Excerpt: "Walker describes her upbringing in the segregated South, then goes on to discuss today’s segregation in the Occupied Territories."
Alice Walker, legendary poet, author and activist has been a long-time advocate for the rights of Palestinians. (photo: Democracy Now!)
Alice Walker: Palestine Conditions 'More Brutal' Than In U.S. South
01 October 12
e continue our conversation with the legendary poet, author and activist, Alice Walker, who has also been a longtime advocate for the rights of Palestinians. Last summer, she was one of the activists on the U.S. ship that attempted to sail to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla aimed at challenging Israel's embargo of the Gaza Strip. Alice Walker also serves on the jury of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, an international people's tribunal created in 2009 to bring attention to the responsibility other states bear for Israel's violations of international law. Walker describes her upbringing in the segregated South, then goes on to discuss today's segregation in the Occupied Territories. "The unfairness of it is so much like the South. It's so much like the South of 50 years ago, really, and actually more brutal, because in Palestine so many more people are wounded, shot, shot, killed, imprisoned. You know, there are thousands of Palestinians in prison virtually for no reason," Walker says. [includes rush transcript]
AMY GOODMAN: But you have refused, Alice, to have your book translated into Hebrew for an Israeli publisher. Can you talk about your decision and who the publisher was?
ALICE WALKER: Yes. Well, actually, it was already published there in 19-I don't know, 80-something. And at that time, there was no cultural boycott of Israel for its apartheid practices and its persecution of the Palestinian people. But now there is a boycott, and so I respect that boycott in the same way that I respected the boycott when there was apartheid in South Africa. And we were contemplating sending the film there, and I lobbied against it.
AMY GOODMAN: Talk about the parallels you make.
ALICE WALKER: Mean apartheid ones? Well, first of all, in Israel and the Occupied Territories, there's this gigantic wall, which is, I think, the most offensive symbol of the apartheid. It not only segregates the Palestinians from the Israelis, but they also, at the same time, have stolen so much Palestinian land. I mean, they've essentially stolen what was all of Palestine. And it's just horrible to see the treatment of the people. I mean, the checkpoints are dreadful. We went through some of them. And the way the Palestinians are treated is so reminiscent of the way black people were treated in the South when I was growing up. And it's an intolerable situation. And that our country backs this treatment by standing with Israel through thick and thin is just unbearable.
AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to turn to a clip of South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu talking about apartheid, talking about South Africa and talking about Israel.
DESMOND TUTU: Coming from South Africa and going-I mean, and looking at the checkpoints and the arrogance of those young soldiers, probably scared, maybe covering up their apprehension, there's no way in which I couldn't say-of course, that is a truth. It reminds me-it reminds me of the kind of experiences that we underwent. I mean, I was bishop of Johannesburg and would be driving from town to Soweto, where we lived, and I would be driving with my wife, and we'd have a roadblock. And the fact of our having to have passes allowing us to move freely in the land of our birth, and now you have that extraordinary structure that-the wall. And I do not, myself, believe that it has improved security, breaking up families, breaking up-I mean, people who used to be able to walk from their homes to school, children, now have to take a detour that lasts several-I mean, it's-when you humiliate a people to the extent that they are being-and, yes, one remembers the kind of experience we had when we were being humiliated-when you do that, you're not contributing to your own security.
AMY GOODMAN: Retired South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Alice Walker, your response?
ALICE WALKER: Well, I'm very happy that Desmond Tutu speaks out on this issue, because so many people are afraid to speak at all. And I think this is very dangerous. I think that wherever there is this kind of oppression, wherever you see people who are being humiliated, it's our duty as human beings and as citizens of the planet to speak. You know, that's all we can do: speak, at least.
AMY GOODMAN: You were in Gaza. Our producer Anjali Kamat in 2009 interviewed you while you were there. I want to play a clip of that.
ALICE WALKER: It's shocking beyond anything I have ever experienced. And it's actually so horrible that it's basically unbelievable, even though I'm standing here and I've been walking here and I've been looking at things here. It still feels like, you know, you could never convince anyone that this is actually what is happening and what has happened to these people and what the Israeli government has done. It will be a very difficult thing for anyone to actually believe in, so it's totally important that people come to visit and to see for themselves, because the world community, that cares about peace and cares about truth and cares about justice, will have to find a way to deal with this. We cannot let this go as if it's just OK, especially those of us in the United States who pay for this. You know, I have come here, in part, to see what I'm buying with my tax money.
AMY GOODMAN: That was the Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker in Gaza in 2009. Last summer, she was one of the activists on the U.S. ship that attempted to sail to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla aimed at challenging Israel's embargo of the Gaza Strip. Dubbed The Audacity of Hope after President Obama's bestselling book, the U.S. ship was stopped by Greek authorities just as it set sail. Alice Walker spoke to Democracy Now! producer Aaron Maté from the ship as it was being turned back.
ALICE WALKER: It feels really good to know that the world is watching, that there are people on this earth who care about the people of Gaza so much that we all got out of our houses and into our various cars and planes, and we made it to this boat, and we actually tried to cross the water to get to the people of Gaza, especially to the children, who need to know that the world is here and the world cares and the world sees and a lot of us love them, and we do not agree that they should be brutalized and harmed.
AMY GOODMAN: That was Alice Walker speaking on the Freedom Flotilla. She is now serving on the jury of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, an international people's tribunal created in 2009 to bring attention to the responsibility other states bear for Israel's violations of international law. The Russell Tribunal will be holding its fourth international session in New York October 6th. You're going to be there, Alice Walker.
ALICE WALKER: I will be there. Yes, I will be there with some wonderful people, including Angela Davis, Cynthia McKinney, Mairead Maguire-
AMY GOODMAN: The Nobel Peace Prize winner.
ALICE WALKER: Stéphane Hessel-yes, lots of wonderful-Michael Mansfield, a lot of really good people.
AMY GOODMAN: Noam Chomsky will also be-
ALICE WALKER: Noam Chomsky will be there, Dennis Banks.
AMY GOODMAN: And what will you do?
ALICE WALKER: Well, we will hear testimony about why it is that nothing seems to move. The U.N. makes resolutions, you know, and they're ignored. And there are so many resolutions. The one that particularly pains my heart is Resolution 194-I think that's the number-which says to Israel that you cannot keep the Palestinians, who were forced out of their homes-you cannot prevent them from returning to their homes. And I'm such a believer that people need to have a place to live that is theirs, that they should never be run out of their own place. And if they are run out, they should be able to return there. And this, with so many other resolutions, was ignored and has never been addressed. And the United States is complicit, because it backs Israel no matter what. And I think this is corrupting, I think for our young people especially, to see that, you know, justice in this case is just never even thought about.
AMY GOODMAN: You make comparisons to the South. Talk about your growing up and about your family.
ALICE WALKER: Well, my family was a poor farming family, and we lived under absolute segregation. Although, even though, you know, all of the hotels and the motels and the restaurants and the water fountains, all those things were segregated, we didn't have segregated roads, which you do have in the Occupied Territories, roads that only Jewish settlers can use, and the Palestinians have these little tracks, you know, these little paths, often, you know, obstructed by boulders. And that is how they're supposed to move around, for the most part. And the unfairness of it is so much like the South. It's so much like the South of, you know, I don't know, 50 years ago, really, and actually more brutal, because in Palestine so many more people are wounded, shot, killed, imprisoned. You know, there are thousands of Palestinians in prison virtually for no reason.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you feel like public opinion is changing in the United States?
ALICE WALKER: I feel that public opinion is changing, and I think it's because people have decided that, you know, we're all in such danger. We're all in harm's way now, and people are awakening to the fact that unless we take care of each other, nobody is safe, there will never be safety.
AMY GOODMAN: Alice Walker, we're going to break, and then I want to ask you about your thoughts on President Obama, on the election, and I'd like to ask you to read your newest poem. Alice Walker, the award-winning author, poet, activist, is with us for the hour. Stay with us.
Alice Walker, award-winning author, poet and activist. Her book The Color Purple was published 30 years ago. It won the 1983 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and the National Book Award for Fiction, and was later adapted into a film directed by Steven Spielberg, starring Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey, and into a musical of the same name. Her latest book is The Chicken Chronicles, and before that, Overcoming Speechlessness: A Poet Encounters the Horror in Rwanda, Eastern Congo and Palestine/Israel. She is set to participate next week in the fourth session of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
"This land is mine, God gave this land to me
This brave and ancient land to me
And when the morning sun reveals her hills and plain
Then I see a land where children can run free."
On reflection, in later years I came to conclude that this was supposed to be some kind of analogy or parallel justifying the European takeover of the American continents. America's unconditional support for Israel stems not from the perception that it is the only "democratic" society in the Middle East, but due to the fact that its creation and continuation compensates for guilt over America's rejection of pre-World War II Jewish refugees fleeing fascism in central Europe, supports the crazy notions of the Christian millennialists, and can be tied, in some equally crazy way, to America's Manifest Destiny of continental takeover.
How else have we continued to be friends and supporters of Israel, celebrated their kibbutz communes, which in many respects are like Soviet collective farms, and forgave them for their deadly attack on our naval vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, on June 8, 1967?
Note also Hamas and Hezballah leadership traveling to Tehran signing war pacts with Iran, agreeing to dump Palestinian cannon fodder into coming Iran/Israel conflict.
Comparing Israeli communes with Soviet era forced collectivized farming is ludicrous. We have personal family history of what happened, so forget about responding on that one...
Crazy notions are in fact 2500 year old prophetic writings minutely detailed and exactly fulfilled, on time and date perfect. You are showing a lazy person's view of reality. Palestinians displaced for the 1948 annihilation of Israel were left stranded by their Muslim masters. Believe or don't.
Periods of threats, followed by massive attack on Eretz Yisrael are met with defeat in circumstances so bizarre and unlikely the US War College in West Point refuses to use Israel's war victories as teaching material.
Survivors of the 1967 and 1973 conflicts, including Muslim combatants, have reported battlefield events which can only be described as "paranormal"... There is a spiritual component here, and you can argue over that with eyewitnesses. The mission of Islam is chronicled in depth; see George Grant's "The Blood Of The Moon".
Citing an American Evangelical writer who is avowedly anti-Islam as a credible source instead of a reputable Islamic scholar kind of says it all.
Finally, Palestinians were forcibly expelled from their lands and were not simply "displaced" as even the rapidly right-wing Israeli Historian Benny Morris (who wrote the definitive work on the Palestinian "refugee" problem) documents (Morris now says that Israel's "mistake" was in not kicking out all of the Palestinians but he maintains, unlike other less honest apologists for israeli state policies, that they were forcibly expelled.
In this area throughout this era lots of Jews for forcibly expelled from Arab countries/Iran as well, their property and wealth confiscated - and not compensated for.
In retrospect if the Israelis had kicked the Arabs out things might have been solved more easily, or at all, but a Jewish homeland was never supposed to be the opposite of Saudi Arabia where Jews cannot even go or they are murdered.
Instead of playing games with the language biased for the Palestinians, maybe you should deal with the realities on the ground.
And, i'm not sure what "language games" you think i am playing? As for the realities on the ground; this is a big part of the problem since Israeli State Policies at least since 1967 has been to create "facts on the ground" that make a viable (politically as well as economically) contiguous state (as opposed to the non-contiguous "bantudstans" that they are currently being offered. If you put enough settlers on occupied land it becomes almost if not totally impossible to get them out. these are the facts on the ground and they are all due to Israeli state policies. This does not mean that I am uncritical of the Palestinian leadership (as people like Edward Said was which is why Arafat banned his writings in Palestine) but this is a different question.
I don't really see the logic in that or how that is supposed to work, other than to try to flip the logic and the blame on the Israelis for winning and being able to survive. You know damn well if the balance of power was going the other way Israel would not even exist. Is that what you want?
Cheap 2-bit psychoanalysis does not work on a country basis.
Yeah, your kooky last paragraph confirms you are just an anti-semite.
If Americans and British really believed that the Jewish refugees from Europe deserved a homeland in compensation for the suffering of the Holocaust, why didn't they offer up a piece of their own territory instead of promoting the theft of land already occupied by another people?
futhark, i would agree that both the americans and the british had no love for nor did much to stop nazi slaughter of jews as well as political opponents, gypsies, homosexuals, etc (until it was too late)...but this idea that someone who is pro-palestinian cannot be anti-semitic is to play post-modernist word games. yes, the palestinians are also semitic people but we all know what the term anti-semitism (even if it is strictly speaking not being used "correctly") means and or has come to mean. So, yes, one can support the palestinians and not be anti-semitic (or a self-hater as i am accused of being since i am a jew but also anti-zionist) but one can also be a palestinian supporter and also be an anti-semite (as in anti-jewish)... you need look no further than some of the comments on this board to see, sadly, how true this is (even amongst so-called progressives or leftists).
That it's fine, then?
Israel has a long history of violence and I defy you to show that Palestinians have:
bulldozed neighborhoods in Israel
used cluster bombs against Israel
used phosphorus in weapons
shot Israeli children
shot Israeli babies
stolen farms and water from Israel
burned the orchards of Israelis
positioned land mines as Israelis did in Lebanon
stopped aid into Israel
limited food to Israel
stolen their land
destroyed the villages
and a lot more
Israel is their own worst enemy and have garnered much hatred for the crimes they have committed. You are kidding yourself if you think the leadership of Israel is not vicious, straight razor toting bastards.
Then why do a majority of Israeli Jews continue to support a two-state solution based on the pre-1967 borders? Are they also "unstable"? While i have many disagreements with the Palestinian leadership and tactics that they have employed they are the occupied not the occupiers. The only way for there to be a chance for peace is for the occupation to end and for the creation of a viable, contiguous Palestinian state along the lines of the pre-67 borders. This has always been "the plan" but Israeli state policies have been designed to create "facts on the ground" (i.e., the number of settlement communities) that makes this virtually impossible.
I held names like Bill Moyers, Robert Reich and Paul Krugman in the highest esteem and I have been reading many of their comments on RSN.
But the drift of the liberal left towards amazing inconsistancies with what they used to stand for is alarming,and distressing. Many like me, instead of being inspired by the liberal democrats, worry that they are beginning to accept and stand for ideologies, attitudes and rhetoric that contradict what the democratic party stands for.
Your inexplicable growing bias against Israel, and your alliance with the muslim distortions that they are selling to the American public and the rest of the world is appaling. Alice Walker to write in your online newsletter crosses the red line. Any objective person and half knowledgeable of the true facts on the ground, IN REALITY would not spout the "big lie" that Israel excercises apartheid.
You are extremely right to be concerned about your "recent drift toward Vitriol" in the RSN reader comment section.It is vitriol and biased lies. I request to stop receiving the information you send me right away.
RSS feed for comments to this post