Durst writes: "Normally, rape and funny live in two different solar systems, whose orbits rarely if ever intersect with significantly different trajectories and fields of gravity, if you catch our drift."
Political satirist Will Durst. (photo: WillDurst.com)
Oh, My Akin Ideology!
26 August 12
ining humor out of Missouri Senate hopeful Todd Akin's barrage of claptrap is tougher than eating frozen jerky in a rowboat on the eyewall of Hurricane Isaac. Normally, rape and funny live in two different solar systems, whose orbits rarely if ever intersect with significantly different trajectories and fields of gravity, if you catch our drift.
But this guy's historic and colossally moronic remark is the very exception that proves the rule winning him in one fell brimming swoop, the Joe Biden "Foot So Deep In His Mouth He's Probably Tickling His Spleen with His Shoelaces" Lifetime Achievement Award.
During an interview with St. Louis television station KTVI, the Republican Congressman told a reporter, that from what he understands from doctors, women who are legitimately raped don't get pregnant. And the plopping noise across the country from mouths dropping open was loud enough to wake every student at Gallaudet University.
Now, we expect our anthropoidal troglodytes to believe stupid stuff; we're just not used to hearing their inane anthropoidal troglodytic beliefs articulated out loud. Refreshing and depressing at the same time.
Wow. Where do you start? Legitimately raped? Suffice it to say that no qualifying adverb is ever necessary in front of that particular noun. Especially from a man. And what does he mean by "legitimate"? It seems to infer something exists that could be known as "illegitimate" rape but, oh no, we're not going there. As redundant as Halloween in San Francisco. Boring in Burlington. Hot in hell.
Next to the abstracted nonsense of his feeble-minded opinion, it's the casual attribution that rankles. Here's a man running for the U.S. Senate using medieval wives' tales as philosophical justification. And he's a member of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology? Let's hope his concentration is on space and technology. Notwithstanding the space between his ears.
Also makes one worry about the state of the medical profession in Missouri. Is the "Show Me State" overrun with puritanical shamans? Thirteenth century barbers? Filipino psychic surgeons? Physician bags stuffed with snake oil and leeches? Do their white jackets have long, long sleeves that wrap around the back where they're buckled real tight?
The inundation was so overwhelming it came close to rendering Chris Matthews speechless. Almost. While an oblivious Akin tried to walk back his clueless comments, the GOP brought out the industrial-strength cattle prods to walk him back over a cliff. Steep drop. Sharp rocks. Big waves.
Republicans needed to reignite a War on Women right before their national convention the same way a fireworks factory needs a grease fire on July 3rd and the entire party rented jet skis to rooster-tail away from the eye of stupidity as far and fast as possible.
The storm surge of Hurricane Akin washed a bit of the shine off Golden Boy, Paul Ryan, as well. He and Akin have a history of introducing bills to redefine rape, and both oppose a woman's right to choose following one. Not a problem for Romney though. Who thinks completely different. Or doesn't. No one's quite sure.
Thus far, the Tea Party favorite is determined to stay in and go full-term. And Democrats across the nation are shouting themselves hoarse fanning the waves of this deluge, while whispering words of encouragement hoping this testament of dark bewilderment exercises his god-given right to remain consummately cretinous in public.
To Election Day! And beyond!
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
This WAS NOT THE CASE just 1 month ago.
If left-wingers, "liberals", "progressives", or whatever we want to call ourselves are STILL not motivated to vote in this election, I don't know what would possibly make us care about anything.
Honestly, if you're too disgruntled by imperfection to be bothered with voting in this election, you don't deserve to stay in this country any longer.
What this means is that voting third party at this time, before they have become viable and electable, is the exact same thing as voting for Republicans and how in the world is putting ultra-right-win g Republicans in office an improvement over electing Democrats? I just don't get it.
I understand wanting to elect truly progressive candidates and supporting a third party but the time to do that is well before election time and at the time these candidates have a real chance of being elected. Until the work has been done that creates viable candidates, voting third party is the same as voting for Republicans.
We CAN'T AFFORD to let things get worse!
There is a case where voting third party is actually the right thing to do at this time. If a progressive/lib eral voter lives in a deeply red state where Democratic candidates have little if any chance of winning, like Obama in Utah, voting for a third party candidate makes perfect sense. Voting for a right-wing or even centrist Democrat over a liberal/progres sive third party candidate in this case would definitely be a thrown away vote or worse and the wrong thing to do. In this case, voting for someone other than Obama won't do anything to assist Romney in getting elected but in a swing state where every vote is crucial, voting for anyone other than President Obama or even sitting it out and not voting, is the same thing as voting for Romney/Ryan, which is absolutely unthinkable. How anyone who considers themselves to be a liberal or progressive can even THINK about Romney/Ryan in the White House is totally beyond me, no matter what Obama has done or not done.
You will get no argument from me that we absolutely need a third party or a takeover of the Democratic Party by progressives and liberals, like the Tea Party has done with the Republicans. The way to do this is by building a third party into a viable entity with electable candidates. A good way start this is by voting for third party candidates in deeply red or essentially one party states where voting third party won't help Republicans to get elected.
Voltaire: The perfect is the enemy of the good.
What he meant was-- 'those women who are actually raped, not those women who pretend to have been raped.' This makes me even angrier at him. No matter how he cuts it, he is a neanderthal.
Apparently, a rape is only "legitimate" if it has the stamp of republican male approval. You probably need a notary for that. Oh yeah! And an I.D. card!
RSS feed for comments to this post