RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Weil writes: "Let's try out a novel idea: Banks that help drug cartels launder money and give cover to those tied to terrorism should be put out of business. Is that really so hard for everyone to agree on?"

The logo on the front of a branch of HSBC. (photo: Getty Images)
The logo on the front of a branch of HSBC. (photo: Getty Images)



Cocaine Cowboys Know Best Places to Bank

By Jonathan Weil, Bloomberg News

03 August 12

 

o grow up in South Florida during the 1970s and 1980s, as I did, wasn’t your typical American childhood experience. Back then the area was known as the most dangerous place in the country.

Carnage from the drug wars filled the local news long before “Miami Vice” became a hit TV show. By elementary school, my friends and I knew some of the lingo. A Colombian necktie wasn’t a piece of clothing, but a gruesome execution method. When I was 7 years old my barber was murdered in his shop, apparently over a drug deal.

It had been a long time since I thought much about those days. By chance I recently came across a fabulous documentary, “Cocaine Cowboys,” by Miami filmmaker Billy Corben. Then last month a Senate panel held a hearing on the U.K. bank HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) and its ties to drug lords, money laundering, al-Qaeda and rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea.

Here’s a bank with $2.7 trillion of assets that flouted U.S. laws for a decade, according to the July 17 report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. HSBC turned a blind eye to organized crime, Mexican drug cartels and overseas terrorism financiers, and gave them access to the U.S. banking system. HSBC’s main U.S. regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, for years tolerated its violations of anti-money laundering laws.

For this, HSBC and the OCC apologized. Justice Department fines are likely. It’s an outrage HSBC hasn’t had its U.S. banking licenses revoked, assuming the Senate panel’s report is accurate - and there’s no reason to believe it isn’t.

Try This

Let’s try out a novel idea: Banks that help drug cartels launder money and give cover to those tied to terrorism should be put out of business. Is that really so hard for everyone to agree on? Free markets have worked in the U.S. because we have the rule of law. It’s why so many investors from other countries want to do business here. When contracts are breached, courts can be accessed to enforce them. When individuals or companies commit crimes, they’re supposed to be prosecuted and punished.

Except we have this mutant species of corporation called too-big-to-fail banks whose collapse might wreck the global economy. No financial institution in the U.S. can survive a felony indictment. So these companies have become un-indictable, creating a perverse nonchalance regarding financial crimes. In 2010, Wachovia paid $160 million to settle criminal allegations of laundering Mexican drug money. By then the bank had been bought by Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), and the Justice Department let it off with a deferred-prosecution deal. Usually the most that happens to management is someone resigns, as HSBC’s head of compliance, David Bagley, said he would at last month’s Senate hearing.

What would it take for the government to really crack down on wrongdoing in the financial-services industry? What finally prompted the feds to do something about cocaine smuggling into South Florida long ago was the epidemic of violence it spawned.

A defining moment came in July 1979, when drug traffickers went on a shooting spree in broad daylight at the Dadeland Mall in Kendall, southwest of Miami. This was unprecedented. The gunmen arrived in a delivery van that had been converted into an armored personnel carrier. Two people were killed. Bystanders dove for cover. Cars in the parking lot were riddled with bullets from machine-gun fire.

Attacks like that became frequent over the next few years. In 1979 there were 349 murders in South Florida, according to the Justice Department, triple the number of two years earlier. By 1981 murders had climbed to 621. The local police were outgunned, outnumbered, easily corrupted and often stoned. Finally in 1982 President Ronald Reagan formed a task force and devoted hundreds of additional federal agents to South Florida to restore law and order.

Cash Surplus

Back then, too, the cartels’ enablers included dirty banks. As Corben’s film noted, in 1979 the Federal Reserve’s Miami branch reported a $5 billion cash surplus - more than the country’s other Federal Reserve banks combined. One crucial difference, compared with today, was the drug banks in those days were relatively small. When an outfit such as Sunshine State Bank got busted, it didn’t threaten the economy.

In terms of stray bullets, Miami is a much safer place today. But mainly what the U.S. did was drive the cartels, the turf battles and the killings into Mexico, where the violence is out of mind for most Americans even while much of that country has turned into a narco-state.

Maybe if the bankers were the ones spraying machine-gun fire in the streets, that might spur the U.S. government to take meaningful, punitive action. Short of that, you have to wonder if anything would. Too-big-to-fail isn’t merely an economic problem. It is a great moral failing of our society that poisons our democracy. Something has to give.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+54 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 08:53
While I am all after going after the banksters for their illegal activities and ill gotten gains, if drugs were legal there would be no laundering. The "war on drugs" (which was never about the drugs) has been an absolute failure (if the goal was really to "get the drugs" and not to get the "leftist" guerillas in Columbia...whic h has now simply moved the cartels to mexico and caused the death of at least 40,000 mexicans...not to mention institutionaliz ing "the new jim crow" here at home)and the answer is not to call for going after the banks for laundering drug money but, rather, to legalize the drugs in the first place. Prohibition has never worked and in fact only led to incresed alcohol use and alcoholism not to mention all of the crime due to the fact that it was illegal)....Lat in American leaders have woken to this reality which is why many are now calling for legalization. Passed time for the US to get with the program.
 
 
+26 # stoher9 2012-08-03 12:27
I agree that the "War on Drugs" has been a waste of police resources & manpower. It has been a success at what it's real goal was however. This is the disenfranchisem ent of 10's of millions of potential voters in this country. A felony is forever in most states & the targets of most drug laws are the poor & minorities, whose main crime is not voting Republican.
 
 
-16 # JackB 2012-08-03 14:29
This may very well be the most ridiculous post ever on this blog.

The objective of the War on Drugs is to disenfranchise voters????
 
 
+43 # erogers 2012-08-03 09:19
Every bank that is proven to have laundered drug cartel money should not only be put out of business but all those within the bank need to do hard jail time in some of our worse prisons. No Club Med prison for these bas***ds. I often wondered what happened to the Wachovia-Wells Fargo investigation. It just seemed to go away.
But nothing will happen to these crooks, just as nothing will happen to the power elite which hides money offshore. We as a nation are rotting from the inside and that rot has led to thousands of innocent people being killed in Mexico and other countries. But no worries, the power elite within these rotten banks are quite comfortable. How do they sleep at night?
 
 
-31 # chirostv 2012-08-03 09:51
The Wells/Wachovia investigation was launched during the Obama Administration. Be a could place to start. How did he personally benefit?
 
 
+8 # BlueReview 2012-08-03 12:56
From Bloomberg News, posted Dec 8, 2011 4:24 PM CT: "Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) agreed to pay $148 million to settle criminal charges and civil claims for conspiring to overcharge state and local governments on investments, becoming the fourth bank to enter a settlement in the case.

The deal will resolve investigations into Wachovia Bank, which Wells Fargo acquired in 2008, by federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department, as well as attorneys general in 26 states, the Justice Department said in a statement.

The case is the latest in a more than five-year investigation into how Wall Street banks conspired with local- government advisers to reap excessive fees on investments sold to public agencies by rigging competitive auctions and carving up the market among themselves. JPMorgan Chase & Co., (JPM) UBS AG (UBSN) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) previously settled similar cases."
 
 
+17 # Maxwell 2012-08-03 13:19
Quoting chirostv:
The Wells/Wachovia investigation was launched during the Obama Administration. Be a could place to start. How did he personally benefit?

Well, chirostv, if Obama is guilty of anything then fine, hang him with the rest of them.

On the other hand: perhaps you noticed that these problems were all entrenched as far back as the 1970s, well before Obama ever entered the picture. If you could put aside your partisan agenda long enough to address the real issues -- the violence and immorality of the drug trade, the possibility of decriminalizing drugs, and financial corruption -- maybe you could contribute something useful to the discussion.

In the mean time, we get it: you hate Obama. Thanks for that.
 
 
+6 # soularddave 2012-08-03 14:58
Yeah, it's a dumb comment.

Who appointed the federal prosecutors and federal judges who pursued the case? would be more like it. Who appointed the regulators? Why did Wells-Fargo get Wachovia instead of Citi (as was planned)? Who appointed the Securities and Exchange Commission?

On another note, Well Fargo IS in prison(s). They're a big player in the for-profit private prison industry. Hmmm...

I don't like ANY of it, and never said I did. As long as stupid information passes for actual facts that are germane to the conversation, we'll never get anywhere in straightening out this mess.
 
 
+13 # mdhome 2012-08-03 11:31
How do they sleep at night??!! Under a quilt of tons of money, when they know they can keep the millions they have been paid, maybe get a golden parachute, they only need to resign knowing the can live like kings for the rest of their lives. That security they feel MUST be yanked out from under them!
 
 
+28 # Barbara K 2012-08-03 09:21
They absolutely should be put out of business. So just do it. We need to start somewhere to rid the corruption that is strangling this country of OURS.
 
 
-22 # chirostv 2012-08-03 09:21
All Romenys fault and proves the need to re-elect Obama!
 
 
+35 # Adoregon 2012-08-03 09:29
What's more addictive than cocaine?
Money.
Google: crack CIA

To open your eyes a bit further, read, "Trading With the Enemy: The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949" by Charles Higham.
To quote from Amazon.com:
This perennial classic of political literature remains the only book to document the trading of the American financial establishment with Hitler's Germany in World War II, from Pearl Harbor to V-E Day. Ford supplied tanks to Hitler, the Chase Bank financed the Nazis in Paris, ITT built rocket bombs for Goering and Standard Oil fueled U-boats in the Atlantic.

Do you really think banks do what they do without the collaboration, collusion and malfeasance of the government and [other] corporations?

Just business and (to quote William H. Vanderbilt)let the public be damned.
To think the wealthy people who benefit from the banks' criminality are going to let laws interfere with their cash flow is to not understand just how corrupt this nation is.
 
 
+23 # Archie1954 2012-08-03 09:46
Since the US is the biggest supporter of terrorism in the world today (think CIA) every bank in the US would have to be put out of business!
 
 
+6 # Gnome de Pluehm 2012-08-03 09:53
Wait, wait, wait! Money doesn't destroy people; cocaine does. We should be free to buy and sell anything that can be converted to money; only those that use it should be punished.

signed:
NMA (National Money Association)
 
 
+12 # Texas Aggie 2012-08-03 10:42
Putting the banks out of business allows the people responsible to continue doing the same thing under a different name. The solution is more to put the people themselves out of business, or at least the financial business. Making license plates or picking strawberries in Alabama or wearing orange vests while picking up trash along the road in TX for the rest of their sorry lives would be a salutary job experience for them, something that will look a lot better on their CV when Judgment Day comes.
 
 
+11 # SOF 2012-08-03 11:02
Since NDAA, wouldn't those bankers, who supported terrorism, be due indefinite detention? and waterboarding at least?
 
 
+4 # Above God 2012-08-03 12:26
Why are all the banking scandals run through London? MT Global,Peregrin e Finicial Group, Madoff,HSBC and on and on. Britian should take responsibility and jail these executives. Fat chance!
 
 
+7 # dkonstruction 2012-08-03 12:34
Quoting Above God:
Why are all the banking scandals run through London? MT Global,Peregrine Finicial Group, Madoff,HSBC and on and on. Britian should take responsibility and jail these executives. Fat chance!


London was the global financial center before capital's empire moved to the US (just as before London it had been Amsterdam). The regs in England are more lax than here which is why the big US banks (if we can still talk about any bank or large corporation as being "national" and having any allegiance to any nation state) do alot of their business there.
 
 
+6 # BobHG 2012-08-03 13:09
Adoregon: not to forget Coca Cola for inventing Fanta so that they could stay in Germany and IBM for providing accounting services.

As for the various wars on irksome problems, they only create more of what they are supposed to eradicate. Thus, the wars on alcohol (a.k.a prohibition), communism (a.k.a. Reds under the beds), drugs and terror have brought more of the same.
 
 
+1 # Rick Levy 2012-08-03 21:07
How about this: Bust the money laundering banks who are also likely dealing with terrorists as well as drug cartels first. Then decriminalize drugs afterwards.
 
 
+2 # Lee Eisenstein 2012-08-04 09:27
Imho, in this regard, there is only one way to end the criminalization of our banking system.

Compel the government to end the so called, Drug War. THAT is the price support system that floods drug money into the banks of the US and London.

There's the answer, if the American people are up to it and progress in this area indicated that they are.
 
 
+1 # Old Man 2012-08-05 15:17
Tar and Feathering might do the trick.
 
 
+1 # cordleycoit 2012-08-06 04:22
Since my retirement was stolen by the Cocaine Cowboys who wrecked the Bank of New York I feel a bit testy about how the money laundering business became bank business. They the management told me thy had ten thousand employees and now they are a drive up window.The first sign something was wrong was when GE started paying it's CEO three hundred million a year to lose money. Then came the fast boys with sticky fingers and thousands of life times of work were crushed. They tell me it my fault when I trusted them. Jail them all.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN