Intro: "Congress is poised once again to sacrifice domestic security in the service of unnecessary wars and the profits of defense contractors. The FY 2013 Defense Appropriations bill, which includes $519 billion for the Pentagon's base budget and $88.5 billion for the war in Afghanistan is expected to reach the House floor this week. This represents 57% of all federal appropriations for the coming year."
US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta with President Obama. (photo: AP)
Unchecked Pentagon Spending Threatens Our National Security
18 July 12
ouse of Representatives Should Vote:
“YES” for Jobs Program, Federal Aid to States and Vital Social Services!
“NO” on current proposed FY 2013 Pentagon Budget!
Congress is poised once again to sacrifice domestic security in the service of unnecessary wars and the profits of defense contractors. The FY 2013 Defense Appropriations bill, which includes $519 billion for the Pentagon’s base budget and$88.5 billion for the war in Afghanistan is expected to reach the House floor this week. This represents 57% of all federal appropriations for the coming year. Click here for a more detailed account.
Under the Budget Control Act passed last August, if military funding is approved at this level it will mean significant cuts to vitally needed social programs, including nutrition, education, housing, job training and health care for the poor.
Since 2001, the Pentagon budget, including the wars, has grown almost three times as fast as appropriations for domestic programs.* These choices have cut or reduced the “safety net” for millions of Americans, weakened our domestic institutions, sacrificed the lives and well-being of our own soldiers, and brought immense suffering to people in other nations. New funding caps have squeezed domestic priorities even more. For example, adult job training, children’s mental health, substance abuse treatment, home heating assistance for the poor, community development funds and grants for adult education have all been cut from 2010 to 2012.
* (This calculation is adjusted for inflation and does not include the billions of dollars for veterans benefits, nuclear weapons, military construction and other military purposes that are budgeted in other appropriations bills.)
The proposed FY 2013 Defense Appropriations bill is harmful to our “national security” in multiple ways. Unfortunately too many members of Congress keep voting in favor of these unpopular measures, assuming that constituents are not paying attention.
Major reasons to deny passage of the bill:
- It insures that the costly and ineffective military approach to the threat of “terrorism” will be perpetuated -that Americans and Afghans will continue to die in the service of a failed military policy.
- It continues the use of “drones,” Special Operations and the illegal policy of assassination, which is killing civilians and making new enemies around the world.
- It deprives our states and cities of the funds they need to insure that all of their residents have access to adequate food, shelter, education and health care.
- It comes at the expense of investing in our future and funding infrastructure and public programs that are the most effective form of job creation.
House members will be voting on the FY2013 Pentagon Appropriations bill this week. They need to hear from constituents, urging them to:
1. Vote for amendments that eliminate funding for continued fighting in Afghanistan, for the use of drones, and for expensive and unnecessary weapons systems.
2. Vote against the FY 2013 Pentagon Appropriations bill, unless it includes the amendments suggested above and substantially lower funding levels.
We insist on sufficient funding to meet urgent domestic needs – for jobs, education, health, nutrition and human services. At a time of severe recession, we cannot afford to squander another $608 billion for military purposes.
Speak Out Today!!
- Call your Member of Congress. Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121.
- Send an email.
- Bring a delegation of constituents to their local office, with a written statement.
- Write a letter to the editor, alerting others in your district of the upcoming vote and your Rep’s position.
(Find contact information for your Rep and Staff here. And please share any feedback This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it !
As always, we ask that you please disseminate this message widely and quickly to family, friends and colleagues. Click here to send a letter to your Representative and to forward this alert!
Signed,
(Institutional affiliations are for identification purposes only)
Marc Becker, Historians Against the War
Medea Benjamin, Global Exchange
Randy Block, Gray Panthers
Leah Bolger, Veteran For Peace
Shahid Buttar, DC Guerrilla Poetry Insurgency
Jacqueline Cabasso, Western States Legal Foundation
Tim Carpenter, Progressive Democrats of America
Sr. Patricia J. Chappell, SNDdeN, Pax Christ USA
Christine DeTroy, Maine Branch of Women’s Int’l League for Peace & Freedom.
Jane Swift Dugdale, Main Line Peace Action Bryn Mawr
Nancy Dwyer, Pax Christi LI
Rusti Eisenberg, United for Peace and Justice
Michael Eisenscher, U.S. Labor Against the War
Jodie Evans, CODEPINK
Shelagh Foreman, Massachusetts Peace Action
Rebecca Griffin, Peace Action West
Jean Haskell, Grannie Peace Brigade
Robin Harper, Peace and Social Action Committee of Providence Friends Quaker Meeting
Tom Hayden, Center for Participatory Democracy
Mary Hladky, Military Families Speak Out
Sally Jones, Peace Action Fund NYS
Mark C. Johnson, Fellowship of Reconciliation
Barbara Larcom, Alliance for Global Justice
Ray McGovern, Retired Senior CIA Analyst
Kevin Martin, Peace Action
Duncan McFarland, United for Justice with Peace (Boston)
Michael McPhearson, United for Peace and Justice
Margaret Melkonian, Long Island Alliance for Peaceful Alternatives
Gael Murphy, United for Peace and Justice
Robert Naiman, Just Foreign Policy
Jim O’Brien, Historians Against the War
Dr. Charlotte Phillips, Brooklyn for Peace
Mike Prokosch, Mass. Coalition to Fund Our Communities – Cut Military Spending 25%
Shirley Romaine, Great Neck SANE/Peace Action
Mark Roman, CODEPINK Maine
Lisa Savage, CODEPINK Maine
Alice Slater
Jean Stokan, Sisters of Mercy of the Americas – Justice Team
David Swanson, War is a Crime
Sue Udry, Defending Dissent Foundation
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
 20 May 2013
|
 19 May 2013
|
 19 May 2013
|
 21 May 2013
|
 21 May 2013
|
 20 May 2013
|
 20 May 2013
|
 20 May 2013
|
 19 May 2013
|
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Demos in Congress so what do they care.
The people in the white south is letting their bigotry destroy this country the rich as getting richer.
The military-indust rial scum will consume as much of our [tax] resources as we allow. Shall we silently sit on our thumbs while weapons makers and usurers strip us of our wealth and the benefits that are rightfully ours?
It is up to each of us to stand on our hind legs and refuse to allow this grand theft to continue. Otherwise, assume the position and let the hosing continue as the world ends with a whimper.
The next day 9/11 happened. The story was forgotten.
So this talk about unchecked spending has been occurring for a long time. Will anyone do anything abou it?
In other words, they'll OPENLY ADMIT the "defense" racket is killing our economy when cornered.
But we need to be spending as much money / tax dollars as possible on weapons to destroy our fellow human beings because ...
Help me out on this one fellas. If we don't use those weapons, then we have wasted all that money. And if we use those weapons, we waste so much humanity. Kind of a pointless effort, but yet another too big and too drunk to fail economies that we just can't shake.
I give it 10 years max before it all crashes down and we have to start all over, hopefully not repeating this same crap all over again. Ever hopeful ... not too convinced.
It is NOT question IF, but when now ...
RSS feed for comments to this post