The War Against The Successor Generation
The impact of policies flowing from each development combine to cast a pall over the current and future prospects for an entire generation and would create a society, politically and socially, starkly reminiscent of an America of the 1950s.
Joe Scarborough, the conservative co-host of MSNBC’s news show, “Morning
Joe”, offers context for the war against youth by identifying a major failing of our elected leadership today: providing quality, affordable education (college or technical) to a successor generation of young people.
Historically, one of our greatest priorities as a nation was to ensure a future for our children and the current generation. We have always tied ourselves to our future through our legatees. This tradition ensured the continued prosperity of this great country. A missing ingredient today, however, is an economy dynamic enough to absorb the millions of unemployed and a successor generation – many of which are already victims of a dearth of opportunity despite their educational achievements.
Scarborough says, “We need to invest in people who work hard to get an education. We need to make education and training higher priorities than protecting subsidies for oil companies and special tax breaks for billionaires. The way we spend our money shows our values…” He goes on to say he values people who work hard to build a future. It is counter intuitive to wage war against them.
The economic and political landscape for the current cohort of 80 million 18-34 year olds is not encouraging. Income mobility enabled prior generations to move from one class to another creating a window of opportunity for their children. This tradition, perhaps by default, perhaps by design, is under assault by an oligarchy of entrenched and powerful interests opposed to the size and function of government in our lives, opposed to the role of government in stimulating growth of an economy that offered a temporary tide of opportunity, and opposed to public investments in education and infrastructure.
For any emerging generation, two early and sacred keys to success and a future are education and opportunity. Not always in that order but they are linked in the minds of generations of Americans.
An astounding, but recent, development birthed under the guise of deficit reduction is the growing level of organized resistance to quality affordable education for the average American. Dismissing public school teachers and cutting funds for education are the preferred remedies to balance state budgets by conservative governors and state legislators in GOP-controlled states. Higher rates of public sector unemployment that are the inevitable consequence are just more collateral damage.
The crisis continues within publicly funded colleges and universities. Parents today are frantic because the costs of education are spiraling out of control. The statistics are sobering: Since 1999, average student loan debt has increased by 511%. In 2010, total outstanding student loan debt exceeded total outstanding credit card debt in the U.S. for the first time ever. This year, total student loan debt is expected to exceed $1 trillion. Millions of families are being crushed by this tsunami of student debt.
You ask, “Where is the war?” The forces arrayed against the interests of youth today are resident in state legislatures and the Congress of the United States. In 2007, Congress passed the College Cost Reduction and Access Act. This legislation reduced interest rates for college loans – Stafford Loans subsidized by the government – from 6.8 % to today’s 3.4%. This provision expires on July 1st if the Congress does not act.
Last week, Education Secretary Arne Duncan reminded us that more than 7 million students would be financially squeezed if interest rates were to rise. The average additional cost is $1,000.
U.S. Representative Hansen Clarke of Michigan introduced H.R. 4170, the Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012, which would extend a helping hand to students struggling under massive debts. The President and the presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney support this proposed legislation.
However, the future of this proposed legislation rests with a Republican-controlled House that is hostile to public education; hostile to public school teachers and opposed to Pell Grants – the life’s-blood for over a million needy students who otherwise would be denied the opportunity for a college education. Congressional debate in the House would appear to focus on how to absorb the costs of an interest rate reduction.
The rub for the current generation is simple to understand. Elected officials at the state and national level whose particular partisan policies now cripple our economy, would bring us the Ryan budget (which doubles student loan rates), defund Planned Parenthood, support the Blunt Amendment, support Personhood Amendments and eliminate the U.S. Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are, themselves, the beneficiaries of policies of an earlier generation of bi-partisan leadership that built and sustained a strong economy, and offered affordable education while creating job opportunities for those willing to work.
Today’s college graduates prefer to be less debt-ridden. Their indictment of today’s leadership – of both parties – is legitimate. They bear witness to how easily elected officials of both major parties at the state and national levels are easily corrupted by a powerful corporate, financial, and political elite financed by hundreds of millions of superPAC dollars and campaign contributions. Legislation narrowly crafted to serve more narrow private and corporate interests further circumscribes the future prospects for today’s youth.
If the civic lessons of this successor generation have taught them anything, it might be that a strong correlation exists between legislation that strengthens the middle class and an economic and political climate in which a new generation can feel hopeful about its future.
Youth today are in a war for their future and a claim to the resources and institutions that form the architecture for a better future than they currently confront. In a war, you fight or capitulate. These are their choices.
Here is the landscape. The conservatives and their Republican allies are aggressively seeking to deny them their franchise, undermine public education, and return women to the home while making government and elected officials the ultimate arbiter of women’s reproductive rights and contraception. Moreover, they would despoil the quality of the environment, gut any legislation that provides a framework for values of fairness and equity, and enshrine the idea that every citizen bears sole responsibility for themselves, their success, and most assuredly their failures.
These are examples of the new rules others seek to anchor in law and practice and they are waging war against a new generation to ensure success. The motivation behind this cascade of retrograde legislation is a desire to refashion a simpler, more narrowly structured society that advanced the priorities of a particular stratum of society – not the interests of the collective. If they are successful, this would represent a fundamental redefinition of American values where, as the President noted, “A shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number of people struggle to get by.”
The choice is clear: capitulate in this war for the future and accept a new values-paradigm, or stand and fight back as voters did in Wisconsin, Ohio, Arizona, Mississippi, Virginia, and Maine, for example.
Demand accountability from those who represent you! Those we elect will endanger liberty, constrain opportunity, and undermine traditional values if allowed. It is we, the electorate that are their enablers.
Charles Blow, columnist for the New York Times, suggests it is time to focus. Focus on those who would “repeal, restrict, restructure, reclaim, and restore” Blow advises. He is right! The current generation and its allies need to fully engage in this election and elect a brand of leadership – at all levels – that embraces the winds of change and that does not recoil in horror at the prospect of losing positions of power and privilege due to change.
We need to elect a brand of progressive leadership that is more “pro” than “anti”, that respects fairness, equality, inclusion, personal liberty, free choice, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
We win the war being waged against the successor generation by fighting for the beliefs and values that enrich the lives of the many and strengthen our society, while creating opportunities for those who would succeed us.
Every generation must have its turn.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.
ARTICLE VIEWS: 1227
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) downgrades global growth forecasts and warns of rising debt levels in "emerging" economies in its newly released World Economic Outlook report. The report lowers
Tuesday, 06 October 2015
Highlighting inter-related regional problems in his speech at the Central South Asia Security Conference in Munich, Germany, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, General Raheel Sharif said on September
Monday, 05 October 2015
Adolf Trumpenstein Abandoning our collective soul we sought rebirth and rejuvenation Descending into a dearth of heart and brain dead from misinformation We needed to recreate something great to
Saturday, 03 October 2015
Umpqua is “Routine”?Jose Martinez After Umpqua, Obama decried the routines of mass killings. They will continue, nonetheless. His cries for a tweaking of gun control will not stop the killings,
Thursday, 01 October 2015
The Facebook comment below recently appeared on our timeline.“He (Sanders) conveniently ignores the fact that we are protecting the entire Western world, including all those wonderful European
Thursday, 01 October 2015
Prominent Puerto Rico faith leaders join members of Congress at a briefing on Capitol Hill to call for solutions to the island's financial crisis and for US government intervention.The Archbishop of
Thursday, 01 October 2015
While democracy means a government of the people, socialism means a sharing of (or government controlling) the means of production and distribution of goods. But is there really a difference? It
Wednesday, 30 September 2015