Sterling writes: "Arizona's governor threw yet another political volley at Planned Parenthood Friday night, inking a law aimed at preventing thousands of women on state Medicaid rolls from accessing family-planning services"
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer talks to the news media after voting in the Republican presidential primary, 02/28/12. (photo: Jonathan Gibby/Getty Images)
Jan Brewer's Abortion Grenade
06 May 12
rizona's governor threw yet another political volley at Planned Parenthood Friday night, inking a law aimed at preventing thousands of women on state Medicaid rolls from accessing family-planning services - including breast exams and pap smears - from organizations that also offer abortions.
Jan Brewer signed HB 2800 into law at a gathering of the Susan B. Anthony List, a group that claims on its website that its "grassroots activists" are "on the front lines in the battle to defund America's abortion giant - Planned Parenthood."
The bill drew swift reaction from former U.S. surgeon general Richard Carmona, Arizona's Democratic candidate for senator. At an opening of his campaign office in Phoenix on Saturday, Carmona told The Daily Beast that "anything we do to diminish access of health care to women" is bad policy.
A longtime preventive-health-care advocate, Carmona said in a statement released today: "This is an example of how politics and overheated rhetoric get in the way of common sense. Planned Parenthood provides a vast array of women's health care services, often reaching under-served communities where health and economic disparities make access to quality care difficult."
Bryan Howard, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Arizona, struck a similar note, telling The Daily Beast that the intent of the law is to "score political points" and "demonize" Planned Parenthood to "appease certain segments of the voting public."
The law will reduce Planned Parenthood's clients by about 10 percent. About 4,000 women on Medicaid, out of a total of 40,000-45,000 patients overall, visit the organization's 14 Arizona offices, Howard said.
But the law will likely also impact thousands more who may seek family-planning services from Planned Parenthood when the Affordable Health Care for America Act takes full effect in 2014.
As late as last month, Medicaid officials were still trying to figure out the economic ramifications of the bill, according to The Arizona Republic. Officials were not available for comment on Saturday.
In a statement released in the wake of the ceremonial bill signing, Brewer said: "This is a common-sense law that tightens existing state regulations and closes loopholes in order to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to fund abortions, whether directly or indirectly."
Asked about the political strategy behind signing the bill alongside the Susan B. Anthony List, the governor's spokesman, Matthew Benson, wrote in an email: "Susan B. Anthony List is one of the nation's most prominent supporters of pro-life elected officials, and HB 2800 was a high priority of the group. It only made sense to sign the measure into law in front of this group and its members."
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the Susan B. Anthony List donates mostly to Republicans. It contributed $511,416 to Rick Santorum's presidential campaign in 2012, and in 2010 donated about $23,000 to attempt to defeat congressional Democratic pro-choice candidates Gabrielle Giffords, Raul Grijalva, and Ann Kirkpatrick. (Kirkpatrick lost; the other two won their bids.)
Brewer held off signing the HB 2800 until Tea Party legislators passed one of her top priorities: a bill that would make it easier for her to fire and discipline state employees.
Planned Parenthood is considering a legal challenge as its next step. It's not "acceptable," Howard said, to have the state prohibit women from choosing where they want to get birth control.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
My grandmother told me that "abstinence didn't work when she was young during the 1880's, and it certainly isn't going to work today.
At what point will the people say "enough is enough" and that these people have gone too far?
Those of you who are angry at President Obama and plan to sit out this election or write in some 3rd party, take a good clear look at what these repugnant monsters are doing across the country. If you're female, do you really want to be treated this way? Told where and from whom you can obtain health care? Give over control of YOUR BODY to such pigs? If you're male, do you want your wives and daughters so treated? Because this is what you'll get if you help hand over the whole country to the mad dogs that are drooling at the prospect of having unlimited power with NOBODY to rein them in at all.
Get out and vote! Help others vote! Volunteer! and VOTE DEMOCRATIC!
I feel that any person seeking or accepting government assistance or welfare should be required to perform useful work and receive job training and education if at all possible. That just makes sense, and is better for the person as well as balancing the cost to society.
However a law like this, restricting a person's choice of type of health care, amounts to imposing a religious or personal preference on others, and is blatantly unjust. It shows why separation of church and state is so important, and provides a clear example of the need for anti-discrimina tion provisions at all levels of government.
Government is created by all citizens, and exists to serve all equally. Personal preferences are just that, personal, and have no place in government regulations.
If Brewer wants to speak out about her thoughts on abortion, that is fine, but trying to impose her views on others using the power of the government is wrong, and either is or should definitely be illegal.
As psadave said in the first comment, "I'm so sick of all the GOP goons that are always crying about 'somebody' taking away their FREEDOMS and then passing laws like this!"
RSS feed for comments to this post