RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "While it is heartening to hear President Obama affirm that climate change is not a hoax, he - like his Republican opponent - seems to place a higher value on achieving 'energy independence' via expanded oil and gas drilling than on action on climate change."

Obama and Romney. (photo: Accuracy.org)
Obama and Romney. (photo: Accuracy.org)


Obama, Romney 'Playing Games' With Environmental Disaster

By Daphne Wysham, Tyson Slocum and Richard Steiner, Institute for Public Accuracy

11 September 12

 

APHNE WYSHAM

Wysham is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies and is the founder and co-director of the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network. She said today: "While it is heartening to hear President Obama affirm that climate change is not a hoax, he - like his Republican opponent - seems to place a higher value on achieving 'energy independence' via expanded oil and gas drilling than on action on climate change. The Obama administration has promoted policies that will result in enormous greenhouse gas emissions being released from the expanded mining and burning of coal - regardless of whether it is burned via unproven 'clean coal' technology - and via the poisonous and dangerous practice of fracking for gas, as well as via expanded offshore oil drilling. He has also signaled that, after the election, it will be full steam ahead for a pipeline for the dirtiest of all fossil fuels - tar sands from Canada. This is what happens when moneyed fossil fuel interests, like the Koch brothers, maintain their grip on our nation's politics."

TYSON SLOCUM

Director of Public Citizen's Energy Program, Slocum said today: "It was important that President Obama made clear his belief that climate change remains a major threat - a contrast to Governor Romney's use of climate change as a punchline to a joke in his speech. But more important will be what policy solutions President Obama proposes to tackle climate change - and how his 'all of the above' strategy may undermine that commitment. This election, fossil fuel corporations will spend millions to not only shape voters' opinions of the candidates, but their attitudes on energy policy –- namely that producing and using more fossil fuels will liberate our economy. The fact is that the longer we remain with the fossil fuel status quo, the farther we fall behind on the sustainable era of renewable energy. There is no such thing as benign fossil fuel production and consumption, and the future of fossil fuels will only become more expensive."

RICHARD STEINER

A retired professor at the University of Alaska, Steiner was deeply involved in the aftermath of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. He said today: "Neither the Republican Party, nor the Obama administration seem to grasp the severity of the energy/climate crisis we are in. While the Republicans are further from an energy plan that addresses the situation, both are playing games with something that is truly a life and death situation.

"That Romney belittled sea level rise and the global ecological crisis in his convention speech one night, and the very next day toured southern Louisiana, flooded with sea water from Hurricane Isaac, was one of the most spectacular ironies in the history of American politics. I suppose we expect this sort of delusion from the Republicans.

"But the Obama administration has had several years to make serious inroads into our carbon-intensive economy, and their performance has been an utter disaster. With only a few small achievements to tout, such as the recent auto fuel efficiency standards a decade or so in the future, this administration has failed miserably to live up to what those of us who voted for them expected.

"In energy efficiency and alternative fuels, we are now at a place we should have been at 40 years ago. Here in Alaska, and across the Arctic, we are presently experiencing the lowest sea ice extent since records have been kept. Walrus and polar bears are struggling on thin ice, and in open water. At this rate, the Arctic Ocean will be ice-free in summer within a few years.

"But instead of a crash emergency program to do everything possible to save the Arctic Ocean ecosystem from this unfolding disaster, the administration just approved Shell's oil drilling in offshore waters. In addition to the chronic degradation from increased industrialization in the Arctic, and the very real risk of a catastrophic oil spill, every carbon atom produced from the Arctic Ocean seabed will simply wind up in the global atmosphere and oceans, further exacerbating the death spiral from climate warming. It's a lose-lose proposition, and everyone who knows this issue knows that.

"In fact, the administration's offshore drilling program for the coming five years is worse than that of the former Bush administration. It harkens back to the 1980s days of James Watt and Ronald Reagan.

"We cannot continue dancing around the edges of this beast, and if we care about our common future, we need immediate, emergency action on the part of the U.S. government, and world governments to reduce carbon emissions some 80 percent. Nothing short of this will do. The continuing denial of the severity of this crisis by both main political parties could be our collective undoing."

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-6 # MidwestTom 2012-09-11 10:57
The climate appears to be changing, the question is whether human activity is to blame. If humans are to blame, we need to go to the biggest causes. If CO2 is the problem, China and India combines emit a total of more than four times what the US does. The study of climate over centuries shows that the earth warms before CO2 rises. Our forest fires generate a gigantic amount of CO2.

In the late 70's and early 80's we were told that Freon was causing a hole in the Ozone later, and we outlawed it's use here. Thus forcing all of us to use less efficient and more expensive refrigerants. Literally all of the other industrialized counties are still using Freon. Our stopping has make us less efficient, and had no effect on the overall climate in the earth. Climate models have so far proven very unreliable.
 
 
+2 # dkonstruction 2012-09-12 09:49
You're right Midwest Tom, climate models have proven to be unreliable...th e size and pace of the change has been even worse than the models predicted.

So, right now there are those that want to move us off fossil fuels (the major cause of global warming...no one ever said it was freon) and those who either deny that climate change is happening at all or who simply want to keep us on fossil fuels as long as they can profit from it. The answer therefore is to nationalize the oil and gas industries so that they can no longer bribe congress and state legislators to do nothing and we can finally move towards a truly "green" economy.
 
 
+4 # Glen 2012-09-11 12:34
Humans are the cause, Tom, and there never have been as many of us. By us I also mean huge corporations, as well, and your example of open fires and growing countries around the world.

However, if the U.S. would set the example and begin to insist on regulations and such, it would be a start. A late start, yes, but a start.

Having said that, the token removal of old style CFCs does not overcome the amazing amount of pollution of all types, produced by the U.S.

While traveling this past week I was reminded, once again of the millions of trucks on the road, spewing smoke, airplanes, factories, you name it. There has never been a time in the history of the planet when humans were polluting as much as at present.
 
 
+2 # panhead49 2012-09-11 12:59
Thank you for your comment MidwestTom - I was thinking along the same line while reading this article. I wish we could be the leader on protecting this only home we have. But it would be the equivalent of being the only home in a residential neighborhood that hooked up to the sewer system while all your neighbors just flush out a pipe into their backyards.

This is an old one but 'pollution does not know any geographic or geopolitical boundaries'. Our planet is screwed, stewed and tattooed.
 
 
+2 # ericlipps 2012-09-11 14:19
Well, Topm, of course our stopping the use of CFC's hasn't solved global warming. It was never supposed top, It was iontended to address ozone depletion, which is a different issue, and it appears to be working. As for the "unreliability" of climate models, they're improvng all the time--and unfortunately, as they do, thery don't point toward less global warming but if anyuthing toward more.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-09-11 15:12
Ozone depletion is bigger than CO2s. The ozone layer, along with the rest of the atmosphere is the only thing between us and certain death. Global warming is a slow death by comparison.
 
 
+2 # cordleycoit 2012-09-11 16:03
The US will do nothing as long as these party hacks who pretend to represent us are returned to office. The rotten brain Obama is shifting and dancing with big money. Romney would use mountain top removal until the last lump coal is burned and then whine when the lights go out.Obama is either a total crook, a victim of amnesia, or a third order con man. 'Buy the ticket take the ride.' And we've been on the ride. Want to see famine it seems to the goal of the men who own the earth and all the people.
 
 
+3 # Hank 2012-09-12 10:23
Fact: climate change is happening.
Fact: Our use of fossil fuels is causing it to happen faster.
Stop using lame arguments to avoid facing the facts.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN