RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Abortion does not contribute to suicide, this is known fact and supported by a wealth of medical information. To say otherwise is misleading. While there is a link between depression and unwanted/undesired pregnancies, whether the pregnancy ends in a live birth or an abortion does not affect the depression or the suicide risk."

Is your doctor telling you the truth? Possibly not. (photo: PhotoAlto/Ale Ventura/Getty Images)
Is your doctor telling you the truth? Possibly not. (photo: PhotoAlto/Ale Ventura/Getty Images)



US Court Mandates Doctors Falsely Advise Abortion Leads to Suicide

By Dr. Jen Gunter, Wielding the Lasso of Truth

03 August 12

 

n Tuesday, July 24th the Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit in St. Louis allowed legislation that requires doctors provide women with false information about abortion.

A quick recap ...

A law was passed in South Dakota requiring that doctors tell women seeking abortion that the procedure is associated with an increased risk of suicide. As this claim is false an appeal was filed and the District Court appropriately stayed this legalisation, but it was overturned by the doctors scientists researchers justices (*cough*) of the Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit:

Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Mike Rounds
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 09-3231
and No: 09-3233
and No: 09-3362

U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, for the Court En Banc] Civil case - Abortion. District court erred in granting a permanent injunction enjoining a provision of a South Dakota statute requiring the disclosure to patients seeking an abortion of an increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide as the suicide advisory is non-misleading and relevant to the patient's decision to have an abortion; advisory does not place an undue burden on abortion rights and is not a violation of physicians' free speech rights. Judge Loken, concurring. Judge Colloton, concurring in part and concurring in the result. Judge Murphy, with whom Wollman, Bye and Melloy join, dissenting.

There is no association between abortion and suicide.

Let me say that again.

Abortion does not contribute to suicide, this is known fact and supported by a wealth of medical information. To say otherwise is misleading. While there is a link between depression and unwanted/undesired pregnancies, whether the pregnancy ends in a live birth or an abortion does not affect the depression or the suicide risk.

With the multitude of studies showing no link between abortion and suicide, to claim otherwise is to willfully disregard science in favor of one’s own personal belief system. And then what will stop state lawmakers from pushing for legislation to tell women that contraception is unsafe? And here I thought judges were supposed to be impartial and follow the facts.

Providing false medical information is malpractice and state sanctioned lying. It is Newspeak (and love the choice of words, non-misleading, sort of has a doublespeak ring to it) and a health care atrocity. But apparently, the 8th Circuit is unconcerned with facts or the freedom to have access to facts, what’s important is that American women get a government so small that it can be in every exam room in the country.

black white: loyal willingness to say black is white when party discipline demands this. It also means the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know black is white, and forget that one has ever believed the contrary. -- George Orwell.
 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+48 # Regina 2012-08-03 07:35
When is the AMA going to stand up for honesty in medical practice? The political insanity and religious stranglehold that now infest our laws are an outrage to the people and the Constitution. But apparently the medical profession itself is too politically entangled to uphold its oath: First do no harm.
 
 
+32 # mdhome 2012-08-03 07:58
I think you are right, it is high time the AMA gets out there and set things straight, action by the AMA is overdue.
 
 
+14 # AMLLLLL 2012-08-03 09:49
Less than 50% of doctors now belong to the AMA. It has become a lobbyist for big pharma. Period.
Kind of like the FDA who has for decades been pushing meat and milk as necessary building blocks for a good diet. They lobby for the Dairymens' Assoc. and the Cattlemens' Assoc.
 
 
+8 # maddave 2012-08-03 14:54
Sorry to inform you, folks, but - going back into the 30's when they sided with the anti-marijuana demagogs and even before - the AMA has a history of rolling over and playing dead over controversial actions by pandering politicians.
 
 
+12 # NCcoachie 2012-08-03 10:27
They stand up tall...to protect their money streams
 
 
+13 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-08-03 09:07
Contemptible court.
 
 
+13 # maddave 2012-08-03 14:48
Oh, Yeah! This is beneath contemptible. A woman has a RIGHT to expect the truth from the OB/GYN whom she pays good money for advice. Auto mechanics who lie to you are called crooks and frauds. Why are our MD's ---in whom we invest devout special trust---allowed and even encouraged to violate our extraordinary faith in their words. This is serious business and NOT an area wherein the Doctor's ancient mantra of "First Do No Harm" is a repealed by a lame brained State legislature.

And we have yet to consider that "bearing false witness" is a major sin that is specifically forbidden by literally all Christian and Jewish denominations of which I am aware.

But aside from the hypocrisy think of (God forbid!) a Romney Administration in which at least one and possibly four new Supreme Court Justices; a dozen or two Appeals Court Judges and literally hundreds of lower Federal Court Judges will be appointed to office for life. For information, . Romney's judicial Advisor is Robert Bork. If that name doesn't ring a bell, look him up! If you like & agree with his judicial philosophy, by all means vote for Romney - you'll love the next thirty years as we plunge even deeper into a our current Corporate American-contro lled fascist oligarchy.

It's the Courts, Stupid.
 
 
+6 # JJS 2012-08-03 16:02
There must be a way for these women to sue their Doctors for malpractice or at least deceptive practices when they are lied to and given false information in making major medical decisions.
 
 
+11 # chrisconnolly 2012-08-03 10:00
How are doctors and patients supposed to navigate this legislated obfuscation? Doesn't this require doctors to set themselves up for malpractice suits? Where are the insurance companies on this. Where will the legislated lies and idiocy end? Are they going to next require that doctors tell new mothers that vaccinations will cause their children to become autistic?
 
 
+22 # MylesJ 2012-08-03 10:01
Let the baby be born first, then neglected and abused, yeah, that's the ticket!

Start listing the father as State of South Dakota or use the name of the person in your state that sponsored such a bill on all your official paperwork.
 
 
+15 # NCcoachie 2012-08-03 10:28
yep, the GOP mantra...love the fetus, hate the baby
 
 
+15 # Texas Aggie 2012-08-03 10:48
"advisory does not place an undue burden on abortion rights and is not a violation of physicians' free speech rights."

Am I correct to say that this judgment allows an honest physician to then tell the woman that the state requirement is complete baloney and that she runs a greater risk of dying from carrying the baby to term than she does from an abortion?
 
 
+5 # JJS 2012-08-03 16:04
Yes, all Doctors should be required to reveal these facts to a woman.
 
 
+5 # reiverpacific 2012-08-03 16:10
I hate to say it again but "Only in America" (with it's criminally exclusive, for-massive-pro fit and loose-zealot medical non-system; Hell, even most of the hospitals have religious names), where the patient's welfare comes last!
 
 
+3 # chinaski 2012-08-03 16:34
It's too bad that deliberately giving false advice to a patient doesn't lead to suicide.
 
 
+10 # Art947 2012-08-03 17:21
Excuse me folks, however, these "judges" just authorized perjury! If doctors can be required to lie when they are counseling their patients, then how can anyone who is asked to testify in a court of law be expected to tell the truth? These judges need to be impeached for their contempt of the rule of law!
 
 
+3 # isafakir 2012-08-03 21:53
nixon rr and gwh bush politicised the federal court system turning it into a 19th century spoils system and democrats went along but since 1996 GOP has not reciprocated. then 2000 5 judges overturned democracy.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN