Share
Email This Page
add comment

The Final Lesson of BP

Print
28 July 2010
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

 

 

P is starting over. It just named a new American president and its finances are looking up. BP's second-quarter report showed surprisingly strong revenues of $75.9 billion, beating Wall Street's estimates. (This includes a $32.2 billion writedown along with the $20 billion liability fund that the Obama Administration wanted.) The company has started to sell $30 billion of its assets to ensure it has all the money it needs to pay any liability claims. No wonder several Wall Street analysts are suggesting BP stock as a terrific buy.

It doesn't seem to matter BP was responsible for the worst environmental disaster in American history. Consumers worldwide - including Americans - continue to slurp up its oil.

But wait a minute. If BP emerges from this debacle fatter and happier than anyone imagined a few months ago, whatever happened to the idea of corporate accountability? Does this mean any giant corporation can wreak havoc and then get back to business as usual?

Corporations aren't people. They have no brains, no consciences, no capacity for intent or guilt. Every one of their moveable parts can be replaced, just like BP's former CEO Tony Hayward was replaced. Corporate accountability and responsibility are meaningless concepts. Corporations exist for only one purpose: to make money.

If we want corporations to act differently, we have to force them to do so through laws that are fully enforced and through penalties higher than the economic benefits of thwarting the laws.

Here's the real outrage: In the wake of the BP spill, essentially no laws have been changed - not even a ridiculously low cap on damages private parties can collect from oil companies. Senate Republican leaders said Wednesday they wouldn't support a bill retroactively removing the liability cap; and not even Democrats Mary Landrieu (D-La) and Mark Begich (D-Alaska) will support it.

Why isn't Congress doing more - not only removing the cap on civil liability but also raising the level of penalties oil companies have to pay for violating safety and environmental regulations, permanently prohibiting deep-water drilling, and enacting a carbon tax?

Because of Big Oil's political clout.

The same anthropomorphic fallacy that accords human attributes to giant corporations like BP distorts clear thinking about how to limit their political influence.

Consider the grotesque Supreme Court decision earlier this year in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which gave corporations the status of people with First Amendment rights to spend unlimited amounts of money on political ads. Citizens United ranks right up there with Bush v. Gore and Dred Scott as the most brainless and irresponsible Supreme Court decisions in history.

In March, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided that in light of Citizens United, there was no longer any basis for limiting contributions to so-called independent committees set up to support or oppose particular candidates. (Such committees are known as 527's, after a loophole clause in the campaign finance laws.) The old contribution limit was $69,900 every two years. Now even that's gone.

And the Federal Elections Commission has just interpreted these two court decisions to mean corporations, not just individuals, can now give unlimited amounts of money to 527's.

To top it off, Tuesday the Senate failed (by only a few votes) to pass the "Disclose Act," that would have forced corporate sponsors of campaign ads to reveal themselves and not hide behind innocuous sounding names like "Americans for America." The bill also would have prohibited campaign ads run by U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies. (Think BP.)

Now all the limits are gone and the gloves are completely off. Even BP, incorporated in the UK, is officially free influence American politics to its heart's content.

The will of the American people is being subordinated to the demands of giant money-making machines called global corporations that can now spend or threaten to spend unlimited amounts of money in support of any politician willing to help them make more and against any who might cause them to make less.

This is the final lesson of BP.

What should you do? As with the loophole-ridden finance reform law, and the new health law that richly rewards Big Pharma - get angry, not cynical. Commit to getting big money out of politics, even if it takes us years.

 

Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+3 # IDiocracy 2010-07-28 23:46
"Corporations aren't people. They have no brains, no consciences, no capacity for intent or guilt."
- 'Nuff said... except that the American Revolution was largely fought over the issue of liberating OUR economy and society from THEIR stranglehold.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:11
British corporations are just one aspect. The power elite fund repubs and demos. They are the ones that were behind Bush and the Iraqi war. Until the top 1% in this country, the contemporary good old boys which are a sythesis of old money and new CEO money, is held accountable, no progress will EVER take place.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # WizardofOz 2010-07-28 23:54
"Corporate Personhood" is a MYTH... and not much more than a hundred year old myth at that.
THEY are all bowing to an ILLUSION, a dream of greedy lawyers and corrupt judges from the late 19th century... Would-be medieval British barons and duchesses, all playing the make-believe game, behind the mask of "corporate personhood."
Its old, its trite, its going on useless. Its a joke. Who'll be the last man to get it?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:17
Today's power elite come from three sectors, the coporate world, the goverment world, and the military world.

It is well proven now that the new elite that control us are a synthesis of the old good ole boy money with the new corporate elites. Books by William G.Domhoff, Harold Kerbo, and C. Wright Mills have all driven this point home, at least as far as one can drive a stake into the grand vampire Dick Cheney's blackened heart. Much more needs to be exposed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+14 # Gurka von S 2010-07-29 00:46
The unrestricted activities of the big corporations, encouraged and protected by the official Republicans and other Republicans in Democrats' clothes, is nothing short of Evil Incarnate.
If money is not taken out of politics, today's trend will lead directly to the destruction of Western democracy and civilization. And it may come sooner than many of us like to think.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:18
It may have happened already! Those 8 years killed us. Total laissez faire corruption and illegal price gouging wars for 8 straight years.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # Jake Walter 2010-07-29 01:20
I agree wholeheartedly. But how can we achieve anything with this Supreme Court in place. It will be a long time indeed before the composition of the Court changes substantially.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:20
maybe some of the evil judges can be disbarred somehow. Certainly Scalia and Alito are basically criminals. They must have ethics violations. We know Clarence Thomas does for sure. Investigations are in order. What they did to illegally elect Bush and to push the illegal war are crimes enough for me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+7 # Jawbone Grouch 2010-07-29 02:08
Good luck with that Professor.

While MSM keeps the people uninformed, we are up against that corporate crime cartel.

As long as "foxnews" rules the undereducated, ill-informed, and RealityTV syndromed populace go happily on their ignorant way, look for a couple of generations to arrive at your conclusion.

Given that even the NYT reveals stories after they were scooped by some unbacked independent journalist do they do the job of informing the public.

the Old Grey Lady still wants her corporate biggies unoffended.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:23
Someone needs tp pull the plug on Beck the liar and cheat. Sure I'm for free speech and all. BUT YOU CANNOT SCREAM FIRE in a packed theater unless there truly is a fire. The only flames I see come from this blowhards a$$.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # fletch 2010-07-29 03:09
Hayward was not "replaced" he was rewarded with $18 million. As far as I know that is a fat life for most. He no longer has to work at all.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Abigail Beutler 2010-07-29 04:16
The only reason that corporations rule the country is the absurd amount of money spent by candidates for TV time. More absurd is the fact that the TV frequencies belong to us, th people, and should be free to all candidates, and yet no-one is forcing the FCC to remedy that situation. The FCC should make the TV licencees give free time to all candidates for national office and rescind their licenses if they don't. and if any candidate tries to buy extra time, the TV station should be forced to give equal time to all the other candidates. That is the only way, short of an armed rebellion,that we, the people, can regain control of our government.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Peacedragon 2010-07-29 05:57
That was a great piece and I agree except for one small point. I don't think Congress should be able to make a law that punishes retroactivly. Does anyone know if they can?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Sukumar 2010-07-29 18:26
If they can bail out the banks retroactively, thereby punishing the rest of us who foot the bill, then why not BP? Nuremberg was retroactive punishment too.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Coriander 2010-07-29 06:57
We need some leadership, like Robert Reich who will give us some direction. The American people seem lost and overwhelmed. They don't know what to do. I say March in the millions over and over. The sense of crisis hasn't really penetrated. We are eith in a state hof hopelessness and apathy or confusion. So we need some leadership, an organizer, some suggesttions.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Coriander 2010-07-29 07:07
We are really cooked if the mentality in congress doesn't change. With their pockets wide open. they are in complete lock step with the corporate agenda except for a few. If they succeed they may be left with reveaged nation. With no jobs and so many living from pay check to pay check, how can we compete with these ruthless monsters? We need leadership and we need to rise up and say no - but there is so much apathy in the nation not even those in trouble are fighting back. Perhaps This is the end of it all.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Coriander 2010-07-29 14:05
Not all of our reps will sell their children. Sen Bernie Sanders of VT, Congressman Peter Welch, Maxine Waters and Grayson, Kucinich, Kaputr. There are good ones out there we just need more of them. For example in Vermont people will always vote for Bernie Sanders because we are very familiar with his track record and his history of not taking bribes at our expense. We are in a really big crisis and I think people are beginning to wake up - I pray they are before it's too late!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Glen 2010-07-29 13:31
Americans are not lost, and Americans are not continuing to "slurp up" BP's oil thoughtlessly. It is not that simple. Americans, in spite of there being many who are confused about their lives now, and a wee bit misdirected, do know what is right and wrong. Citizens do know that the government and all who are connected, are out of control and ignoring them. "Slurping up" gives the impression that citizens are fools and have the option to not go to work, and should not take a driving vacation, visit relatives 600 miles away, or drive a vehicle suitable for their living environment. And let's not forget transport systems, etc.

Sure, we have entered a stage in history that requires attention and adjustment, but no pundits, corporations, or government has the right to slam our faces in it without offering alternatives. Citizens would lose should they decide to fight back, or pretend at civil war. We do have few choices, but resistance comes in many forms. Think about it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Coriander 2010-07-29 14:11
Well it took a big movement on many different levels during the 60's but after a lot of persistence they caved. people in Europe march in big numbers and vote too for safety nets- they know what's at stake. If we had a draft for example there would be a big reaction and that's why they don't. But if things continue to go down hill people will rise up.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Glen 2010-07-29 15:59
How citizens "rise up" is the problem. Consider how many died in the War Between the States. More would die now. This is not the '60's. Be glad there is not a draft. Yes, there have been revolutions and such in the past, but those people were facing weapons not too different than what they, themselves, possessed. Ok, maybe they did not all have cannon, but they did have the equivalent of dynamite. Today, citizens would face incredible odds, in the way of weapons, military trained police, and all else. What would be won, with these odds? Nothing more than those in power gaining more power and being relieved of numbers of unhappy people.

As I said, there are ways to "rise up" and citizens world wide should begin to consider how to carry it out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # sara lee 2010-07-31 14:45
The media has a huge responsibility to inform the public. But when the one local paper in a community puts the idiot Rush Limbaugh on daily from 12:00 to 3:00 pm for the idiots who listen and believe his lies it's no wonder we have such a misinformed and biased populace.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # liloleladywho? 2010-08-01 10:48
Face it folks, we're screwed. While we were sleeping, the corporations bought us out lock, stock and barrel. Now we have only the illusion of democracy left. Looks like a constitutional republic is only good for about 200 years. Apres ca, le deluge!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote