Kinsley writes: "Paul Ryan laughed. He stood naked on top of the vice president's desk in the Senate chamber, scanning the crowd of sniveling politicians below him."
Paul Ryan with images of Ayn Rand and the Pope in the background. (image: Salon)
What Ayn Rand Taught Paul Ryan
24 August 12

grew up reading Ayn Rand, and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are and what my beliefs are. It's inspired me so much that it's required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff."
U.S. Representative Paul Ryan, Republican vice presidential candidate, in a 2005 speech.
Paul Ryan laughed. He stood naked on top of the vice president's desk in the Senate chamber, scanning the crowd of sniveling politicians below him.
He flexed his muscles, the result of hours spent in the House gymnasium. Look at these pathetic specimens, he thought. Not one of them could do a one-armed pushup if his life depended on it. Not one was worthy of so much as co-sponsoring one of Ryan's bills. Every single one of them had been elected by appealing to the average citizen in his (or her - Ryan snorted at the thought) district. It occurred to him, and not for the first time, that of all the men and women in this room, only he, Paul Ryan, had been selected for his current office by the president himself.
The president. Ryan's mind wandered as he thought about the only man who stood between him and absolute power. Mitt Romney was a weakling, he thought - and not for the first time. He's a man whose views can change. The thought filled Ryan with disgust. His own views were as solid as granite. They were the views of the only clear-thinking woman he had ever met: Ayn Rand.
Pathetic Losers
Ryan thought back on the humiliating "job interview" he had allowed himself to be subjected to before being chosen as Romney's vice president. Did he have any pregnant, unmarried daughters? Could he see Russia from his living room window?
Worst of all was the probing of his attitude about federal programs such as Medicare and Social Security. His attitude? His attitude was that all of these programs were for pathetic losers. Romney had agreed with him, but said they should keep this opinion under their hats. Ryan had obliged, only long enough to make it through the election. And he despised himself for this. But he did it, and it worked, and the Romney-Ryan team was elected. And now he kept nothing under his hat.
In fact, he didn't have a hat, or any other article of clothing. Clothing was for weaklings.
It was the opening session of the Senate, Vice President Paul Ryan presiding. The House leadership also was present. Below him he could see and hear so-called leaders of his own party pleading with him to get off the desk and sit in a chair like a normal human being - or at least put on some clothes, for God's sake. He cringed inwardly at having to listen to such advice from the likes of Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.
Although, he had to admit, he couldn't despise these two men, much as he might wish to. They both seemed terribly bitter. He liked that. Actually, he had a real soft spot for Senator McConnell, who, when the occasion called for it, could be impressively nasty.
As for House Speaker Boehner, he could be nasty, too, but always with a slight cynical smirk, which said, "I know this is all just a game." This ruined it for Ryan. For Ryan, this was not a game.
Furthermore, Boehner smoked cigarettes. That marked him as a pathetic, weak character. But it also marked him as a man willing to stand up to the sickening pressures of social conformity. You could argue it both ways. There are merits on both sides of the argument. Reasonable men may differ. …
Pathetic Thinking
"Stop!" Ryan thought to himself. Was even he not immune from the poison of relativism? Had not his mistress taught him that there are not two sides to every question? There is only one side to every question. He could hear her voice in his head, saying: "No. No. No. Paul, you disappoint me. Hearing you say that something can be argued both ways makes me physically ill. Yes, yes, I want to vomit. There is one objective answer to any question, and that is the answer that derives from reason. And if you are in any doubt about what reason dictates, just come to me and I will tell you. You can take it on faith."
Ryan thought about the challenges that lay ahead. Privatizing the interstate highway system. Replacing the Pentagon with national defense vouchers. Turning the Smithsonian and the National Gallery of Art into block grants for the states. Ryan was especially excited by the defense vouchers idea. Why should national defense have to be "one-size-fits- all"?
Again, he scanned the room. It occurred to him that, if anything, the opposing party was even more pathetic than his own. What a collection of mediocrities. A perfect reflection of the people who elect them. Over there was that weasel Harry Reid. During the campaign - with no evidence at all - Senator Reid said that Romney had paid no taxes for 10 years. So what if he hadn't? Good for him. Taxation is slavery. It is the inferior majority expecting the superior minority to pay them for their very inferiority.
Paul Ryan banged the gavel and brought the Senate to order. It quieted down quickly - much faster than the House used to under the so-called leadership of that woman from California. The politicians recognized that they had entered the force field of a true, natural leader.
Yes, things were going to be very different from here on out, Ryan chuckled to himself.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Only people who have never read Ayn Rand, whether you like her or not, would be dumb enough to think Paul Ryan uses Ayn Rand as anything except some kind of pseudo-intellec tual icon for making himself seem intelligent to stupid people.
Gosh, I'll have to give Mr. Puppy-Dog Eyes a second look...
Ryan is just another "dittohead" who speaks and thinks in soundbites which only hint at what lies below the surface. He sees government as an instrument of control, and nothing more. Ayn Rand would dismiss him without a second thought, and we should do the same.
Good satire though.
I am agnostic but what Ryan doctrine and social teaching of the Catholic church have common?
John Kennedy was Catholic and certainly more moral than Money Sleazebag Bill - previous democratic president
Ryan thought about the challenges that lay ahead. Privatizing the interstate highway system. Replacing the Pentagon with national defense vouchers. Turning the Smithsonian and the National Gallery of Art into block grants for the states.[ /quote]
Priceless.
But scary as sin if this Paul Rand Ryan actually captured the catbird seat and sits pretty in the Senate, grinning as the empire is dismantled, a cruel twist on Nero fiddling as Rome burned. Talk about fiddling rather than helping 'the people'! We'd have Cheney with a smile 'in charge'... Really a frightening thought, this dream team from Hell. Very scary too, RandRyan's history of acts, votes, & proposals. Ayn would be proud, except on the issue of abortion. (Ask Ryan to clarify the contradiction; I can't.)
Atlas may shrug, but we need to wake right up and *scream out* if we truly value the democratic and Constitutional ideals upon which this nation was founded. We need a *landslide* rejection of the 1% and Crazy parties, and at least a strong majority of sane and citizen-respons ive, 'representative s' of the humans who vote for them to do so. For the common good - and future, of our country. It's a critical, 'tipping point' election, truly. Vote!
They are 2 crazy idiots who will make dumb and dummer (i.e. "W" and Cheney) seem smart
Rand was a chain smoking meth abuser and crappy writer. And this is (R)ayn's pole star?
Just another huckster disguised as a political leader. Rmoney and Ryan: perfect together, bad for humanity. Greedy little worm.
intellectuals continue to laugh at Ayn Rand. Her works are "shallow" and
"filled with fantasy" and etc., etc.
Which is what the pinkos said about young Adolph Hitler and his buddies during the 1920s..... The crazies look and sound crazy in every generation. Once in a while - for very strange reasons - some of the clowns are given the opportunity to run the circus. It happens in religion, politics, etc. Sometimes the clowns are on the left and sometimes they're on the right... At the moment, the ghost of Ayn Rand is moving into a power position. Don't laugh. Pay attention to what's happening... NOTE: Don't be surprised that America's capitalist philosopher is a woman. Women have been in bed with Daddy Rich for centuries.
But you are right about it not being a good idea to scoff at these people. They are truly armed (with political power) and dangerous.
There is no doubt that there are Dems who have off-shore accounts. That does not change that Mit uses off-shore accounts for the same reason. People use off-shore accounts to avoid their full tax responsibility to this country. Does anyone see anything wrong with electing someone that off-shores money to avoid his full tax responsibility?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uHSv1asFvU&feature=player_embedded
The word "fascist" leaps to mind.
Also note Phil Donahue's excellent response.
greed ….. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3526904531647&set=a.1091657972005.2012132.1243177541&type=3&theater
All population ecology/evoluti on points to just opposite - humans (and other animals) are social/altruist ic animals - re:
The Social Conquest of Earth by Edward O. Wilson
Any species practicing Ayn Rand ideology would not survive as a species for long ..
With present US militarism the extinction of Homo Destructor is very possible.
“The trouble with the world today is philosophical: only the right philosophy can save us. But this party [Libertarian] plagiarizes some of my ideas, mixes them with the exact opposite — with religionists, anarchists and every intellectual misfit and scum they can find—and call themselves libertarians and run for office.”
Ayn Rand on abortion:
Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing other than her wish in the matter is to be considered. Who can conceivably have the right to dictate to her what disposition she is to make of the functions of her own body?" http://maxkeiser.com/2012/08/27/was-mises-stoner/
RSS feed for comments to this post