less connected. I suppose you could say it’s like joining the history of the human race.
 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
0 # RICHARDKANEpa 2011-01-12 14:27
Why does the Government bow down to gun freaks? I wish some reader would have an answer. As you pointed out the Constitution didn't get in the way of torture. Thank for mentioning other countries do wrong as well. Usually this is left out of the points you make.

If we appreciate this blog allowing ordinary folk to post, why do we only comment on what the big shots say.
 
 
0 # John Turner 2011-01-13 10:30
Richard,

Thanks for responding. I confess I felt a bit queasy about this posting. I don't want to be thought of as the kind of extremist who finds the U.S. government the source of all misbehavior in the world. On the other hand, I think our government has done some harmful things over the past decade. My main point was that the national security structure has got so far beyond any ordinary person's influence that it's impossible for me to feel any citizen-like connection to it. I sensed that, perhaps, others were feeling that way, and would take some comfort from seeing the alienation expressed.
 
 
0 # lkach 2011-01-17 05:52
The gun lobby has created an issue that inspires many people to vote on that one single issue, even though on every other issue the candidate they choose consistently advances policies contrary to the interests of those single issue voters. As a consequence, the government "bows down" to these voters. It does not hurt that there are also profits to be made so that this minority of voters have the support of well paid lobbyists, paid advertising, and cmapign contributions.

If there is any single thread to all the issues where the government is going in the wrong direction it is the latter issue of money in politics - paying politicians to promote policies that earn profits for those who pap. Spying on americans, wars, and denial of civil liberties all serve the ultimate purpose of making "the rich even richer and more powerful." After the Citizens United case there can be no doubt that the rich are going to keep getting a larger share of the national income and wealth.

What you can do to change this is to give up on Democrats, and begin to vote as a single issue voter on the issue of money in politics. This will take unity, focus and coordination of those who wish to reempower themselves.

http://moneyouttapolitics.org/
 
 
0 # OlyMax 2011-01-17 10:42
What happened to "by the people, for the people"? It seems "the people" have been disenfranchised by their own government. Or do I mean the "corporations"? Or is that more accurately called the "military-indus trial complex"? As far as I can tell, the reason we can't control our own government is because the entity in charge has the guns, so to speak. Thanks Mr. Turner for giving voice to these sentiments. Here's my solution. If voting no longer works because the citizenry has been disempowered and have been made to feel powerless, then perhaps voting should be a requirement of citizenship. As they have been doing in Australia, those who do not exercise their citizenship by voting are fined. Money seems to be the only voice with volume these days.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN