Michael Ware writes: "More than a week after the US soldier's alleged massacre, there is still no answer to the 'why' of this abomination. But war correspondent Michael Ware says after all the tours Staff Sgt. Bales endured, he must have some form of PTSD - and a terrible void within."
Staff Sgt. Robert Bales (left), the American soldier who went on a shooting spree killing 16 Afghan civilians, including nine children, in Kandahar villages. (photo: DoD)
The Emptiness of Sgt. Bales
20 March 12
More than a week after the US soldier's alleged massacre, there is still no answer to the "why" of this abomination. But war correspondent Michael Ware says after all the tours Staff Sgt. Bales endured, he must have some form of PTSD - and a terrible void within.
still remember the night in Iraq when we shot and killed someone's grandmother. I say "we" even though I did not pull the trigger, nor was I even carrying a weapon. But when you're present at such a thing, when you're a part of those who've come and delivered death, a shadow passes over you. In an odd, muted way the hurt of it bleeds inside you too.
No one was to blame. Innocence resides on both sides of that 2006 night. These are simply the things of war, things for which your heart becomes a dark and lasting harbor.
It was in a village beside the Euphrates River, outside of that combat-ruined city of Ramadi, then the capital of al Qaeda's self-proclaimed Islamic State of Iraq. The sleepy rural area, green and vibrant, and fed, in a land of endless desert, by the snaking river, was part of a swath of territory housing al Qaeda's command and control centers, and said to be the domain of the organization's national headquarters, from whence the group's particular breed of misery spread across the entire country.
Fresh intelligence had it that this village was one in a small cluster in which key al Qaeda commanders regularly bedded down. As best as such guerrilla wars allow, the information was vetted and checked and calibrated to the greatest, most honest degrees. That it would soon prove false, most likely fed by the same al Qaeda leaders the mission sought to kill or capture, has little, if any, meaning today. Only in the old woman's death does this one operation for me rise above some of the hundreds of others I joined, or the thousands conducted throughout the conflict.
U.S. military units moved to and isolated the hamlet from three sides, by air assault and convoy on land and, somewhat remarkably, by water in fast-moving gunboats along the river. From hazy, shadowed memory, the shooter was a soldier among us who landed ashore and advanced silently across hundreds of yards of open field until we reached upon the village fringe.
It was one of those wretchedly hot, late-summer Iraqi nights, when families often slept on their balconied rooftops, drowsing on metal bed frames, or blanketed mats aligned on the concrete. They must have heard the commotion as the dozens of heavily armed troops first entered the village and then began cracking doors, searching building by building.
The head of this family, atop his roof with the rest, poked his head gingerly above the parapet, fearing the worst. He could see only the inky silhouettes of armed men moving below. From the first he suspected they were Americans, and not a more malign force, but he had to check, popping back up for a breathless moment more. He whispered to his family it was indeed Americans. But his elderly wife took an instant to see for herself, popping up her head just as her husband had done.
To the soldier some distance away in the night, through the misty green view of night vision goggles, it looked to be a bobbing head, "turkey peeking" as it's dubbed, when enemy fighters are furtively glancing to range or locate their targets. One peek is often an innocent, wanting to know what approaches. A more daring second peek arouses suspicion. A third peek, well, that strikes many soldiers as more than suspicious. So the soldier held his aim and squeezed the trigger, his high velocity round piercing the grandmother's skull.
In the minutes it took us to reach the house, the family had moved down to the living room, the grandmother laid out in the room's center and covered with a veil. Three or four generations were crouched around her, wailing and weeping, some clawing at her still body. Worse still, somehow, was a shrieking baby, held aloft in a young father's arms, blood coursing from the child's behind. A fragment of the bullet had cut a wound, and the soldiers cried out for a medic who came rushing and tenderly administered aid in the poor dim light.
"Second to losing one of our own," the platoon's officer told me outside on the grass, killing a civilian is "probably one of the hardest things that happen to us. It'll be a big blow."
After three bloody tours of Iraq and a fourth in Afghanistan, most soldiers would be carrying any number of such big blows, and I wonder what shreds at the soul of Robert Bales, accused of committing the Panjwaii massacre of 16 civilians, nine of them children, might have dwelling inside him.
None of which would pardon nor condone the butchery he is said to have unleashed. It's a vision of horror I cannot get out of my head: a killer wretchedly moving from adobe to abode, wantonly executing children standing or lying before him.
Early reports suggest that Staff Sgt. Bales returned to his base after the alleged killings and promptly turned himself in, almost immediately volunteering what he had done. But the question remains: if indeed he is guilty, why would a 38-year-old father of two, a man who signed up to fight for his country, do such a thing?
Since 9/11, more than 107,000 soldiers have completed three or more combat tours, and studies show that up to about 30 percent of combat vets returning home report some kind of post traumatic stress disorder. As a sufferer myself, I find it hard to believe that Bales, after all the tours he's endured, would not have some form of PTSD. But even if that is so, that alone is not any kind of explanation.
It was a Medal of Honor winner from Vietnam who said that given what we must see in war, given what soldiers must do, one would have to be almost a sociopath for these things not to touch you, irrevocably, for the rest of your life. The killing of the Iraqi grandmother is one, but not the worst or most haunting, in my accumulation of horrors from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
While our troops go out of their way, even adding great risk to their own lives to prevent it, the killing of civilians does still happen. Many of us who have experienced the fighting over these long years have seen it for ourselves - be it from the lighting up of errant vehicles at checkpoints, or tossing grenades into structures to silence a well-used weapon, or from the ubiquitously named collateral damage when we drop our bombs or are forced to blast our way out of ambush killing zones.
People may come to be seen as chattel, once you've stepped over enough body parts, picked up enough dying mates, and embraced that mind-set required to be purveyors of death in foreign lands. In that odiously dark place where our young men have to go in their heads to endure and survive and carry out the ugly deeds demanded of them in combat, these things must take their seat. Human life comes to hold both a greater and a lesser value than it might hold in a peaceful civilian world.
It's taken me a full, sleepless week to pen this since first hearing of the shootings in Panjwaii; all this time to turn that image of the shooter in my head, to fathom any of my reaction to it. There is still no answer to the "why" of this abomination. But a beating heart must, by human necessity, assume he is possessed of a terrible and consuming emptiness within. If Bales's guilt is true, his soul must surely be a dark, lightless place.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
You can sort out degrees of blame, but none of the above are innocent.
It is the lack of innocence that induces the "terrible and consuming emptiness" that is "irrevocable for the rest of your life."
Keep your passports current.
No one commanded him to do this.
I wonder if he finally found a way to get the discharge he wanted. Afterall, recent memory indicates that most of these attrocities (lyndie england, the trophy hunters, etc.) are treated with a slap on the wrist. Maybe jail for 1 year and "off you go, just try not to do it again, ok?"
There are psychos all the way the line in the military -- more so now than used to be before the 'war on terror' and 'full spectrum dominance'. I would not assume rational thinking on Bales' part.
By the way, we've been at this since last Friday. By my count you said we should let it go and stop arguing because it's getting nowhere 3 times. I thought we did that. But, here you are getting into it again. Did you really mean, let's not talk about it on this thread because we don't have an audience anymore, but let's continue it forever on another thread?
If you bring up items in new threads I can, of course, respond to those items.
The entire war agenda and military (or mercenary) machine is irrational. It may attract crazies, or make people crazy. This gets worse from time to time -- it happened with Vietnam too, big time.
I'm still going to say this is a systemic problem and getting too concerned with this particular incident is to be distracted from the important work of busting up the machine.
Since you brought it up AGAIN, tell me something:
Can an individual EVER commit a war crime?
Were the Nuremberg trials a mistake? Is "I was only following orders" a valid excuse? Was ANY individual responsible for Nazi attrocities? HItler was crazy and had a horrible childhood. Is he responsible for his own actions? In fact, Hitler was a WWI war hero. He probably witnessed a lot of attrocities that further messed him up. Before he was in control of the machine, he was a minor cog in it.
For the, I don't know, maybe 20th time, holding ONE person responsible for their own actions is NOT a distraction from holding the machine responsible. In fact, we can't do one without ALSO doing the other.
Your turn, again...
You keep taking little bits and pieces of what I have said and exaggerating them beyond all recognition into some black or white theater of straw men.
As for Hitler, he did not suddenly pop into being -- he was terrible abused as a child, as were most all such monsters, and that DOES tell us something about how children (and adults) should be protected from abuse. (See the web site http://www.psychohistory.com/ for oen source, and http://alice-miller.com/index_en.php for another). There is also an immense body of knowedge in sociology, psychology, neurosience, and related fields.
And yes, assigning moral culpability, or 'free will' is not a simple and straightforward affair, but pervaded by doubts, unwarranted assumptions and beliefs, and various world views. In the end, it's not nearly as important to judge other people (lest you be judged) as to solve the social, political and economic problems which we KNOW leads to crime and other individual failures.
Playing whack-a-mole is very unproductive here.
I wouldn't have a bunch of thugs hang him and deface the body, as with Sadam Hussein, or sodmize him and execute him extrajudicially as with Gadaffi -- thats what American 'justice' has come to now.
But I would also try to use what was learned to stop more Hitlers from popping up all the time, and to deal with them effectively when did, before they could go off murdering and destroying.
======================
End impunity, for openers.
http://blog.thenewstribune.com/military/2012/03/20/assault-charge-against-jblm-soldier-suspected-in-afghan-slayings-stemmed-from-casino-incident/
In the armed forces in which I served (U.S. Regular Army enlistment; active duty 1959-1962), Bales conduct at the casino would have warranted a court-martial as well as a civilian trial. At the very least the army would have been convicted him of conduct unbecoming a soldier (violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice).
Given the flagrant nature of the violation, he'd have at the very least been busted down to buck private, quite possibly with 30 days in the stockade (military jail). Repeat offenses would have resulted in a bad-conduct Undesirable Discharge, only one rung up from the ultimate sanction of the Dishonorable Discharge.
Which brings me to the (obviously suppressed) story behind mounting accounts of U.S. atrocities in the Middle East: the fact it increasingly seems the government is very methodically building a military machine of thugs and sadists – no doubt to be all the more horribly effective when it's unleashed on us here at home.
Another story says it was cursed by some of the European immigrants who were forced off that land.
I have not been able to authenticate either tale, nor even to obtain any clear details, because the people who have mentioned the story to me -- each born and raised in the Puget Sound region -- all tell it differently.
Mostly it seems to be saloon talk. But over the years I have heard it from at least a dozen sources including a couple of Nisqually tribal folk, consensus being Fort Lewis is "a bad place," its lands accursed or haunted or both.
Driving late at night on the few public roads through the fort, it's spooky as hell, especially when you're the only car in sight.
Sometimes people see things there that can't possibly be real, like a dog-form, black as death, shaped from twigs and sticks and running through your headlight beams to cross the road...
"No one was to blame. Innocence resides on both sides of that 2006 night. These are simply the things of war, things for which your heart becomes a dark and lasting harbor."
And then two words pop into my head:
"Stockholm Syndrome."
I wish you peace Mr. Ware, truly.
You very powerfully put into words a feeling I had but couldn't articulate. I sincerely want to thank you for that.
The only mitigation there can ever be for murder is if the person murdered (NOT someone else) was doing the killer unjust harm. The murder of those people, especially the children, was unmitigated. There is no honourable way to weasel out of taking sides, 100% to 0%. Casting the killer as a victim betrays those he chose to kill. Indeed it betrays the human species.
But we’ll be seeing a lot of that sort of revisionism in coming weeks as the focus is being carefully directed away from the injustice to the victims on to the angst of the perpetrator. Those behind the directing are those who need at their disposal a mindless, antihuman, unquestioning killing machine. Indulging in an “anger problem” at the casino, and ultimately at Kandahar, is the right CV material.
No one can say if there were mitigating circumstance now, before even preliminary investigations are done, and before trial. Not even his own lawyer has gotten a case together yet.
Even many facts about the incident are not established -- who else may have participated in the killings, for instance.
What we DO have is a pattern of abuse and war crimes going back over ten years in the current imperialist program, as per PNAC plans (and much longer in other US campaigns) -- with millions dead (especially including the sanctions against Iraq).
It's important for people to see and undestand that pattern and not be diverted by the 'bad apple' spin on this that the government and media is putting out.
This is a propaganda technique to distract people. Its like when the right wing finds some individual cheating on welfare and says "See -- welfare is bad", or one person who voted illegally and clamps down on voting rights.
An entire batch of bad apples can be separated into individual bad apples. In fact, how can the system be so bad unless individuals are involved? The machine (as you put it) is not an inanimate entity. It's a group of individual human beings acting on a philosophical belief of exeptionalism.
I know about the propaganda technique. I'm not distracted. More than one person is guilty. The person or persons who committed this attrocity are probably among them.
Admittedly, it is quite difficult to sort out the levels from individual to 'world culture' and how the parts relate to the whole. In fact Korzibsky with his 'general semantics' and levels of abstractions started an entire discipline just dealing with the more linguistic aspects of it.
Part of the difficulty is the way our brains are structured, and part is the way the universe itself seems to be structured -- likely with the nature of consciousness as a relational force of existence. (BTW -- see http://isss.org/world/index.php if you want to deep into this).
Learning about computer systems can help -- it provides testable models for different level views of information.
In any case, if the computer (or other elctronics) gets overheated, or the power supply's voltage is too low or high, or the connections get corroded, one often hits what looks like components or isolated things failing -- but the only solution is to follow it to the system problems and fix those.
It's like how capitalism damages individuals everywhere, and a person is blamed when they go bankrupt and lose their house (even if a rich guy going bankrupt is thought to be a smart move).
Systems thinking! We have to do that.
By the way, don't you see how we're repeating ourselves in this conversation? It's as if, by repeating the exact same concept with a variation on the wording we can expect the other one to suddenly say, "Ah, NOW I GET IT!"
If you need me to spell it out for you more specifically detailing the back and forth since last Friday I will.
One of my favorite commenters on here (I can't remember who - It might have been Glenn or JohnLocke.) argued with me at great length about how to deal with this very situation. My argument was to never just walk away from it because it makes it look like you don't have a response to the latest remark or accusation. I was concerned about what other people might think of my ideas if I was willing to just let it go. I now realize I was wrong. Dragging this out has become nothing more than a pedantic exercise in futility, or maybe a typing exercise. Anyway, this argument died of old age last Saturday and we've kept it going as a zombie conflict. I'll take responsibility for that.
If you want the last word, it's all yours.
A sample of what's WRONG with substituting systems thinking for individual responsibility was given by Bluepilgrim himself: "It's like when the right wing finds some individual cheating on welfare and says 'See -- welfare is bad', or one person who voted illegally and clamps down on voting rights."
Attacking welfare or voting rights is a systems approach. The individual justice approach is to penalise particular welfare or voting cheats and nobody else.
This whole sub-thread, with Bluepilgrim urging us to sideline individual justice, Billy Bob calling for it, and a few others (like myself) joining in, has devolved to the question of systems. Billy Bob pointed out that "The machine . . . is not an inanimate entity. It's a group of individual human beings acting on a philosophical belief of exceptionalism."
In systems terms, impunity is essential to the murder machine, and resolutely opposing impunity wherever it rears its ugly head is a real-world (as opposed to sophistical) systemic blow aimed at the machine.
You distort everything I've said. The point is simple: anecdotal indications will not show the overall situation and is no substitute for a system view or analysis, whether its' about massacres, voting, or welfare. One has to look at the particulars and also at the system, and not mistake or spin one for the other. If one does a system analysis of welfare one finds that cheating is relatively rare and not systemic, unlike the masscres and constant death toll the US inflicts onother nations.
You quoted me out of context. What I said was:
"It's important for people to see and undestand that pattern and not be diverted by the 'bad apple' spin on this that the government and media is putting out.
This is a propaganda technique to distract people."
You and Billybob refuse to 'understand' what I've said, or even to look at simple legal well established legal principles such as mitigating circumstances. Billybob siad his opinion is that all murders are the same.
Whatever. I'm worn out trying to engage in legitimate discussion with people.
I do have a last word as I give up on politics:
Goodby.
OK, that's what should be looked for. Were those kids unjustly harming Bales or his lethal buddies? Or had they done so? That's all that could even begin to be "mitigating". Psychobabble can't. Blame belonging to others can't. Legalisms can't. Politics can't. Systems can't.
Is that right? I say it depends on whose brains were splattered. If I were the citizen of any country and a stray bullet from from the weapon of an occupying army blew the brains from my 9-year old daughters head, I would be able to scrap up some blame.
And we ask, why do these people hate us? Why would they join the Taliban? Don't they love freedom? (as if we knew what that was)
War is a lie. And it lives on the lies we tell ourselves every day about why it's right and it's good and it's just and it's blah blah blah. And we go on with the same lock-step mantra, blocking our ears and yelling I CAN'T HEAR YOU, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
And bored with that we sit down, crack open a cold one, and wallow in our freedom.
And that asshole George Bush is on the golf course.
Has this country become the Land of MORDOR?
Military recruiters lie and send our impressionable young people to either slaughter or be slaughtered. What a travesty!
If everybody who has children would teach them that killing is wrong and that they will never partake in that then we would have no army. Every one should become a conscientious objector and pledge non violence until the last breath.
RSS feed for comments to this post