RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Amy Goodman asks Robert Redford about "... President Obama's decision last week to reject the proposal for the Keystone XL tars sands oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. "Oil, coal and gas still dominate, in terms of control, because of their relationship with members of Congress they give a lot of money to. But because times have changed so drastically, and I don't think we can be at the mercy of what Big Oil wants to do anymore."

Actor and environmental activist Robert Redford. (photo: Contour/Getty Images)
Actor and environmental activist Robert Redford. (photo: Contour/Getty Images)



We Can't Afford to Be at the Mercy of Big Oil

By Robert Redford, Democracy Now!

25 January 12

 

 

MY GOODMAN: We're at Park City Television in Park City, Utah, home of the Sundance Film Festival, the largest festival of independent cinema in this country. Over the weekend, I spoke with Robert Redford. He is the founder of Sundance Film Festival, well known as an actor, an Academy Award-winning director, and a producer. We sat down in the opening days of the film festival to talk about politics and his life. Over these next few days, we'll play excerpts of that interview.

Today we're going to begin with a conversation around President Obama's decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline that would go from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. Robert Redford has weighed in on this, written columns, posted podcasts about it, a well-known environmentalist. He talked about the significance of this decision.

ROBERT REDFORD: I think it's important because it ties to a number of crucial things. One is what kind of information gets to the American public that's really the truth, that's going to relate to what happens to their environment, which has already been so degraded over the years that we - there's less and less planet to live on. And if anybody is thinking about their children or the children to come beyond that, then they should start thinking about what they're going to provide for them to live on. And it's the greed and the corporate control of profit, which was fine up to a point during the Industrial Revolution - I mean, that was great, helped this country grow strong and so forth - but you have to look at the other side of it now, and it's kind of grim.

So this - this, to me, was an example of one of the big interests that I think has a lot of control over the country, certainly politically, which is Big Oil. Oil, coal and gas still dominate, in terms of control, because of their relationship with members of Congress they give a lot of money to, the jobs they claim they create, and so forth. But because times have changed so drastically, and I don't think we can afford to be at the mercy of what Big Oil wants to do anymore, it's a question of, "OK, you've had your thing." Now, if you just want to look at a real simple equation, which is what got me involved in the environment in the first place, it's really simple. You have non-renewable energy sources, and you have renewable energy sources. And when I saw a map in the late '60s about that, I thought, "Wait a minute, all of our energy is going to non-renewable energy sources. Why are we not considering that it's non-renewable for a reason? It's going to go out someday. And it's polluting our environment. It's creating health hazards and so forth. Why would we not be switching to renewable?" And that's when I realized how politics plays its role in it. So, from that time on, I've been pretty active in trying to have a hard look at the environment and human rights. But those are the two areas that I've been focusing on.

So, right now, here's this glaring example of what's wrong. And that is, if you look at the facts, it's a terrible situation - if the facts can get out there. But the facts are so busy being distorted, exaggerated, or just lied about by the other side, who has a more commanding presence on the airwaves and so forth, you've got a serious situation. And so, my effort to come out is, please look at the facts. Don't look at - when you have people like Mitch McConnell, you have people like Boehner, Gingrich, who's his own - he's a whole other issue - but when they exaggerate the truth, or fabricate it, or just out-and-out lie about the actual facts, then you've got to step up and say, "Wait a second. That's not the truth." So, what is the truth? And there is a lot of untruth being propagated by these people about this pipeline, 1,200 miles of crude oil, which is the dirtiest oil on the planet, being shipped from Canada, that wants to get to the ocean, to Houston. And for what? It's not going to put any - it's not going to put any gas in your tank. It's oil that's going to be exported to other countries. So, what is the point? In the meantime, it's going to run through the heartland of America. And don't tell me there won't be any leaks. Of course there will be leaks, because we've seen it all over the map in recent months, years. So I just figure, OK, the American people will decide.

AMY GOODMAN: Actor Robert Redford. We will play excerpts of this interview throughout the week.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-9 # MidwestTom 2012-01-25 09:43
The Washington Times yesterday finally ran an article explaining the Warren Buffett stands to gain big time, form the XL not being built. The railroad he bought two years ago is the one hauling all of the crude out of the Tar Sands to the Gulf Coast. I think that long term the pipeline would have caused a lot less pollution than 10 or 15 trains rolling every day moving the oil from the Tar sands to the Gulf Coast ( four or five loadings per day, 2 day trip each way ). If we want to stop the tar sands development, the trains must be stopped---anoth er job for Occupy. Show Warren his money can't enlist the aid of Occupy to make him more money.
 
 
-13 # Robt Eagle 2012-01-25 11:41
Robert Redford is a great actor, director, and producer. I appreciate his enviromental concerns, but this pipeline has been researched for three years and is good to go, except for Obama and his voting base. Makes no sense to hold up this pipeline. We need to get more oil, the cheapest place is from Canada, and also, letting the oil go to China is insane. Obama wants prices to rise on everything and bankrupt our economy...what other explanation is there?
 
 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-25 13:51
Both you and Tom seem to be intellectually challenged. The reason that this pipeline was stopped was because it WASN'T researched thoroughly and when the republicans forced a decision before the studies could be completed, then they forced Obama to say that it couldn't be built. The law requires that anything like this pass an environmental review, and the republicans, in effect, prevented a review from even being completed.

As for the oil going to China, that isn't in Obama's hands. It is a decision made by Big Oil to sell to the highest bidder. If your argument is that there should be more control over the business practices of Corporate America, then I'm with you.
 
 
+1 # BellBuoy 2012-01-26 19:47
The other explanation, Robert, is that Obama might just love this country too. Look at the gigantic messes caused by the reckless oil industry and their lackeys in Congress: talk with fishermen on the Gulf coast: and it's clear we need to draw a line in the soil somewhere. America is now a NET EXPORTER OF GASOLINE. We don't need more oil! We need smarter energy sources! Tar sands oil is a disaster for Canada: we don't need to take on that risk.
 
 
+11 # ABen 2012-01-25 12:05
Our addiction to oil is undermining both our economy and our national security. We have the resources and know-how to be at the forefront of the green energy revolution. What we lack is the national political will. Go as green as possible as soon as possible.
 
 
+6 # brianf 2012-01-25 12:06
How it gets transported is a secondary issue, but pipeline and train are both very bad, and I agree we should work to stop them both.

The important thing is to stop the tar sands oil from being extracted and processed and burned. Although pollution is an extremely important issue and should be enough on its own to stop tar sands oil development, global warming is far more urgent and will do far more damage to humans and other species unless we stop it very soon.

We also must stop burning coal and all other fossil fuels as quickly as possible.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN