RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Arsenault writes: "Some analysts worry that wars of the future will be fought over blue gold, as thirsty people, opportunistic politicians and powerful corporations battle for dwindling resources."

Dried lake sediment, left behind by a shrinking lake at Wooly Hollow State Park, Arkansas. (photo: John Lewis/National Weather Service)
Dried lake sediment, left behind by a shrinking lake at Wooly Hollow State Park, Arkansas. (photo: John Lewis/National Weather Service)


Are the Water Wars Coming?

By Chris Arsenault, Al Jazeera

02 September 12

 

Almost half of humanity will face water scarcity by 2030 and strategists from Israel to Central Asia prepare for strife.

he author Mark Twain once remarked that "whisky is for drinking; water is for fighting over" and a series of reports from intelligence agencies and research groups indicate the prospect of a water war is becoming increasingly likely.

In March, a report from the office of the US Director of National Intelligence said the risk of conflict would grow as water demand is set to outstrip sustainable current supplies by 40 per cent by 2030.

"These threats are real and they do raise serious national security concerns," Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said after the report's release.

Internationally, 780 million people lack access to safe drinking water, according to the United Nations. By 2030, 47 percent of the world's population will be living in areas of high water stress, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Environmental Outlook to 2030 report.

Some analysts worry that wars of the future will be fought over blue gold, as thirsty people, opportunistic politicians and powerful corporations battle for dwindling resources.

Dangerous Warnings

Governments and military planners around the world are aware of the impending problem; with the US senate issuing reports with names like Avoiding Water Wars: Water Scarcity and Central Asia's growing Importance for Stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"Water scarcity is an issue exacerbated by demographic pressures, climate change and pollution," said Ignacio Saiz, director of Centre for Economic and Social Rights, a social justice group. "The world's water supplies should guarantee every member of the population to cover their personal and domestic needs."With rapid population growth, and increased industrial demand, water withdrawls have tripled over the last 50 years, according to UN figures.

"Fundamentally, these are issues of poverty and inequality, man-made problems," he told Al Jazeera.

Of all the water on earth, 97 per cent is salt water and the remaining three per cent is fresh, with less than one per cent of the planet's drinkable water readily accessible for direct human uses. Scarcity is defined as each person in an area having access to less than 1,000 cubic meters of water a year.

The areas where water scarcity is the biggest problem are some of the same places where political conflicts are rife, leading to potentially explosive situations.

Some experts believe the only documented case of a "water war" happened about 4,500 years ago, when the city-states of Lagash and Umma went to war in the Tigris-Euphrates basin.

But Adel Darwish, a journalist and co-author of Water Wars: Coming Conflicts in the Middle East, says modern history has already seen at least two water wars.

"I have [former Israeli prime minister] Ariel Sharon speaking on record saying the reason for going to war [against Arab armies] in 1967 was for water," Darwish told Al Jazeera.

Some analysts believe Israel continues to occupy the Golan heights, seized from Syria in 1967, due to issues of water control, while others think the occupation is about maintaining high ground in case of future conflicts.

Senegal and Mauritania also fought a war starting in 1989 over grazing rights on the River Senegal. And Syria and Iraq have fought minor skirmishes over the Euphrates River.

Middle East Hit Hard

UN studies project that 30 nations will be water scarce in 2025, up from 20 in 1990. Eighteen of them are in the Middle East and North Africa, including Egypt, Israel, Somalia, Libya and Yemen.

Water shortages could cost the unstable country 750,000 jobs, slashing incomes in the poorest Arab country by as much as 25 per cent over the next decade, according to a report from

the consulting firm McKinsey and Company produced for the Yemeni government in 2010. Darwish bets that a battle between south and north Yemen will probably be the scene of the next water conflict, with other countries in the region following suit if the situation is not improved.

Commentators frequently blame Yemen's problems on tribal differences, but environmental scarcity may be underpinning secessionist struggles in the country's south and some general communal violence.

"My experience in the first gulf war [when Iraq invaded Kuwait] is that natural resources are always at the heart of tribal conflicts," Darwish told Al Jazeera.

The Nile is another potential flash point. In 1989, former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak threatened to send demolition squads to a dam project in Ethiopia.

"The Egyptian army still has jungle warfare brigades, even though they have no jungle," Darwish said.

On the Nile, cooperation would benefit all countries involved, as they could jointly construct dams and lower the amount of water lost to evaporation, says Anton Earle, director of the Stockholm International Water Institute think-tank.

"If you had an agreement between the parties, there would be more water in the system," he told Al Jazeera. The likelihood of outright war is low, he says, but there is still "a lot of conflict" which "prevents joint infrastructure projects from going ahead".

Differing Views

Water scarcity, and potential conflicts arising from it, is linked to larger issues of population growth, increasing food prices and global warming.

There are two general views about how these problems could unfold. The first dates back to the work of Thomas Malthus, an eighteenth century British clergyman and author who believed that: "The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race."

In other words, more people and scant resources will invariably lead to discord and violence.

"Unequal power relations within states and conflicts between ethnic groups and social classes will be the greatest source of social tensions rising from deprivation," said Ignacio Saiz from the social justice group. "Water too often is treated as a commodity, as an instrument with which one population group can suppress another."Recent scholars, including Thomas Homer-Dixon, have analysed various case studies on environmental degradation to conclude that there is not a direct link between scarcity and violence. Instead, he believes inequality, social inclusion and other factors determine the nature and ferocity of strife.

Bolivia, South Africa, India, Botswana, Mexico and even parts of the US have seen vigorous water related protests, says Maude Barlow, author of 16 books and a former senior adviser to the UN on water issues.

"The fight over water privatisation in Cochobamba, Bolivia did turn into a bit of a water war and the army was called in," Barlow told Al Jazeera. "In Botswana, the government smashed bore holes as part of a terrible move to remove [indigenous bushmen] from the Kalahari desert. Mexico City has been forcibly taking water from the countryside, confiscating water sources from other areas and building fotresses around it, like it's a gold mine. In India, Coke will get contracts and then build fortresses around the water sources," taking drinking and irrigation water away from local people. "In Detroit 45,000, officially, have already had their water cut off."

Human Rights

Strife over water, like conflicts more generally, will increasingly happen within states, rather than between them, Barlow says, with large scale agribusiness, mining and energy production taking control over resources at the expense of other users.

The IPPC, the UN panel which analyses climate science, concluded that: "Water and its availability and quality will be the main pressures on and issues for, societies and the environment under climate change."

Dealing with these pressures will require improved technologies, political will and new ideas about how humans view their relationship with the substance that sustains life.

"People have the right to expect access to a basic life resource like water by virtue of being human, regardless of the social situation they are born into," Saiz said. "Alongside the worrying development of water scarcity, I am hopeful that we will see increasing struggles to see access to water as a right, and not a priviledge."


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+27 # Street Level 2012-09-02 20:44
It's already started here. We will see more farmers competing with the frackers whose destructive practice uses water by the trillions of gallons leaving behind toxic waste that can't be recycled to a potable state. We'll see more water companies move to privatization so they can sell to the highest bidder as the public conserves more but the water companies can't pay the upkeep on the infrastructure because our stupid economic system is based on consumption and not conservation.
The 1% will fill their pools and jacuzzi's, water their sprawling landscapes and golf courses and claim not to see a problem right along with Washington.
Their ability to recognize a problem is about as good as their ability to recognize our rights.
 
 
+16 # jsluka 2012-09-02 21:10
Please comment on how privatisation of water fit into this. I live in New Zealand, and there is a drive towards privatisation of water here, and I believe the same thing is happening just about everywhere. I think this is an issue that will shape the water wars of the future. Just as the water is becoming critically short, more and more it comes under not national or state control but private corporate ownership.
 
 
+13 # Working Class 2012-09-03 10:02
Quoting jsluka:
Please comment on how privatisation of water fit into this. I live in New Zealand, and there is a drive towards privatisation of water here, and I believe the same thing is happening just about everywhere. I think this is an issue that will shape the water wars of the future. Just as the water is becoming critically short, more and more it comes under not national or state control but private corporate ownership.


If you think you get screwed at the gas pump, wait until your water supply has been privatized. You can take public transportation (where it exist) or walk, try doing without water. Privatizing water supply and/or delivery systems is a very bad idea.
 
 
-10 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-02 23:05
Won't happen. Because desalination of sea water using solar and wind power is very cheap and you can sell the salt, sell the hevy metals, and anything else in sea water the oceqan is full iof it, just like the suggestions and the politicians wasting time and money thus.
 
 
-7 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-03 17:39
Geeze you leftist Americans rate us tough when you hgave a one track mind set for Rubbishing Business initiatives and street marching on a single reactionary mode. Just can't see wood for trees can you. When nyour guys are in power they still don't stop Capitalist exploiting labor or why have 1% collected near 70% of entire GDP gain since Obama came in? I guess I support hiom so see Repubklican Parliament stopped his initiatives. But he didn't even try saving water, trees, GMO penetration etc?
 
 
+4 # soularddave 2012-09-03 20:50
Desalinization won't help the farmer in Nebraska, Kansas, or Oklahoma. When the people pushing the XL pipeline get their way, they'll use ungodly amounts of water for tar sand preparation and transfer, and deprive the Ogalala aquifer of it's regenerating supplies of water. The cities along the way won't have supplies to water the populations, either.

The biggest criminals are those who pollute drinking and agricultural water supplies (someone mentioned the frackers).

Her in St. Louis, the sewer bill rises twice as fast as the water bill, as we try to purify our sewage before it passes back into the Mississippi River from whence it came.
 
 
+1 # Jorge 2012-09-04 11:40
Sorry Rob, desal is not "very cheap" and disposal of the wastes is a big problem (SoCal is still stealing water from NorCal instead of building your "very cheap" desal plants). If so cheap why are there so few desal plants now? Give us some examples of the cost-effectiven ess and beneficial ecology of desal plants.
 
 
+1 # X Dane 2012-09-04 14:28
robcarter.vn

I am afraid that you are at best misinformed. It is very EXPENSIVE to do the desalination, and it will be difficult to dispose of all the salt. If it was so easy it would have been done long ago. Since much of California is desert, and get water from far away Owens Valley and the Colorado River.

There will definitely be....if not war...at least a lot of trouble between Nevada, Arizona, Colorado and California, which all get water from the Colorado River. And it will happen sooner than we expect.
 
 
+2 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-02 23:09
Only shortages because too cheap now when we value our health and kidney washing as much as our car fueling and shampoo in a car wash, water price will dictate desalination and cleansing for pure water. Imagin the profits at $4/gallon for H2O?
 
 
+14 # dick 2012-09-03 03:33
Israel has been waging imperial war to get control of aquifer water for DECADES already. Native Americans lost their water wars, & America is losing aquifers as a result. Will there be raids on the Great Lakes? Domestic water wars in LOTS of places?
 
 
+2 # Activista 2012-09-03 09:24
“Israel is responsible because it keeps a siege imposed on Gaza and controls most of our water resources,” said Zeyad Nonat, director of the health ministry’s water and sewage department."
www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-03/gaza-s-contaminated-water-worsens-health-for-palestinians.html
 
 
-3 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-03 17:40
Was that why Arafat and Hitler both had to go?
 
 
-3 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-03 23:40
Well there is a Scifi movie about that very subject, Flash Gordon and "Thicker than Water" with Terek Ming and The Ice Queen etc. Has all the answers about cost water can run to when commercialised or in the hands of a tyrant.
Cheers guys. I doubt it can get to car fuel and wash price in this generation?
 
 
+13 # WolfTotem 2012-09-03 04:35
Water Privatization

Just one of the many mind-boggling threats the world faces.

Monsanto, Syngenta et al are using GMO seed to gain monopoly control over world food supplies, while several corporations are working in the same direction to control water supplies via privatization.

If a corporation can gain control of essential, irreplaceable resources, it has the human population by the throat.

It's the mad scientist/would -be world dominator figure of pulp fiction - BUT FOR REAL.
 
 
-4 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-03 17:42
That's what I mean did Barrak Obi-wan even try to stop Monsanto destruction of Mexican Corn Farmers and cause them to turn to Kun Sa products.
 
 
+21 # skipb48 2012-09-03 04:44
Let's face the basic facts. It is not rally about water as much as it is about overpopulation, especially in areas that were never intended to support a lot of people. Case in point the US southwest, how can they justify all those homes in such a waterless area?
Fracking and all those technologies would be unnecessary if we didn't have so many people.
In the Bible GOD said to multiply and fill the world. It's full!
 
 
+3 # Activista 2012-09-03 09:03
"...Ariel Sharon speaking on record saying the reason for going to war [against Arab armies] in 1967 was for water,"
1967 "preventive" war was Israel war of choice ..
Netanyahu 2012 - Red Line - threatens/black mails Obama (election) with bombing Iran (another preventive war) before November - if Obama stays neutral then he looses more Jewish voters. Israel grabs more land to "defend" itself. Look up shrinking map of Palestine
 
 
-5 # robcarter.vn 2012-09-03 17:59
Right Israel rules USA because it ruled USD & Hollywood PR brainwasher.
According to Wikipedian "Hitler frequently spoke positively about the Christian German culture, and his belief in an Aryan Christ. Before his ascension to power, Hitler stated before a crowd in Munich: "My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian, I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice."
 
 
+6 # Activista 2012-09-03 18:57
robcarter - this is pathetic biblical fanaticism/raci sm - Holocaust was indeed the crime of the century. I reject 100% Hitler's psychopath ideology ... SICK
 
 
+1 # happycamper690 2012-09-04 09:13
Clearly we have 780 million more people on this planet than can be sustained. We still have an enormous population problem that will be frighteningly worse in the future. Water is a symptom of our problem. Thermonuclear war would kill off a billion or more. As sick as it sounds, maybe it's our only long-term way to survive.
 
 
+1 # X Dane 2012-09-04 14:46
happycamper690.
That is indeed a SICK solution, for although enormous amounts of people will die, the planet may become uninhabitable for the few unlucky survivors, who will certainly be "bombed back to the stone age".....Back to the drawing board
 
 
+3 # Activista 2012-09-04 09:49
"Thermonuclear war would kill off a billion.."
and radioactivity the rest of biosphere - life.
Overpopulation is number one problems - consumerism is even higher problem. Check how much resources goes into car, check how much resources is using US Military in Afghanistan ...
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN