Nader writes: "I often ask Congressional Democrats these days: 'If you agree that your Republican counterparts in Congress are the most craven, corporatist, fact-denying, falsifying, anti-99 percent, militaristic Republicans in the Party's history, then why are you not landsliding them?' Their responses are largely in the form of knowing smiles and furrowed brows."
Ralph Nader. (photo: TruthAlliance)
Can Democrats Landslide Republicans?
07 February 12
often ask Congressional Democrats these days: "If you agree that your Republican counterparts in Congress are the most craven, corporatist, fact-denying, falsifying, anti-99 percent, militaristic Republicans in the Party's history, then why are you not landsliding them?" Their responses are largely in the form of knowing smiles and furrowed brows.
There are answers that are more specific to account for the large election losses in 2010, the loss of the House of Representatives to John Boehner and Eric Cantor, and the prospect of losing the House and the Senate this November. Chief among them is that the two parties are vigorously dialing for the same commercial dollars to finance their campaigns. The resultant inhibitions and self-censorships bring the parties' real agendas closer together, erasing the bright lines that make elections clearer choices for voters.
Here are eight initiatives that could landslide the Republicans in November's Congressional contests. It starts with a ringing declaration that recalls the legendary labor rally challenge: "Whose side are you on?" With the two parties often seen as Republicrats or DemReps, due to the lack of credible, distinct differences on military, foreign policy, trade, agribusiness, energy and corporate crime/welfare subjects, among others, such a proclamation of "we the people" helps frame the details of this fresh approach, as follows:
First, resurrect the old Democratic Party's historic safeguarding of federal minimum wage and labor laws from Republican dissolution. It is astonishing that, since the passing of Senator Ted Kennedy, there have been so few high-profile champions in Congress for restoring the minimum wage - now $7.25 per hour - to its inflation-adjusted level of 1968 which today would be $10.00 per hour. That long overdue move would pour tens of billions of dollars into job-producing consumer demand during this recession. It would end a decades-long windfall for employers who have been increasing their prices and salaries while receiving many tax breaks during that period. To objections from the curled-lip House Republican Eric Cantor, the reply is: "You don't believe workers in your district should make as much as workers made 44 years ago when their productivity was half what it is today, Eric?"
The scholar who showed that keeping minimum wages current doesn't cost jobs is Alan Krueger, now President Obama's chief economic advisor. In 2008, Mr. Obama himself pledged to push for a $9.50 minimum wage by 2011.
Second, announce the filing of legislation that declares immediate drafting of all able-bodied and age-qualified children and grandchildren of all members of Congress any time that branch or the president plunge us into another war. Besides forcing Congress to pay attention to its Constitutional responsibilities to declare or not declare war, this legislation would ring with the authenticity of responsible humble servants becoming part of the risk presently hoisted on a few million, mostly low income, families.
Third, cut the huge, bloated, wasteful military budget, really end the wars, and switch the expected savings into repairing and renovating America through a public works program all over the country with good-paying, non-exportable jobs.
Fourth, shift much of the tax burdens to activities we do not like, such as pollution, huge Wall Street speculation, corporate crime waves and profits from systemic product waste. Even Exxon/Mobil supports the idea of a carbon tax, which would help the environment. The motto: Tax what you burn before you tax what you earn.
Fifth, announce a national energy conversion campaign based on efficiency and renewables. The only true energy independence comes from the sun in its many manifestations. This will create more local employment, and small businesses down to the community-neighborhood levels. Goodbye to the toxic fossil fuel and atomic energy cartels.
Sixth, crack down on corporate and governmental violations of our Constitution and laws. No more no-fault government and no more no-fault big business. If the law is to be observed in the streets, then it must be observed in the suites. People are being pushed around, disrespected, defrauded, injured, and given the runaround from arrogant corporate bureaucrats using nameless, robotic and tyrannical "fine print" barricades. There have to be accountabilities that the abused citizens can invoke.
Seventh is a proposal to establish a national complaint-handling system using the Internet to help consumers, taxpayers and workers, for a change. You got a beef with your insurance company, bank, energy company, pension fund, cable company, hospital, telephone/gas/water/electric utility, or some government agency and you can't get through to file your complaint?
A complaint-handling system will save billions of hours wasted on just trying to get through, much less getting your complaint heard. It will also be a good way to aggregate complaints to detect patterns for policy-making and enforcement corrections. Patterns lead to deterrence, fewer complaints, and fewer dollar losses. What a way to show sensitivity to the daily irritations and frustrations of the American people!
Eighth, create a democracy movement based on simple facilities for people who choose to band together in various roles. In return for what you the taxpayers have had to spend to bail out and otherwise privilege these large companies, the Democratic party can press for inserts in their billing systems and other corporate carriers inviting you to voluntarily join and contribute dues to a nonprofit staffed with full-time champions of your causes as consumers, patients, workers and taxpayers (inserts could also be sent in the communications from tax-collecting agencies) directly accountable to you. No results, then no dues next time, and no taxpayer subsidies. These facilities would shift some power from the haves to the have-nots.
Imagine the public discussion, excitement and participation these eight proposals would provoke. Previous non-voters along with regular voters would see they have a stake in these elections, and that one of the major parties at least wants to be on their side, and will strive to earn their trust by empowering them directly.
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author. His most recent book - and first novel - is "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us." His most recent work of non-fiction is "The Seventeen Traditions."
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Your wonderful and original proposals are examples of necessary medicine for a very sick country.
Thank you for your ongoing dedication to presenting original and thoughtful solutions for really getting serious about saving the world for democracy. Thank you for representing the voice of hard working tax-payers, the unemployed, the intellectuals and soldiers who need honest representation. If you could be a candidate, I would vote for you, although the thought of Newt Gingrich winning through some illegal transparent treachery is enough to make me give up any hope for change in the government.
Thank you for your will to keep fighting for the truth and a better world for our children.
Denise in Portland
All class deformed historical cycles are degenerating totalitarian outcomes, because the class mechanism, and class hiearchies corrupt, overturn social forces, which are not independent of dominant enslaving class forces. Only a global social revolution puttting in place social, middle classes, world wide can dissolve the Patriarchal, class mechanism around milleniums, when class history usurped social control, social wealth in the Matriarchy.
We need a social manifesto and social strategies to smash the corrupting class hierarchies, class history to kick start a social mechanism, in history, to automate social reforms, that are independent of class forces:
A Social Manifesto and Historical Theory
http://asocialmanifestoagainstclasshistory.com/
Reminds me of a period of time in my youth when lived in South Dakota. I went door to door, campaigning for McGovern, their favorite son, and nearly without exception, the response I got was "He's a great guy, but he's too honest to be President." sigh
votes to enable Dubya to rule the USA for
a calamitous 8 years. Thanks a lot, you
gigantic anal sphincter. At least have the decency to get off the stage and keep
your mouth shut. PLEASE!!
And decency, ... such audacity... crass, inane belligerence without a single critical thought on any of the many enumerated details that Nader offers.
You could have approached commentary from many angles, from whether one, none, or all these are indeed good ideas, whether they reflect progressive's interests, whether these ideas are feasible, ... what did you do, you chose 7th grade language, 6th grade political insight, and, speaking of decency, you have no sense of irony.
Although I agree that in 2000 Nader put ego ahead of better judgment and chose political strategy and rhetoric that worked against Al Gore, time has proven Nader to be correct about the virtual sameness of the two Parties. However, he was not to blame for Bush's ascendance to the Presidency.
You are like too many people here on RSN who say nothing, disregard relevant details, revel in myopic sycophancy, or just click a thumb of disapproval.
Not the best way to show political, moral, or intellectual superiority.
Right up to Election Day 2000 Nader had the option of telling his followers, "I thank you for your support, but since it now appears I cannot win the White House, please consider yourselves free to vote for another candidate if you feel that will be more productive."
Nader got 90,000 votes in Florida that year. If 99 percent voted for some minor-party candidate or other, or didn't vote, and 1 percent voted for Gore, that would have swamped Bush's fictitious 537-vote "victory margin" in that state. One percent.
Instead, Nader called it a "victory" when because of his votes Gore didn't win. I almost choked--and I had actually voted for Mr. Nader in 1996. I don't know what Nader had against Gore (did he see him as a rival for leadership of "progressives"?), but whatever it was, he has to bear a lot of blame for what followed.
Nader garnered was also a tiny sliver of votes that really shows the incompetence of the Dems for not being able to grab, what, 1.5% more of the votes? Not to mention their spinelessness in the face of rigged voting machines and Bush v. Gore.
No wonder they want to use Mr. Nader as a convenient scapegoat for their own uselessness....which, as he points out here, continues to this day with no real likelihood of changing before this election.
What will it take to change this ... I think we all know! we don't advocate though, we are just watching and waiting for it to start.
It is so easy to find the facts, but for you it appears easier to blather insults.
If this problem continues to be ignored by Nader and the Dems, liberals, progressives, et al, they can organize and fund raise til the cows come home, and it won't make a damn bit of difference. The Repubs will steal more seats in Congress, and maybe the White House as well.
His ideas are good, but actions speak a lot louder than words.
Philip
Show me a figure in the US who has put more dedicated, uncompromising, successful action behind his words in the past 40 years.
Obama really does reflect the heart of the democratic party since Clinton. It is happy to be the subaltern to the republicans. It does not want to lead. So there are deeper problems inside the democratic party. The Kucinichs or Sanders are far to few in number. The center of the party really has no mission.
If he still believes in the political possibilities of this country, Ralph could spend his time more efficiently by organizing a people's party to take back government in elections on the city, county, state, and national levels.
The biggest elephant in the room is not the GOP-it's corporate funding and PACS. Until money is not the electing factor, neither party is for true reform. You should have been so far-sighted in the election year 2000, and maybe you would have thrown your support behind Al Gore for President.
Yes, I can, and that's the problem. Mr. Nader's suggestions would make sense in a sensible democracy, but that's not what we have. These suggestions if embraced by the Democratic Party would only stoke the passions of the Repubs and push many right leaning independents towards voting Republican.
That's not the way to win in November. Democrats have to have a set of principles and policies that will not only distinguish them from the medieval ones of the Repubs, but be implementable and have easy to understand benefits. Admittedly, several of Mr. Nader's initiatives fit these criteria, but the rest get lost in a confusing list of "wouldn't it be nice" ideas.
And, Mr. Nader, please, oh please, do not get discouraged by reaction to your initiatives and decide to run as a third party!
please,fade more quickly... and ralph, thanks for serving the people far beyond the intellectual capacity and corporate morality of what passes for a democratic party...
RSS feed for comments to this post.