Share
Email This Page
add comment

Incumbents Still Welcome Wall Street's Poison

Print
26 May 2010
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

 

 

Why Wall Street's Political Poison Is Still Catnip for Many Incumbents

oday's quiz: At a time when California's Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman is losing ground to her Republican rival in the primary because of her ties to Wall Street, when Utah's incumbent Senator Robert Bennett was just booted out by Republicans who are furious that he voted to bailout Wall Street, when New Jersey's Jon Corzine lost his bid for reelection partly because of he was formerly head of Goldman Sachs, when Connecticut's Chris Dodd was so tarnished by his close ties to Wall Street that polls showed he had little chance of reelection - at a time, in other words, when Wall Street is political poison, why are politicians still so intent on doing its bidding?

Answer: Wall Street's almost endless supply of money for upcoming campaigns.

Case in point: The measure in the banking bill that would force banks to push their derivative trading into separate units rather than rely on tax-payer subsidized insured deposits. For reasons I've already stated, the measure is common-sensical.

Wall Street hates it because it would cost it billions.

Already New York Representative Michael McMahon says he'll work to remove it from the bill. Yesterday, New York Representative Gary Ackerman, also a member of the finance committee, told his staff to circulate a draft letter yesterday to House members seeking their opposition to it.

Watch who signs Ackerman's letter. Listen for the positions of members of the conference committee. Vote accordingly next fall.

 

Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+14 # x Viking 2010-05-27 00:03
Unfortunately, when it comes to Wall-street money, our representatives behave like drug addicts. They just can't kick the habit. They don't care that they put all of us at risk again. They tell us that they are in Washington to serve us. BALLONY, they are there to be re-elected and to enjoy the perks of office. We will have to show them that we have had enough. They either truly represent us or we send them home.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # J.Lindsley 2010-05-27 04:37
Man o man...can't wait until November!!!!
The little pigs suckling
on the Mommy Wall Street Hog
Suck, babies, suck
Dinner's about done
Gone Baby Gone
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Byronator 2 2010-05-27 21:26
Right on target. Robert Reich, don't underestimate the deep sea pulsating rage of the voters. It will take years to plug the hole of citizen outrage and distrust of Wall Street. The bailout of the sociopathic financial corporations who straddle the U.S. and global economy may unfortunately be the epitaph on the the tombstone of the Obama Administration, which acted too soon in their interests.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # m 2010-05-27 04:41
Well, after all, didn't WALL ST. put many of them in office in the first place.
So, Who does Congress REALLY Represent?

I think thats an excellent question for the Tea Party crowd.
Those people seem to think We still have a Big Government like we did 30 years ago.

WRONG..!!!

Thanks to 30 years of relentless CONservative efforts to bring me and you and 99% of Americans LESS GOVERNMENT.

They SUCCEEDED..!! BUT, It was also a big scam.

They never did get BIG Government off Our backs. Instead, they got 'Old' Big Government (of OURSELVES, and which built the Middle Class in America) almost completely off the backs of Corporations... (take note of the BP Oil Spill Tea Party).
And in place of what was a BIG GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, We now have an even BIGGER GOVERNMENT OF THE CORPORATE FOR THE CORPORATE.
Now I think that's more a reflection of reality in America today than anything CONservative Media says about Government.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+8 # AML 2010-05-27 05:05
We do need more transparency having to do with the machinations of our congress, and publish the lists of signers who wish to cling to the Wall St. teat.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Daniel Fletcher 2010-05-27 13:18
The more things change, the more they stay the same it seems...unfortunately.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # MillerLew 2010-05-31 19:20
More justification for public financing of all election campaigns, and elimination of corporate donations.

Businesses pay for the candidates' advertising, but the voters put them in office. Without the votes, the candidates would be seeking gainful employment elsewhere, yet they feel no obligation to the people who pay their salaries.

My dear, late mother always said, "Every politician is a crook. If he's not a crook when he gets in, he's a crook by the time he gets out."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote