RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Hightower writes: "Big brewers like Anheuser-Busch frequently admonish us imbibers of their grain products to 'drink responsibly.' Well, I say back to them: Lobby responsibly."

Texas' progressive political curmudgeon Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)
Texas' progressive political curmudgeon Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)



Big Beer Brewers Are Drunk on Greed

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet

20 May 12

 

ig brewers like Anheuser-Busch frequently admonish us imbibers of their grain products to "drink responsibly." Well, I say back to them: Lobby responsibly.

In particular, I point to a disgusting binge of besotted lobbying by Anheuser-Busch (now owned by the Belgian beer conglomerate InBev) and other beer barons this year in the Nebraska legislature.

At issue was the "town" of Whiteclay, smack dab on the Nebraska-South Dakota border. I put "town" in quotes because only 10 people live there - but it is home to four beer stores. Why? Because right across the state line is the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation of the Oglala Sioux tribe, which has a devastating problem of alcohol addiction among its 20,000 members, combined with intractable and dispiriting poverty.

Whiteclay exists solely so booze peddlers can profit from the Oglala tribe's addiction miseries. They sell more than 4 million cans of beer a year to Pine Ridge residents! This includes literally making a killing by peddling high-alcohol malt liquors, such as Busch's aptly named "Hurricane High." So much for "Drink responsibly."

A fourth of the children on the reservation are born with fetal alcohol birth defects. Life expectancy of tribal members is less than 50 years. And more than 90 percent of the violent crime on the reservation is attributed to drunkenness. On Pine Ridge itself, the tribe bans the sale and consumption of alcohol - the Whiteclay stores, positioned only a short walk away, are the source of the addictive drug and its consequences.

Responding to this grotesque exploitation of an epidemic illness, Republican state Sen. LeRoy Louden introduced LB 829 this year, a modest bill to designate Whiteclay as an "alcohol impact zone." Used successfully in Tennessee, Washington state and elsewhere, these zones allow authorities to take such steps as limiting store hours and high-alcohol beers. Of course, Busch and its other beer buddies lobbied responsibly by backing the bill, right?

Ha! Like gators on a poodle, their lobbyists leapt on the legislature, calling in chits from key lawmakers (who'd taken thousands of dollars in campaign cash from the industry) to kill the bill.

Tyson Larson, one of the senators inebriated with beer money, sputtered his opposition to LB 829 with this stunningly obtuse declaration: "We're not here to protect people from themselves." Surely that was beer talking.

Then there's Russ Karpisek, chair of the Senate committee handling the bill. He tried to rationalize his opposition by pitting Pine Ridge citizens against Nebraskans whom he said were worried that if Whiteclay were restricted, the beermongers might simply move the problem 40 miles or so down the road.

Even he had to admit that this was, at best, a flimsy excuse for doing nothing. When some asked Karpisek, "Well, if you had a crack house across the street, wouldn't you want to do something about it, even if it might pop up somewhere else the next day?" The chairman frankly conceded, "I didn't have a good answer for that."

But who needs logical answers when Anheuser-Busch alone has put $4,000 in your political pocket? Karpisek dutifully refused even to let the bill out of his committee for a vote.

Nebraska legislators did, however, approve one piece of liquor reform legislation before adjourning on April 18. They voted to lift the statewide prohibition against Sunday morning alcohol sales. Just what the Oglala tribe needs - a few more hours of wide-open beer sales in Whiteclay.

The tribal council, fed up with the disrespect and lack of action from legislators, despite years of appeals and protests, has filed a landmark $500 million federal lawsuit against Anheuser-Busch, three other big brewers and Whiteclay's four beer stores.

Even a big monetary award, however, can't scrub the shame off the corporations and pusillanimous legislators who have created and maintained this outrageous affront to human decency. There must certainly be an especially hot barstool in hell reserved for them.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # bluebluesdancer 2012-05-20 07:59
Immoral!
 
 
+15 # byard pidgeon 2012-05-20 08:39
I realize this proposal will never happen...let's ban all lobbying by corporate entities.
Money is not speech.
 
 
+2 # mdhome 2012-05-21 07:36
Maybe money is not speech, but it sure gets thing done, at least things that the rich want done.
 
 
+24 # reiverpacific 2012-05-20 08:56
Actually it's a sin to call the pissy water these con-companies churn out by the good title of "beer" ("King of Beers" my kilted arse, as their huge advertising budgets beat their vapid drums at you, and Coors is even worse!) but Hightower is right about targeting Indians and -I've seen up close and personal that they can't handle alcohol (as what originally nomadic peoples could). Their life was rich, full, spiritually imbued and earth-based before the genocide of the Wasicus and their "Black-Robed" child-stealers, culture-killers and abusers.
I've been to Pine Ridge res' a couple of times and others (please refrain from commenting about "Rich Indians and their Casinos -that's almost as contemptuous) and in spite of their poverty, been welcomed to their pow-wows but also seen the booze outlets and cheapshit "commodities" disguised as food the Bureau of Indian Assholes dishes out as a cheap excuse at subsistence concessions.
It's just an extension of the diseased blankets and pepper-laced, watered down whiskey the Government pushed on the "Hang-around-th e-forts in former times.
And don't get me started on the FBI's COINTELPRO activities.
FREE LEONARD PELTIER!
 
 
0 # Listner 2012-05-20 08:57
I live in a state with a large Native American population. This is a huge issue that goes back many years and is a very complex one. Alcohol is just one part of the issue although it's an important one. Alcohol abuse is an indicator of deeper societal problems that have gone on for many years.
Russia has an enormous problem with alcohol abuse and the reasons are endless.
Of course it's foolish to compound the problem by making it easier for alcoholics to buy booze but to shut down those liquor stores would accomplish very little, except to guarantee that somebody would have to drive farther to buy it. Do we really want alcoholics on the road in the first place ?
In this state, government has spent much time and resources in an effort to reach the Tribal community and develop an understanding and share ideas about this ongoing problem. I think the jury is still out but there is still hope.
 
 
+5 # reiverpacific 2012-05-20 14:22
Quoting Listner:
I live in a state with a large Native American population. This is a huge issue that goes back many years and is a very complex one. Alcohol is just one part of the issue although it's an important one. Alcohol abuse is an indicator of deeper societal problems that have gone on for many years.
Russia has an enormous problem with alcohol abuse and the reasons are endless.
Of course it's foolish to compound the problem by making it easier for alcoholics to buy booze but to shut down those liquor stores would accomplish very little, except to guarantee that somebody would have to drive farther to buy it. Do we really want alcoholics on the road in the first place ?
In this state, government has spent much time and resources in an effort to reach the Tribal community and develop an understanding and share ideas about this ongoing problem. I think the jury is still out but there is still hope.

There is always hope if sincerely applied but you have to go to the Res' to understand why most of these people -several generations now, feel "invisible", which is the most consistent comment I heard by those who would even talk about it.
What d'you mean by a "large Native American population? They are the minority of minorities and have no say in any state legislature that I'm aware of. You can live in an "Indian State" all you want and never even be aware of their existence if you don't go part way to meeting them.
 
 
+1 # thirteenthpaladin 2012-05-28 22:31
reiverpacific, I am entirely in agreement with both your posts, and find the finger pointing at tribal people about matters of addiction ironic at best.

if you aren't already familiar with dr gabor mate:

In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction, 2009

http://drgabormate.com/writings/books/in-the-realm-of-hungry-ghosts/

"From street-dwelling drug addicts to high-functionin g workaholics, the continuum of addiction cuts a wide and painful swath through our culture ... Countering prevailing notions of addiction as either a genetic disease or an individual moral failure, Dr. Gabor Mate presents an eloquent case that addiction - all addiction - is in fact a case of human development gone askew."

His presentation of relevant neurobiology and brain circuitry development is persuasive and inspiring.

also from his website, http://drgabormate.com/ :

"...Common to all of Dr. Mate's work is a focus on ... the broader context in which human disease and disorders arise ... Rather than offering facile, quick-fix solutions ... Dr. Mate weaves together scientific research, case histories, and his own insights and experience ... linking everything from neurophysiology , immunology, and developmental psychology to economic and social policy – and ... the spiritual dimensions of disease and healing."

many of Dr Mate's talks can be found on youtube.

thanks for your comments
 
 
0 # thirteenthpaladin 2012-05-28 22:39
on point, dr mate's participation in an online panel june 2, All My Relations, Reclaiming Our Place in a Larger Order, part of the Indigenous Wisdom and Modern Science Summit for the global, online Spring of Sustainability event:

http://drgabormate.com/all-my-relations-reclaiming-our-place-in-a-larger-order/

http://springofsustainability.com/
 
 
0 # thirteenthpaladin 2012-05-28 22:51
Listner, you might find this article interesting:

http://drgabormate.com/our-strange-indifference-to-aboriginal-addiction/#more-239'

from the article -

"... tobacco and other potentially addictive substances were available prior to the European settlement of this continent — even alcohol, in what is now Mexico and the American Southwest. Yet there is no mention by anthropologists or historians of anything that could be reasonably called addiction. As Bruce Alexander, professor emeritus of psychology at Simon Fraser University, points out, “where alcohol was readily available, it was used moderately, often ceremonially rather than addictively.”

The precursor to addiction is dislocation, according to Dr. Alexander. Dislocation is the loss of psychological, social and economic integration into family and culture — a sense of exclusion, isolation and powerlessness. “Only chronically and severely dislocated people are vulnerable to addiction ...”
 
 
+4 # epcraig 2012-05-20 09:12
Looks more like the legislators are taking too much money from out of state.
 
 
+7 # Adoregon 2012-05-20 12:27
Sounds like the Oglala need some medicinal cannabis to help them give alcohol the slip.

Alcohol is an addictive substance able to be lethal in one sitting, while cannabis is neither addictive nor lethal.

The lethal substance, alcohol is legal and ubiquitous, while non-lethal cannabis is prohibited. Huh... how does that make any sense?? Seems like the federal government is in bed with the alcohol pushers.
 
 
+3 # coberly 2012-05-20 12:37
i think you are right about the beer companies and the politicians.

but wouldn't it be better to find a way for these people to have a real life?

prohibition didn't work for white people. the war on drugs doesn't work for... er, us.
 
 
+1 # robbeygay 2012-05-20 16:41
Great writing to read shameful to comprehend the consequences of genecidal laws.
 
 
+1 # The Voice of Reason 2012-05-20 17:59
Alcohol is only one of many predator economies that plague us. Consider how the state taxes alcohol sales, and when some drunk driver kills a family of innocents, the state bemoans how they have to find someone to replace the drunk's tax base.

But still, it is difficult to get anyone to realize how destructive alcohol is, since the drinkers have only praise for the alcohol industry that preys on the drinkers.

This is another too-drunk-to-fa il economy that will never change. But what do you expect from an amoral society that prides itself on the health benefits of daily drinking.

The last time we tried the force of law to control alcoholics, the Gangster Rebellion broke out. And when the gangsters won, it was renamed 'the Roaring 20s' (to highlight the excitement of drive by shootings and mob rule), and the gangsters were given their place of honor in the government: ATF.

Of course, if firearms went first, they would be called FAT heads. hmmmmm. not a bad idea.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN