RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Gibson writes: "Did you hear the one about the guy who became a millionaire without anyone's help? You haven't heard of that guy? I haven't either."

The US Capitol building in Washington. (photo: EPA)
The US Capitol building in Washington. (photo: EPA)



You Didn't Build That - WE Did

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

29 August 12


Reader Supported News | Perspective

 

id you hear the one about the guy who became a millionaire without anyone's help? The guy who oversaw his own birth, who hunted, grew and gathered all of his own food since he was a baby? The guy who found teachers to teach him, and paid for them from his own pocket? The guy who went to work every day on roads he paved all alone, burning oil that he drilled and refined on his own, in a car that he built with his own hands?

You haven't heard of that guy? I haven't either.

Here in New Hampshire, a lot of the "free staters" who quote Ayn Rand novels say they don't need government, equate taxation with theft, and believe they carry enough guns and ammo to defend their home from intruders to not have to pay taxes for police salaries. They even talk about mixing their own concrete and fixing the potholes on their own street instead of paying taxes for road repair.

A society like that exists already: Somalia.

Somalia is a libertarian paradise where nobody pays taxes because there are no national institutions or national infrastructure. Since there's no police protection or gun regulation, guns are cheap and plentiful. There have been 14 different governments in a mere 18 years. According to UN data tables, Somalia's average life expectancy is just 50.8 years, with only 1.8 years of school on average for each child. Famine has plagued the nation ever since Al-Shabab decided to block all humanitarian aid. In January 2010, instability in Somalia led to an outbreak of violence that killed 260, wounded another 250, and left 80,000 others displaced. But hey, I'm sure Somalis are looking on the bright side - there's no big, bad government to steal tax money from them.

What the most selfish Americans don't realize is that there is nothing stopping a large band of raiders from taking their property, other than groups of armed men and women paid for with their tax dollars, ready to respond with a phone call. They don't realize the taxes that they consider theft already pay for prisons that would jail those bandits under charges of armed robbery, thanks to laws put in places by lawmakers who were paid for with the help of other people's tax dollars.

In America, we all need each other. CEOs aren't making 231 times as much as their lowest-paid employees because they work 231 times harder than those employees. The only reason the guys in suits have their jobs and their salaries is because ordinary people like us are patronizing that CEO's business, giving him the money s/he needs to pay and train employees and buy raw materials.

Selfishly proclaiming "I built this" without acknowledging the vast network of people and infrastructure that helped make your success possible is both selfish and ignorant. The first step to America restoring her place in the world and pulling herself up by her bootstraps is Americans realizing that we all need each other to make that happen.

 


Carl Gibson, 25, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Manchester, New Hampshire. You can contact Carl at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and listen to his online radio talk show, Swag The Dog, at blogtalkradio.com/swag-the-dog.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+55 # LeeBlack 2012-08-29 11:40
I thought of the Microsoft millionaires. I doubt if any of them would say that they had talent greater than hundreds of other techies of the same era - they were in the right place at the right time. Granted they did have the skills once they got that break but they know they didn't build it by themselves.
 
 
+32 # pagrad 2012-08-29 13:51
There is the conclusion that anyone who votes for an American Republican Party candidate is not thinking rationally and not logically. Such a person is not just misguided; they have not received a credible education. In doing so, they are actually dangerous. What should be done with someone who actually endorses Treason?

Such an act used to be considered just a misjudgment or a poor opinion. Not so, these folks are putting the rest of society in danger. A convicted criminal is isolated and put in prison so that they will no longer harm other people. What should be done with individuals who advocate the destruction of our cities and our country?

One just has listen to the nonsense platitudes and irrational statements of these Republicans. If permitted, we can easily show their statements to be irrational. In the meantime, uneducated citizens are easily convinced that truth is being expressed.

The American Republican candidate for President has publicly stated that he prays several times a day. There is no way that this may be proven. However, how can the American public support someone who exposes to lead a nation, based on superstition and unsupported ‘faith’, rather than actuality and facts?
 
 
+8 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:21
I pray several times a day and Lord knows a lot of it is for myself.

But I do pray for those who even consider voting for these Criminals. I do hope the votes this November answer my prayers.
 
 
+7 # robniel 2012-08-30 12:10
Why bother KittatinyHawk? My wife is very religious, probably the result of indoctrination before the age of 6, and after the Afghanistan revenge war started it was widely feared that Iraq was next. My wife prayed almost non-stop for many weeks (and enlisted many in her congregation) so that our leaders in Washington would be wise enough to not begin any more Mideast aggression and that our son's National Guard unit would not be called up. She received no consideration from her imaginary invisible friend and our son was killed in Iraq. Twenty years of nurturing and education was destroyed and wasted in no time flat. My complaint is small compared with the Bush total of over 4,000 U.S. and 100,000 Iraqui deaths endured so that the Neocons could show America to be macho. Victory? Hah! I applaud Obama for standing up to the military and finally ending the Iraq debacle. Now Romney, Ryan and their Bush-era Neocon shadows want "victory" in Afghanistan. The only victory will be for those who are able to come home. And ... will Romney and Ryan cough up the money needed to put 24,000 amputees on titanium and fiberglass legs, or is that "off-budget" too? (Their minions in Congress are not likely to cooperate, unless they make cuts elsewhere, like Medicare.)
 
 
+8 # fliteshare 2012-08-29 19:15
Americans vote for their "tribe".
The Republicans know this and use tribal platitudes (white,Christia n,paternalistic ,etc..). so as to pretend to fight off the political power from those "threatening" outsiders.
Therefore, the real purpose for all the b.s. issues is merely for Republican politicians to paint themselves as good members of the tribe.
NOT to let (heaven forbid) the populous in on any decision on real issues.
This also explains why Republican women vote knowingly for paternalistic and against their own interests.
 
 
+8 # Carol R 2012-08-30 02:58
I blame the popular media for not exposing the lies perpetuated by both parties. The problem, as I see it, is that the GOP has some really destructive platform ideas. Not receiving factual information doesn't help the average person make an intelligent decision when going to the polls.

Do seniors really want a voucher plan which will ensure more money out of their pockets over time? No, but a majority of them support Ryan. Why?

Should Social Security be privatized? Who wants to live on on even fewer crumbs when they retire? How much will a common investor get for a return on his measly investments? This idea exists only to save government money...not to help anyone survive.

Equal time for all candidates is not logical. This leads to all statements becoming true, if repeated often enough. The media should start denouncing lies on a regular basis, no matter who says it.
 
 
-16 # jimattrell 2012-08-30 05:08
The voucher program won't kick in for anyone over 55 and it's an OPTION. And investing your social security payments that you make from your paychecks is an OPTION. Somehow the other media doesn't accurately report these things to those who don't watch Fox News......
 
 
+2 # Cliff 2012-09-01 17:21
Jim, We know that they say it is an option. And you know, I am tempted to go along with that if I knew that it would be just Republicans that would buy in and lose, but it is not so.
 
 
+6 # pagrad 2012-08-30 06:35
Well said, Barbara, and more importantly, you document and give evidence to support you statements, -which many folks do no† do.
 
 
+32 # BobbyLip 2012-08-29 11:45
"Selfish and ignorant." Sound like anybody you know?
 
 
+72 # Barbara K 2012-08-29 11:54
Does anyone know of anything that Romneyhood built? How about Ryanhood? How about Rove, Koch Bros? They built nothing. They got wealthy off the backs of the people who did do the building. The road workers built the roads, carpenters and contractors built the buildings, bridge builders built the bridges, the taxpayers funded them all, and much, much more; the railroads, the trains, and on and on and on. The wealthy didn't build a thing. Even the places they campaign or hold their convention was not built by them. We funded it all, they funded nothing. Romneyhood took over existing businesses, he sucked the assets out of them, bankrupted them, fired the American workers and sent the jobs overseas. That is not building, that is destroying. We know the difference. DON'T Vote T-publicans at any level, there are several states that need cleaning out.

DO VOTE: Never set out another election and put us in this position again. Your vote DOES COUNT, don't believe the ones who don't want you to vote. VOTE, make sure you are still registered and VOTE
 
 
+24 # Independentgal 2012-08-29 14:50
And encourage your non right wing friends to vote too.
 
 
+6 # robniel 2012-08-30 12:15
I used to have right wing friends, but they've moved too far away to be able to communicate with them comfortably. I hope they do not vote. Unfortunately, they are likely to have photo ID.
 
 
+4 # Eliza D 2012-08-29 15:06
Barbara-You are absolutely right about most wealthy contributing little or nothing of substance to the world. I admire people who WORK and CREATE. But, I'm curious-how can you ignore all the ignominious legislation Obama has signed or overseen (NDAA for one) as well as his apparent utter disregard for the lives of people murderously impacted by fracking?
 
 
+17 # Sophie 2012-08-29 16:56
Obama is not a liberal/progres sive. He gets a few things right and other issues-No.
However, the Mittens/Ryan energy "plan" will frack and drill the living jesus out of this country, and they will eviscerate the EPA as well. Check out Think Progress for the facts.
 
 
+10 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:34
Scam Industry is going to run out within w20 years as the resources will not renew any better than any other ones have. I see no boom in coal happening. I do not see oil regenerating.
We must push for Existing Safe Energy. Alternative Energy, Future Alternative Energy...you all love to text words, new headlines, new titles. Wind, Sun, Water been here since the beginning of time...we are just too stupid to use it and say no to Oil.
As far as EPA,Dept of Ag, Dept of Interior...the need a clean up and firing.
 
 
+4 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:30
OB like Clinton is far from what I would have wanted to see Democrats go into but then I never cared for Yuppies and that is what has taken over in both Parties. Spoiled Brats. Their children are no better so watch out.

Fracking is going State by State. If you ever spent anytime at township, County, State or Federal Planning Meetings you might have a clue of how government works.
Fracking Industry hires people esp lawyers who write beautiful pamphlets telling you how great their plans are, how harmless the process is, then to quiet the crowds they promise to build a park, a community center and so on. Right now Fracking Industry is entertaining the Audobon Society promising everyone in those town hall meetings that no animal will come to harm.
They refute everything you say because they go to so many meetings and can counter you within a flash. I did this meetings and activism for over 40 years now started with Nukes. Where were you all? See these things have been happening for decades. They have poisoned Florida, Tex, West...you do not hear anything now thanks to Lawyers, Judges giving you something to shut up.

Do understand that President gets nutshells, he doesn't see the homes, smell the air because his advisors aren't taking him there. Like I said the people were paid to shut up....
Everyone voted to get Government out of your lives, give States control...now that isn't working either? OOOPS
 
 
+7 # JohnMayer 2012-08-29 21:54
Quoting Eliza D:
Barbara-I'm curious-how can you ignore all the ignominious legislation Obama has signed or overseen (NDAA for one) as well as his apparent utter disregard for the lives of people murderously impacted by fracking?
  Can’t overlook those and numerous other offenses on the part of Obama. And I’d decided I was no longer going to vote for the lesser of two evils. But he’s just so MUCH less evil, I guess I’ll vote that way this time, too. But without enthusiasm.
 
 
-5 # jimattrell 2012-08-30 05:12
And the last poor person that you worked for was ....???
 
 
-16 # jimattrell 2012-08-30 05:12
Getting wealthy off the backs of others? Wow. You really don't like success? Does realization of the Anerican Dream come down to that in your eyes? Does getting a good education and working hard mean that you give the fruits of your efforts to someone who didn't get an education and work hard. That's not the America that I want and that's why I will proudly support those that want every Anerican to realize their dream... Or at least to have that chance.
 
 
+2 # Cliff 2012-09-01 17:23
Right. Does anyone really believe that someone can EARN a billion dollars?
 
 
+42 # dkonstruction 2012-08-29 11:55
The reason why the right got so apoplectic about Obama's comment is that if you probe it a bit more deeply than even Obama wants people to examine it it exposes the entire fantasy of the "free market" economy. The whole notion is a myth something Adam Smith understood all too well when in his private writings he was calling for government intervention to create the market (see Michael Perelman's Invention of Capitalism) by calling for more "enclosure" laws that would throw people off the land...for Smith understood that no one would voluntarily become a wage laborer and so people's ability to be self-sufficient by living off of "the commons" had to go.

As for business in the US from the railroads (who got either free or very, very cheap i.e., gov't subsidized land) to silicon valley (which didn't start due to "whiz kids" inventing stuff in their garage but rather to large dep't of defense contracts) all of these industry giants had massive amounts of gov't help. This goes for the "war effort" during world war II as well which as conservatives these days love to point out (why i don't know given that it too, like the New Deal, was a huge "government program") was what got us out of the depression and not the New Deal.

The point we should be taking away from all of this is that "free market" mythology is just that: a myth. Never existed. so, in fact, they never "built it."
 
 
-39 # Gnome de Pluehm 2012-08-29 12:24
The tycoons didn't necessarily build it, but they are efficiency experts and predictors of the near future. They deserve some credit, but not all of it. Perhaps they should understand that their efficiencies reduce the number of jobs available and that is better for those left-over citizens to have a government job than none at all. It might even be productive to think of those jobs as bribes to keep the peasantry occupied and preventing riots and civil war thereby. Thus, leaving them alone.
 
 
+17 # Mrcead 2012-08-29 14:43
Stop it.

In Europe, those tycoons would have been stopped dead in their tracks by the elites.

That's why they came to a place that had no such social system in place.

People don't spend time researching for and writing history books for fun you know.
 
 
+5 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:36
I do not believe the new day Owners, CEO"S give a damn if anything works. The Engineers go thru all their energy and then the top pop their balloons.

Money, stuff, having 'it' all....Today's Mind
 
 
+8 # dkonstruction 2012-08-30 05:01
Quoting Gnome de Pluehm:
The tycoons didn't necessarily build it, but they are efficiency experts and predictors of the near future. They deserve some credit, but not all of it. Perhaps they should understand that their efficiencies reduce the number of jobs available and that is better for those left-over citizens to have a government job than none at all. It might even be productive to think of those jobs as bribes to keep the peasantry occupied and preventing riots and civil war thereby. Thus, leaving them alone.


"Efficiency"? Surely, you jest. All of our major financial institutions were insolvant (i.e., bankrupt) as a result of their uber-leveraged ponzi schemes. they only survived because we, the taxpayers, bailed them out. Is this your idea of efficiency? Mitt made his money borrowing huge sums (i.e., he created massive debt) that other people would have to pay off (see Matt Taibbi's recent piece for a great explanation of how this worked). Is that efficiency? And, take a look at Doug Henwood's book "Wall Street" that clearly shows how wall street "investment" as a way to promote economic development is an incredibly inefficient for deploying resources. Not to mention the fact that every major US industry has taken off due to large scale government investment (from the railroads to the internet) so to argue that "we built it" and it was all done by the private sector simply is not true.
 
 
+26 # WolfTotem 2012-08-29 12:29
Sounds like some gawd or demigawd out of a Greek myth. Or my childhood SUPERMAN comix.
SHAZZAM!!!
Holy Moley - HERAKLES RYAN to the Rescue!!!
RUN FOR IT, BEFORE HE DIVERTS THE POTOMAC THROUGH WASHINGTON DC AND DROWNS THE COUNTRY IN BULLSHIT!!!
 
 
+38 # ecovortx 2012-08-29 12:43
Because of WWII the playing field was leveled and balanced. Since then the top 1% have worked to take us back to a period of time where they did what they wanted and we had no choice but to go along for the ride.

Money in the wrong hands is very dangerous to all including the ones who have control of it.
 
 
+22 # Ray Kondrasuk 2012-08-29 12:44
As writer Gar Alperovitz posed: When was the last time you made something completely by your self... using tools you made completely by yourself?
 
 
-5 # jimattrell 2012-08-30 05:14
Using those tools to create jobs and opportunity and creating wealth out of thin air for yourself and others is what made our country great.
 
 
+33 # mcav 2012-08-29 12:44
Finally someone pointed out the essential POSITIVE role of the government! Corporations don't fund libraries, schools and interstate highway systems, unless of course there is a toll and a profit to be made! Keep rephrasing and repeating the good and essential work government does. In a world ruled by corporations and profit, only a select few would have anything, like in The Hunger Games.
 
 
+17 # JT_Gomez 2012-08-29 12:45
"The basis for this system of endeavor, enterprise and profitability , to which we are committed and devoted, accrues on the basis of theft of the land and resources from the natives. It's a greedy and dishonest endeavor from day one." Ward Churchill
 
 
+26 # JT_Gomez 2012-08-29 13:01
Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect.
Chief Seattle
 
 
+5 # Carol R 2012-08-30 03:06
Quoting JT_Gomez:
Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect.
Chief Seattle


We need to start caring about the weakest members of our society.

The Constitution of the World Health Organization has this definition of health:

"Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economics or social condition.The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest cooperation of individuals and States. The achievement of an State in the promotion of health is a value to all."
 
 
-75 # jimattrell 2012-08-29 13:03
Boy I'm sure worried about our country and he pursuit of the American Dream after reading this stuff ..... Surely you know that poor people aren't hiring and creating jobs. Surely you understand how that works?
 
 
+29 # JT_Gomez 2012-08-29 13:11
Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
 
+6 # JohnMayer 2012-08-29 22:08
Please don’t use words like “altruism” in mixed company. There are libertarians and randroids here.
 
 
+42 # CarlGibson 2012-08-29 13:18
Um, you know CEOs don't pay employees from the money stashed under their mattress, right? They pay and hire more employees based purely on demand. If there's more demand, the company hires more employees to keep up. If there's no demand, the company has to lay off employees. It's basic math.

Poor people DO create jobs, when we buy stuff from companies and create demand. When we don't have money to spend, businesses see less demand and fire people. Poor people and middle class people are America's only job creators.
 
 
+13 # LeeBlack 2012-08-29 17:05
Some of the wealthy people I know said they made their fortunes by taking advantage of low prices for material and labor in a down turn. They built their house or an apartment building or invested in some way to take advantage. Why is it that these rich people with money under their mattress aren't making such investments? In my opinion it is precisely because they want this recession to last long enough to put 'their' people back in charge.

This is the time that the government should be doing the same kind of investing - in schools and infrastructure, this would do more for the national debt that cutting 'entitlement' programs.
 
 
+7 # bingers 2012-08-29 20:10
The best and in fact the only way out of these deep recessions and depressions is through government spending. When the marginal tax rate on the rich is under 70% it causes recessions. Tax cuts for the wealthy cause a loss of 67 cents on every dollar of cuts. Unemployment payments add 87 cents ($1.87) for every dollar spent. So, of course, because Republicans are all corrupt, they push the proven stupidity that tax cuts for the rich and austerity for everyone else is the way to end recessions. We spend a lower % of the GDP than any other developed nation in the world besides Taiwan. Of course Taiwan has a population of about that of South Dakota. (assumption, not an actual claim.)
 
 
-10 # jimattrell 2012-08-30 05:20
You ask a very good question. I know the answer and if you have owned a business and employed 100 people like I did, and then had to lay off most of them, many of them who became friends, like I did, then lived the reality of the last six years under Liberal rule watching liberal policies eliminate your ability to operate your business profitably, and therefore causing banks to refuse your need for working capital because you were barely surviving...the n you would understand why business cash is on the sidelines..
 
 
+7 # LeeBlack 2012-08-30 06:19
Jimattrell, Thanks for your response. Obviously you aren't one of the wealthy people I was referencing - I do think there are many people out there who are sitting on a pile of money, e.g. go look at the Port of Miami and see the $1m condo's and boats.
I'd be interested in what specific liberal policies effect your ability to do business.
 
 
+2 # Cliff 2012-09-01 17:46
I understand you. I had a business, too. Mine had less people (a restaurant) and maybe some program could have analyzed your situation and given you a break. Would that have allowed you to keep "most of them"? We know that taxes are a pain it the butt to keep up with and a percentage of the business budget, but the biggest expense in any business is people.

Personally, I don't think sales should be tsxed, only profits. But there are a lot of crooks. And I know this from experience as well.
 
 
+2 # Cliff 2012-09-01 17:39
I will bet that if Republicans get in charge they will spend money on advertising and investments in businesses. They will pay off, but not as effectively as a program that monitors the profits to make certain it does not go to an overseas tax-free shelter. They refuse to let the Democrat programs work.
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:47
We got carried away in the eighties and started making more than demanded. Cars, appliances, clothes... When we actually did do work for demand, people would get laid off for x amount of time, we knew it, if a special order came we got lucky but miraculously, companies found they could make even more money moving south of the border. then they hit gold in the Asia...
Most never ever worked for a living like the rest of us. They worked in summer, school then another summer job. No they did not want to hear those old stories...boring.
Companies started over producing and then, they started losing and losing. Patents ran out and Asia took over, but still we take our products to them to make.
Knowing that everyone will keep buying, and they will make more money. CEO's actually do stash all sorts of money in all sorts of places, and they do pay illegals under the table to do work the neighborhood plumber needs.
Spoiled Yuppie Brats...we warned you they were coming, SciFi Movies warned ya...you just didn't listen or care.
 
 
+5 # JT_Gomez 2012-08-30 11:05
[quote name="CarlGibso n"]Which creates the downward spiral we find ourselves in, but it doesn't affect the ruling elite that are engineering it to create a poor mass here. But, they seem to ignore that in past after having "our heads pushed down", the poor masses eventually will stand and fight together. Carl points one of the ways - fight with our dollars. Together we yield the power to bring about a change. The depression era folks - poor as they were and self-sustaining in many ways I might add - brought about most of the social progressive changes which made America possible. Primarily Unions! Join or create a union - credit unions, trade unions, coops, any progressive union. Can we see the correlation of the demise of unions and the upswing of corporate takeover - which why the US Postal Service is a prime target. Break a large union and reap billions for corporations.
 
 
+5 # Jim Young 2012-08-29 13:27
Quoting jimattrell:
... Surely you know that poor people aren't hiring and creating jobs. Surely you understand how that works?


Here's how I think it works when I look deeper in the a bit of history (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/overview) some conservative accountants try to cherry pick, and compare what we did in 1945/46 with an approach so very opposite, today, I wonder how they expect it to work by going even farther away from what worked in the past.

1945
Debt as GDP% 121.7%, 13.1% Government, 108.7% Public, Effective tax rate on top quintile 20.7%,
Top marginal tax rate, 94% (on income over 2009 equivalent of $2.4 million)
"Public" back then didn't mean same "offshore %" as today.

2012 est
Debt as GDP% 104.0%, 30.6% Government, 74.2% Public, Effective tax rate on top quintile 20.7% (just like 1945),
Top capital gains rate, 15% (no limit on how many billions or trillions you make, less 1/6 the rates we collected on people making more than $2.4 million in 2009 equivalent dollars back in 1945).
(Did we have our most advantaged hoarding more than 2X our GDP, or somewhere between the equivalent of $21 trillion to $32 trillion, offshore, back then, not even taxed at the 15%?)

Yes I do see a problem, but a bigger problem if we keep getting farther from the old solutions.
(part 1 of 2)
 
 
+8 # Jim Young 2012-08-29 13:29
(part 2 of 2)
I personally don't want to see Dark Money taking us back to the Dark Ages that Grover Norquist's "No New Taxes" pledge is leading us to. On 60 minutes, he said he wanted to take us back to taxes he says were only 8% of GDP. I don't know how that relates to Effective tax rate or value of what was provided (something accountants often find hard to grasp), but I'll bite and see what our country looked like back then. Were we at war? No the Spanish American War had ended in 1898. What was our infrastructure like? Good Postal Service, but internal transportation was via poor roads, in a horse and buggy era for most, but monopolized railroads, mule and canal boats for much of the industrial East coast.

Even in later days, I remember Harry Truman's political career started as an honest agent trying to improve the roads for farmers in the county. My wife's uncle started out WWII as a mule skinner in the Army

A few neat pictures from back in that era (but I don't want to go back). See www.lakesidehistory.org/Americana/PPS/Horse_And_Mulepower.pps

Heck, I don't even want to go back to the times my mother described, trying to get around all the horse manure (and dead horses) even in the cities, though I would like some of work ethic and forward looking they did back then.
 
 
+20 # bmiluski 2012-08-29 13:29
The middleclass is the largest consumer, here in the US. If you take away their money by taxing them, then they won't have the money to buy the stuff the rich have manufactured. If the rich can't sell their product then they close down factories and fire people. So in essence, its the middle-class that creates jobs.
 
 
+22 # Art947 2012-08-29 13:47
Actually, poor people are creating more jobs than the rich! A poor person needs to spend ALL the income that they receive (no matter waht the source of the dollars) in order to pay rent, buy food, clothe themselves, etc.). This money goes to businesses that supply the products that they need. As a consequence, the businesses can hire staff to stock their shelves, sell their products, etc. Unfortunately rich people have little need for additional funds and therefore they have been putting it into instruments that create NO new jobs! How many jobs were created in the Cayman Islands through Romney's bank accounts?
 
 
+18 # Art947 2012-08-29 13:53
"In America, we all need each other. CEOs aren't making 231 times as much as their lowest-paid employees because they work 231 times harder than those employees. The only reason the guys in suits have their jobs and their salaries is because ordinary people like us are patronizing that CEO's business, giving him the money s/he needs to pay and train employees and buy raw materials."

There was a major element left off this paragraph. The increase in productivity of the American worker has permitted CEOs to "raid" their company's treasury for their exorbitant compensation. The people who are actually doing the work have not seen their wages increased as a result of their increased productivity.

I am also reminded of an additional element. It was interesting to see the bank executives go to Washington to testify about the problems that their banks caused for the American economy. In their testimony they claimed that they had nothing to do with the problems; it was the result of actions by lower ranking members of their organizations. Yet, these same individuals claim that they deserve their astyronomical compensation because of the great value that THEY create as a result of their actions! What a crock of BS!
 
 
+16 # Barbara K 2012-08-29 13:53
I hope you are remembering that without Consumers, there would be no businesses. They need us to buy their products in order to make money. It makes money for them if we have jobs and can make a decent living and have money to buy their products and to invest in their businesses. So we do create jobs. If we don't buy, they don't sell, and they lose.
 
 
-3 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:52
That is exactly what we should plan on doing boycotting. Buy from Canada and Europe, So America

Your in Charge so do something to stop ...
buy less, drive less, make do. Seemed to work for my family in the early 1900's thru to Ike. Do Your part now, scare them by Nov
 
 
+1 # Cliff 2012-09-01 17:54
Why would you want to make this worse for Obama?

Now if Romney gets elected...
 
 
+19 # pernsey 2012-08-29 14:10
Quoting jimattrell:
Boy I'm sure worried about our country and he pursuit of the American Dream after reading this stuff ..... Surely you know that poor people aren't hiring and creating jobs. Surely you understand how that works?


No the poor people just get the priviledge of being under paid and over taxed by this screwed up system Bush built. The poor and middle class spend money to support some rich A-hole and his business. Dont kid yourself Jim without all the cheap labor the rich cats would be screwed!
 
 
+20 # Mrcead 2012-08-29 14:45
Rich people don't create jobs.

Economies do.

Else, why can't they sell iPads in Somalia?
 
 
-4 # KittatinyHawk 2012-08-29 17:40
Poor are the ones who do everyone else's work when there are companies to work in.

I doubt you give a darn about anything but today and what You are doing
 
 
+7 # reiverpacific 2012-08-29 18:14
Quoting jimattrell:
Boy I'm sure worried about our country and he pursuit of the American Dream after reading this stuff ..... Surely you know that poor people aren't hiring and creating jobs. Surely you understand how that works?

Yep, I understand fully (unless you write in ironic terms of course).
Funny, the more money these CEO's make and award themselves and their mostly non-productive crony yes-men/women, the more poor people are created.
Strange inverse-ratio thing that.
But the sweat-shop nations love it, especially China.
 
 
+5 # bingers 2012-08-29 20:02
Quoting jimattrell:
Boy I'm sure worried about our country and he pursuit of the American Dream after reading this stuff ..... Surely you know that poor people aren't hiring and creating jobs. Surely you understand how that works?


Surely you know that Abraham Lincoln said "Labor is superior to capital." Right?
 
 
+8 # JohnMayer 2012-08-29 22:04
All hail our noble and beneficent protectors, the 1%. Indeed, they ARE creating jobs—at least the ones not just shuffling derivatives around—just not in the US.

But poor people DO create jobs. They buy things other people sell and make. The poor are the ones MOST likely to put any money that comes into their hands into the economy, not into some bank account in the Caymans like that exploiter, manipulator and fair weather patriot Romney.
 
 
+5 # rockieball 2012-08-30 04:23
And surely you know that the billionaire's are not hiring the poor or if they do paying them a wage they can live on. While at the same time they chow down on prime cuts of meat expensive wine and buy the Republican Party to make those same poor you just criticized even poorer and them even richer. How much it to much? You have to realize they are playing the game of Monopoly with real people.
 
 
+18 # Doll 2012-08-29 13:16
I, too, have pointed to Somalia as being the ideal place for all those who want no taxes and no government. But they do have a military. Perfect!

And the lack of education must be the icing on the cake (the Republican cake, that is).

They also have pirates and the problem of other countries dumping their radioactive waste off their shores (no wonder their lifespan is so short).

And, of course, war lords come in and fill the vacuum left by their lack of government.
 
 
+6 # bingers 2012-08-29 20:14
And the dumping killed off the fishing that used to support them, which is the exact reason they turned to piracy.
 
 
+16 # barbie 2012-08-29 13:42
It was just in the news that corporate CEOs make more money than the corporations pay in federal and state income taxes, what a joke these greedy rich people are, the middle class don't have a chance anymore
 
 
+7 # pagrad 2012-08-29 13:50
There is the conclusion that anyone who votes for an American Republican Party candidate is not thinking rationally and not logically. Such a person is not just misguided; they have not received a credible education. In doing so, they are actually dangerous. What should be done with someone who actually endorses Treason?

Such an act used to be considered just a misjudgment or a poor opinion. Not so, these folks are putting the rest of society in danger. A convicted criminal is isolated and put in prison so that they will no longer harm other people. What should be done with individuals who advocate the destruction of our cities and our country?

One just has listen to the nonsense platitudes and irrational statements of these Republicans. If permitted, we can easily show their statements to be irrational. In the meantime, uneducated citizens are easily convinced that truth is being expressed.

The American Republican candidate for President has publicly stated that he prays several times a day. There is no way that this may be proven. However, how can the American public support someone who exposes to lead a nation, based on superstition and unsupported ‘faith’, rather than actuality and facts?
 
 
+13 # Art947 2012-08-29 14:20
[quote name="pagrad

The American Republican candidate for President has publicly stated that he prays several times a day. There is no way that this may be proven. However, how can the American public support someone who exposes to lead a nation, based on superstition and unsupported ‘faith’, rather than actuality and facts?

We need to remember that GWB also said that he got has message by speaking to "G-d" and look where that got us!
 
 
+5 # bingers 2012-08-29 20:16
Romney is a bishop in the Mormon church. Now, I'm no expert on that church, but I don't know of any church that says screw the poor, so I'm thinking he may be the crappiest excuse for a church elder in history.
 
 
+8 # Regina 2012-08-29 13:55
They're too damned poor to buy the stuff someone else wants to make and sell. So nothing can move. In this stalemate, only a government -- out of its tax reserves -- can help prospective buyers get a start on the consumption the sellers need in order to make the products to be sold. There are no jobs until there are buyers. This is Econ. I -- which the Republican Party has flunked, generation after generation. Those of us who suffered through the 1930s know that the current fiasco in the 2000s is basically the same flopperoo. Romney would be the next Hoover. Obama is no FDR , but he's smarter than Hoover, if only because he passed Econ I. And yes, we have to repay those tax reserves when we get to the point that we can -- ALL of us, in proportion, not just the bailed-out poor!
 
 
+8 # MindDoc 2012-08-29 14:08
Why have they not opened their eyes to the reality even right in front of them? Who among the assembled in Tampa has noted that the lovely center they're in was largely funded by taxpayers dollars.

So fortunately, Isaac has degraded to a tropical storm, though outlying N.O. areas without levees are a bit bashed. Um, "we did it all ourselves" ers - Who repaired the levees? Private generosity? Nope - Federal Government by and FOR the people. Badly done under Bush, of course, but fact. (I know: facts are stupid things, said Reagan.)

I'm stil waiting for 'the big guy' Gov. 'respect me don't like me' Christie to define what he meant by "shared sacrifice". (By whom? For whom?)

Follow the money, look at the actions, and note the parsing and re-defining of words... Vote for sanity and *shared* sacrifice, and public-focused society, moving forward rather than back to the Bush/Rove/$ disaster we're *finally* starting to recover from, no easy fete.

Wishing the best to those impacted by the storm (in N.O.) - happy there was still a taxpayer/Govern ment coalition when and where needed in times of need!
 
 
+5 # bingers 2012-08-29 20:21
It was kind of funny listening to fatso patting himself on the back and talking about how Republicans create jobs. Romney was 47th in job creation. Now that he's been replaced by a liberal Democrat Massachusetts is 3rd in job creation. Meanwhile Fatso Christie has New Jersey in Mittens' old spot of 47th. And Snot Wanker the big star from Wisconsin who promised to create a quarter of a million jobs has hit 50th place with a total of 17,000 in nearly two years.
 
 
+9 # dick 2012-08-29 14:42
Listen up, you sniveling leeches. SELECTED Any Rand is the Fuhrer, & he/she knows what's best. Cigarettes & Ideology for Idiots. So get your Moron's Guide to Eco-Political Ideology & READ. We're gonna burn the other books: parasitic trash. I'll PROVE to you I'M A MAN, a tough guy. I'll preach a mean spirited ideology, disregard it myself, take some food & medicine from "undeserving" infants. Maybe then the girls won't laugh at me.
And the Koch brothers will subsidize my independence.
 
 
+4 # slimslider 2012-08-29 14:42
Barbara K, unfortunately it really doesn't matter if you vote or not. That your vote means something is a popular long perpetuated lie, but it is bogus. It all depends "where" you vote. If you live in Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and other such red states it is not worth your gasoline to drive to the polls if you want to vote for a democrat. I don't think the founding fathers had this in mind when they set the rules down, but the idea of one man, one vote has been an electoral college joke for a long time. A popular vote just makes too much sense for politicians because they love their protective state majorities, and then they gerrymander like crazy within those states. It would be nice if your vote counted for something, but it all depends on where you live.
 
 
+9 # Regina 2012-08-29 16:20
Slimslider: If what you say were true, the Republicans wouldn't need to bother with their nefarious Voter ID schemes. Obviously votes do count -- when entered and counted, and negatively when stolen or denied. Yes, the states with Republican governors have generated a cabal to limit access to polls by all categories of people who might vote Democratic, so in that sense it matters where voters reside.
 
 
+4 # JohnMayer 2012-08-29 22:16
I live in such a red state. So I campaign for Obama and others in adjoining purple states—in person or by phone—and vote Green in the general election in hopes of getting the Green Party officially on the ballot. I still got to vote for a black person last time.
 
 
0 # Cliff 2012-09-01 18:06
A fair point. That kind of negativity keeps people from voting. Get off your ass and vote. Or shut up.
 
 
+5 # jwb110 2012-08-29 14:59
Lets secede New Hampshire from the Union. Close their border to the US and give them the chance to see how well the system they want will work. We can save the cost of their Senators and House Representatives salaries and also their medical and retirement. The Union could collect tariffs for anything coming over their border into the US, like the
 
 
+19 # Mrcead 2012-08-29 15:06
Hmmm, let's see.

Businesses don't do OJT anymore - but expect to pick from a list of trained individuals.

Don't pay for college educations - but expect them to waltz in the door.

Don't pay for Highschool educations but expect people to not flash mob their stores.

Don't have their own power plants (in most cases)but expect the lights to turn on despite a hurricane or earthquake.

Don't pay for police protection but call 911.

Don't pay for military protection but don't live in fear of suicide bombers.

Don't pay for Health Care but expect competent doctors and hospital staff to be at the ready.

Don't pay for road upkeep but expect shipments to arrive and leave on time.

Don't pay for sewer and expect the toilet to flush without issue.

Don't pay for water but expect the tap to function.

Don't pay for telecom but expect a signal to be present.

or any hygiene expense for that matter - not with all of the tax dodging that many of them do that equates to a free ride courtesy of the tax payer.

But they certainly do pay to bribe, excuse me, "lobby" to ease "restrictions" on turning a profit. Who knows, that money set aside for lobbying was probably a portion of the savings made from dodging taxes. That would be a slap in the face, wouldn't it?
 
 
+9 # kalpal 2012-08-29 16:02
Some societies people are afraid of the government, others the government is afarid of the people but in society has any individual built a fortune without the help of anyone at all. At the very list you need customers because they supply the funds which may grow into a fortune. The right wingers who insist they built a business without any help are crazy of egomaniacal fools.
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2012-08-30 02:35
The biggest irony of all this is that capitalism is an ideology of parasitism. Wealth is only produced by labor. Capitalists position themselves so that they can take a certain amount of value out of the labor of others, whether this is done by investment or by owning the factory where labor is performed.

Capitalism does not build anything. It is a negative and destructive force. People labor or create wealth by nature. Marx defined labor as the transformation of object of nature into objects of human use. A tree can be converted to lumber and a house by means of human labor. Humans cannot survive for a minute without labor.

But capitalism -- the ideology of Romeny, Ryan, and the Republicans -- is parastitic on labor.
 
 
0 # Mrcead 2012-09-02 03:53
Totally agree. Look at how trading works. Small buy in (the mosquito's needle) to extract a substantial payout just for holding out long enough before the hand comes down to swat you. How much work does that entail? You just have to learn how to judge a vein and look out for the swatting hand.
 
 
+6 # Carol R 2012-08-30 02:49
I think this is a great article.

One other country that doesn't have a functioning government is Bolivia. Nobody that I know, who lives in the US, could even conceive of the difficulties of living in that country.

Tea baggers, you have no idea of how destructive their beliefs are. You do NOT want to live in a country run by the wealthy.

One former president, while running for re-election, had his enemies slightly drugged and thrown out of airplanes.

Poverty abounds, roads are falling apart, the water is undrinkable, corruption is rampant with the wealthy getting anything they want published in the local paper, and jobs available are only for cooks, maids, gardeners and drivers. The wealthy have beautiful large homes with armed guards stationed outside their homes which are surrounded by high walls. Extra security is needed because of the income inequality.

Our country should not be going in this direction.
 
 
+3 # Interested Observer 2012-08-30 04:08
"and believe they carry enough guns and ammo"

And they didn't make those either.
 
 
+2 # RobertMStahl 2012-08-30 05:37
"The most brilliant and corrupt society of all time" (Saul Bellow)is, still, ignorant of productivity's relationship to reward. Somehow, I don't think you tackled this one yet, but I am sure you enjoy football, nonetheless. Hindsight is 20/600. Say goodbye to the Magna Carta.
 
 
+2 # Interested Observer 2012-08-30 08:59
It is also ignorant of the advantage bestowed in 1945 of being the only major un-bombed and un-invaded industrial base in the world and having taken the least losses by far of all those involved when the party, now winding down, started.
 
 
0 # Juscelino 2012-08-30 10:39
Please see my response at http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/you-didnt-build-that-we-did/ since your broken comment system keeps telling me that my comment is too long, although there are "28 symbols left".
 
 
+3 # vgirl1 2012-08-30 13:43
As long as the media continues to let the TPRepublicans get away with their lies by refusing to outright call them lies instead using soft terms like inaccurate, untrue etc, then the Republican outright strategy to dupe the electorate will work.

Also clear is the willingness of the Republican's base to accept the duping as if it were not duping, because they just can't stand the notion of "THAT MAN, THAT OTHER" in "THEIR" White House.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN