FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "We called it Sandy, and it came to tell us we should have listened harder when the first, second, and third disasters showed up."

Was Hurricane Sandy caused by climate change? (photo: Victor J. Blue)
Was Hurricane Sandy caused by climate change? (photo: Victor J. Blue)


The Name of the Hurricane Is Climate Change

By Rebecca Solnit, TomDispatch

07 November 12

 

was recently interviewed by Bill Moyers for his TV show. It was a pleasure and an honor. The show was supposed to air last Sunday just before the election. Unfortunately, superstorm Sandy closed Moyers's operation for the week and the rest of the show was never completed. Nonetheless, the interview has now been posted online at the Moyers & Company website. To check it out, click here. For new readers coming in, the three books of mine that Moyers mentioned were The United States of Fear, The End of Victory Culture, and Terminator Planet (with Nick Turse). Tom]

Consider me lucky. Yes, Sandy made a modest mess of my life. I had to cancel a trip to Chicago (or swim down the LaGuardia Airport runway to get there). The wind roared past our window like a speeding truck. The Hudson River was a white-capped torrent. Trees in our neighborhood came down. A piece of construction scaffolding on a building across the street fell. It was unnerving, but living on a (relatively) higher part of Manhattan Island I never lost electricity or the Internet.

I didn't find myself, like a friend in Jersey, living on the 21st floor of a high-rise with no electricity, no water, essentially nothing. Unlike a friend of my daughter's I wasn't flooded out of a first-floor apartment in the low-lying neighborhood of Red Hook in Brooklyn, and didn't lose my furniture to two feet of water. I didn't end up with a basement full of sewage and fuel oil, or find myself for a week in lower Manhattan where the lights were out ("little North Korea," Jon Stewart called it), the food rotting in refrigerators, and you could hardly get cell phone reception. I didn't spend hours in endless car lines waiting for gas. I wasn't in a hospital that lost power. I didn't, like 110 people in the region, die.

So, yes, I was lucky. But my city took one hell of a hit. Honestly, when it's the Midwest and a drought that won't end, I may know what's at stake, I may truly care, but it's still happening elsewhere. When it's the place where you were born, where you grew up, which you fled and returned to, the place that's built into you, then it's terrifying.

I was also quite safe and distant when terror struck far downtown on September 11, 2001. Last Monday, terror struck again. I know it looked like "nature," not some al-Qaeda wannabe, and I'm quite aware that no specific, in-your-face weather event can definitively be linked to climate change, but let's face it, ever fewer people doubt that we are warming the planet, with disastrous weather results. And at the top of the list of those who know what's going on are the fossil-fuel companies with their unprecedented profits and unbearably overpaid executives and shareholders.

Just like those running asbestos, lead paint, and tobacco companies who knowingly continued to do harm for profit after the scientific verdicts on their products were in, energy executives undoubtedly are more aware of what the burning of fossil fuels actually means for this planet than most of the rest of us. They certainly don't know less than the reinsurance types who have launched a campaign of climate change awareness within the insurance business or New York's Mayor Bloomberg, whose magazine Bloomberg Businessweek just had the blunt cover headline, "It's Global Warming, Stupid."

And if they know and haven't taken steps to prepare us for a fierce weather future or to switch us over to an alternative energy economy, if they've just kept on pouring money and effort and ingenuity into the frizzling of this planet, then let's face it, they are the business equivalents of terrorists. In fact, for years they've funded a massive campaign to deny the reality of climate change. Only recently, Chevron made a last minute contribution of $2.5 million to a Super PAC dedicated to reelecting Republican members of the House of Representatives (who could, of course, block any legislation detrimental to an oil company). Realistically speaking, we should think of them as oil-Qaeda and we already know one thing: the strikes against us that they are at least partially responsible for are only going to grow more devastating.

Eleven years ago, three days after a terrible assault on New York City, a U.S. president arrived in downtown Manhattan, clambered onto a pile of rubble at Ground Zero, grabbed a bullhorn, and swore: "The people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!" Then, after those who called for police action against al-Qaeda to bring them to court for their crimes were laughed out of the room, he launched a Global War on Terror. And you know where that ended up.

Today, people aren't wearing I [Heart] New York T-shirts nationwide, and no one, president or otherwise, is calling for a "war" on oil-Qaeda. Personally, I'm still for the police-and-courts route, but the best we can hope for right now is simply that, after a political season of too-hot-to-handle silence on climate change, the people who had a hand in doing this to us "will hear all of us soon!" It does seem that, dripping wet and stinking of sewage, climate change is crawling out of New York's subway tunnels and into the political light of day. TomDispatch regular Rebecca Solnit, who has been thinking about global warming for a long, long time, offers her own assessment of just where we are today. Tom

The first horseman was named al-Qaeda in Manhattan, and it came as a message on September 11, 2001: that our meddling in the Middle East had sown rage and funded madness. We had meddled because of imperial ambition and because of oil, the black gold that fueled most of our machines and our largest corporations and too many of our politicians. The second horseman came not quite four years later. It was named Katrina, and this one too delivered a warning.

Katrina's message was that we needed to face the dangers we had turned our back on when the country became obsessed with terrorism: failing infrastructure, institutional rot, racial divides, and poverty. And larger than any of these was the climate - the heating oceans breeding stronger storms, melting the ice and raising the sea level, breaking the patterns of the weather we had always had into sharp shards: burning and dying forests, floods, droughts, heat waves in January, freak blizzards, sudden oscillations, acidifying oceans.

The third horseman came in October of 2008: it was named Wall Street, and when that horseman stumbled and collapsed, we were reminded that it had always been a predator, and all that had changed was the scale - of deregulation, of greed, of recklessness, of amorality about homes and lives being casually trashed to profit the already wealthy. And the fourth horseman has arrived on schedule.

We called it Sandy, and it came to tell us we should have listened harder when the first, second, and third disasters showed up. This storm's name shouldn't be Sandy - though that means we've run through the alphabet all the way up to S this hurricane season, way past brutal Isaac in August - it should be Climate Change. If each catastrophe came with a message, then this one's was that global warming's here, that the old rules don't apply, and that not doing anything about it for the past 30 years is going to prove far, far more expensive than doing something would have been.

That is, expensive for us, for human beings, for life on Earth, if not for the carbon profiteers, the ones who are, in a way, tied to all four of these apocalyptic visitors. A reasonable estimate I heard of the cost of this disaster was $30 billion, just a tiny bit more than Chevron's profits last year (though it might go as high as $50 billion). Except that it's coming out of the empty wallets of single mothers in Hoboken, New Jersey, and the pensions of the elderly, and the taxes of the rest of us. Disasters cost most of us terribly, in our hearts, in our hopes for the future, and in our ability to lead a decent life. They cost some corporations as well, while leading to ever-greater profits for others.

Disasters Are Born Political

It was in no small part for the benefit of the weapons-makers and oil producers that we propped up dictators and built military bases and earned the resentment of the Muslim world. It was for the benefit of oil and other carbon producers that we did nothing about climate change, and they actively toiled to prevent any such action.

If you wanted, you could even add a fifth horseman, a fifth disaster to our list, the blowout of the BP well in the Gulf of Mexico in the spring of 2010; cost-cutting on equipment ended 11 lives and contaminated a region dense with wildlife and fishing families and hundreds of thousands of others. It was as horrendous as the other four, but it took fewer lives directly and it should have but didn't produce political change.

Each of the other catastrophes has redirected American politics and policy in profound ways. 9/11 brought us close to dictatorship, until Katrina corrected course by discrediting the Bush administration and putting poverty and racism, if not climate change, back on the agenda. Wall Street's implosion was the 2008 October Surprise that made Americans leave Republican presidential candidate John McCain's no-change campaign in the dust - and that, three years later, prompted the birth of Occupy Wall Street.

The Wall Street collapse did a lot for Barack Obama, too, and just in time another October surprise has made Romney look venal, clueless, and irrelevant. Disaster has been good to Obama - Katrina's reminder about race may have laid the groundwork for his presidential bid, and the financial implosion in the middle of the presidential campaign, as well as John McCain's disastrous response to it, may have won him the last election.

The storm that broke the media narrative of an ascending Romney gave Obama the nonpartisan moment of solidarity he always longed for - including the loving arms of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. But it's not about the president; it's about the other seven billion of us and the rest of the Earth's creatures, from plankton to pikas.

Hope in the Storm

Sandy did what no activist could have done adequately: put climate change back on the agenda, made the argument for reasonably large government, and reminded us of the colossal failures of the Bush administration seven years ago. (Michael "heckuva job" Brown, FEMA's astonishingly incompetent director under George W. Bush, even popped up to underscore just how far we've come.)

Maybe Sandy will also remind us that terrorism was among the least common, if most dramatic, of the dangers we faced then and face now. Though rollercoasters in the surf and cities under water have their own drama - and so does seawater rushing into the pit at Ground Zero.

Clearly, the game has changed. New York City's billionaire mayor, when not endorsing police brutality against Wall Street's Occupiers, has been a huge supporter of work on climate change. He gave the Sierra Club $50 million to fight coal last year and late last week in Sandy's wake came out with a tepid endorsement of Obama as the candidate who might do something on the climate. Last week as well, his magazine, Bloomberg Businessweek, ran a cover that could've run anytime in the past few decades (but didn't) with the headline: "It's global warming, stupid."

There are two things you can hope for after Sandy. The first is that every person stranded without power, running water, open grocery stores, access to transportation, an intact home, and maybe income (if work isn't reachable or a job has been suspended) is able to return to normal as soon as possible. Or more than that in some cases, because the storm has also brought to light how many people were barely getting by before. (After all, we also use the word "underwater" for people drowning in debt and houses worth less than what's owed on their mortgages.) The second is that the fires and the water and the wind this time put climate change where it belongs, in the center of our most pressing issues.

We Have Power! How Disasters Unfold

A stranger sent me a widely circulated photograph of a front gate in Hoboken with a power strip and extension cord and a little note that reads, "We have power! Please feel free to charge your phone." We have power, and volunteers are putting it to work in ways that count. In many disasters, government and big bureaucratic relief organizations take time to get it together or they allocate aid in less than ideal ways. The most crucial early work is often done by those on the ground, by the neighbors, by civil society - and word, as last week ended, was that the government wasn't always doing it adequately.

Hurricane Sandy seems to be typical in this regard. Occupy Wall Street and 350.org got together to create Occupy Sandy and are already doing splendid relief work, including for those in the flooded housing projects in Red Hook, Brooklyn. My friend Marina Sitrin, a scholar and Occupy organizer, wrote late last week:

"Amazing and inspiring work by community and Occupy folks! Hot nutritious meals for many hundreds. Supplies that people need, like diapers, baby wipes, flashlights etc., all organized. Also saw the first (meaning first set up in NYC - only tonight) scary FEMA site a few blocks away. Militarized and policed entrance, to an area fenced in with 15-foot fences, where one gets a sort of military/astronaut ration with explanations of how to use in English that I did not understand. Plus Skittles?"

Occupy, declared dead by the mainstream media six weeks ago, is shining in this mess. Kindness, solidarity, mutual aid of this kind can ameliorate a catastrophe, but it can't prevent one, and this isn't the kind of power it takes to pump out drowned subway stations or rebuild railroad lines or get the lights back on. There is a role for government in disaster, and for mobilizing all available forces in forestalling our march toward a planet that could look like the New Jersey shore all the time.

When Occupy first began, all those tents, medical clinics, and community kitchens in the encampments reminded me of the aftermath of an earthquake. The occupiers looked like disaster survivors - and in a sense they were, though the disaster they had survived was called the economy and its impacts are usually remarkably invisible. Sandy is also an economic disaster: unlimited release of carbon into the atmosphere is very expensive and will get more so.

The increasingly turbulent, disaster-prone planet we're on is our beautiful old Earth with the temperature raised almost one degree celsius. It's going to get hotter than that, though we can still make a difference in how hot it gets. Right now, locally, in the soaked places, we need people to aid the stranded, the homeless, and the hungry. Globally we need to uncouple government from the Big Energy corporations, and ensure that most of the carbon energy left on the planet stays where it belongs: underground.

After the Status Quo

Disasters often unfold a little like revolutions. They create a tremendous rupture with the past. Today has nothing much in common with yesterday - in how the system works or doesn't, in what people have in common, in how they see their priorities and possibilities. The people in power are often most interested in returning to yesterday, because the status quo was working for them - though Mayor Bloomberg is to be commended for taking the storm as a wake-up call to do more about climate change. For the rest of us, after such a disaster, sometimes the status quo doesn't look so good.

Disasters often produce real political change, not always for the better (and not always for the worse). I called four of the last five big calamities in this country the four horsemen of the apocalypse because directly or otherwise they caused so much suffering, because they brought us closer to the brink, and because they changed our national direction. Disaster has now become our national policy: we invite it in and it directs us, for better and worse.

As the horsemen trample over all the things we love most, it becomes impossible to distinguish natural disaster from man-made calamity: maybe the point is that there is no difference anymore. But there's another point: that we can prevent the worst of the impact in all sorts of ways, from evacuation plans to carbon emissions reductions to economic justice, and that it's all tied up together.

I wish Sandy hadn't happened. But it did, and there have been and will be more disasters like this. I hope that radical change arises from it. The climate has already changed. May we change to meet the challenges.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+4 # readerz 2012-11-07 23:25
Most of the time, people sit across the country and ignore the disaster at a distance.

I recall a story about some politician that a Native American said was powerless; what has power is the wind or floods or fire. This has always been, and always should be, the central concern here in North America. Now we have added global warming, and we will certainly pay for it.

What is worse, there are more homes built in harm's way. Some whole towns are built in the way of volcanoes, or potential tsunamis. A lot more planning and action needs to be done, or something much worse will be next.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-11-08 10:56
Greedy giving permits to the greedy...fittin g. Time we put some real thought of wow I am building this home on a beach in a tidal area...duh
I am building on a river duh

Engineers...duh Lawyers duh Planning and Zoning duh

I am sorry I live under a Mt, next to a stream....my grade is good for water to run off. I moved my house over when it was put on a foundation. Didnot build down but up (springs from Mt) I am very glad since Katrina we had foresight to do so. My creek never overflowed like a river but it did go to peak, pond also went to outer ledge....Lifted home, moved away What a thought Concept. Not trying to outdo family, friends or keep up with Jones' just trying to keep above water. So far, so good.
Thought Process more important than paying off Officials. I still have my home
I hope those who refused to move boats, or their cars after warnings for a week, get nothing. We all knew, was told, saw the Storm building....we remember other disasters Why didn't you leave, stuff can be replaced, most of it is junk. You had time to pack up those photos, those jewels, clothes tv, pc so why didn't you? figured FEMA is going to bail you out for free. Insurance is not unless you have Hurricane and Flood.
So while you were laughing, I hope they were good ones because they are on you.

NJ keep blaming everyone..this one is on you and Gov waiting til last minute
 
 
+4 # kalpal 2012-11-08 04:00
The business of learning from past mistakes has yet to be accepted as valid by those whose education is based in US schools.

Somehow this nation is quite unwilling to look at past mistake, not disasters but mistakes, analyzing how they came to be made and how repetition might be avoided in the future.

A child who burns its hand and then does it again, is either getting some pleasureable feedback or is incapable of learning any lesson.

Having looked at the stock market for the past 50 years I conclude that each generation is certain that gravity has been suspended for it. What goes up will keep going up forever and ever even though history plainly offers ample evidence to the contrary.

Weather is changing and not for the better, I had hoped to retire to a beach area but that dream has become a potential nightmare. No amount of misplaced faith will stop it, slow it or make it go away. I don't care who is at fault and who pays some scientists to deny their culpability and intentional continued pollution as a potential cause.

I will be dead and gone in a few years and the current generation will contend the damage that rich twits will have caused. (They do this because they know the rich will suffer the least and probably die last due to their obstructions.)
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-11-08 11:05
I do not know if I am going to blame our destroying the Atmosphere, and polls and whatever climate change for Hurricanes.

I am afraid that Hurricanes have been around a long, long time. I do not know which has been the worst since Dinosaurs and CaveMan are not here to back up the information.

I will blame the Climate Change for just that Climate Change. I see the NE USA trending towards Washington State and English Weather or rain, clouds, strange occurrences of freak snow, hail. But I am not saying that this has not made the other Weathers Thunderstorms, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, Tornadoes, and the like into a more Complex System...it has.
But Hurricanes were here as well as other Weather Problems way before Industrial Revolution, Cars Emmission, Poisoning Intentionally of air and water, land.
I am glad some people are picking up on the significance we are making on animal and people's live who depend on Polar Caps...it is about time. I also remember most of you all taunting us environmentalis ts for over 40 years
I often ask how you like the Clean Energy, no Cost Nuclear Power we have today. You see there was never to be cost rises. Like Casinos and Property Taxes...bull.
I believe if you want to do something, organize, join forces with other groups because we are going to have to be in OB's face and Congress. We need our Air and Water Acts back up and enforced.
We need EPA cleaned up.
 
 
0 # Smokey 2012-11-09 07:39
You may be right.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-11-08 11:15
We need to work to stop tar sands, fracking...proo f of Pa DEP giving false reports of homeowner water tests have come to light Post-Gazette Nov 2, 2012 Pitt area.
No one is going to do things if all you do is whine on a blog site. You go to do what we have done for decades, in fact going on half a century...stand up for your rights.

GMO Labeling is still on the March, get involved. Vermont right now is taking on the Corporate Slugs and needs our help a ten dollar donation will help Bernie Sanders and VT with 12 other States. We need to walk all over these Polluters, Killers now. They just lost 45 million dollars so let's say we help them lose double that this year, stop buying their products. It is time we took our food back, buy only from local farmers, organic/nearly organic.

Tomorrow an phone conference from Food and Water Watch is going to happen at 2pm to discuss clean air and water.

Have a great week, We can Change things.

Next we must put China up against a Wall so to speak. China has gone to World Council and is complaining about our Environmental Standards. I think we should take a good look at theirs. Once a leader, not so anymore with pollution in water, air, food. I believe they want us to contaminate the USA with piping tar oil. Well I think if they want the tar oil they can safely get it out of Canada if they are such Great Environmentalis ts....
 
 
0 # Smokey 2012-11-09 07:40
You may be wrong. In any event, thanks for staying involved with the climate change and energy discussions.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN