Why do Republicans want to stigmatize welfare recipients?
This morning I had a brief and revealing exchange on Twitter with Mickey Kaus, a blogger from The Daily Caller. Kaus was in the middle of a discussion with Dylan Matthews (a Harvard undergraduate who seems to be a pundit-in-training) and Jonathan Alter (of MSNBC) about how Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, might be trying to change welfare regulations. Here's how it went:
Mickey Kaus: @dylanmatt @jonathanalter she won't recreate AFDC but she may contradict "work first" and send signal that it's OK to go on welfare again.
Daniel Altman: @kausmickey @dylanmatt @jonathanalter It *is* okay to go on welfare. Why would you stigmatize people who do? Shameful to get Medicaid, too?
Mickey Kaus: @altmandaniel @dylanmatt @jonathanalter As long as welfare (+ foodstamps) R available 2 people who don't work they'll rightly be stigmatized
Mickey Kaus: @altmandaniel @dylanmatt @jonathanalter Also AFDC was epic social disaster for ghettoized poor. We don't want it to grow again if possible.
Daniel Altman: @kausmickey @dylanmatt @jonathanalter Punishing people w/stigma is not how 2 prevent this. Why stigmatize 4 something often not their fault?
The exchange ended there. I was shocked that anyone would suggest that people could be "rightly" stigmatized for receiving welfare benefits. For most people who receive benefits, it's not that they don't want to work. As Rebecca Blank, the new Secretary of Commerce, has written, most mothers who receive benefits face multiple barriers to working (http://www.npc.umich.edu/publications/policy_briefs/brief10/policy_brief10.pdf). Several of these barriers, such as health problems and domestic violence, are often beyond the mothers' control. To stigmatize them for receiving welfare benefits is to blame them unfairly for these barriers to work.
Kaus's callous and ill-informed comments echo a continuing strand of Republican economic philosophy: the idea that we live in a complete meritocracy. If that were true, then the only things affecting access to economic opportunities would be talent and effort. But that's not true. Many people are shut out of opportunities because of factors beyond their control, and many others are beaten out by people with more money and connections. For all of them, poverty is undeserved. To stigmatize these people for accepting the benefits that keep roofs over their heads and food in their children's mouths is both ignorant and cruel.
For more on the fallacies of Republican economic philosophy, please check out my new eBook, "SABOTAGE: How the Republican Party Crippled America's Economic Recovery" (http://www.amazon.com/SABOTAGE-Republican-Crippled-Americas-ebook/dp/B008LMNDYO).
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
ARTICLE VIEWS: 3663
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
|
Since the emergence of the Internet, it has not been easy for government officials and mainstream media folks to get away with lying to us. It has become necessary, if for no other reason than Friday, 17 May 2013 |
|
Every sphere of life within the US is being transformed by the post-911 momentum toward tyranny. One outrageous violation after another assaults our liberties and places ever-more unrestrained power Friday, 17 May 2013 |
|
Have We The People been betrayed by President Obama and his fellow Democrats? Betrayal is a bitter pill to swallow, especially when one as an individual tries to maintain some semblance of hope that Thursday, 16 May 2013 |
|
Reconstructing nuclear confidence in post-Fukushima world is a long and painful process. But real-life energy demands especially in the developing countries predetermine a significant share of Thursday, 16 May 2013 |
|
Who knew, before delving beyond Wayne LaPierre’s shrill, defiant persona, that the NRA imbues guns with sanctified moral purpose? Not just sanctimonious but sanctified, and for the public good. Why Wednesday, 15 May 2013 |
|
Diplomacy which is defined as an art of negotiations to resolve an issue has many meanings, if a single word is added with it. For example, shrewd diplomacy, sham diplomacy, power diplomacy, peace Tuesday, 14 May 2013 |
|
European capitalism remains deep in the mire. In the first quarter of this year, Eurozone GDP fell 0.2%, according to figures out today – and that was worse than expected. The Eurozone economy has Tuesday, 14 May 2013 |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Cheri Honkala is running for Vice President under the Green Party ticket so the homeless might learn to be proud enough of themselves to vote,
http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/256-justice/12816-from-homeless-child-to-community-leader-perhaps-even-president-someday
RSS feed for comments to this post