RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

O'Reilly the Islamophobe

Print
Written by Richard Butrick   
Tuesday, 17 June 2014 23:47



O’Reilly has taken a lot of flack for claiming the senior Bergdahl looked like a Muslim. The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart got in the act with the clever quip[1] that he didn‘t want “to complicate your hatred of facial hair there, friend, but my guess is if you gave Bob Bergdahl a bandanna and a duck, you’d like him just-f***ing-fine.” In general, there was little hesitation on the part of commentators, left and right, to drape O’Reilly with the mantle of Islamophobia.

However, the “looked like a Muslim” remark cannot, per se, be the issue. After all, on the commentator’s own account, what is the matter with looking like a Muslim? To claim that there is something insidious about looking like a Muslim would itself be Islamophobic. In order for O’Reilly’s remark to be deemed offensive it must be taken as implying what? That there may be more to the Bergdahl story than a desperate father trying to leverage his son’s release - that Bergdahl may be in sympathy with the Taliban or even be of the opinion that his son’s captors had justification considering American actions in Afghanistan? Fine. Take that up. But railing against O’Reilly just for daring to claim someone looks like a Muslim implies that there is something inherently wrong with being a Muslim - which is itself Islamophobic. O’Reilly’s critics have been hoisted by their own canard.

Moreover, the Islamophobe crutch is getting to be a bit pathetic. It has become a dodge for countering any criticism of practices done in the name of Islam when no such counter can be mustered. Every jihadist group from Boko Haram to ISIL claims justification for their murders and atrocities under the banner of Islam. If criticizing blowing up people in weddings, funerals and marketplaces in the name of Islam is Islamophobic then so be it. If criticizing the beheading, butchering and maiming people for being of the wrong religion - all in the name of Islam - is Islamophobic then the term is an asinine accusation.

As Robert Spencer writes[2]in Jihad Watch, “ … “Islamophobia” is essentially a propaganda tool designed to shut down discussion and thought rather than foster either one … “. It is an attempt to shut down honest discussion rather than foster it.

Bergdahl’s deferential affirmation that Allah is most gracious and merciful? There is more to that than meets the eye? “Shut up,” she explained.

[1] http://www.businessinsider.com/jon-stewart-mocks-fox-news-for-hatred-of-facial-hair-2014-6
[2] http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/01/haroon-moghul-tries-and-fails-to-invest-the-concept-of-islamophobia-with-some-genuine-substance





e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN