FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

writing for godot

President Obama's Machiavellian Fallacy

Print
Written by Richard Butrick   
Thursday, 07 June 2012 22:10



Despite a Zogby poll back in 2011 indicating that President Osama’s “outreach” program to the Islamic world (Ummah) wasn’t working, the Obama team continues to pursue a policy of trying to ingratiate itself to the Ummah with demonstrations of humility, deference and respect coupled with offerings of tribute, i.e., the money of American taxpayers.

As an example of the Solyndra-like returns on our money, here is an recent account of the thanks we get in the UN.

2 billion annually to Egypt. Result: Egypt votes 79% against the US in the UN.

192 million annually to Jordan. Result: Jordan votes 79% against the US in the UN.

6.7 billion annually to Pakistan. Result: Pakistan votes 75% against the US in the UN.

A particularly galling example of the futility of buying the hearts and minds of Muslims is the “piddling” 1.2 billion biennial aid to UNRWA which supports Jordanian refuge “camps” like Baqua. It is a city celebrating it’s 50th anniversary. A city full of shops apartment buildings and Mosques. Not exactly tent city or the digs of Occupy Wall Street. Nor is it a town full of authentic refuges who have been driven out of their own countries by rape squads and genocide but rather it is populated by third generation “Palestinians” on the dole. The issue of just who should count as a Palestinian refuge is finally coming to a head in the GOP controlled congress.

As David Greenfield writes in FrontPage:

After September 11, al-Qaeda enjoyed some of its highest approval ratings there, and most Jordanians still do not believe that Muslims carried out the attacks. Despite half a century of aid, 67 percent of Jordanians blame the West for their lack of prosperity and majorities there support suicide bombings against civilians and American soldiers.

Since the Zogby poll the reaction of the Obama team has been to double down on its ”outreach” program by disempowering the US military and empowering Muslim militaries. The Obama administration under the leadership of our cuddly, avuncular Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, has proposed cutting the military budget by 1/2 trillion and has commenced selling military drones to Pakistan and Iraq and now Turkey is in the offing.

But what could better exemplify President Obama’s policy of ingratiating the Islamic world by disempowering the US and empowering the Islamic world than his recent policy of cutting back on those in the military that qualify for combat pay. American soldiers get an extra $7.50 a day hazard duty pay in combat zones and President Obama just recently cut back on those that qualify. That’s $7:50 a day for risking life and limb for the US. That is Obama’s way of saving money. He could save real money by making that $750 a day for our combat troops and zero to Baqua and its ilk. And besides, that would spare them the moral hazard of being on the dole.

As Rick Moran wrote back in 2011, Obama’s “outreach” program is an exercise in futility since it fails to grasp the intractable commitment of the Mideastern Islamic world to the destruction of Israel:

Wishing the world was a certain way rather than accepting reality and acting accordingly is not just dangerous and naive, it is also the mark of a stupid man. For the Arab world, nothing - repeat, nothing - the US can ever do short of helping them wipe Israel off the map will assuage their feelings of resentment and hate.

And even that would not be enough since the mission of every good Muslim is to make Islam dominant “über alles.”

Machiavelli addressed the general question of policy formation in the matrix of power, love, hate and respect:

“Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved.”

President Obama seems to think the take-away from this matrix is that the less the US is feared the more it will be loved. But by cutting back on US military power and kowtowing to Muslim leaders the President has put us on a trajectory is in which the US will be neither loved nor feared.






 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
0 # RMDC 2012-06-09 07:35
I really don't think anyone in the US governement or its military apparatus cares at all what muslims think. The money that goes to Egypt goes only to its military elite who control the country. The arab spring did not loosen the military control of Egypt.

There is not "hearts and minds" campaign. The US does not care who loves it or fears it. As far as the AAIE (Anglo-American -Israeli Elite) go, Arabs, Muslims and all people with darker skins are sub-humans whose existence is of very little concern. They are the business of the military and police to keep crowded up in nation-sized concentration camps.
 
 
+1 # RICHARDKANEpa 2012-06-09 08:10
The US is like a big elephant trying to stamp on rabid little mice. Al Qaeda is delighted that the big elephant is banging into the economic walls that are part of the polls holding the circus tent up. Sarkozi or the French cat knew how to deal with rabid mice, without giving France bin Laden’s rabies. But now that he is gone the other animals in the circus just try to keep away from the angry elephant and the crazy mice at the same time. Incidentally bin Laden somehow kept his will to live while spreading in his followers a will to die and take as many other circus animals with them as they go.

Somehow I and others got to resist the right-wing world articles, like the above are creating, without claiming al Qaeda isn't dangerous.
 
 
+1 # futhark 2012-06-12 08:09
It would be nicer if the American "outreach" to Islamic nations was not mediated by drone strikes. If that were the case America might begin to generate some good will among the people of the region instead of stirring up enmity.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN