Reefer Madness in Vermont
Written by William Boardman
Thursday, 09 August 2012 08:14
MARIJUANA ISSUE RAISED BY VERMONT REPUBLICAN RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR
In a fundraising email sent out on Wednesday, Aug. 8, the Republican candidate for Governor of Vermont claimed that “Governor [Peter] Shumlin is making decriminalization of marijuana one of his top priorities,” although Republican Randy Brock doesn’t cite any source for that assertion.
Shumlin has long supported moving toward decriminalization of marijuana in Vermont, but there little evidence it’s one of his “top priorities,” which include providing Vermonters with universal health care, developing more affordable housing, and taking care of the growing numbers of homeless people. http://nlihc.org/article/vermont-advocates-celebrate-multiple-wins-legislative-session
Referring to a report in the Burlington Free Press, Brock’s email wrongly claims “that Governor Shumlin took the highly unusual step of personally calling the head of a marijuana legalization organization and volunteering to be their national spokesman … in exchange for a max-out contribution of $6,000, of course (8/6/12).” As it turns out, NORML is giving Shumlin $2,000.
What Terri Hallenbeck wrote, with some ambiguity, on her August 7 Free Press blog was: “Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the pro-marijuana group NORML, doesn’t get many calls like this. Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin rang him up last week, he said, and told him he’d like to be a national spokesman for the marijuana reform movement.”
Nowhere does Hallenbeck suggest that Shumlin wasn’t to be a spokesman for NORML, as Brock asserts, nor does she confirm Brock’s claim of a quid pro quo between Shumlin and NORML.
http://blogs.burlingtonfreepress.com/politics/2012/08/07/shumlin-makes-new-best-friend-over-marijuana-decriminalization/
The blog post was inspired by the NORML executive director’s own August 3 report on the NORML blog of a recent phone call with Shumlin. NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, was founded in 1970 “to move public opinion sufficiently to achieve the repeal of marijuana prohibition so that the responsible use of cannabis by adults is no longer subject to penalty.” In 2010, when Shumlin first ran for governor, NORML contributed $1,000 to his campaign.
What NORML’s St. Pierre wrote had nothing to do with Shumlin being a spokesman for NORML, but referred gratefully to Shumlin’s being a spokesman for the same cause. This is pretty much what Shumlin has been doing for years.
When Brock voted as a state senator against a medical marijuana bill in 2010, he presumably knew his then fellow-senator Shumlin favored the bill. And he’s presumably also aware that in April 2012, Governor Shumlin signed a medical marijuana bill into Vermont law. http://governor.vermont.gov/search/node/marijuana
Brock’s email is wrong, but it’s not clear whether he was misled by Hallenbeck’s ambiguous report, or whether his campaign did its due diligence and then just went ahead and lied.
NORML is an interest group no different in form from any interest group supporting Brock or any other candidate. In response to Shumlin’s call expressing support for NORML’s interest, the executive director acted normally, explaining to his readers first how they could contribute to NORMALPAC or, as an alternative, how they could contribute to the Shumlin campaign directly. http://blog.norml.org/2012/08/03/when-a-governor-calls-and-asks-for-support-to-reform-marijuana-laws/
According to Hallenbeck, Brock’s reaction on August 6 to news of the NORML-Shumlin connection was to say: “I’m astounded that we have a governor who is seeking money as a result of supporting decriminalization of a drug the possession of which is against federal law.”
She does not say why Senator Brock seems to think it’s wrong to follow the normal legislative process to seek reform in the case of marijuana. She did say that, if he became governor, Brock promised to veto any legislation that decriminalized marijuana.
Shumlin has promised to seek legislation that decriminalizes small amounts of marijuana, but he has not yet taken a stand on a specific amount.
In his NORML blog, St. Pierre concluded on a hopeful note from his perspective: “cannabis law reformers have worked hard and long to arrive at these days where, according to most recent Gallup polling, legalization is more popular than prohibition–let’s help finish this process sooner than later by helping to elect the political allies we need to replace the failed and expensive public policy of Cannabis Prohibition with logical alternatives.”
http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/17/for-the-first-time-gallup-poll-shows-majority-support-for-marijuana-legalization-nationwide/
By William Boardman This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
In a fundraising email sent out on Wednesday, Aug. 8, the Republican candidate for Governor of Vermont claimed that “Governor [Peter] Shumlin is making decriminalization of marijuana one of his top priorities,” although Republican Randy Brock doesn’t cite any source for that assertion.
Shumlin has long supported moving toward decriminalization of marijuana in Vermont, but there little evidence it’s one of his “top priorities,” which include providing Vermonters with universal health care, developing more affordable housing, and taking care of the growing numbers of homeless people. http://nlihc.org/article/vermont-advocates-celebrate-multiple-wins-legislative-session
Referring to a report in the Burlington Free Press, Brock’s email wrongly claims “that Governor Shumlin took the highly unusual step of personally calling the head of a marijuana legalization organization and volunteering to be their national spokesman … in exchange for a max-out contribution of $6,000, of course (8/6/12).” As it turns out, NORML is giving Shumlin $2,000.
What Terri Hallenbeck wrote, with some ambiguity, on her August 7 Free Press blog was: “Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the pro-marijuana group NORML, doesn’t get many calls like this. Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin rang him up last week, he said, and told him he’d like to be a national spokesman for the marijuana reform movement.”
Nowhere does Hallenbeck suggest that Shumlin wasn’t to be a spokesman for NORML, as Brock asserts, nor does she confirm Brock’s claim of a quid pro quo between Shumlin and NORML.
http://blogs.burlingtonfreepress.com/politics/2012/08/07/shumlin-makes-new-best-friend-over-marijuana-decriminalization/
The blog post was inspired by the NORML executive director’s own August 3 report on the NORML blog of a recent phone call with Shumlin. NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, was founded in 1970 “to move public opinion sufficiently to achieve the repeal of marijuana prohibition so that the responsible use of cannabis by adults is no longer subject to penalty.” In 2010, when Shumlin first ran for governor, NORML contributed $1,000 to his campaign.
What NORML’s St. Pierre wrote had nothing to do with Shumlin being a spokesman for NORML, but referred gratefully to Shumlin’s being a spokesman for the same cause. This is pretty much what Shumlin has been doing for years.
When Brock voted as a state senator against a medical marijuana bill in 2010, he presumably knew his then fellow-senator Shumlin favored the bill. And he’s presumably also aware that in April 2012, Governor Shumlin signed a medical marijuana bill into Vermont law. http://governor.vermont.gov/search/node/marijuana
Brock’s email is wrong, but it’s not clear whether he was misled by Hallenbeck’s ambiguous report, or whether his campaign did its due diligence and then just went ahead and lied.
NORML is an interest group no different in form from any interest group supporting Brock or any other candidate. In response to Shumlin’s call expressing support for NORML’s interest, the executive director acted normally, explaining to his readers first how they could contribute to NORMALPAC or, as an alternative, how they could contribute to the Shumlin campaign directly. http://blog.norml.org/2012/08/03/when-a-governor-calls-and-asks-for-support-to-reform-marijuana-laws/
According to Hallenbeck, Brock’s reaction on August 6 to news of the NORML-Shumlin connection was to say: “I’m astounded that we have a governor who is seeking money as a result of supporting decriminalization of a drug the possession of which is against federal law.”
She does not say why Senator Brock seems to think it’s wrong to follow the normal legislative process to seek reform in the case of marijuana. She did say that, if he became governor, Brock promised to veto any legislation that decriminalized marijuana.
Shumlin has promised to seek legislation that decriminalizes small amounts of marijuana, but he has not yet taken a stand on a specific amount.
In his NORML blog, St. Pierre concluded on a hopeful note from his perspective: “cannabis law reformers have worked hard and long to arrive at these days where, according to most recent Gallup polling, legalization is more popular than prohibition–let’s help finish this process sooner than later by helping to elect the political allies we need to replace the failed and expensive public policy of Cannabis Prohibition with logical alternatives.”
http://blog.norml.org/2011/10/17/for-the-first-time-gallup-poll-shows-majority-support-for-marijuana-legalization-nationwide/
By William Boardman This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 2062
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
The history of federal finances and the economy is a superior indicator of reality than the edicts of our politicians in Washington and elsewhere. History since World War II belies the concept that Tuesday, 18 June 2013 |
|
Legal abortions in the US number about 1.2 million per year and that represents a decline and a leveling off at that number. The number one reason women give for an abortion is that a child would Tuesday, 18 June 2013 |
|
Gun rights are guaranteed by the Second Amendment while gun wrongs are guaranteed by the NRA. 30,000+ Americans die every year while far fewer die annually by acts of terrorism and our wars against Monday, 17 June 2013 |
|
Though the USA loudly condemns hacking or cyber war, if you like, the USA is by far the number one computer hacker in our world today. The problem is that the USA doesn't want this known so much of Monday, 17 June 2013 |
|
Perhaps the most important event of this week is what did not happen. US Secretary of State John Kerry did not land at Ben Gurion Airport, and did not go by helicopter back and forth between Saturday, 15 June 2013 |
|
Sometimes, the simplest solutions are the best ones. Unfortunately, though, Canada’s extreme concentration of corporate power often precludes the solutions from ever seeing the light of day.The Friday, 14 June 2013 |
|
The term "palindrome" is not a palindrome — since, backwards, it is "emordnilap" (a word that begs the question of what kind of "lap" is "emordni"). Compare true word-palindromes: dad, did, eve, Thursday, 13 June 2013 |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
RSS feed for comments to this post