Intro: "Bill Moyers addresses the failure of the DISCLOSE Act, and calls out politicians who fight tooth and nail to hide the truth about the wealthy few who purchase and corrupt American democracy."
Portrait, Bill Moyers. (photo: Robin Holland)
Fighting Disclosure, Killing Democracy
20 July 12
ur politics took a nightmarish turn this week. Senate Republicans twice blocked a vote to require corporations, unions and obscure organizations hovering in the shadows to tell us who's putting up the millions and millions of dollars for all the propaganda assaulting the public during this political year.
The bill the Republicans killed was already a weak parody of its original intent. It wouldn't even go into effect until after the November auction when the buying and selling of the White House, Congress, state legislatures and courts will have been completed, and the dark money will have done its dirty work. By then a vast pall of secrecy will cover the tracks of the secret donors. The knife plunged into the heart of democracy will have been wiped clean of the fingerprints of those who wielded it. The public will not even know who owns title to our government.
Both our political parties are up to their necks in this corruption; it was Barack Obama, you'll recall, who tossed public funding under the bus four years ago, then hauled in huge sums of money from Wall Street fat cats he later promised to protect from public wrath over their ill-gotten gains. And when there was just a brief chance to reform carried interest, the trickery that enables the Mitt Romneys of the world to pay a tax rate far below working people, Wall Street Democrats like Chuck Schumer helped to snuff it out in the cradle.
But the Republicans, once the party of Lincoln -- "government of, by, and for the people," remember? -- have thrown their soul into the bargain.
Once upon a time they said, "Let there be light."
Here's Ronald Reagan in l988: "We need full disclosure of all campaign contributions...."
Here's the first George Bush in l989: "Disclosure -- full disclosure -- that's the answer."
Senator John McCain in 2004: "What reform does is create transparency, equality, and participation..."
Senator Scott Brown in 2012: "Attack ads, from unaccountable, outside groups that spend millions of dollars from anonymous donors portraying their opposition unfairly and misleading voters are wrong."
Once upon a time even Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell was for transparency. Even Mitch McConnell sang, "Let the sunshine in." In l997 he said disclosing campaign donors and spending "should be expedited so voters can judge for themselves what is appropriate." Three years later he called for "real disclosure" and asked, "Why would a little disclosure be better than a lot of disclosure?"
That was then. Now Mitch McConnell has become a walking alibi for corruption. He lines up every Republican in the Senate -- every one of them -- to protect their secret donors. And he does so twice in one week.
Why? Because they have made it their mission to prevent majority rule. And because they are no longer a conservative party. The noted political scientist Sheldon Wolin, in his book Democracy Inc., writes that the Republican Party is now radically oligarchical -- programmed to advance corporate economic and political interests and to protect and promote inequalities of opportunity and wealth. There's the nightmarish future: a government run of, by, and for the rich, while everyday Americans are left to lives of lowered earnings, chronic insecurity in the workplace, and a vulnerable old age.
This is why secrecy is a must. Because that vision -- of a nation no longer fair, no longer just -- cannot possibly win free and open elections conducted as honest competition. The majority of Americans -- citizens of a country born in what one historian calls "the age of democratic revolutions" -- would never choose to be governed by the few at the expense of the many. Politicians required to play by the rules, to openly confess that their loyalty has been purchased and forced to identify the highest bidders, could not possibly survive the scrutiny. So they must bend the rules to conceal their transactions. In doing in democracy, their safety is in secrecy, and we must be kept in the dark.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
You continue to Give Obama a free pass WHY? almost every article recently shows Obama for what he is... it must be very painfull to wear those blinders in so much sunlight?
"Both our political parties are up to their necks in this corruption; it was Barack Obama, you'll recall, who tossed public funding under the bus four years ago, then hauled in huge sums of money from Wall Street fat cats he later promised to protect from public wrath over their ill-gotten gains."
Think, look at the evidence and stop giving this bum a free pass!
Now, you still think your right to vote has ANY validity?...oh yeh, then there is the Argonne Labs boyz who hacked a Diebold machine from a half mile away with a laptop and a ten buck gizmo from RadioShack...
That's unless you were one of the 20,000 (?) african american voters thrown off the roles in Florida in 2000 and which gave us W -- sorry, it wasn't Nader); or how many in Ohio in 2004? And, now how many tens if not hundreds of thousands are going to be illegally thrown off the roles for the 2012 election? And let's not forget all those convicted of felonies that served their time but are still not allowed to vote (not to mention those still in prison). So, at the very least we need to add a big time qualifier or asterisk to the right to vote in the US
Never vote republican, our future is at stake.
But DO GET OUT AND VOTE them OUT !!
"Both our political parties are up to their necks in this corruption; it was Barack Obama, you'll recall, who tossed public funding under the bus four years ago, then hauled in huge sums of money from Wall Street fat cats he later promised to protect from public wrath over their ill-gotten gains"
If I recall Obama is a Democrat and not a Republican... I realize its hard to find the difference from how he has acted!!!
Way past time for progressives to stop being cheer leaders for the democratic party and at least be honest that both parties represent the interests of capital (albeit if different factions...the ruling class is not now nor has it ever been a political monolith).
it was a democrat, Bill Clinton, that deregulated the financial markets that gave us the mortgage debacle and the resulting broader financial meltdown. It was Clinton that "ended welfare as we know it." It was Clinton, that pressed for the draconian drug laws (including the crack cocaine laws) that are a big part of "the new jim crow" in this country. According to Congressman Conyers, it was a democrat, Obama (and not the republicans) that offered to put Social Security "on the table" in the deficit reduction talks (even though SS contributes not one penny to the deficit). It is a democrat, Obama, a constitutional law professor, that pushed for having the power to detain (permanently if they want to) anyone (including american citizens) anywhere in the world forever without ever formally charging, trying or convicting them of anything. It was a democrat, Obama, who sanctioned US involvement in at least 1 (if not 2 or 3) illegal overthrow of democratically elected leaders (honduras for sure). Was Vietnam only the responsibility of republicans. during the recent congressional hearings on J.P. Morgan, Barclays, HSBC, etc., not a single dem. talked about any of the banks actions as being criminal. Come on; what the heck are you defending these bums for? To do so is simply to deny history. Do the dems suck less than the repubs? In most cases, sure. But is that our yardstick for real change in this country?
The idea of deregulating financial markets is driven by the free market philosophy of social and economic relations. While the idea had been bandied about since the Nixon administration, it was the Reagan administration, with George H.W. Bush as vice president, that began the legislative push to end federal oversight over Wall Street, the banks and the financial services sector
At the very end of the first Bush administration in 1992, one of the crucial deregulatory decisions was made to permit banks to function outside of their state boundaries. This was a major step in that it permitted banks to get involved with major commercial deals of international scope, and eventually eliminated smaller local banks. Banking, after this reform, became an oligarchy, dominated by a few major big-city banks involved in international speculation and investment.
And what do the dems do when they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar?...hmmmm... ..when bill clinton's hands were caught in jennifer flowers cookie jar he decided to go back to arkansas to precide over the execution of a man so mentally retarded that he didn't even know his last meal was his last meal and about whom the republican prosecutor said should not be executed? He does the same thing again in 1998 after he was caught in Monica's cookie jar (which he should never have been impeached for i will grant you) when he bombed a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory. Come on, the dems just like different cookies....or was that Wieners?
You must not have been around, John Locke, during the Bush administration when more than 5 Million e-mails - being stored illegally on RNC servers - were "inexplicably' deleted. Or when Cheney wouldn't disclose minutes and attendees at his energy meetings, and used taxpayer money to take the case before the Supreme Court. Or when Cheney and his minions, in a spiteful rage, outed a CIA agent and wasted 2 years of taxpayer money and time while they lied about who did what. Or the lying buildup to the Iraqi invasion - a whole year of lies by an entire administration. Or the lies about $12 Million cash that disappeared in Iraq. Or the Cheney/Hallibur ton no-bid contracts. And, oh yeah, before Bush even came to office, how can we forget the whole ballot counting fiasco in Florida which ended when GOP hoodlums threatened to kill the Miami-Dade poll workers if they didn't stop their recount? This ended in
Bush being SELECTED by the Supreme Court even though Gore had 1/2 million votes more.
Transparency, huh? Need I say more???
Everybody cannot be privy to information regarding National Security. And when they are left out of the loop, they whine about it and cause a big stink.
Unfortunately, both parties belong to the ruling class.
So now that full disclosure really means - full disclosure - they attempt to turn back the clock.
Soon, we will start having candidates and judges that have lived the open information meme all their lives. Soon, slowly at first, then an avalanche of change will overtake the old school hide and seek way of thinking. For an example, look at gay marriage and how it was an issue used against Sen. Kerry in 2004, weakened Romney in 2008 and now only matters to handful of nuts.
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
Not long ago we were fighting to get money out of politics and losing. Now we are only fighting to know who is spending the money on politics and we are still losing.
What a country!
Obama was the real hope four years ago when he claimed he would not take the big money. How quickly he caved on this along with others like McCain who demanded transparency in elections.
Maybe the time has come for a new political party in the USA. The two we have are serving corporate America very well, but not the American people!
RSS feed for comments to this post