Reich writes: "President Obama's electoral strategy can best be summed up as: 'We're on the right track, my economic policies are working, we still have a long way to go but stick with me and you'll be fine.' That's not good enough."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Why "We're on the Right Track" Isn't Enough
21 April 12
resident Obama's electoral strategy can best be summed up as: "We're on the right track, my economic policies are working, we still have a long way to go but stick with me and you'll be fine."
That's not good enough. This recovery is too anemic, and the chance of an economic stall between now and Election Day far too high.
Even now, Mitt Romney's empty "I'll to it better" refrain is attracting as many voters as Obama's "we're on the right track." Each man is gathering 46 percent of voter support, according to the latest New York Times/CBS poll. Only 33 percent of the public thinks the economy is improving while 40 percent say they're still falling behind financially - an 11 point increase from 2008. Nearly two-thirds are concerned about paying for housing, and one in five with mortgages say they're underwater.
If the economy stalls, Romney's empty promise will look even better. And I'd put the odds of a stall at 50-50. That puts the odds of a Romney presidency far too high for comfort. Need I remind you that Romney enthusiastically supports Paul Ryan's wildly regressive budget, and as president would be able to make at least one or possibly two Supreme Court appointments, and control the EPA and every other federal agency and department?
The Obama White House should face it: "We're on the right track" isn't sufficient. The President has to offer the nation a clear, bold strategy for boosting the economy. It should be the economic mandate for his second term.
It should consist of four points:
First, Obama should demand that the nation's banks modify mortgages of homeowners still struggling in the wake of Wall Street's housing bubble - threatening that if the banks fail to do so he'll fight to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act and break up Wall Street's biggest banks (as the Dallas Fed recently recommended).
Second, he should condemn oil speculators for keeping gas prices high - demanding that the oil companies allow the Commodity Futures Trading Corporation to set limits on such speculation and instructing the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute oil price manipulation.
Third, he should stand ready to make further job-creating investments in the nation's crumbling infrastructure, and renew his call for an infastructure bank. And while he understands the need to reduce the nation's long-term budget deficit, he won't allow austerity economics to take precedence over job creation. He'll veto budget cuts until unemployment is down to 5 percent.
vFinally, he should make clear the underlying problem is widening inequality. With so much of the nation's disposable income and wealth going to the top, the vast middle class doesn't have the purchasing power it needs to fire up the economy. That's why the Buffett rule, setting a minimum tax rate for millionaires, is just a first step for ensuring that the gains from growth are widely shared.
The President can still say we're on the right track. But he should also say he's not content with the pace of the recovery and will do everything in his power to quicken it. And he should ask the American people for a mandate in his second term to make the economy work for everyone, not just those at the top.
Such a mandate can be put into effect only with a Congress that's committed to better jobs and wages for all Americans. He should remind voters that congressional Republicans prevented him from doing all that was needed in the first term, and they must not be allowed to do so again.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "Locked in the Cabinet," "Reason," "Supercapitalism," "Aftershock," and his latest e-book, "Beyond Outrage." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Please consider Rockie Anderson for our next President.
The fact remains also that Obama's policies on virtually every major issue, from civil liberties to the bankers and taxation,l to war, has been either identical with or worse than Bush. That's not being harsh; it's being accurate. Close your eyes on the man's race and party (and pretense of being liberal) and look at what he's actually done.
And by the way, it's not analysis or argument to name-call. 'Rethuglican' or 'Mutt' is on the level of Limbaugh's nonsense. It doesn't substitute for thought.
I'm not voting for Obama. His policies have been horrid.
As far as threatening the banks with Glass-Steagall reinstatement unless they write down mortgages for homeowners- No, we need both.
There are those who ask, "Why should we give a write-down to foolish, greedy homeowners who took on mortgages they should have known they couldn't afford?" but an equally valid question is, "Why should we give a profit to foolish, greedy banks who gave mortgages to people they should have known couldn't afford them." The foolish, greedy (and often unsophisticated ) homeowners are certainly feeling some pain and will do so far into the future. The foolish, greedy (and supposedly sophisticated) bankers should certainly be sharing that pain, now and far into the future.
Obama extended the Bush billionaires tax break and is willing to cut Social Security and Medicare. He's a fraud. Take te blinders off, okay? Stop expecting him to act like someone he's not.
There is no answer. This election has no power to stop the disintegration of this nation. It doesn't matter whether you vote Obama, Romney, Anderson, write in Elizabeth Warren, or just stay away from the polls--it's too late now.
Stop acting as if it matters. It doesn't.
Of course all countries are part of the oil demand curve, but old formulas fail to account for the explosive growth seen in the "Asian Tigers'. In context of 5% annual oilfield depletion rate, speculators are a footnote, so eliminating speculators will not help our motor fuel cost/supply problem very much. American economic vulnerability increases incrementally as fuel costs go up; middle class pain turns to national collapse when almost certain Middle East meltdown knocks out several millions of barrels per day.
Robert Reich does not pay attention to warnings from oil supply analysts like Jan Lundberg, Robert Klare, Richard Heinberg or Anthony Cordesman. Mike Ruppert and others have written about oil problems impacting food supply. Even with seemingly massive oil extraction projects underway in Canada and the US, the sum total of all these domestic energy prospects is but a small fraction of what we still must import.
While Congress diddles, we move closer to transport emergency. Is there ANYONE in the private sector, anyone left in banking savvy about Peak Oil and railway's part in the solution set?
Among his worst betrayals: he instantly appointed a pack of insider elitists to keep Wall Street DE-regulated --plus, he scuttled the then-growing public demand for a Single Payer health care system.
IMO, Obama is a Quisling for the USA's entrenched oligarchy -- and a pathological liar to boot.
Better to vote Green than support any more Duopoly candidates.
If Romney wins and the Republicans take over Congress they will: pass the Ryan budget destroying Medicare as we know it and probably will crash Social Security as well, will decrease regulation on the petroleum and financial industries, leading to more catastrophe, add another two conservative judges on the Supreme Court and then repeal Roe v Wade and countless other beneficial rulings for the working class, will repeal health care so that people could still be denied insurance when they get sick and the people with pre existing conditions will be out of luck, will continue to lower taxes for the rich and create larger deficits, will reduce funding for food stamps, for clean energy, for science, for global warming, for Pell Grants, will try to destroy unions, and will probably come up with some excuse to go to war. The list of destructive Republican policies goes on a long time but I can guarantee that they favor the very wealthiest. Their platform is now,” Donate to my campaign and I will make you wealthier.”
Some of you hate Obama but anything he has done will pale in comparison to what the Republicans will do.
It is a FACT that the minority cannot prevent laws from being enacted; it can only delay the process. The 'modern' version of the filibuster depends on Senate rules, which are subject to majority vote.
It is the connivance of BOTH parties which enable minorities to stifle legislation. BOTH are corrupt to the teeth. These are not 'fake facts'. Learn something before you name-call.
This explains why you can't force a filibuster.
What will it take for Americans to wake up? Obama has been solidly on the side of the worst elements in the country. Period. That's not hyperbole. He appointed to his cabinet the bankers who caused the collapse, lobbyists for Monsanto and other environmental criminals, and stooges for the oil industry.
The Republicans will pass all of this terrible legislation? Not without Democratic complicity. If the Democrats simply do what the GOP has done, tie up the Congress, then the Ryan budget and the rest of that junk has no chance... right? Unless it turns out that Obama's excuse so far, GOP obstructionism, is really not true.
We're being screwed by both parties, folks. Look at who's paying the campaign funds for Obama and Romney –– they're the same corporations.
The overriding factor for this election is not completely about Romney or Obama, it is whether or not the Republicans will be able to maintain their influence and power over the Government, the Democrats and so many American people. Their ideology of less regulation and less taxes on the rich has been going on for at least thirty years. It is crippling our economy, our country and our greatness. It is the most profound scam that so many people, against their own good, have fallen for: making wealthy people even wealthier so they will make jobs and shower us all with their wealth. Of course if that were true our economy would be soaring because the wealthy have never been so rich. We must stop the Republicans war against the 99% and the only realistic way, just months before the election, is to vote for Obama and every Democrat we can. Unfortunately, if we don’t get a real super majority, it will be business as usual.
Some people say the Democrats are just like the Republicans, and in some ways that’s true, but when it comes to making legislation, over all, they try to protect the interests and lives of the 99% and all Americans. The Republicans platform is now, “Donate to our campaign and we’ll make you wealthier.”
Our only chance to heal our country is to have a true Democratic super majority, until the Republicans regain their sanity.
The President is well aware that he has to juggle very carefully in the next 6 months if he wants to make it to, or even win the election. It would be very foolish of him to advertise just what he plans to do to his enemies, now, or after the election. His enemies have proven to be scandalous criminals, hell bent on fascilitating his demise, will fabricate and stop at nothing to accomplish their goal. I think that keeping a low profile before the election, even at some political cost can be his only strategy right now. He's a good man; what he lacks in experience is surpassed by his integrety. Once reelected the ball will be in his court and I think he'll be ready, able and willing to unleash some holy kick-butt on the real problems.
Give the guy the benefit of the doubt, stick with him, believe in him,, what better choice do we have?
Just what I want, a mega multi millionaire that wears secret sacred underthings calling the shots of this country.
Laissez faire capitalism is a short term bubble that stands to reap untold wealth for the few at the expense of the many. But, the benefactors of this system are well aware of the shaky ground on which they stand, so it becomes a game of get as much as you can, as fast as you can, while you can, because it is not going to last.
The revolution is already forming on a global scale, and the time allotted for the greedsters is indeed limited. What occurred during and after the French Revolution will pale compared to what is to come. Doom and gloom? Depends upon where you stand, isn't it?
But I do agree that Obama needs to use his oratorical skills to build his base and some of Dr. Reich's ideas make a lot of sense.
Whatever is decided on has to work: the U.S. cannot go through another regressive Republican regime without permanent harm to its institutions.
RSS feed for comments to this post