Krugman writes: "Was Mr. Romney lying? Well, either that or he was making what amounts to a sick joke."
Portrait, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, 06/15/09. (photo: Fred R. Conrad/NYT)
Romney's Sick Joke (Part 2)
05 October 12

o. 1," declared Mitt Romney in Wednesday's debate, "pre-existing conditions are covered under my plan." No, they aren't - as Mr. Romney's own advisers have conceded in the past, and did again after the debate.
Was Mr. Romney lying? Well, either that or he was making what amounts to a sick joke. Either way, his attempt to deceive voters on this issue was the biggest of many misleading and/or dishonest claims he made over the course of that hour and a half. Yes, President Obama did a notably bad job of responding. But I'll leave the theater criticism to others and talk instead about the issue that should be at the heart of this election.
So, about that sick joke: What Mr. Romney actually proposes is that Americans with pre-existing conditions who already have health coverage be allowed to keep that coverage even if they lose their job - as long as they keep paying the premiums. As it happens, this is already the law of the land. But it's not what anyone in real life means by having a health plan that covers pre-existing conditions, because it applies only to those who manage to land a job with health insurance in the first place (and are able to maintain their payments despite losing that job). Did I mention that the number of jobs that come with health insurance has been steadily declining over the past decade?
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |














Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The alternative is a disaster.
I nailed the bum, but as I walked out of his office with my assistant, I said, "Did you feel the evil in that room?" She said she had had such a bad feeling just from the man that she had felt like running or throwing up.
It is why President Obama could not look at Mitt Romney (whom I wish they would stop calling "Governor"), but he simply HAS to from here on out. Romney will always tell lies; that's why he's gotten this far; he's backed by liars and cheats and amoral people just like him. But the president MUST call him out on his lies, face-to-face, naming dates and quoting Romney or his campaign people. Stick it to him with the facts and ONLY the facts, and while they are on the same stage.
This election should not even be close, but it CAN and WILL be stolen...and we have a history of allowing these things to happen.
Also, think about it. What do the American people revere most: the way someone looks, I'm sad to say. We're a bunch of "star f***ers."
Anything can happen. And Romney winning this election would be the epitome of evil in the White House...again.. . remember W.
N.
While extremely non-religious myself, I fully support others right to believe & practice what they may as long as it causes no harm to others. The anti-Muslim rhetoric in the US is sickening & deserves the respect that should be given as to the LDS church. This said, the LDS tradition of lying is quite clear when candidate Romney opens his mouth. Google it, no crappola.
Lock up the children!
It may surprise you to know that lying isn't confined to the Mormon religion. Much more broad based. Actually, been around a lot longer Mormonism.
A guy named Machiavelli was a strong supporter of it.
It has proven useful for all sorts of politicians ever since. Even, gasp, some you have likely voted for wholeheartedly.
I have well documented my dislike of the GOP and Romney, however I also have no problem expressing the same toward tribal crap like this.
You are likely one of those who whines incessantly when the righties refer to Obama as a Communist with a "secret agenda".
A plague on both houses.
You might also consider the fact that Romney is a Bishop in the LDS church and what it takes to get that position !
I have been to their church and studied the bible with them . The first lie they tell you is that they believe in Jesus Christ .
It would seem true when you see a picture of Christ on the wall in their hall until you get into bible study and your told to turn to the back of the book and learn the story of Joseph Smith and the golden tablets he supposedly was given by an angel .It's then you become aware that Joseph Smith is their profit and Jesus is never mentioned !
These right wing christian's who support Romney have no clue that he doesn't believe in their Jesus or their bible !
Like you I don't care what anyone believes as long as its left out of our legislature . Do you honestly think any religious zealot who becomes President wouldn't put their beliefs into legislation?
I do think its important that people understand Romney's Mormon beliefs if they want to understand the man who wants to become President of our country and his motivations.
Google the president of the Mormon church .
Here is a quote from chad a member of the church :Thomas S. Monson (the president of the church ) who is authorized to hold the power and authority (priesthood)of God and act in his name for the World !
For The World not just the church !
I am well aware of the tenets of Mormonism having spent a great deal of time in the western strongholds in Arizona, Nevada and California. I would am confident my knowledge of them is at least equal to yours.
Far be it from me to defend them or Joseph Smith. He has come under criticism from many sources even within the Mormon Church. You may want to google Fawn Brodie and Leonard Arrington if you are interested.
I suspect the angel/golden tablets story is about as believable as the story about a certain itinerant rabbi's ability to immediately turn water into wine.
Do you withhold your vote from those who believe that story?
How about Harry Reid, Reps. Jim Matheson and Tom Udall? Democrats all, and Mormons. Do you recommend a vote against them for the same reasons?
I am viscerally opposed to Romney and the GOP. But the idea that a President, any President, by himself can create a theocracy is simplistic, tribal hogwash.
Promoting this kind of BS in a political campaign is unworthy of legitimate political discourse and makes its presenters no better than the right wing slanderers they so detest.
which in a nutshell says the Mormons will take over the government and run it as a theodemocracy.
What fun..our own American Taliban.
So, while those here have pointed a finger at Mormons, and Islamists, and Christians, there is no need to single one or the other out. They're ALL bad!
But, like the superbowl, many people wait and tune in for the sound bytes and the commentary at the end to hear the pundits tell them who won. That's why we have truly uninformed voters. We don't have to go to Factcheck.org, we could go to yesterday's paper for chrissakes to see the change in Mitt's stance or see the way the numbers won't or can't add up. It's easier to take our opinions from a "name". We get mad if a celebrity from Hollywood takes a political stand but we raise our pundits up to celebrity status(Rush, Colter, and yes, Jackson).
I am one of those directly affectled by these ACA benefits and hope like hell that no one buys the BS Mitt is spewing. Under Bush, 67 doctors who should have seen me for my cancer(I have medicare/medica id) refused. Under Obama, just 2 years later, I called only one.
I think that I agree with you on this, a dementor makes one feel demented.
They see a sign: "Contest for World's Most Beautiful Woman." Snow White goes in, later comes out smiling, wearing a crown.
They walk along and see another sign: "Contest for World's Strongest Man." Superman goes in, later comes out smiling, wearing the belt.
They walk along and see a sign: "Contest for World's Greatest Liar." Pinocchio goes in, later comes out with his head down crying. "Who the hell is Mitt Romney?" Pinocchio sobs.
http://www.mormonwiki.org/Lying_for_the_Lord
That being said, I give both comments a "thumb up".
Romney sucks the air out of the room with his demented smile and his dozens of lies. Im sure it was exhausting just listening to that sociopath lie.
I doubt that he identifies his lies as lies, because he believes that if it's expedient to say it, it becomes the truth — the true mark of a psychopath.
Is this an attempt by companies to nudge people into voting republican?
Do these people really think that once Romney is in their rates will go down?
As a Mormon bishop, how soon will he start taking orders on how to run the USA from his Mormon Church Bosses (if he isn't already)?!?!?!? !?!? They mean more to him than we do....
These lifetime commitments mean that the actions of the Supreme Court often have more impact than the next four or five Presidents.
THIS, above all else, is the single most important issue facing us, as all other movements by the Legislative and Executive Branch can be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
YES your vote counts....THIS time more than ever before. Don't let Romney destroy the future.
Romoney lied quite a bit. And a lot of his figures did not add up or were just impossible. How's he going to cut tax rates but not add to the deficit. Eliminating deductions? Not a chance. Corporations have tax lawyers who can find a deduction in a pile of shit. No member of congress will vote to eliminate the home mortgage deduction, about the only deduction the middle class has. So he's either lying or blowing smoke. But the promise of reduced tax rates is music to most people's ears.
Romoney is a vulture capitalist. When he is president he will loot the nation just like the Bushes or Reagan did. There is no doubt about that.
Obama and Clinton have been more fiscally responsible than any republican ever has been, though they cut government spending on the backs of the poor.
Obama is more likely to destroy social security and medicare than Romoney. But in the end both will do it.
Of course Obama will NOT cut military - is afraid of generals.
I'm sure that that wish is also Mitt Romney's.
RSS feed for comments to this post