Clarke writes: "After decades of skyrocketing tuition and stagnant wages, American students and graduates now often owe significantly more on their student loans than their degrees are - in dollar terms - worth."
Student loan debt is now larger than credit card debt in the United States. (photo: Nastassia Davis)
The Case for Student Loan Forgiveness
26 April 12
he financial tidal wave of 2008 left millions of American homeowners "underwater," owing more on their homes than their properties are worth.
This has decimated consumer demand and destroyed countless dreams.
Yet homeowners are not the only group of Americans who find themselves "underwater." After decades of skyrocketing tuition and stagnant wages, American students and graduates now often owe significantly more on their student loans than their degrees are - in dollar terms - worth.
This week, President Obama took a decisive stand for students, fighting to prevent a three-point hike in interest rates on federally-subsidized Stafford loans. Over the past several months, he has also proposed an accelerated income-based repayment program and new incentives for states to contain costs. These are steps in the right direction. But we need more decisive action to get America's "underwater" students and graduates back on dry land.
The ever-growing cost of getting a degree is at the heart of the problem. Public institutions, where a majority of students are educated, have steadily increased tuition as public financing has declined. Amidst unprecedented state budget cutting, average public tuition increased by an astounding 8.3 percent in 2010 alone.
With many of their parents facing pay cuts or unemployment, students have had to take out more and more loans to cope with these quickly rising costs. The average borrower graduating from a public or private institution owed an unprecedented $25,250 according to recent figures. Americans' outstanding student loan debt obligations now exceed $1 trillion.
The problem is not just the immensity of the debt. It's the scarcity of opportunity for borrowers.
While the unemployment rate for new college graduates stood at 9.1 percent in late 2011, a recent Rutgers University study found that only 53 percent of a random sample of recent graduates of U.S. four-year universities were holding full-time jobs. Even fewer were making use of their university-level skills.
That explains why delinquency and default rates for student loans are rising sharply - even with income-based repayment programs in place. Students who studied hard, played by the rules, and are now desperate to find work are being denied basic opportunities and are, accordingly, falling behind on payments. They are finding that their degrees, like homes at the height of the real estate bubble, were vastly mispriced assets that are now hard to finance. Yet, unlike the debt from a home bought in the boom years, it is impossible to walk away from the debt incurred by getting a degree. A student borrower cannot discharge or even refinance their debts in bankruptcy, regardless of how desperate his or her situation becomes. And, if a student borrower does default, he or she will face perpetually rising interest rates and compounding fees with no hope of escape. Mike Konczal, a prominent blogger, has rightly called this "modern-day indentured servitude."
We must set these students free.
This month in the U.S. House, I have proposed H.R. 4170 - The Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012 - which would eliminate many of the awful consequences of educational indebtedness. In doing so, it would give Americans greater purchasing power, helping to jumpstart our economy and create jobs.
The bill provides full loan forgiveness for current borrowers who have paid the equivalent of 10 percent of their discretionary income for 10 years or who are able to do so over the coming years. It moreover caps interest rates on federal student loans at 3.4 percent and enables existing borrowers to break free from crushing fees by converting many private loans into federal loans.
Crucially, Americans who are behind on their payments due to a setback such as unemployment or illness would be eligible to enroll in the new program. The bill seeks to ensure that no one would be consigned to "indentured servitude" because of a stroke of bad luck.
To control costs and create prudent incentives for both students and institutions going forward, the bill allows future enrollees in the program to receive forgiveness up to a limit of $45,520 after paying up to 10 percent of discretionary income for 10 years. Under the bill, both current and future borrowers could still opt for the benefits of the existing income-based repayment program as an alternative.
If you support this solution, please join the movement by signing your name at hr4170.com. Also, please consider asking your Representative in Congress to sign on as a co-sponsor.
For at least a century, this country has run on an implied social contract that says "if you study hard and work hard, you'll have a steady middle-class income and a stable career."
Let's reinstate that contract and put student borrowers back on higher ground.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I am 68 years old. I should not pay for any education if I attend a public college or university.
If all schooling is free then many people will take more classes, leading to higher costs and shortages for the people that really need a certain class. Even if it's free to you, there are still costs involved.
The whole nation benefits from better education. This should be a social good.
"For at least a century, this country has run on an implied social contract that says "if you study hard and work hard, you'll have a steady middle-class income and a stable career."
THis was actually always a radical idea but one that was believed in by many.
Now the mantra of the US is Debt Peonage. In fact, debt peonage is what the owners of the US -- the ruling elites -- always thought the implicit implicit social contract was.
College education was once a way out of debt peonage, but today it is a route into debt peonage.
==========
I returned from four years in the military in 1975 -- worked at crappy jobs for a while and then attended BSU in the early 80s. The GI Bill at that time required completion of studies within 10 years of DOS (when I left the service). I was able to LIVE on the GI Bill and still save enough for tuition and books each semester without having to work at the same time. I'm afraid those days are gone forever. I don't think the ruling elite wants well-educated citizens. It makes them tougher to manage when they're not so gullible. As 5/8 of an Economics major, I can assure you that if education is free, there will be MORE students admitted; not less. It's the most fundamental rule of supply and demand. Scholarships are only available to a tiny percentage of students. It's a myth to think that scholarships alone will be sufficient. We're already being left behind by other -- better educated -- countries. Quality education is key. Don't let the anti-intellectu al crowd eat your brain.
==========
sail4free
==========
And what would be wrong with that. Even some college experience is better than none. There would still be entrance requirements and a grade point average to remain in a program. Colleges are now under such financial pressure that they must do everything to retain tuition paying students who should probably flunk out.
And US colleges are going after foreign students like crazy because they pay full tuition with no need based scholarships. I can see the day when some of the best colleges in the US are mostly foreign students. It is already that way in grad schools in science.
The rulers of this nations are really just short sighted. They send infinite amounts of money into war and weapons but invest very little in education.
After WWII, returning GIs took advantage of the GI Bill and low tuition to get higher education and live better debt-free lives.
Today a college degree is a requirement for many, many available jobs, so a young person is obligated to mortgage his future just to gain access to a future.
America was stronger when Americans could build their own lives without having to go into debt just to reach the starting line.
A big part of the problem -- not even mentioned in the article -- are the relatively new for-profit colleges. These scammers only have 10% of the nation's students but receive 90% of student loan proceeds. Their predatory practices designed to get anyone with a pulse to sign a contract are legendary. In a nation which properly regulated such industry, their actions would be criminal. An acquaintance of mine graduated top of her class as a "Surgery Tech" only to learn her school is not certified. She still has to pay back the $28,000 though. Even the director of the federal Dept. of Education says he has no ability to forgive a loan -- even if the so-called "school" has been proven to be a fraud. Madness!
==========
sail4free
==========
RSS feed for comments to this post