Why do Republicans want to stigmatize welfare recipients?
This morning I had a brief and revealing exchange on Twitter with Mickey Kaus, a blogger from The Daily Caller. Kaus was in the middle of a discussion with Dylan Matthews (a Harvard undergraduate who seems to be a pundit-in-training) and Jonathan Alter (of MSNBC) about how Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, might be trying to change welfare regulations. Here's how it went:
Mickey Kaus: @dylanmatt @jonathanalter she won't recreate AFDC but she may contradict "work first" and send signal that it's OK to go on welfare again.
Daniel Altman: @kausmickey @dylanmatt @jonathanalter It *is* okay to go on welfare. Why would you stigmatize people who do? Shameful to get Medicaid, too?
Mickey Kaus: @altmandaniel @dylanmatt @jonathanalter As long as welfare (+ foodstamps) R available 2 people who don't work they'll rightly be stigmatized
Mickey Kaus: @altmandaniel @dylanmatt @jonathanalter Also AFDC was epic social disaster for ghettoized poor. We don't want it to grow again if possible.
Daniel Altman: @kausmickey @dylanmatt @jonathanalter Punishing people w/stigma is not how 2 prevent this. Why stigmatize 4 something often not their fault?
The exchange ended there. I was shocked that anyone would suggest that people could be "rightly" stigmatized for receiving welfare benefits. For most people who receive benefits, it's not that they don't want to work. As Rebecca Blank, the new Secretary of Commerce, has written, most mothers who receive benefits face multiple barriers to working (http://www.npc.umich.edu/publications/policy_briefs/brief10/policy_brief10.pdf). Several of these barriers, such as health problems and domestic violence, are often beyond the mothers' control. To stigmatize them for receiving welfare benefits is to blame them unfairly for these barriers to work.
Kaus's callous and ill-informed comments echo a continuing strand of Republican economic philosophy: the idea that we live in a complete meritocracy. If that were true, then the only things affecting access to economic opportunities would be talent and effort. But that's not true. Many people are shut out of opportunities because of factors beyond their control, and many others are beaten out by people with more money and connections. For all of them, poverty is undeserved. To stigmatize these people for accepting the benefits that keep roofs over their heads and food in their children's mouths is both ignorant and cruel.
For more on the fallacies of Republican economic philosophy, please check out my new eBook, "SABOTAGE: How the Republican Party Crippled America's Economic Recovery" (http://www.amazon.com/SABOTAGE-Republican-Crippled-Americas-ebook/dp/B008LMNDYO).
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 3676
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
We are certainly living in the midst of a dark and very troubling period in American history. This is a nation that is not advancing, it is regressing; it is no longer growing, it is in a state of Monday, 20 May 2013 |
|
Am I paranoid? Do I worry that the State of California will take my vehicle, since it is registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles? After all, I bought it in another state so I must have Monday, 20 May 2013 |
|
There is nonsense everywhereThere is nonsense in the airThere is nonsense on TVThere is nonsense on radioThere is nonsense in printThere is nonsense on the ‘netThere is nonsense everywhere.There is Monday, 20 May 2013 |
|
Although elections 2013 were free and fair, yet isolated incidents of rigging which are very common in South Asia are creating uncertainty in Pakistan where terrorists continue their subversive Sunday, 19 May 2013 |
|
Julia Trigg Crawford of Direct, Texas, is the manager of a 650-acre farm that her grandfather first bought in 1948. The farm produces mostly corn, wheat, and soy. On its north border is the Red Sunday, 19 May 2013 |
|
Proposition: The most likely doomsday scenario we face is not the one we are constantly being force-fed by dissembling politicians and the corporate-controlled media. The right-wing strategy aimed Saturday, 18 May 2013 |
|
When Barack Obama was running for president, he promised an administration that would be the most transparent of all time, one that would make sure the public was aware of how its government was Saturday, 18 May 2013 |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Cheri Honkala is running for Vice President under the Green Party ticket so the homeless might learn to be proud enough of themselves to vote,
http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/256-justice/12816-from-homeless-child-to-community-leader-perhaps-even-president-someday
RSS feed for comments to this post