RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

Can National Security be affected by a scientific Experiment?

Print
Written by Otto E. Rossler   
Monday, 25 January 2016 03:24
The answer reads: “of course it can.”

The experiment in question produces the hottest resident spot in the Universe on earth. This fact, realized by the “LHC” experiment of CERN, is being withheld from the NSA by CERN.

On the other hand, the appealing label used publicly by CERN – “pulling the Big Bang down onto earth” or more briefly “Big-Bang Experiment” – ought to have alarmed everyone having to do with national security.

A PARTIAL EXCUSE VALID FOR THE NSA

At the time the name “Big-Bang Experiment” was coined by CERN eight years ago, everyone still believed in “Hawking radiation.” According to Stephen Hawking’s famous hypothesis, every ultra-dense hot spot generated should, after transforming itself into a miniature black hole, “evaporate” in a flash of electromagnetic radiation. For this reason, the cosmic-record LHC experiment appeared fairly innocuous despite its unprecedented status in the universe.

Then, CERN somehow “forgot” to inform the world that the experimentally observed absence of Hawking radiation (reported with great fanfare by CERN) renders the achieved cosmic-record resident energy density down on earth not less. but more dangerous:

Micro black holes must still get formed at the hoped-for probability (ten percent?), but invisibly so. After the non-existence proof of Hawking radiation of mid-2008, which goes unchallenged in the scientific literature, the first miniature black hole that gets trapped inside earth is bound to grow exponentially there – much as its giant cousins inside the cores of galaxies do in the presence of eatable matter. Hence after a symptom-free growth period of several years, the first resident micro black hole will make its presence felt through its tell-tale “jets.” By then, everyone would know what the bell tolls (Armageddon).

How come the NSA did not check on the security implications of this cosmic-record scenario? (See the December issue of “Progress in Physics” for the latest proof of the decisive pertinent result called “c-global.”) The NSA’s fateful blunder will figure foremost on the minds of historians of our hoped-for future. But the same question is already on the mind to date of every citizen who learns about the 8-years-long breach of duty shown by a certain national agency. Or to put it more constructively: WHY, DEAR NSA, did you condone CERN’s refusal to update its latest safety report LSAG from early 2008 up to this day?

I sometimes feel it is all my own fault: due to the optimistic banterful tone of my first public appeal to CERN ( http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/petitiontocern.pdf ) eight years ago. It may have caused CERN to feel morally obliged to act as it did in order not to lose face before a clown. I apologize to the NSA that the safety blunder is all my own fault.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN