Nichols writes: "Declaring that he wants to 'change Medicare and Medicaid like I did welfare,' Thompson asked a May gathering of the Lake Country Area Defenders of Liberty in Oconomowoc: 'Who better to and who better than me, who's already finished one of the entitlement programs, to come up with programs to do away with Medicaid and Medicare?'"
Republican candidate for the US Senate Tommy Thompson. (photo: Getty Images)
Tommy Thompson: 'Do Away With Medicare, Medicaid'
25 September 12
aul Ryan admits that he's an "end Medicare as we know it" candidate.
But, somehow, we are not supposed to think that he would actually end the popular and successful health care program for the elderly, as well as related Medicaid programs for the poor and people with disabilities.
The "as we know it" part provides a sort of cover, as least in the eyes of a media that is more inclined toward stenography than journalism.
Never mind that Ryan, a fanatical reader of government-can-do-no-good fanatic Ayn Rand, goes positively wide-eyed when he starts talking about how desperately he wants to downsize government - and shift control of health care and retirement programs to the insurance and Wall Street interests that so generously fund his campaigns. We're not supposed to talk about the long-term crony-capitalist scheme of certain Republicans to do away with government programs that work so that private-sector profiteers can come in and create programs that don't work - except for private-sector profiteers.
Never mind that the Republican nominee for vice president has a long history of decrying Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in Randian terms such as "collectivist" and "socialistic." Never mind that Ryan has griped that "Social Security right now is a collectivist system. It's a welfare transfer system."
The red flags are not supposed to go up until someone actually says they want to, you know, "do away with Medicaid and Medicare."
Never mind that, even now, Ryan complains about how America is being overwhelmed by "takers" (citizens who claim benefits to which they are entitled) and the "welfare state" (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).
Only when a candidate starts talking about ending entitlement programs - as in "doing away" with them - can we be serious about the immediate threat those programs actually face.
Meet Tommy Thompson, former Republican governor of Wisconsin, former Bush/Cheney administration secretary of health and human services, former candidate for the Republican nomination for president, and mentor to Paul Ryan.
Speaking to a tea party group while campaigning for Wisconsin's open U.S. Senate seat, Thompson recounted how he "reformed" welfare in Wisconsin.
Back in the 1990s, Thompson said he wanted to "end welfare as we know it." In fact, he replaced the program with a classic combination of high-government spending, lots of patronage appointments and rising poverty.
Now Thompson has dropped the "end welfare as we know it" pretense. He brags that he finished off "one of the entitlement programs."
And he's gunning for a couple of other entitlement programs.
Which ones? You guessed it: Medicaid and Medicare.
Declaring that he wants to "change Medicare and Medicaid like I did welfare," Thompson asked a May gathering of the Lake Country Area Defenders of Liberty in Oconomowoc: "Who better to and who better than me, who's already finished one of the entitlement programs, to come up with programs to do away with Medicaid and Medicare?"
The video has only now surfaced and it's a blockbuster - especially in the aftermath of the release last week of a similar video that saw Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney dismissing 47 percent of Americans as a "dependent" class unworthy of Republican consideration.
Just to repeat: A top Republican Senate candidate has been caught on video talking about how he would "DO AWAY WITH MEDICAID AND MEDICARE."
Just to repeat: "DO AWAY WITH MEDICAID AND MEDICARE."
It should be understood that Thompson is no fringe-dwelling Todd Akin. As the longtime Republican governor of a swing state, he's worked with every GOP president since Ronald Reagan, and he oversaw social programs for the Bush/Cheney administration. This year, he's one of his party's premier recruits in the fight to retake the Senate. Indeed, the race between Thompson and Democratic Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin could decide which party controls the chamber.
Thompson is, as well, closely aligned with Paul Ryan. The Senate candidate's ties to Ryan's politically connected family go back to when the Republican vice presidential nominee was a child. Thompson has been a Ryan booster from the very beginning of the younger Wisconsinite's career in electoral politics - when Thompson was the powerful governor of the state and Ryan was organizing his first congressional bid.
When Thompson joined the Bush/Cheney Cabinet, he and Ryan kept regular company in Washington. They look forward to working together when Thompson becomes the point man on entitlement debates in a Republican-controlled Senate and Ryan is the Romney White House's chief liaison to Capitol Hill.
The voters will have something to say about that, however.
If they want to preserve Medicaid and Medicare, they will remember that, while Ryan may add the "as we know it" spin, Thompson gets to the heart of the matter when he says it is the intention of these "reformers" to "do away with Medicaid and Medicare."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
For-profit, private medicine is not about healthcare. It is about profit. Medicare and Social Security are the most successful government programs in all US history. It is truly unbelievable that republicans would oppose them -- except that it is about profit and nothing else.
While the Reps will say openly that they want to end medicare as we know it, it will take a democrat to actually do it. This is how welfare worked. Reps fumed against welfare and entitlements for a long time, but it took Bill Clinton to do it. I feel the same way about medicare and social security. Reps will fume about entitlements, but Obama will actually do it. this is the current democrat theory of Triangulation or the Third Way.
Obama is part of the Clinton stable of politicians.
Killing the elderly is not a new idea, people living on the edge of starvation do it to this day. Some of us have been worked out and to the Rand followers are useless feeders. Some of us cling to ideas that are old fashioned, quaint. Ideas like Commons, Cooperation, Conservation, Art ,Music, Dance and Joy are all against the Rand's followers life view. Bought and paid for guys like Tommy Thompson enjoy hurting the elderly before plunging our lives into chaos and death.
What republicans see is ideology. Ideology is a screen that covers reality. They see "entitlement" and socialism. And they are against those. In their world view, no one is entitled to anything. Everyone must work for everything he/she has. If old people or children or the disabled can't work, the they should receive nothing and die.
What a weird world view. Actually socialism is the way all life works. Parents or others care for the young and the old. No one calls that "entitlement" but they do believe that the young, the old, the infirm are entitled to care from others.
The republicans are the party of Ayn Rand and their silly version of social darwinism. All of this is really shallow.
Why do we have to "balance" the federal budget? It is a myth based on a total lack of understanding about how "fiat money" works and its relationship to the economy as a whole. The Federal Budget is not the same as a household budget or the budgets of state and local govt's because we/they are "borrowing" from and thus "owe" someone else in their currency...howe ver, the Fedreal gov't creates its own currency so the idea that it is going or will "go broke" is just wrong and absured on the face of it. As for "printing money" the Japanese, to give one example, have been doing it for more than a decade and running far larger deficits (in terms of debt to GDP ratio) than the US and it has had absolutely zero impact on either the value of their currency or on inflation so both of these are simply not real problems as they are purported to be here.
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative".
She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
RSS feed for comments to this post