Excerpt: "News outlets are busy canvassing Republican senators to see how they plan to vote Thursday on the Blunt amendment ... With less than 24 hours to go before the vote, only Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe had confirmed that she would vote against the measure. ... Snowe's surprise declaration that she would be stepping down from her seat after three terms because of the 'atmosphere of polarization and 'my way or the highway' ideologies' served to crystallize the debate over the Blunt amendment."
Maine's Republican senators, Olympia Snowe (left) and Susan Collins are members of Wish List, a dwindling group of female Republican politicians who are pro-choice. (photo: Harry Hamburg/AP)
Olympia Snowe Quit Senate to Protest GOP Agenda
01 March 12
ews outlets are busy canvassing Republican senators to see how they plan to vote Thursday on the Blunt amendment, which would allow employers to withhold insurance coverage for any health-care service that violates their “religious beliefs and moral convictions.” It would grant this exemption not only to religiously affiliated institutions but to all secular employers as well.
With less than 24 hours to go before the vote, only Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe had confirmed that she would vote against the measure. Her fellow Maine moderate, Sen. Susan Collins, remained undecided, at least for the record. A third female Republican senator, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, was also withholding her commitment, raising the prospect of a potential mini–women’s rebellion within the GOP over the controversial amendment.
Introduced by Missouri Republican Roy Blunt and cosponsored by Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown in the heat of the debate over making contraception coverage mandatory as part of preventive health care for women, the amendment looked like a good vehicle for Republicans seeking to make the debate about big government trampling on religious freedom. But polls have since shown that the religious-liberty argument has been undercut by successful Democratic efforts to characterize it as a war against women, and comedians portraying it as the GOP’s war against sex.
Snowe’s surprise declaration that she would be stepping down from her seat after three terms because of the “atmosphere of polarization and ‘my way or the highway’ ideologies” served to crystallize the debate over the Blunt amendment. Her decision also underscores the political peril facing Republicans over the measure. Asked about it on Wednesday, Mitt Romney told a reporter he was “not for” the Blunt amendment, but within the hour, a spokesperson came back to say the way the question was phrased was confusing, and that Romney supports the Blunt measure “because he believes in a conscience exemption in health care for religious institutions and people of faith.”
Romney won’t get off that easy, because the issue is more complicated. The Blunt amendment goes beyond religious institutions, allowing any employer that, for example, disapproves of smoking or drinking to potentially withhold treatment for those behaviors. After weeks of overreach on women’s issues, including a debate over invasive probes as part of a bill in Virginia requiring women seeking abortions to have an ultrasound, you would think that Republicans would be looking for a way to get back to the economic issues that were supposed to define this election year.
Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown is in an especially difficult position as a cosponsor of Blunt. He really can’t back away, so instead he’s been doubling down, claiming that Sen. Ted Kennedy, his iconic predecessor, would agree with him, an assertion that Kennedy’s son Patrick says is flat wrong. The younger Kennedy asked Brown to refrain from airing a radio ad invoking his father’s name; Brown refused. Brown’s efforts to portray himself as an independent-minded lawmaker will take a big hit if he goes ahead with this vote.
A unified Republican vote has been a hallmark of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and there was immediate speculation that Snowe’s decision to resign was driven in part by pressure from the GOP leadership to get her to vote with her party on Blunt. The fact that she gave only a few hours’ notice to McConnell and Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who heads the National Republican Senatorial Committee, fueled the speculation that Snowe, long a thorn in her party’s side, had finally had enough. A spokesman for Snowe denied that the pending Blunt vote had anything to do with her decision to resign.
Snowe’s frustrations with her party have been longstanding. Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski, a friend of many years, took to the Senate floor on Wednesday to decry Snowe’s departure, saying it’s “because she’s sick and tired of the partisanship.”
For a time, Snowe voted against her party in almost equal measure with her support for Democratic legislation, but that balance was changing as she faced Tea Party pressure in a primary challenge and, in an election year, more of a concerted effort in the Senate for Republicans to stick together. She did not support President Obama’s health-care bill, though she did back the initial stimulus spending, one of only three Republicans to do so.
The respect Snowe commands on Capitol Hill and among the media is substantial, and she will be missed as one of the very few who could at least be courted across party lines. A Democrat affiliated with a Senate campaign and who did not wish to be named said of the Republicans, “They have gone off into some deep, dark cave that we came out of 400 years ago, and poor Olympia Snowe had enough.” A pro-choice Republican woman from Maine is a job description that doesn’t find many takers in today’s GOP, to the detriment of both major political parties.
Eleanor Clift is a contributing editor for Newsweek. Follow her on Twitter.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
vicious GOP lunacy. From that early camp came Olympia Snow, who was increasingly under pressure from the dumbest scum of Congress to hate and destroy everything good about our country.
It just may be that her defection and after-life will lend more to the cause of humanity than her vote in Congress ever could. This much I wish for her, and all of us.
Recall that the EPA was established in the Nixon administration. There is an example of how grotesquely deformed the GOP has become.
When I was a kid people complained that there wasn't a dime's worth of difference between the parties. I'm not saying that's a good thing, but it does show how different things are today.
Obama is not part of The Problem. The Problem is a Congress full of people who neither understand nor respect the democratic process, which involves compromise and give-and-take.
My thoughts exactly. I am a former New Englander and am aware there is a streak of "blue bloodism" up there that makes it difficult for some to become Democrats. That is the only reason (albeit quite weak) of why a rational thinker like Senator Snowe would continue on as a Republican. That and because it's friggin Maine. Lots of strange, lumberjack lookin hunter types up there.That whole "fiercely independent" nonsense.
But before you punch out completely, Ma'am, Bernie Sanders could use some company and morale support in his position as the Senate's only sane independent member.
Even us liberals would support you far more-than-half- of- the-time.
Present company excepted I'm sure, most independent voters *are* the problem with the electorate. They call themselves "independent" when in fact they are simply not paying attention. They are swayed by TV ads. They decide in the polling booth for the shallowest of reasons. They will put more thought into the color of a bath towel than their choice for President.
R's have social clubs that meet monthly and keep their base energized. At the local Dem level there always seems to be a fight for power - everyone wants to lead the group. R's are sheep and like to be led by the strongest in the group. Dems all want to be leaders and don't know how to find followers. Bottom-line is unless Dems make considerable changes - everything will remain status quo...even with these opportunities.
"R's are sheep and like to be led by the strongest in the group." Close to a text book definition of "authoritarian" .
Incredibly bad economics.
Insurance is meant to cover unexpected unplanned big ticket expensive things.
Like your house burns down, your car is stolen or smashed into pieces and people are hurt.
Insurance is not meant to cover daily consumables like food, heating cost or contraception.
If insurance gets perverted by stupid pandering politicians to cover every little thing - then no one has any incentive to be smart about the price of anything.
The greedy stupid people will whine (Because somebody else is paying for it) Of course I want the best! It is my RIGHT !
I don't see why insurance companies might not refuse to cover contraception, IF they'd lower premiums accordingly. But they never ever do that!
"Being an American, I naturally spend most of my time laughing." - HL Mencken
These are not Eisenhower Republicans folks; they are nuts.
In my view, my party has failed when it fails to follow its own (partisan) principles.
I blame the partisan situation we're in on Republicans. They are the lawmakers for the 1% and the 1% is never going to give up their power to control the message, the church, and education.
The only remedy is for the people to identify and cast votes for leadership in their favor. It's really time for Americans to wake up and stop being Chickens for Col. Sanders.
This sounds like they could deny coverage for any treatment that might increase their insurance costs, (like cancer, major operations, etc.), which would be repugnant to their greedy nature.
Just 400 years ago? More like the caves hominids emerged from 4 million years ago.
Presidential vote should be popular vote, use the Congress when there is no majority winner, top three just like now.
Senate...nice that we vote but again the money should be limited to donors in state. Stop this cross the state lines and outside influences (including the parties)
Representative: The People's House
Senate: The Sate Concerns
President: Representative of the people.
...and clean up the Supreme Court...when there isd a conflict of interest they should not rule.
Sorry to see Senator Snowe go, but an example of the party politics and the (outside)money for re-election being tied together
1200 members! Nothing would get done--maybe that would be a good thing.
Some people are trying to get an ethics code adopted for the Supreme Court. Every other judge in every other capacity has ethics codes and someone to manage it.
Odd, no one on the SC is interested in one.
The timing of her announcement doesn't leave the Repubs of our state a lot of time to gear up let alone try to campaign on getting along in congress.
I cannot imagine how any repub would campaign on getting along with the other side. The have a "my or the highway" mentality.
When that happens, leaders like Olympia Snowe will be needed to help pull the Republican party back to the moderate base that can win an election. Otherwise, the Republicans will be done for.
RSS feed for comments to this post