RSN April 14 Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Taibbi writes: "Instead, it's a bizarre, almost tribal mentality that rules our capital city - a kind of groupthink that makes extreme myopia and a willingness to ignore the tribe's ostensible connection to the people who elected them a condition for social advancement within."

Rolling Stone Journalist Matt Taibbi. (photo: HBO)
Rolling Stone Journalist Matt Taibbi. (photo: HBO)



'Bailout': Barofsky's Adventures in Groupthink City

By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone

07 February 13

 

eil Barofsky isn't going to like this, but the first person I thought of when I read the former TARP Inspector General's book, Bailout, was G. Gordon Liddy. Not that he has anything in common politically with Nixon's fanatical arm-roasting hatchet man, but after reading Bailout I had the same thought I had after reading Liddy's memoir, Will - that every now and then, a born writer ends up in some other, far more interesting profession, and we don't find out about it until he or she is forced for some reason to write a book.

Bailout has its first paperback release this week, and Barofsky accordingly is making the media rounds (check out Comedy Central tomorrow), where he'll mainly be asked about the political revelations in the book. You know, the inside-baseball stories of how the officials who administered the TARP bailout fought transparency at every turn, failed to do due diligence on the health and viability of bailout recipients, seemed totally uninterested in creating safeguards against fraud, and generally speaking spent more time bitching about the media and plotting against the likes of Elizabeth Warren and, eventually, Barofsky himself than making sure the largest federal rescue in history wasn't a complete waste of money.

As the former Special Inspector General of the TARP, a key official who was present at the highest levels throughout most of the bailout period and saw from the inside how both the Bush and Obama administrations attacked the economic collapse, Barofsky does have that story to tell, and the book unsurprisingly is full of historically weighty scenes and factoids that will be culled by reporters like me for years to come.

But there's a secondary and I think more interesting subplot to this book, a personal story that will give it more staying power. Just like Will was really a journey-of-self-discovery story that just happened to have the Watergate burglary as a backdrop (the book's real climax comes in the post-Watergate prison years, where Liddy really "finds himself"), Bailout is a kind of Alice in Wonderland tale of an ordinary, sane person disappearing down into a realm of hallucinatory dysfunction, with Tim Geithner playing the role of the Mad Hatter and Barofsky the increasingly frustrated Alice who realizes he's stuck at the stupidest tea party he ever was at.

Though you would think it would be an angry book, Barofsky describes his experiences with a wry, anthropological detachment, almost in awe at these strange and irrational characters who seem so obsessed with intramural squabbles and other irrelevancies (when the newly-appointed Barofsky asks for advice from the Treasury Department's Inspector General, Eric Thorson, Thorson's first tip, delivered in total seriousness, is to get an account at the Treasury Dining Room, where a presidential appointee can get good food at cheap prices) while the world economy is melting down all around them.

The book is full of morbidly funny scenes, like for instance when Barofsky describes his inner trepidation in taking the oath of office on the extremely religious Hank Paulson's personal Bible:

Paulson is famously a devout Christian Scientist and as I put my Jewish hand on the Paulson family Bible, I fleetingly pictured it bursting into flames . . .

In that same surreal scene, Paulson, in his first meeting with Barofsky, rambles on about the decisions he's faced with, including whether or not to use TARP funds to rescue the auto industry. Barofsky listens politely, believing he's just accidentally present while an important official is thinking out loud, when suddenly Paulson looks at him. "So what do you think?" Paulson asks.

This moment underscores the randomness that seems to have permeated a lot of bailout policy. Barofsky realizes that Paulson is actually asking advice of a career criminal prosecutor - a man he's only just met, who knows nothing about the subject - on whether or not to bail out Detroit. "What do I think?" he wonders to himself. "I think the only thing I know about the domestic automobile industry is that sweet '95 Chevy Camaro I parked outside."

Another section reads like something straight out of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Barofsky has it explained to him that an Inspector General shouldn't be too much of a "junkyard dog" ("You don't want to be seen as promoting yourself") and you don't want to be a "lapdog," either (because Congress will get upset and drag you over the coals if they find out you're playing golf with the people you're supposed to be policing). Instead, an IG should be porridge whose regulatory temperature is "just right" - a "watchdog," which in Washington parlance means you want Congress to know you're doing something, but you don't want it to think that it owns you.

Again, all of this advice Barofsky gets has nothing to do with what's best for, you know, the actual country - maybe, in this circumstance, the country needed a "junkyard dog" in that spot, but that's not the way things are done inside the Beltway. According to the twisted logic of this place, your goal is to find a happy medium, where you don't anger too many of the people in the agency you're supposed to be policing, but you also don't go so soft on them that Congress crawls up your rear end.

This is a persistent theme of the book: that Washington is a kind of upside-down world where everyone is all the time frantic about some emergency or other - you can't ever be sure what it is, exactly, except that it almost certainly isn't one of the real-world problems the locals were hired to solve, like the loss of 5,000 points of Dow Jones value in a year or the awesome quantity of toxic/fraudulent loans infecting the books of our major banking institutions. Instead, the characters Barofsky encounters seem to worry endlessly about one-upping each other, not rocking the boat, and avoiding looking like tools in the media and/or to their bosses.

In an early chapter, Barofsky describes a major international drug prosecution against the FARC rebels in Colombia undertaken by the U.S. Attorney's office in the Southern District of New York that gets undermined when the Washington office - apparently afraid that a regional office nailing a major South American cartel would make the main office look like asleep-on-the-job twits - races frantically to prevent indictments from being handed down before they can be put in nominal charge of the case.

In another scene, the Treasury IG, the aforementioned Thorson, scrambles to throw together a last-minute investigation of some schmuck bailout-recipient bank in Beverly Hills before Barofsky's SIGTARP office - which would take over oversight responsibilities from Thorson- was up and running. Thorson conducts a review of the bank's receipt of bailout funds, then seemingly arranges to plant a question with a local reporter about the investigation, which Thorson immediately says, in an email cc'ed to top Treasury officials, that he must respond to - because he has "a responsibility here to have accomplished some work" and that this investigation was "the one job that would demonstrate our required involvement" in the bailout oversight.

In other words, Thorson felt that it was the responsibility of his office to show, to a reporter, that he had actually done something, and not sat on his thumbs while hundreds of billions of dollars were flowing out of Treasury's coffers.

Anyway, in the end, Barofsky suffers an Alice-like end, essentially ejected from the Beltway Wonderland for being different. You remember how Alice was ejected by the King and Queen after giving her evidence - Rule 42, "all persons more than a mile high must leave the court":

"Well, I shan't go, at any rate," said Alice: "besides, that's not a regular rule: you invented it just now."
"It's the oldest rule in the book," said the King.
"Then it ought to be Number One," said Alice.

It's clear by the end of the book that Barofsky is a similar kind of mutant/unwanted smartass in this world, veering way too far into "junkyard dog" territory. His SIGTARP reports on the bailout are unflinchingly critical of the bailout effort, and in particular the glaring discrepancies between what was promised in areas like home mortgage modification and what was actually delivered.

There is an interesting moment when Barofsky and his deputy Kevin Puvalowski realize that, over a year into the bailout, Treasury official Herb Allison, a close confidant of Geithner, has made a subtle change to the language describing the aims of the ill-fated HAMP mortgage modification program. Allison ends up claiming that the goal of the program was only to make 3 to 4 million offers of trial modifications, as opposed to actually helping 3 to 4 million people stay in their homes, which is what the president and the Treasury originally announced.

By the end of 2009, only 70,000 permanent modifications had been completed, a long way from the stated goal. When Barofsky confronts Allison about the problem, he says only that there's a "moral hazard" issue with giving out too many modifications, that expanding the program it isn't fair to people who made their mortgage payments all along.

Obviously, neither Geithner nor Allison ever worried much about "moral hazard" when they were handing out billions in no-conditions cash to irresponsible banks. Barofsky realizes then that the government is not only willing to bend the truth to give itself political cover, but more importantly is essentially unconcerned with fixing the problem of mass foreclosures.

Again, this is a world that is really blind to the fact that it is connected somehow to the rest of the country outside of D.C. - so changing language to make it look like certain goals have been met makes perfect sense, given that nobody outside their fairy-tale bubble really exists to them. It's a kind of creepy collective narcissism captured perfectly by the ever-grumpy Tim Geithner when interviewed by another SIGTARP deputy, Geoff Moulton, who asked Geithner if he could think of any mistakes he might have made in administering TARP.

Geithner thought, then answered:

The only real mistake I can think of is that there were times when we were unnecessarily unsure of ourselves. We should have just realized at the time how right each of our decisions was.

Barofsky left SIGTARP in early 2011. He's teaching at NYU now and after writing this book, essentially unemployable in Washington. That sucks for him, but the benefit for the rest of us is this trippily entertaining account of how crazy Washington is.

If you follow issues like Too-Big-To-Fail or Wall Street corruption long enough, you realize that the reason things don't get done about them by our government has very little to do with ideology or even politics, in the way most of us understand politics.

Instead, it's a bizarre, almost tribal mentality that rules our capital city - a kind of groupthink that makes extreme myopia and a willingness to ignore the tribe's ostensible connection to the people who elected them a condition for social advancement within. Most normal people don't get to see what that place is like, because most of the rearview-mirror accounts of that world are written by people who somewhere along the line became infected by the Beltway disease. Only a few true outsiders make it out alive, and only a few of those write books. This is one of the best.

Editor's Note: Apologies for mixing up Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks. That's freaking pathetic. If anyone's keeping my score this year, that's like ten shame points.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+15 # Patbilla1 2013-02-07 08:12
"Asleep-on-the- job twits" That about says it all!
 
 
+32 # maddave 2013-02-07 08:32
You are surprised, maybe, over your awakening to the fact that that power and the powerful are their own reasons for being, and nothing - not you, not me, not the better good of the Nation - is more important?

They don't care what we are thinking. . .or worse. . .they tell us what to think, and most of us obey.

With the plutocratic disdain of a pack of well-fed Serengeti lions napping under a solitary shade tree, Washington Inner-circle (and inner-circle and wanabees) - view We The People just as the lions survey the other animals on the Plain . . . The (antelopes) and We (The People) comprise their next meals.

Generally, in the minds Corporate America and our Government, common people economic expendables: inexpensive commodities to be used up, thrown away and, if need be, cheaply and easily replaced.
 
 
+25 # lindyb 2013-02-07 08:39
It's what comes of putting lobbyists and industry insiders in charge of oversight. The are all about not getting caught and protecting the industry, not US citizens. It's the fox in charge of the hen house.
 
 
+29 # beeyl 2013-02-07 09:17
Somehow, words like "narcissism" and "hubris" don't quite capture the scale of ugly arrogant solipsism it takes to speak Geithner's words with a straight face. God, what a douche!
 
 
+4 # AndreM5 2013-02-07 11:20
Since it worked so well before, he was probably trying to quote GWB who was asked the same question.
 
 
+16 # coberly 2013-02-07 09:29
I would only add that the behavior and attitudes described were fully evident at my places of employment. I think bureaucratic-th ink is a standard human coping strategy for keeping your job and advancing your career.. in any bureaucracy.

the only cure, i think, is honesty from above. or occasionally an intermediate level boss who is not so interested in advancement that he does not try to run a sane shop at his own level. either of those is extremely rare.
 
 
+33 # elmont 2013-02-07 09:40
Imagine how different our knowledge of the world would be were it not for Matt. Love his stuff.
 
 
+18 # James Marcus 2013-02-07 10:07
All understandable:
Everyone has.... a 'Hand-In-The-Ti ll'.
"Keep quiet. Go along, to get along, and you'll get your share of The Booty" (extorted funds).
Make Noise (or Blow the Whistle!), and 'You'll get yours', in Quite Another Way (and your family is in danger, too!)
Mafia Style!
 
 
+14 # noitall 2013-02-07 10:25
Matt, you should get some profit kick-back from Barofsky because you sure sold "Bailout" to me! You're right, a valuable account that adds credence to what most of us suspect about that cesspool that is our Nation's Capitol. I've just started watching "House of Cards", a TV series about the D.C. chess match where the People's 'win' comes WAY DOWN on the priority list of those regal giants (in their own minds) that are our political leaders. Perfect account, Matt, I loved it! Everyone who makes the pilgrimage to D.C. should read this, put those smooth folks that they will be dealing with into perspective (thereby raising one's own stature and conficence) and move forward with accomplishing your mission for YOUR people without becoming infected by the blight that is D.C. politics.
 
 
+12 # MainStreetMentor 2013-02-07 10:33
Within every elected, good-intentione d, new official, there comes a confrontation with the “turning-point” : i.e.; Their original “what-must-be-d one” attitude meets “this-is-the-wa y-things-are-do ne-in-governmen t” established policy/procedur e. If the latter does not elicit compliance from the new official, both their effectiveness and their tenure are doomed to live a short political life. Until an entire GROUP of newly elected, singleness-of-p urpose, officials arrive at any given body of government – and strictly due to their collective numbers – will any possibility of change EVER be afforded to the level of governance to which they were elected.
 
 
0 # wrknight 2013-02-11 11:22
You argue eloquently for single term limits.
 
 
+1 # Rahn 2013-02-07 11:30
With the UCC filings of the One Peoples Public Trust, which have foreclosed on the corporations posing as government, we no longer live by their leave. The Guardian has stepped up to the plate. How about you Matt.http://gua rdianlv.com/201 3/01/in-the-mon ey-federal-rese rve-world-banks -foreclosed-on/
 
 
+12 # angelfish 2013-02-07 12:30
God Bless Matt Taibbi! He deserves the medal of Freedom for his work and diligence in keeping us informed. NO ONE does it better! Thanks, Matt!
 
 
0 # RobertMStahl 2013-02-08 15:58
Does anyone see how gold is so propagandized with puts on the derivative market to make enough gold underground disappear at such low prices, continents could cave in as the wealth is transferred to China, if you get my drift about the US Treasury and how all nation-states are liquidity traps unaware of what a difference really makes. Lauren Lyster tells it like it is, http://www.silverseek.com/article/gatas-bill-murphy-chris-powell-call-out-gold-and-silver-market-manipulation-conspiracy-criti. And, today, more of the same defeat of the price of gold..
 
 
0 # stoher9 2013-02-16 14:16
Say What???
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN