RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "In June, the federal appeals court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was in violation of the law for failing to adequately assess the environmental hazards involved in the storage of nuclear waste, a point that anti-nuke activists have been making for years and years."

No Nukes protest on March 11, 2012. (photo: Sandy Huffacker/sandyhuffakerjr.blogspot.com)
No Nukes protest on March 11, 2012. (photo: Sandy Huffacker/sandyhuffakerjr.blogspot.com)



Victory for Anti-Nuclear Power Movement in the US

By Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

13 August 12

 

core two for the movement against nuclear power in this country.

In June, the federal appeals court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was in violation of the law for failing to adequately assess the environmental hazards involved in the storage of nuclear waste, a point that anti-nuke activists have been making for years and years.

In response to that court ruling, the NRC this week issued a statement that it was stopping the issuing of permits for new nuclear power construction, as well as for life extensions on old existing plants, until it satisfies the court's concerns.

The NRC's decision puts the breaks on new construction permits for 16 reactors, and renewal permits for 14 more.

That's a welcome move.

Still, it's not a permanent solution because the NRC is likely to go back to the court sometime in the not too distant future to try to convince the judges that its waste storage plans are somehow adequate.

Good luck with that!

Because the truth of the matter is that there is no safe way to store nuclear waste, either in the short term or in the long term - and by the long term, I mean the really long term: It takes 100,000 years before this stuff stops being hazardous.

Here's hoping that federal judges keep seeing the folly and falsity in all of this.

Meantime, let's celebrate a victory for the anti-nuke movement.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
0 # BenECoyote 2012-08-13 07:49
That is great news, but what does it mean for plants like Vermont Yankee which have already been approved for renewal under the new rules?
 
 
+2 # Palaiselysee 2012-08-13 09:04
Anti Nuclear Protest EVERY MONDAY 6pm Elysee Palace, PARIS Manifestation Anti Nucléaire

Manif Anti Nucléaire chaque Lundi 18h Palais de l'Élysée, Présidence de la République, PARIS

Anti Atom Protest JEDEN MONTAG 18h Elysee Palast, PARIS

Manifestation Antinucléaire Palais de L'Elysée chaque Lundi 18h Palais de l'Élysée, PARIS, FRANCE


#

Tokyo Protesters encirle Tokyo Prime Minister every week Friday evening

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydkIRbX1IqU

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xsook4_la-mobilisation-antinucleaire-reveille-la-societe-japonaise_news

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZuwkDY2Mus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CqHgd2SHsY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iju45cpPaIY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpChYsyWi7w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjm8WFpnTUU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY9kQn2JGUo

http://www.rts.ch/info/toute-l-info/4165390.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBsCv2ldack

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd3HZHXDx3A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z368oCdp_Ek
 
 
0 # Lisa Moskow 2012-08-13 10:08
YEAH yeah yeah!

But duhhhhh...we were talking about this in the early 70's.

This waste storage project in Washington state is now a billion or so over budget...
 
 
+2 # reiverpacific 2012-08-13 10:21
For a complete understanding of this and it's ongoing significance, go to Dr Helen Caldicott's "If you love this Planet!" website. She has been at the forefront of nuclear power with it's destructive wake and potential in great detail for many years and don't pull no punches.
 
 
0 # Adoregon 2012-08-13 10:58
Who, alive today, can possibly be responsible for anything for 100,000 years into the future?

When you consider 2,000 years ago is viewed as "ancient history," being responsible for radioactive waste for 100,000 years is beyond ludicrous.

That's why no U.S. state wants a nuclear waste "repository."

NIMBY to the max.

What's next? Some not too bright politician suggesting we shoot our nuclear waste into "outer" space?
 
 
0 # ericlipps 2012-08-13 13:42
Okay. Say we shut down every nuclear plant tomorrow.

What do we do with the huge quantities of radioactive waste which already exist?

And if there's a way of dealing with them, one of the biggest antinuclear arguments goes away.
 
 
0 # reiverpacific 2012-08-13 18:13
Quoting ericlipps:
Okay. Say we shut down every nuclear plant tomorrow.

What do we do with the huge quantities of radioactive waste which already exist?

And if there's a way of dealing with them, one of the biggest antinuclear arguments goes away.

So you are suggesting that we just keep piling up toxic crap that we can't deal with right now until somebody has a brain-fart in the right direction?
Wonderful logic- go to the top of the shitheap and blow us toxic kisses.
Methinks that if a tithe of the resources spent to justify, lobby for and continue messing with this fusion of death was put to use in eliminating it, your last sentence would come to have a little meaning but I doubt if it is even being addressed seriously.
Bechtel and the EPA have been bungling about with Hanford for decades and from what I hear, are simply making things worse, still short-cutting any truly productive concepts and prolonging their own profits, Columbia River becomes a sink and drain-line west for leaking barrels of waste.
Come to Oregon sometime and see the sturgeon glow in the dark!
 
 
0 # Innocent Victim 2012-08-13 18:34
OK, you make the point very well how irresponsible our leaders were to allow those wastes to proliferate. Don't worry about the problem's disappearance! It will disappear only when there is no more life on this planet. Also, don't forget that the second biggest anti nuclear-power argument is the danger of radioactive leakage and contamination. Even if we found a way of dealing with the waste, it would still have to be handled, processed, transported and secured. Cockroaches are better constituted to live with radioactivity than we are.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN