RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Moyers and Winship write: "You could see and hear one of the guests ask Mitt Romney what they could do to help. The governor answers, 'Frankly, what I need you to do is to raise millions of dollars, because the president's going to have about $800 to $900 million. And that's - that's by far the most important thing you could do.'"

Mitt Romney addressing guests at the now infamous Florida fundraiser. (photo: Mother Jones)
Mitt Romney addressing guests at the now infamous Florida fundraiser. (photo: Mother Jones)


Mitt Tells the Truth

By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship, Moyers and Company

21 September 12

 

 

ike everyone else, we watched the movie of the week - that clandestine video from Mitt Romney's fundraiser in Florida. Thanks to that anonymous cameraperson, we now have a record of what our modern day, wealthy gentry really thinks about the rest of us - and it's not pretty.

On the other hand, it's also not news. If you had reported as long as some of us have on winner-take-all politics and the unenlightened assumptions of the moneyed class, you wouldn't find the remarks of Romney and his pals all that exceptional. The resentment, disdain and contempt with which they privately view those beneath them are an old story.

In fact, the video's reminiscent of our first Gilded Age, back in the late 19th century. The celebrated New York dandy Frederick Townsend Martin summed it up when he declared, "We are the rich. We own America. We got it, God knows how, but we intend to keep it."

And so they do, as that glitzy gathering in Florida reminds us. You could see and hear one of the guests ask Mitt Romney what they could do to help. The governor answers, "Frankly, what I need you to do is to raise millions of dollars, because the president's going to have about $800 to $900 million. And that's - that's by far the most important thing you could do."

He's being truthful there, because money rules these campaigns. And if there were more secret videos from other candidates, we would see them in equally compromised positions, bowing and scraping in their infernal pursuit of campaign cash, bending over backwards to suffer the advice that the privileged think their money entitles them to give.

And we mean both parties. Not far from us the other night, at a Manhattan fundraiser hosted by Jay-Z and Beyoncé, President Obama joked, "If somebody here has a $10 million check - I can't solicit it from you, but feel free to use it wisely." At least we think he was joking - Obama and Romney alike now shape their schedules as much around moneymaking events as rallies and town halls. Even though a state may be a lost cause when it comes to votes, if there's money to be made they'll change the campaign jet's flight plan and make a special landing, just for the cold hard cash.

This is a racket, plain and simple. A new report from Moody's Investor Service says that all that spending by the parties, corporations, super PACs and other outside groups will push political ad spending up this year by half a billion dollars - 25 percent higher than 2010 – the biggest increase in history. That prompted the CEO of CBS, Leslie Moonves, to lick his chops and tell an investors conference last December, "There's going to be a lot of money spent. I'm not saying that's the best thing for America, but it's not a bad thing for the CBS Corporation." Yes, the media giants and the TV stations they own are in on the racket.

So are all those highly paid political consultants who as part of their fees skim a percentage of the cost of local TV airtime, usually around ten percent. The pickings are better than ever, thanks to all the dark money being thrown around since the Citizens United decision. One Democratic consultant has called it "the greatest windfall that ever happened for political operatives in American history." You bet it is: By the time the primaries were over this year, the top 150 political and media consultants already had raked in an estimated $465 million - or more. When Election Day finally rolls around, chances are that number will have at least doubled.

So we can't stop reporting on this, even though we're often told: "Please change the subject. Everyone's tired of this one." Don't be so sure. There's a groundswell for rooting the money out of politics, as Americans come to see that this is the one reform that enables all other reforms. Two polls released in the last few days report large majorities - as many as eight in ten - are in favor of clamping down on the amount of money that corporations, the super-rich, and those shadowy outside groups are pouring into the campaigns. It's up to all of us to put a sign on every lawn and stoop in the land: "Democracy is not for sale."

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+37 # DaveM 2012-09-22 19:52
Moneychangers in the temple, anyone?
 
 
+9 # JSRaleigh 2012-09-23 11:31
Quoting DaveM:
Moneychangers in the temple, anyone?


Yeah, Jesus drove 'em out and you see what that got him.
 
 
+2 # carpepax 2012-09-24 07:45
"Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station."

What happened to somebody else should never be a reason to back down from the good fight, and this IS the good fight.
 
 
+23 # mdhome 2012-09-22 20:34
It's up to all of us to put a sign on every lawn and stoop in the land: "Democracy is not for sale."
That's the way it used to be, that's the way it should be, BUT............ ......
 
 
+54 # Doubter 2012-09-22 20:37
Too late for the "Not For Sale" sign. "They" own EVERYTHING and are even picking up the bread crumbs nowadays, in case there was any danger of Reagan's imagined "Trickle Down" actually taking place. I think "they" are trying to starve us into submission. Remember that "they" don't need so many people anymore, so expect a "pruning." The gentleman that is believed to reside in the heavens has delegated the "four horsemen" job to our owners. They are chomping at the bit to blow up Iran, and they will if we don't stop them.
 
 
+45 # Billy Bob 2012-09-22 20:41
It's time for another Constitutional amendment. It's been several decades since the last one was ratified. However, all we need is to NOT S.T.F.U. and we WILL have another one ratified within a year or two.

Scaley-Scalia couldn't do ANYTHING to stop it either. It would have to be carefully worded and we WILL need to get a Democratic group in Congress to be behind it to help with the necessary footwork getting it started.

There are many politicians on the left that will continue playing the game just so long as it's necessary to compete, but would be more than willing to help make the rules of that game more equitable. The only thing holding us back is the notoriously lazy (or easily intimidated) nature of left-wing individual citizens.

This is the single most important thing that MUST be done if we want to save our country. Until then, don't expect to save the environment, close the secret torture camps, undo the "patriot" act, or end the multiple wars for profit. ALL of these things are profit-driven, and ALL of them will continue just so long as it's impossible for an honest campaign to compete for airwaves.
 
 
+54 # dyannne 2012-09-22 20:59
Yes, 8 out 10 are in favor of getting money out of campaigns. 75 percent wanted universal health care. A huge majority wanted the Iraq War to end way before it did and wanted us out of Afghanistan a long time ago. I'm sure most Americans wanted the Jobs for Veterans bill passed too. But what the majority wants doesn't count anymore. Democracy is not for sale anymore. It's already been bought and dismantled.
 
 
+8 # wwway 2012-09-23 11:22
True. 75% of Americans wanted health care reform with a public option (Medicare for all) but after they heard the "death panel" rumor the number dropped to 43%. The public is ill infomred and completely stupid if they demonstrate the definition of fickle. Will they do that with campaign finance reform too? I can already think of one thing conservatives can say to talk Americans out of honest elections.
 
 
+3 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 10:17
It's hard to get the truth out when 90+% of the media outlets are owned by uber neo-con murdock...
 
 
+23 # wwway 2012-09-22 21:08
I'm for rooting money out of politics and I'm so mad at the currant system that I imagine the most strict of scrutny and practice. We need public financing of elections and I have my own ideas about what that would look and be like. Eliminate the lobbies too. Each candidate should get X amount of dollars each and the election cycle should be 3 months. Once in office appointment callendars of our House and Senate reps must be made public and all the representatives financing must be accounted for to check for bribes and insider trading. This way our representaives work for the people because they are members of the people. They should get a salary and pay into SS just like the rest of us with no special lifetime benefits for serving.
Today our politicians, especially Republicans, are it politics for what they can get for themselves. After showing loyalty to lobbies as representatives they get to become lobbists. Not only do they get to make the rules they get nice service pensions from the taxpayer for the rest of their lives.
Finally, I'm not afraid of politicians as much as I am a stupid citizen. I encountered one today. She made a comment about socialism, and being like Sweden. I asked her what sociaism was and what it was like in Sweden. She said Socialism is food distribution then rushed off. The thought of this person voting....that I just might go down the Republican rat hole with her is very disconcerting.
 
 
-37 # dick 2012-09-22 21:16
"Democracy is not for sale"? Obama sold criminal banksters a Nixon Pardon, & maintains ongoing Obstruction of Justice to protect them, as they get even more powerful. Obama betrays his supporters, family, & country by selling out to Wall St. Do not reward him. Support ONLY very select Congressional & local candidates, including NONE who do not call for Wall St. accountability. Obama is NOT who he pretends to be; thinks of us as chumps. He is Bush Lite.
 
 
+22 # Patch 2012-09-23 08:19
Dick - Most of what you say about Obama is true but NOT voting for him puts Romney in office, which is a real disaster. Obama does have a heart, which can't be said for Romney. And, I wonder how easy it is to go against the money that put you in office. Perhaps as viable as someone going against the Mafia.
 
 
+26 # wwway 2012-09-23 11:16
Obama didn't sell anyone out. The reason bankers aren't in jail is because over the years conservatives in congress, at the behest of banker and wall street lobbyists, tightened the rules of prosecution for the Justice Department!!!!! ! Republicans sold America out.
 
 
-9 # MidwestTom 2012-09-23 19:01
According to the Wall Street Journal OBama is worth $12 million personall, and according to NPR OBama outspent Romney 2 to 1 last month. Numbers to keep in mind. How did he accumulate $12 million?
 
 
+7 # Billy Bob 2012-09-23 19:58
Obama outspent Romney because Romney won't use any of his own money to fund his campaign. Apparently, he doesn't want to waste it on a loser.

I've asked you this before. Who's OBama? Is he Irish?
 
 
+41 # Kiwikid 2012-09-22 21:35
In New Zealand, where I live, television political advertising is funded out of taxes, and carefully apportioned according to the measure of support each party received at the previous election. Amounts of spending on individual candidate election campaigns is also carefully monitored with ceilings that each candidate must not exceed. Detailed accounts are presented and carefully audited. Only authorised advertsising is allowed during the election season (I think from 3 months out from election day) - there is no room for PACs be they super or otherwise. Long may this continue. A pity it doesn't work this way in the US - such is the land of the free - the best democracy big money can buy.
 
 
+10 # Eldon J. Bloedorn 2012-09-23 10:20
Remember the slogan that made the right wingers "hard?" "America, love it or leave it." There is another option-to make it more just for all-"to create a more perfect union." I would think Lincoln was very wise when he said, "the American people are able to rise to the call if they are given the facts. The point is to give them the facts." I think there are enough smart, wise people in the U.S. to create a more perfect union. It would take a great leader to get the movement going with the U.S. citizens. The citizens I think have had enough. Where is the leader who is not fearful of being shot?
 
 
+7 # LiberalRN 2012-09-23 13:21
Quoting Kiwikid:
In New Zealand, where I live, television political advertising is funded out of taxes, and carefully apportioned according to the measure of support each party received at the previous election. Amounts of spending on individual candidate election campaigns is also carefully monitored with ceilings that each candidate must not exceed. Detailed accounts are presented and carefully audited. Only authorised advertsising is allowed during the election season (I think from 3 months out from election day) - there is no room for PACs be they super or otherwise. Long may this continue. A pity it doesn't work this way in the US - such is the land of the free - the best democracy big money can buy.

Pity, indeed! Unfortunately those at the top who benefit from this have no incentive to change it (including the will of the people) and every incentive to maintain the status quo. Given corporate ownership of the media, even those enormous contributions, channeled into advertising dollars, find their way back into the pockets of the donors.

Does NZ need nurses?
 
 
+7 # Kiwikid 2012-09-23 19:35
You'd need to inquire, LiberalRN. My other half is a practice nurse - very happy. We have a tax funded health care system in NZ, with private/insuran ce participation. We spend half our proportion of GDP that the US does, with universal healthcare. On the whole it works very well. I guess the Gop would call it socialism. So be it - works for us!
 
 
+2 # AMLLLLL 2012-09-24 11:57
Lucky you, Kiwi. I keep wondering how long the American public will put up with the wall to wall political ads.
 
 
+24 # brux 2012-09-22 22:02
What is amazing about this is the absolute waste that we pay top dollar for.

The repeating cycle of corruption and abuse leads to a system that costs the most in the world and does not deliver any value at all to the people who live there.

We have a virtual army within our country at war with the government and the people - their weapon - megatons of money used to distract, confuse and misinform, but never to solve problems/
 
 
+16 # independentmind 2012-09-23 05:24
Just think - the money raised could go to reducing the deficit (for Republicans) and toward social and medical programs (for Democrats).
 
 
+23 # hoodwinkednomore 2012-09-22 22:44
Keep on Truckin,' as we used to say, Bill Moyers. Many thanks for your straight-talkin g presentations. I look forward to this coming week's show--after taking part in the 1st anniversary of Occupy in NYC. Indeed, Occupy is Everywhere!
 
 
+29 # Peace Anonymous 2012-09-22 22:46
We have long heard corporate America lament that they want the government to keep out of business. It is painfully obvious that what the people need is to not to get government out of business, we NEED to get business out of government. The best interests of the people MUST COME FIRST!
 
 
+6 # Eldon J. Bloedorn 2012-09-23 10:24
Business wants "free-dumb" and freedom from rules that are good for all participants. Selling sub-prime mortgages to anyone who was breathing. That business trick was sold to the public as "freedom from rules and regulations" that protect the public.
 
 
+16 # ladypyrates 2012-09-22 23:15
That sounds like a great idea but let me point out the problem. Back in the 70's and 80's when the farmers took their tractors to Washington,DC, the underlying thought was "If we show Congress the seriousness of the problem (hundreds of thousands of farmers had been driven off their land by US farm policy) they'll surely fix it. Well...they didn't fix it and the new 2012 Farm Bill is even worse. The lesson is that most of the congress has to be voted out of office...otherw ise the corrupt power structure remains intact. The second part of the problem is that real reform can't take place until personhood is taken away from corporations... it's a chicken and egg arguement but the bottom line is that it will take a heck of a lot of organized force to get rid of these thugs.
 
 
+11 # MindDoc 2012-09-22 23:29
Cogent, concise, on point... important! (And with the title, I'd thought it would be about the only time many of us have seen Mitt the Flip 'speak the truth', about his actual conviction(s), courtesy of "the video".

The last paragraph could be discussed for a semester, or generation. A triple-play. First, the pressure on the news readers and editors to "change the topic" - Almost all 'big media' is immersed in, and enriched by, the feeding frenzy of election spinners. A given.

#2. "a groundswell for rooting the money out of politics". Hope so! From election-buying to owning OUR representatives in Congress, out of the ground - like a Phoenix, we need to rise & re-sprout the core American Dream of opportunity and "liberty and justice for all". (Yes, if Obama squeaks by, he *knows* he's going to be expected to deliver for real, with real people watching his back if he watches ours, pushing him from outside the bubble). Of course the GOP sees the groundswell around rooting out money as a sign that surely the next crop of money trees is sprouting.

Lastly, thank you Moyers & Company, and RSN for staying clear of the Payola/Press commingling, and speaking Truth, as well as Truth to Power. There are more of "us" (even if we don't all own several homes and have dozens of cars for bumper stickers) than the 1% (Koch/Rove) party. The last line of the article rings *so* true:It's up to US to save (our) democracy for We the People.
 
 
+8 # PABLO DIABLO 2012-09-23 00:23
The corporations give the money, 80% is spent on TV ads, so the corporations get the money back, and get ALL the influence. "Government" by definition represents the people. I can't think of one government that represents its people since Nelson Mandela.
 
 
+16 # Smokey 2012-09-23 00:30
Bill Moyers got it right... The rich have always regarded the working class with resentment, disdain, and contempt. During the days when the "Titanic" was making its maiden voyage, the situation was much the same... What changed during recent decades? First: Until recently, the rich used a lot of sugar-coated nonsense to convince the 99% that business as usual was wonderful.... Second: A lot of folks were naive enough to believe the propaganda... Third: Progressive forces were confused and divided and often involved with trivia.... Until recently, few people wanted to talk openly about "class conflict" and economic inequality.... Romney is showing us the nasty truth.
 
 
+8 # Independentgal 2012-09-23 08:45
Agree with what you've said and what Moyers said about disdain and contempt. But, I don't understand the resentment. What could the super rich possibly resent about he rest of us. It's the right wing that's filled with resentment, and I don't think many of the super rich are right wingers. And those who are surely can't resent us. Unless they resent the fact that they haven't yet gotten complete control of the country.
 
 
+14 # Rascalndear 2012-09-23 02:05
This message needs to be repeated and repeated. The kind of money that is being wasted on these campaigns is quite simply SINFUL (and I'm not a churgh-going person), considering (a) the debt this country is in and (b) how many people are living below the poverty line today.
 
 
+7 # overanddone 2012-09-23 03:24
You'll often hear Congressmen & Senators lament how much they hate having to spend most of their time raising money. I believe that is a lie. It's really all their good at.
They got elected because they could raise a lot of money, doing the business of the country is a job they were promoted to, that they are not qualified for intellectually, and lack the integrity for.
Remember the Peter Principle by Lawrence
Peter from about 1970.
 
 
+9 # kalpal 2012-09-23 04:14
MARK Hana a political kingmaker around 1900 was quoted as saying there are 2 things important in politics, the first is money and I forget the second.
 
 
+3 # jwoodchase 2012-09-23 08:11
And guess which party Mark Hanna was the National Chairman of...... give you three guesses, the first two don't count.
Incidentally, where is TR when we need him?
 
 
+8 # kalpal 2012-09-23 04:16
BTW the rich will fight tooth and nail if anyone tries to diminish their influence by removing money from political campaigns. If you can't legally bribe someone how do you get those special laws that create the massive piles of money that remain largely untaxed?
 
 
+7 # jwoodchase 2012-09-23 08:23
Exactly: the key word here is "legally". Who makes the laws that allow this corruption to blossom? Even electing a Democratic Congress won't change anything; they're on the corporate dole, too.
And..... all this is aided and abetted by the Supreme Court. AAhrrgh!
 
 
+7 # James Smith 2012-09-23 04:57
I have to admit, it's nice to see that politicians can stay focused on something, even if it's only the money.

Does this show they are not as scatter-brained as we think? Or just that its's another example of the only rule for politicians, "Will this help me get (re)elected?"
 
 
+2 # cordleycoit 2012-09-23 05:37
The Racket will end and not in a pretty way. One side or the other will overstep the boundery that the people have and the people get to do their thing: revolt. Rome held onto power with a police state for three hundred years, then it happened. The cost of Empire which the people must pay was over shadowed by the cost to the subjects. That added to by a fractious Church and unpaid soldiers paved the way for the Muslims to dismantle what was left in a few years.
 
 
+9 # bruapp 2012-09-23 07:03
I'm glad to see, finally, a direct reference to how the media NEED the campaigns for their share of the rip off we're all subject to. Has anyone seen a possibly honest reference that tells how much money local tv stations make off the campaigns? There will never be a change as long as the media are making the billions they do off the current campaign fiasco.
 
 
+4 # cafetomo 2012-09-23 07:32
A pity we can't go out and literally vote against politicians. Elections would be liable to have a tally far into the negative range.
 
 
+4 # charsjcca 2012-09-23 08:37
Begin by putting all real estate on the tax rolls. In 1973, while in graduate school at University of Oklahoma, research revealed that 17% of all land in Cleveland County, the home, was not being taxed. We are subsidizing their 'free speech,' because it come free to them.
 
 
+4 # Old Uncle Dave 2012-09-23 09:58
Democracy is not for sale, but if the money is right you can get two year lease on congressmen and a six year lease on senators,
 
 
+6 # Corvette-Bob 2012-09-23 11:15
The rich always had the power to take from the rest of the population, but now, we money completely controlling the legislative branch and the supreme court and their latest grab of the Presidency they will be able to take the wealth from the country much easier. The question will be how far will they go and how far will the masses let them take the wealth. A billion dollars is becoming chump change and with the international corporations they will be able to rack up much larger concentration of wealth. Another factor which will play into this trend will be to control and monitor the population with the electronics that will be able to suppress any revolt by those masses who will be left closer to the subsistent level.
 
 
+3 # George D 2012-09-23 23:14
It's odd to me that people don't understand why the super rich have contempt for the rest of us. Give it two minutes of thought and you'll realize that they are no different from ourselves.

I have friends that rail about "my money" being used for Welfare and Food Stamps; As if they had to write the check themselves and pay a bill each month on the national debt. People of all classes are blind to the good fortune that put them above anyone lower than themselves. Look at all the fools that came charging out over the "you didn't build that" comment. Just tell someone they might not deserve to be "above" somebody else, and look out.

I hear colleagues often say they "work hard" at a desk job. Many have no idea what "hard" work actually is. And even the beloved Oprah, can't bring herself to acknowledge that "luck" had anything to do with her good fortune. Instead she started a show called "Master Class" of all things.

So when the super rich see that they have to give up enough money to pay 70% of the tax burden in America, they want to find a way to pay less and think of us as the "Welfare/Food Stamp moochers" that we think of the poor as.

Of course "we" refers to the 99% folks that are focused on the wrong issues.
 
 
+2 # heraldmage 2012-09-24 12:16
From day 1 the wealthy have been in charge. The Revolution eliminated the monarchy & hereditary ownership of colonial property. The lords of the land continued as nothing had changed, influencing what was printed in newspapers & said on the pulpit.
If we really want democracy, real change is required. We must prohibit, not limit private funding of election. Publicly funding of all election.
We also must end government(dome stic & foreign) & corporate influence in the dissemination of information. It must be mandated that broadcasters, in payment for the use of the peoples airwaves, set aside 4 non sequential commercial free hrs/ day to report the news and current events. That discussions programs must be continuously labeled; opinion, commentary, not based on fact throughout the broadcast & announced at the beginning & end of commercial breaks. The accuracy of content is the Broadcasters responsibility & references must be publicly available. To avoid prejudges a Fairness clause must be added giving equal time for opposing views.
For decades broadcast media has been used to direct the course of our nation.Broadcas t media has been used to transmit fabricated events and misrepresentati on of fact meant to justify war, invasion & occupation. Brainwashing propaganda campaigns are used to increase national fear & create enemies.
To institute change we must elect an independent progressive Congress free of Corporate, religious & foreign influence.
 
 
+3 # marjb 2012-09-25 10:10
At the every end of the infamous video - you did all watch the whole thing, right? - a woman says to Mitt that she thinks the problem with the average American voter is that they "don't attend luncheons like this one" where they can meet and get to know candidate Romney. She is so clueless that she doesn't realize the cost of her lunch is many family's annual before-tax income.

That's a problem.
 
 
+1 # wipster 2012-09-25 12:19
Quoting marjb:
That's a problem.


That's "the" problem... those folks and Rmoney/Lyan have absolutely no clue of what life is like for the rest of us.
 
 
0 # USA2012??? 2012-10-06 10:48
The saddest perspective of these high dollar elections is that those with significant capital seemingly win the election. This does not represent the majority of America folks! The GOP seems to have well "conditioned" their constituency that money rules, and that my friends eliminates--con servatively guessing --more than 75% of us.

Conversely, our so called power to balance this gross imbalance is our vote, but we consumers forget all common sense by allowing ourselves to be marketed products that we know are not for our well being.

Therefore I challenge America to rebuke this long established trend by honestly examining who has your best interest at heart, and vote accordingly: with intelligence rather than overtly engrained bias!

America: GET SMART!!!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN